This article reviews the published literature on diabetes education evaluations and makes recommendations for outcome measures to be used in future research. We conclude that program evaluations to date have focused too narrowly on assessing knowledge and GHb outcomes to the exclusion of other important variables. To reflect the changing emphasis and conceptual basis of diabetes education, we recommend that future evaluations do the following: 1) report on the program's target population, recruitment methods, and representativeness of participants; 2) collect measures of self-efficacy and patient-provider interaction; 3) include quality of life and patient-functioning outcomes; and 4) use more standardized and objective measures of diabetes management behaviors. We close by providing practical examples of feasible collection measures for most settings and references to studies that have done so.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Behavioral Diabetes Series|
October 01 1992
Evaluating Diabetes Education: Are we measuring the most important outcomes?
Russell E Glasgow, PHD;
Russell E Glasgow, PHD
Oregon Research Institute
Eugene, Oregon
Search for other works by this author on:
Virginia L Osteen, BA
Virginia L Osteen, BA
Oregon Research Institute
Eugene, Oregon
Search for other works by this author on:
Address Correspondence and reprint requests to Russell E. Glasgow, PHD, Oregon Research Institute, 1899 Willamette Street, Eugene, OR 97401.
Diabetes Care 1992;15(10):1423–1432
Article history
Received:
August 26 1991
Accepted:
April 20 1992
PubMed:
1425111
Citation
Russell E Glasgow, Virginia L Osteen; Evaluating Diabetes Education: Are we measuring the most important outcomes?. Diabetes Care 1 October 1992; 15 (10): 1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.15.10.1423
Download citation file: