OBJECTIVE

Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and Medicaid must demonstrate they have self-monitored their blood glucose level at least four times daily to receive continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). New California Medicaid policies eliminated this requirement and, thus, CGM access has increased. This study examines whether infrequent baseline self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) checks result in suboptimal outcomes or nonadherence with CGM use.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective study included youth with T1D and Medicaid who started CGM after January 2019, when newer models no longer needed calibration, at two large health care systems. Patients were stratified by data on baseline SMBG frequency (<4 vs.4 checks daily) collected at the clinic visit prior to starting CGM. Differences between SMBG groups in CGM adherence and HbA1c over time were assessed by a mixed-effects linear regression model and fixed-effect interaction term. Patients were surveyed to explore individual impact of CGM on diabetes management.

RESULTS

We followed 78 youth for 6 months. CGM adherence was similar between SMBG frequency groups at 3 months (68.7% vs. 68.4%; P = 0.97) and sustained at 6 months. HbA1c values improved in both groups at 3 months, with a larger improvement in those with SMBG <4 daily checks (1.3% vs. 0.4%), and sustained at 6 months. Patient surveys (n = 35) reported high engagement with CGM and increased insulin boluses after initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients using CGM demonstrated improvement in HbA1c regardless of prior SMBG. Increased engagement with CGM likely promoted increased insulin boluses. Therefore, restriction of CGM to those with SMBG4 daily checks is an unnecessary barrier, excluding those who could potentially benefit the most.

This article is featured in a podcast available at diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/diabetes-core-update-podcasts.

This article contains supplementary material online at https://doi.org/10.2337/figshare.28303856.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/license.
You do not currently have access to this content.