Patients affected by type 1 diabetes appear to be more prone to infection than healthy subjects (1).
Recently, it has been shown that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is common in type 1 diabetes (2) and that the use of a standard antibiotic therapy obtains a significantly lower eradication rate than in non–insulin-dependent diabetic subjects (3,4). Our aim was to assess the incidence of H. pylori re-infection after a successful therapy in type 1 diabetic patients. A total of 74 subjects previously infected by H. pylori were enrolled, including 34 type 1 diabetic subjects (16 women and 18 men, 42 ± 9 years of age) and 40 nondiabetic control subjects (17 women and 23 men, 44 ± 8 years of age). Control subjects were matched for age and sex.
None of the type 1 diabetic patients had symptoms of gastroparesis, and none was treated with domperidone. All subjects previously treated for H. pylori infection and successfully eradicated, as assessed both by 13C-urea breath test (UBT) and histology (two biopsies in antrum, body, and fundus), were re-evaluated with UBT 12 months after eradication. Re-infected patients were also submitted to endoscopy to confirm the presence of the bacterium. Daily insulin requirement and HbA1c (percent total hemoglobin) expressions of glycemic metabolic control were evaluated.
We found a significantly higher incidence of H. pylori re-infection in type 1 diabetic patients compared with nondiabetic control subjects. In particular, 13 of 34 (38%) type 1 diabetic patients compared with 2 of 40 (5%) control subjects were re-infected with H. pylori 1 year after successful eradication (P < 0.001).
Among type 1 diabetic patients, re-infection occurrence was not affected by sex, type 1 diabetes duration, or mean age. No differences in baseline values of daily insulin requirement and HbA1c were observed between re-infected and not-infected diabetic patients (43 ± 8 vs. 38 ± 9 units and 7 ± 0.7 vs. 7 ± 0.8%, respectively). However, 12 months after eradication, significantly higher insulin requirement and HbA1c were observed in re-infected patients compared with uninfected diabetic patients (43 ± 8 vs. 35 ± 8 units, P < 0.05; and 7.25 ± 1 vs. 6.8 ± 0.8%, P < 0.02). Interestingly, when compared with the enrollment value, patients who remained uninfected by H. pylori after 12 months from eradication showed a reduction trend of daily insulin requirement (38 ± 9 vs. 35 ± 8 units, P < 0.08).
This study shows that the incidence of H. pylori recurrence 12 months after a successful eradication is significantly higher in type 1 diabetic subjects compared with control subjects. Some mechanism could be hypothesized for the higher rate of re-infection observed in diabetic subjects, perhaps an increased susceptibility of the host to the infection as a result of reduced lymphocyte activity and neutrophil dysfunction with failure of chemiotaxis.
Better metabolic control in diabetic patients in whom H. pylori has been eradicated compared with re-infected subjects was observed, suggesting a trend of ameliorated metabolic control after H. pylori eradication. More studies are requested to investigate the mechanisms underlying the increased susceptibility of H. pylori re-infection in type 1 diabetic patients and the role of the bacterium in glycemic control. Vaccine development seems to be one possible effective long-term strategy for this subset of patients.
Article Information
This study was partly supported by a grant from Associazione Ricerca Medicina, Bologna, Italy.
References
Address correspondence to Antonio Gasbarrini, MD, Istituto di Patologia Medica, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Policlinico Gemelli, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy. E-mail: [email protected].