OBJECTIVE—Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are persistent pollutants that are ubiquitous in the food chain; detectable amounts are in the blood of nearly everyone. Their effect on humans at background levels of exposure is an area of active investigation. Increased blood levels of dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin), a PCB-like compound, have recently been reported among subjects with diabetes, suggesting that PCB levels could be similarly elevated. To test this hypothesis, we examined a group of pregnant women whose serum PCB levels had been measured and whose diabetes status had been previously recorded.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Using stored serum from a large birth cohort study, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 2,245 pregnant women, of whom 44 had diabetes (primarily type 1) and 2,201 were control subjects.

RESULTS—The adjusted mean serum level of PCBs among the subjects with diabetes was 30% higher than in the control subjects (P = 0.0002), and the relationship of PCB level to adjusted odds of diabetes was linear.

CONCLUSIONS—The possibility exists that PCBs and diabetes are causality related; alternatively, the pharmacokinetics of PCBs could be altered among patients with diabetes. At any event, if the association is replicated in other studies, increased serum levels of PCBs in subjects with diabetes or their offspring may put them at increased risk of PCB-induced changes in thyroid metabolism or neurodevelopment.

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) are persistent pollutants that are ubiquitous in the food chain, and detectable amounts are in the blood of nearly everyone (1). PCBs and TCDD have similarities with respect to pharmacokinetics and toxicity. We recently reported that among men with no unusual exposure to TCDD, higher serum TCDD levels were associated with increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes (2). That association prompted us to examine the relationship between PCBs and diabetes in another data set.

The Collaborative Perinatal Project (CPP) was a joint effort of scientists at National Institutes of Health and 12 U.S. academic centers to investigate the cause of neurological disorders and other diseases in children (3). Over 56,000 pregnant women were enrolled from 1959 to 1966, and their children were systematically followed to 7 years of age. Because some of the CPP investigators were especially interested in the effect of diabetes in pregnancy on offspring, recruitment at the Boston center included subjects from the Joslin Clinic for diabetes. Sera were collected from the mothers and stored in glass containers at −20°C, with no recorded thaws. To study health effects in children of early life exposure to organochlorines, third-trimester serum from 2,739 women in the CPP was recently analyzed for PCBs, triglycerides, and cholesterol at the Centers for Disease Control.

Serum levels of PCBs were measured in 1997–1999 after solid-phase extraction, clean-up, and dual-column gas chromatography using electron capture detection (4). A total of 87% of the batches contained an aliquot from a single large pool used to calculate the between-assay coefficient of variation (CV). The between-assay CV was 19% at 3.49 μg PCB/l (n = 299). The specimens from subjects with diabetes were distributed at random throughout the analytical batches. The laboratory personnel were blind to the type of sample. Serum levels of cholesterol and triglycerides were measured using standard enzymatic methods.

We used three sampling methods to select children for inclusion in our study. First, we took a simple random sample (n = 1,168). Second, we selected all males with cryptorchidism, hypospadias, or polythelia (n = 222, 208, and 179, respectively). A third group of 962 children was selected according to their performance on tests of neonatal tone, neonatal reflexes, Bayley Scale of Infant Development at 8 months, intelligence quotient on the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children at 7 years of age, and audiometry results at 7 years of age. Among the 2,739 women, the distributions of age, race, smoking status, socioeconomic index, and study center were essentially the same as for all CPP mothers.

Among the 2,739 women whose serum PCB levels were measured, 44 had diabetes. The CPP records did not indicate the type of diabetes. Of the 44 cases, however, 37 had diabetes before pregnancy, i.e., they did not have gestational diabetes (5). In combination with the young age of the subjects, this suggests that most of the 44 case subjects had type 1 diabetes. Of these subjects, 30 were from the study center in Boston, which included subjects seen at the Joslin Clinic. Among all subjects with a PCB measurement who were from study centers other than Boston, 0.9% had diabetes. If we apply this percentage to the number of control subjects from Boston, about five cases of diabetes would have been expected; thus, we estimate that 25 case subjects were from the Joslin Clinic. The 0.9% prevalence of diabetes in the non-Boston centers was consistent with the underdiagnosis of gestational diabetes in the CPP.

We excluded 494 subjects from the analysis for the following reasons: diabetes status could not be determined (n = 14), missing data on socioeconomic index (n = 32), and missing values for serum lipids (n = 2). Cases of diabetes occurred at 9 of the 12 study centers. Because we matched by study center in the analysis (see below), control subjects (n = 446) from the three centers in which there were no cases of diabetes were also excluded from the analysis. Among the subjects included in the analysis (Table 1), the patients with diabetes were slightly older, a greater proportion were white, and the socioeconomic index was higher compared with the subjects without diabetes.

We examined the case-control difference in PCB levels in a linear model of loge(PCB) adjusted for age, race, socioeconomic index, center, serum triglycerides, and cholesterol. We also used conditional logistic regression (conditional on center) to calculate the odds ratio for diabetes in relation to serum level of PCBs, adjusting for the same factors as previously stated. An alternative analytical strategy with control subjects individually matched to cases (conditional logistic regression) by age (±1 year), race, center, and quartile of socioeconomic index, with adjustment for triglycerides and cholesterol as continuous variables, gave results that were essentially the same as those shown.

The median PCB level among the subjects with diabetes was 3.77 μg/l and among the control subjects was 2.79 μg/l (Fig. 1). The median PCB level among control subjects was slightly higher than the value of 1.7 μg/l reported in a more recent study of pregnant women from the U.S. (6). The adjusted mean PCB level in case subjects, expressed in its original scale, was 3.71 μg/l, compared with 2.86 μg/l among control subjects, a 30% difference (P = 0.0002). The similarity of the crude and adjusted case-control differences reflected that there was little confounding in these data.

With increasing PCB level, the odds ratio for diabetes increased monotonically (Table 2). Further adjustment of the odds ratios had no appreciable effect on the association; the additional variables considered were: prepregnancy BMI, smoking, squared values of triglycerides or cholesterol, and variables indicating whether the mother had been selected because the child had one of the outcomes under study. The association was essentially unchanged when the analysis was restricted to subjects with diabetes before pregnancy or when PCB levels were expressed on a per serum-lipid basis (in a model without triglycerides or cholesterol as covariates). In addition, when we systematically excluded each diabetic subject from the analysis and refitted the model, the results were essentially unaffected. The median levels of triglycerides (194 mg/dl) and cholesterol (233 mg/dl) among control subjects were essentially the same as in fresh sera.

These data show a clear association between PCB levels and diabetes, but they are uninformative regarding which came first. Perhaps diabetes causes higher organochlorine levels. Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes alter the pharmacokinetics of selected drugs (7), but so few agents have been studied that one cannot predict the fate of lipophilic compounds that are resistant to metabolism, such as PCBs. Patients with diabetes tend to have an increased serum triglyceride concentration, and serum organochlorine levels increase with lipid levels, thus raising the possibility that the association could be an artifact. However, our results were adjusted for serum triglycerides to account for this possibility.

Studies of PCB-exposed workers reveal no suggestion of an increased level of glucose (8,9), morbidity, or mortality from diabetes (10,11). However, the diabetes in such studies would be primarily type 2. Although the production of PCBs in the U.S. was banned in 1977, much of the material produced is still in use in transformers, capacitors, and other applications.

One potential mechanism by which PCBs might cause diabetes is the depletion of β-cell insulin, an effect seen in vitro in RINm5F cells (12). In addition, some PCBs bind with the Ah-receptor, and the binding of TCDD with this receptor mediates TCDD toxicity. TCDD reduces cellular glucose uptake, possibly by altering glucose transporter activity (13). Because the levels of PCB and TCDD used in these experiments (12,13) were relatively high, the relevance to humans at background levels of exposure is unclear. However, recent studies in humans suggest that within the range of background exposure, higher TCDD levels were associated with increased insulin resistance (2,14). At background levels of exposure, the extent of PCB binding with the Ah-receptor is enough (15) that PCBs, like TCDD, could be associated with increased insulin resistance.

Even if patients with diabetes accrue higher body burdens of PCBs than do subjects without diabetes, the levels in patients with diabetes and their offspring are relatively low. Nonetheless, low levels may have adverse effects on thyroid metabolism (16,17) and neurodevelopment (18,19 20).

Figure 1 —

Percentiles of the distribution of serum PCB concentration (5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th) by whether the subject had diabetes

Figure 1 —

Percentiles of the distribution of serum PCB concentration (5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th) by whether the subject had diabetes

Close modal
Table 1 —

Characteristics of subjects

Diabetic subjectsControl subjects
n 44 2,201 
Age (years) 28 ± 7 24 ± 6* 
Race (% white) 84    45* 
Socioeconomic index 64 ± 25 48 ± 22* 
BMI prepregnancy (kg/m223 ± 4 23 ± 4 
Serum triglycerides (mg/dl) 304 ± 94 208 ± 79* 
Serum cholesterol (mg/dl) 235 ± 60 239 ± 67 
Diabetic subjectsControl subjects
n 44 2,201 
Age (years) 28 ± 7 24 ± 6* 
Race (% white) 84    45* 
Socioeconomic index 64 ± 25 48 ± 22* 
BMI prepregnancy (kg/m223 ± 4 23 ± 4 
Serum triglycerides (mg/dl) 304 ± 94 208 ± 79* 
Serum cholesterol (mg/dl) 235 ± 60 239 ± 67 

Data are means ± SD, unless otherwise stated.

*

The difference between the case and control values was statistically significant (P < 0.05) by t-test, and a χ2 test was done for race.

Table 2 —

Adjusted odds ratio for diabetes according to serum level of PCBs among pregnant women in the Collaborative Perinatal Project

Total PCBs (μg/l)Case subjectsControl subjects*OR95% CI
<2.50 926 1.0 — 
2.50<3.75 13 666 2.9 1.1–7.3  
3.75<5.00 309 4.4 1.6–12.5 
≥5.00 13 300 5.1 1.9–13.8 
Total PCBs (μg/l)Case subjectsControl subjects*OR95% CI
<2.50 926 1.0 — 
2.50<3.75 13 666 2.9 1.1–7.3  
3.75<5.00 309 4.4 1.6–12.5 
≥5.00 13 300 5.1 1.9–13.8 

Data are n, unless otherwise stated.

*

Only the control subjects from centers that had at least one case of diabetes are shown (total number of control subjects in the table is 2,201);

adjusted for age, socioeconomic index, serum triglycerides, and cholesterol as continuous variables and for race (white versus nonwhites). P = 0.004 for trend, with PCB as a continuous variable. OR, odds ratio.

1.
Longnecker MP, Rogan WJ, Lucier G: The human health effects of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) and PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) and an overview of organochlorines in public health.
Annu Rev Public Health
18
:
211
–244,
1997
2.
Longnecker MP, Michalek JE: Serum dioxin level in relation to diabetes mellitus among Air Force veterans with background levels of exposure.
Epidemiology
11
:
44
–48,
2000
3.
Niswander KR, Gordon M:
The Women and Their Pregnancies
. Washington, DC, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1972 (USDHEW monogr. no. 73-379)
4.
Brock JW, Burse VW, Ashley DL, Najam AR, Green VE, Korver MP, Powell MK, Hodge CC, Needham LL: An improved analysis for chlorinated pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in human and bovine sera using solid-phase extraction.
J Anal Toxicol
20
:
528
–536,
1996
5.
Kjos SL, Buchanan TA: Gestational diabetes mellitus.
N Engl J Med
341
:
1749
–1756,
1999
6.
Berkowitz GS, Lapinski RH, Wolf MS: The role of DDE and polychlorinated biphenyl levels in preterm birth.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol
30
:
139
–141,
1996
7.
Gwilt PR, Nahhas RR, Tracewell WG: The effects of diabetes mellitus on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in humans.
Clin Pharmacokinet
20
:
477
–490,
1991
8.
Lawton RW, Ross MR, Feingold J, Brown JF Jr: Effects of PCB exposure on biochemical and hematological findings in capacitor workers.
Environ Health Perspect
60
:
165
–184,
1985
9.
Emmett EA: Polychlorinated biphenyl exposure and effects in transformer repair workers.
Environ Health Perspect
60
:
185
–192,
1985
10.
Loomis D, Browning SR, Schenck AP, Gregory E, Savitz DA: Cancer mortality among electric utility workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls.
Occup Environ Med
54
:
720
–728,
1997
11.
Kimbrough RD, Doemland ML, LeVois ME: Mortality in male and female capacitor workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls.
J Occup Environ Med
41
:
161
–171,
1999
12.
Fischer LJ, Zhou HR, Wagner MA: Polychlorinated biphenyls release insulin from RINm5F cells.
Life Sci
59
:
2041
–2049,
1996
13.
Enan E, Lasley B, Stewart D, Overstreet J, Vandevoort CA: 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) modulates function of human luteinizing granulosa cells via cAMP signaling and early reduction of glucose transporting activity.
Reprod Toxicol
10
:
191
–198,
1996
14.
Cranmer M, Louie S, Kennedy RH, Kern PA, Fonseca VA: Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance.
Toxicol Sci
56
:
431
–436,
2000
15.
Schecter A, McGee H, Stanley JS, Boggess K, Brandt-Rauf P: Dioxins and dioxin-like chemicals in blood and semen of American Vietnam veterans from the state of Michigan.
Am J Ind Med
30
:
647
–654,
1996
16.
Koopman-Esseboom C, Morse DC, Weisglas-Kuperus N, Lutkeschipholt IJ, Van der Paauw CG, Tuinstra LG, Brouwer A, Sauer PJ: Effects of dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls on thyroid hormone status of pregnant women and their infants.
Pediatr Res
36
:
468
–473,
1994
17.
Osius N, Karmaus W, Kruse H, Witten J: Exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and levels of thyroid hormones in children.
Environ Health Perspect
107
:
843
–849,
1999
18.
Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW: Intellectual impairment in children exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls in utero.
N Engl J Med
335
:
783
–978,
1996
19.
Winneke G, Bucholski A, Heinzow B, Kramer U, Schmidt E, Walkowiak J, Wiener JA, Steingruber HJ: Developmental neurotoxicity of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBS): cognitive and psychomotor functions in 7-month old children.
Toxicol Lett
102–
103
:
423
–428,
1998
20.
Brouwer A, Longnecker MP, Birnbaum LS, Cogliano J, Kostyniak P, Moore J, Schantz S, Winneke G: Characterization of potential endocrine-related health effects at low-dose levels of exposure to PCBs.
Environ Health Perspect
107(Suppl. 4)
:
639
–649,
1999

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. M.P. Longnecker, Medical Research Officer, NIEHS EB, P.O. Box 12233 MD A3–05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. E-mail: [email protected].

Received for publication 5 October 2000 and accepted in revised form 27 February 2001.

J.W.B. holds stock in Watson Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Johnson and Johnson, and Cardinal Health.

A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.