OBJECTIVE: To search for determinants of endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive analysis of cardiovascular risk markers and measured blood flow responses to endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine [ACh] and NG-monomethyl-L-arginine) and -independent (sodium nitroprusside [SNP]) vasoactive agents in 30 nonsmoking men with type 2 diabetes (age 51 +/- 1 years, BMI 27.8 +/- 0.4 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.4 +/- 0.3%) and 12 matched normal control men. RESULTS: ACh-induced vasodilation was 37% lower in type 2 diabetic (6.1 +/- 0.5) than in normal subjects (9.7 +/- 1.5 ml.dl-1.min-1, P < 0.01), while flows during SNP were similar (9.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 9.9 +/- 1.3 ml.dl-1.min-1, NS). The ratio of endothelium-dependent vs. -independent flow (ACh:SNP ratio) was 31% lower in type 2 diabetic (0.70 +/- 0.05) than in normal subjects (1.10 +/- 0.18, P < 0.01). Total (2.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.2 mmol/l, P < 0.05), VLDL, and intermediate-density lipoprotein triglycerides were significantly higher, and the mean LDL particle diameter was significantly smaller in type 2 diabetic than in normal subjects. The lag times for LDL oxidation by Cu2+ in vitro were similar in patients with type 2 diabetes (183 +/- 7) and in normal subjects (183 +/- 9 min, NS). Measured and calculated (sum of concentration of individual antioxidants in serum) total peroxyl radical-trapping capacities (TRAPs) were comparable between the groups. In the patients with type 2 diabetes, LDL size was significantly correlated with endothelium-dependent vasodilation (r = 0.43, P < 0.05), serum triglycerides (r = -0.75, P < 0.001), and the lag time for LDL oxidation in vitro (r = 0.38, P < 0.05). HbA1c was inversely correlated with the lag time for LDL oxidation in vitro (r = -0.41, P < 0.05) and TRAP. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, patients with type 2 diabetes exhibited impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in vivo, elevated serum triglycerides, decreased LDL size, and normal antioxidant capacity. Of these parameters, LDL size was significantly correlated with endothelial function.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Abstract|
June 01 1999
Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in type 2 diabetes. Relation to LDL size, oxidized LDL, and antioxidants.
S Mäkimattila;
S Mäkimattila
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Search for other works by this author on:
M L Liu;
M L Liu
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Search for other works by this author on:
J Vakkilainen;
J Vakkilainen
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Search for other works by this author on:
A Schlenzka;
A Schlenzka
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Search for other works by this author on:
S Lahdenperä;
S Lahdenperä
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Search for other works by this author on:
M Syvänne;
M Syvänne
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Search for other works by this author on:
M Mäntysaari;
M Mäntysaari
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Search for other works by this author on:
P Summanen;
P Summanen
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Search for other works by this author on:
R Bergholm;
R Bergholm
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Search for other works by this author on:
M R Taskinen;
M R Taskinen
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Search for other works by this author on:
H Yki-Järvinen
H Yki-Järvinen
Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Search for other works by this author on:
Citation
S Mäkimattila, M L Liu, J Vakkilainen, A Schlenzka, S Lahdenperä, M Syvänne, M Mäntysaari, P Summanen, R Bergholm, M R Taskinen, H Yki-Järvinen; Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in type 2 diabetes. Relation to LDL size, oxidized LDL, and antioxidants.. Diabetes Care 1 June 1999; 22 (6): 973–981. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.6.973
Download citation file: