OBJECTIVE

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) measures could be a surrogate for stimulated C-peptide outcomes in type 1 diabetes trials.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

CGM and mixed-meal tolerance test–derived C-peptide measures at time points out to 52 weeks after diagnosis were compared in 103 children.

RESULTS

At 52 weeks, CGM metrics moderately correlated with C-peptide area under the curve. The highest Spearman correlations were for time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL, time <70 mg/dL, and glucose coefficient of variation (0.45, −0.33, and −0.58, respectively; the multivariate model using these three metrics had a slightly higher correlation of 0.63). For predicting peak C-peptide concentrations ≥0.2 pmol/mL, this combination had a sensitivity of 68.4% and specificity of 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

CGM measures correlated with stimulated C-peptide measures; however, the strength of the correlations and sensitivity and specificity of CGM-derived measures were not great enough to replace C-peptide measures in clinical trials.

Clinical trial reg. no. NCT04233034, clinicaltrials.gov

This article contains supplementary material online at https://doi.org/10.2337/figshare.29087075.

This content is only available via PDF.
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/license.
You do not currently have access to this content.