OBJECTIVE—Until now, few clinical studies have reported on the association between the indexes of body fat distribution and serum ferritin, an indicator of body iron stores and a putative risk factor for insulin resistance. We investigated the association between serum ferritin concentrations and the indexes of distribution of adipose tissues in the body, such as the visceral fat area (VFA), the subcutaneous fat area (SFA), and the hepatic fat content in Japanese subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 248 Japanese subjects (127 men and 121 postmenopausal women aged 57.8 ± 13.9 years, BMI 25.7 ± 4.6 kg/m2; 140 subjects with type 2 diabetes and 108 nondiabetic subjects) were evaluated. Subjects with a history of alcohol intake were excluded from the study. We measured body height, body weight, and serum ferritin, as well as fasting plasma glucose and plasma insulin concentrations. We estimated insulin resistance by homeostasis model assessment. The fat distribution was evaluated by measuring the VFA and SFA by abdominal computed tomography at the umbilical level. To assess the hepatic fat content, the ratio of the computed tomography attenuation value of the liver to that of the spleen was calculated.

RESULTS—Serum ferritin was significantly correlated with the various indexes of adiposity examined, such as the hepatic fat content (r = −0.280, P < 0.0001), VFA (r = 0.254, P < 0.0001), SFA (r = 0.231, P = 0.0005), and homeostasis model assessment (r = 0.286, P = 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS—This is the first report to directly demonstrate an association between serum ferritin and VFA and SFA. The results of this study suggest that the serum ferritin concentration may be a useful indicator of systemic fat content and degree of insulin resistance.

Previous studies (1,2) have investigated the relationship between radiologically measured abdominal fat accumulation, hepatic fat content, and metabolic risk factors. It has been reported that both the visceral fat area (VFA) and the hepatic fat content are correlated with plasma triglyceride levels and glucose disposal (1,2). Elevation of serum ferritin concentrations has been suggested to be one of the components of the insulin resistance syndrome (35). In a population study of 1,013 eastern Finnish men (3), the serum ferritin concentrations were shown to be well correlated with the fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations. A subsequent study also revealed that circulating ferritin levels were related to the degree of insulin resistance (4). However, only a few studies have reported on the relationship between the serum ferritin concentrations and various indexes of adiposity. A study of Spanish subjects demonstrated no association between serum ferritin concentrations and the waist-to-hip ratio (4). On the other hand, a study of Norwegian men demonstrated independent associations between serum ferritin concentrations and the waist-to-thigh ratio and BMI (6). Gillum et al. also reported that the serum ferritin concentrations were correlated with the waist-to-hip ratio (7). It is well established by now that body circumference measures and skin fold measures representing body fat distribution and adiposity are associated with insulin sensitivity, non–insulin-dependent diabetes, and other cardiovascular risk factors constituting the insulin resistance syndrome (8). These reports prompted us to hypothesize that body fat distribution may be significantly associated with body iron stores as reflected by serum ferritin concentrations. Therefore, we investigated the association between serum ferritin concentrations and sex, age, various clinical parameters (HbA1c [A1C], plasma glucose, and insulin), and indexes of body fat distribution, namely the hepatic fat content, the visceral fat area (VFA), and the subcutaneous fat area (SFA).

We evaluated the clinical indicators in patients who were admitted to the Yokohama City University Hospital between 2003 and 2005. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional ethical review committee. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the examinations. The study was carried out in 248 subjects admitted to our hospital for evaluation of elevated transaminase levels, fatty liver, or stringent control of blood glucose levels. A total of 140 of these were diabetic patients, and 108 were nondiabetic patients. The study was restricted to men and postmenopausal women to eliminate the influence of pregnancy and female hormone replacement therapy and to reduce possible confounding by iron deficiency/ iron supplementation. The study was also restricted to persons >20 years of age to reduce the possible confounding effect of growth and development. A total of 248 Japanese (127 men and 121 postmenopausal women aged 57.8 ± 13.9 years, BMI 25.7 ± 4.6 kg/m2, 140 with type 2 diabetes, and 108 without diabetes) subjects were evaluated. Persons with a history of alcohol intake of ≥20 g/day were excluded from the study. Serum ferritin is an acute-phase reactant and does not accurately reflect the body’s iron stores in the presence of inflammation. We therefore measured the serum C-reactive protein in this study to exclude patients with obvious inflammation. The proportion of subjects with history of smoking was 26% in the diabetic group and 13% in the nondiabetic group.

Blood sampling and biochemical assay

Blood samples were obtained before breakfast on the 2nd day of hospitalization for measurements of the plasma glucose and insulin levels. The insulin resistance was calculated by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) using the following formula: [fasting serum insulin (μU/ml) × fasting plasma glucose (mg/dl)/405]. However, the HOMA-IR and measurement of serum ferritin was performed in only 128 subjects for whom the fasting plasma glucose was <170 mg/dl because HOMA-IR has been reported to be a suitable method for evaluating the presence of insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes only when the fasting glucose levels are <170 mg/dl (9). Ono et al. reported that the results of HOMA-IR were not significantly correlated with the insulin resistance in subjects with fasting glucose levels >200 mg/dl (9).

Determination of the visceral and subcutaneous fat areas

The abdominal fat distribution in the subjects was determined by computed tomography (CT) with the subjects in the supine position, in accordance with a previously described procedure (10). The SFA and intra-abdominal VFA were measured at the level of the umbilicus using a standardized method in terms of the CT number. In brief, a region of interest was defined in the subcutaneous fat layer by tracing its contour on each scan, and the attenuation range for fat tissue was measured in terms of the CT number (in Hounsfield units).

Assessment of hepatic fat content

The degree of liver steatosis was measured by CT. Previous studies have shown a strong correlation between the CT attenuation values of the liver and the extent of fatty infiltration as measured by biopsy (11,12). The ratio of the CT attenuation value of the liver to that of the spleen (L/S ratio) was used for quantitative estimation of the hepatic fat content, with an L/S ratio of <1 being considered to represent fatty liver (11).

Data analysis

All the data were expressed as means ± SD. The relationship between any two variables was analyzed by standard correlation analysis conducted using the StatView version 5.0 software (SAS, Cary, NC). ANOVA was applied for group comparisons, followed by Student’s t test for confirmation of the statistical associations. The relationship between the L/S ratio, VFA, or SFA and other relevant covariates was examined by multiple regression analysis and determination of the standardized correlation coefficients. Statistical significance was assumed when the P value was <0.05.

Relationship between the serum ferritin concentration and clinical parameters

The baseline characteristics of the 140 patients with type 2 diabetes and 108 nondiabetic patients are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences in the serum ferritin concentrations, VFA, or SFA between the two groups (type 2 diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients). The baseline characteristics of the 64 diabetic patients for whom the fasting plasma glucose levels were <170 mg/dl and the same number of nondiabetic patients are shown in Table 2. The relationships between the serum ferritin concentrations and the other factors examined in this study are illustrated in Fig. 1. The serum ferritin concentration was inversely correlated with the L/S ratio (r = −0.280, P < 0.0001; Fig. 1A), that is, they were positively correlated with the degree of liver steatosis. The serum ferritin concentration was also significantly correlated with the VFA (r = 0.254, P < 0.0001; Fig. 1B) and SFA (r = 0.231, P = 0.0005; Fig. 1C). In the 64 nondiabetic patients and the 64 patients with type 2 diabetes for whom the fasting plasma glucose levels were <170 mg/dl, the serum ferritin concentration was significantly correlated with the insulin resistance as measured by HOMA-IR (r = 0.286, P = 0.0008; Fig. 1D).

Chronic metabolic and inflammatory diseases may confound the present assessment in diabetic patients. In this study, we excluded subjects with a serum C-reactive protein level of >0.5 mg/dl because serum ferritin is an acute-phase reactant and does not accurately reflect the body iron stores in the presence of inflammation. We also examined the relationship between the serum ferritin concentrations and other factors in the diabetic patients or nondiabetic subjects. The serum ferritin concentration was significantly correlated with the L/S ratio, VFA, SFA, and the degree of insulin resistance in both the diabetic and nondiabetic groups (data not shown). Although Gillum et al. found that the association between the waist-to-hip ratio and the serum ferritin concentration became weaker with increasing age (13), our study revealed no such weakening of the association between the serum ferritin concentrations and the VFA, SFA, and VFA + SFA with age (Table 3).

Multiple regression analysis

Multiple regression analysis was conducted to quantify the impact of the measured variables (age, sex, serum ferritin concentration, A1C, and smoking status) on the L/S ratio, VFA, and SFA. The results shown in Table 4 indicate that the age, sex, and serum A1C, but not the serum ferritin concentration, were significantly related to the L/S ratio in all of the study subjects. We then carried out multiple regression analysis separately in the diabetic group and the nondiabetic group. Interestingly, the serum ferritin concentration was found to be significantly correlated with the L/S ratio in the diabetic patients (Table 5), but not in the nondiabetic patients (Table 6). The results shown in Table 7 indicate that the age, sex, serum ferritin concentration, and serum A1C were also significantly correlated with the VFA. The results shown in Table 8 indicate that the sex, serum ferritin concentration, and serum A1C were also significantly correlated with the SFA. The results shown in Table 9 indicate that the serum ferritin and serum A1C were significantly correlated with the HOMA-IR. Smoking status was not an independent variable. Thus, after adjustment for these five variables, the serum ferritin concentration was still found to be correlated significantly with the VFA, SFA, and HOMA-IR, but not the L/S ratio.

In this study, we investigated the association between the serum ferritin concentrations and the hepatic fat content, VFA, SFA, and degree of insulin resistance. We demonstrated that the serum ferritin concentration was significantly associated with the CT-estimated VFA and SFA (Fig. 1B and C). We were also able to reproduce the previously reported association between the serum ferritin concentration and the hepatic fat content and the degree of insulin resistance (4,14) (Fig. 1A and D, Table 4). We also independently analyzed the association between the serum ferritin concentrations and the indexes of distribution of adipose tissues in diabetic patients and nondiabetic subjects. Serum ferritin concentrations were significantly correlated with VFA, SFA, and HOMA-IR in both the diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients (data not shown). Interestingly, there was a significant relationship between serum ferritin concentrations and the L/S ratio in the diabetic patients, but not in the nondiabetic patients (Tables 5 and 6). A previous study on Spanish subjects assessed the associations between obesity and central or abdominal fat distribution and the serum ferritin concentrations (4); they did not find a significant relationship between the serum ferritin and measures of adiposity. Our results, however, were not consistent with these results. This discrepancy may be explained, at least in part, by the reported finding that the waist-to-hip ratio is greater in the Spanish population than in other Caucasian populations (15) and that the ratio is lower in the Japanese population than in western populations.

Gillum et al. reported that the serum ferritin concentration was associated with the waist-to-hip ratio (6). Increased waist-to-hip ratio may suggest an excess VFA in each subject. However, anthropometric measures such as the waist-to-hip ratio do not always distinguish visceral obesity from subcutaneous obesity. To investigate the relationship between the serum ferritin concentration, VFA, and SFA more directly, we elected to use CT in this study and confirmed the relationship between serum ferritin concentrations, VFA, and SFA. After adjustment for age, sex, and serum A1C, serum ferritin concentrations were still significantly correlated with VFA, SFA, and HOMA-IR (Tables 79). This is the first report to demonstrate a direct association between the serum ferritin concentrations and VFA and SFA.

Increased iron stores in the liver are postulated to induce liver-mediated insulin resistance, with a reduced ability of insulin to suppress hepatic glucose production (4). Serum ferritin levels have been reported previously to be associated with decreased insulin sensitivity and increased fasting plasma insulin and glucose levels (3,4). These abnormalities might lead to increased adiposity. Several studies have demonstrated correlations between serum ferritin concentrations and other components of the insulin resistance syndrome (3,4,16). It has been reported that the chelation of iron is highly resistant to oxidant-mediated injury (13) and is associated with reduced iron-induced lipid peroxidation (17). It is possible to consider that overexpression of ferritin plays a role as an iron cytoprotective agent by limiting the reactivity of intracellular iron with lipids at the site of their biosynthesis within adipocytes. Thus, ferritin overexpression probably represents adaptive adipocyte response to iron-induced oxidative stress, resulting in a positive association between the serum ferritin concentration and the amount of fat tissue in the body.

Although the hepatic fat content, VFA, and SFA can be evaluated by CT, measurement of the serum ferritin level is a nonradiological and inexpensive test. Therefore, the serum ferritin concentration may be a very useful and cost-effective marker of not only the fat distribution in various organs (hepatic fat content, VFA, and SFA), but also of insulin resistance. Estimation of the serum ferritin concentration may thus be more valuable than CT for evaluation of the fat distribution in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. That is, monitoring of the serum ferritin concentration would be more feasible than serial CT for the follow-up of subjects with the metabolic syndrome. We are now investigating whether changes in the serum ferritin levels after treatment would also be correlated with the changes in the hepatic fat content, VFA, and SFA, as evaluated by CT.

In conclusion, a direct correlation was demonstrated between the serum ferritin concentrations and the VFA and SFA as estimated by CT. Therefore, measurement of the serum ferritin concentration may be a highly useful noninvasive and cost-effective test for the assessment of the fat distribution and degree of insulin resistance.

Figure 1—

A: Relationship between the serum ferritin concentration and the L/S ratio; there is a significant correlation (r = −0.280, P < 0.0001). B: Relationship between the serum ferritin concentration and VFA; there is a significant correlation (r = 0.254, P < 0.0001). C: Relationship between the serum ferritin concentration and the SFA; there is a significant correlation (r = 0.231, P = 0.0005). D: Relationship between the serum ferritin concentration and the degree of insulin resistance as assessed by HOMA-IR; there is a significant correlation (r = 0.286, P = 0.0008). Analysis of these relationships was performed in 126 subjects with fasting plasma glucose levels <170 mg/dl.

Figure 1—

A: Relationship between the serum ferritin concentration and the L/S ratio; there is a significant correlation (r = −0.280, P < 0.0001). B: Relationship between the serum ferritin concentration and VFA; there is a significant correlation (r = 0.254, P < 0.0001). C: Relationship between the serum ferritin concentration and the SFA; there is a significant correlation (r = 0.231, P = 0.0005). D: Relationship between the serum ferritin concentration and the degree of insulin resistance as assessed by HOMA-IR; there is a significant correlation (r = 0.286, P = 0.0008). Analysis of these relationships was performed in 126 subjects with fasting plasma glucose levels <170 mg/dl.

Close modal
Table 1—

Clinical characteristics of all subjects

DiabeticNondiabetic
n 140 108 
Age (years) 61.1 ± 10.2 54.1 ± 14.6* 
Sex (male/female) 75/65 52/56 
BMI (kg/m225.1 ± 0.4 26.1 ± 0.57 
L/S ratio 1.090 ± 0.020 1.006 ± 0.028 
VFA (cm2124 ± 6.23 117 ± 5.87 
SFA (cm2178 ± 8.58 192 ± 10.1 
Ferritin (ng/ml) 167.3 ± 13.6 188.9 ± 18.2 
Glucose (mg/dl) 148.5 ± 4.87 105.2 ± 1.43* 
Insulin (μU/ml) 8.93 ± 0.745 9.34 ± 0.746 
HOMA-IR 3.10 ± 0.225 2.10 ± 0.113 
A1C (%) 7.51 ± 0.122 5.09 ± 0.39* 
C-reactive protein (mg/dl) 0.097 ± 0.009 0.101 ± 0.011 
AST (IU/l) 27.4 ± 1.47 23.6 ± 2.41* 
ALT (IU/l) 34.3 ± 2.41 51.9 ± 4.59* 
Smoking (%) 26.4 12.6 
DiabeticNondiabetic
n 140 108 
Age (years) 61.1 ± 10.2 54.1 ± 14.6* 
Sex (male/female) 75/65 52/56 
BMI (kg/m225.1 ± 0.4 26.1 ± 0.57 
L/S ratio 1.090 ± 0.020 1.006 ± 0.028 
VFA (cm2124 ± 6.23 117 ± 5.87 
SFA (cm2178 ± 8.58 192 ± 10.1 
Ferritin (ng/ml) 167.3 ± 13.6 188.9 ± 18.2 
Glucose (mg/dl) 148.5 ± 4.87 105.2 ± 1.43* 
Insulin (μU/ml) 8.93 ± 0.745 9.34 ± 0.746 
HOMA-IR 3.10 ± 0.225 2.10 ± 0.113 
A1C (%) 7.51 ± 0.122 5.09 ± 0.39* 
C-reactive protein (mg/dl) 0.097 ± 0.009 0.101 ± 0.011 
AST (IU/l) 27.4 ± 1.47 23.6 ± 2.41* 
ALT (IU/l) 34.3 ± 2.41 51.9 ± 4.59* 
Smoking (%) 26.4 12.6 

Data are means ± SE.

*

P < 0.01 diabetic vs. nondiabetic;

P < 0.05. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase.

Table 2—

Clinical characteristics of the 64 diabetic patients with fasting plasma glucose levels <170 mg/dl and the same number of nondiabetic patients

DiabeticNondiabetic
n 64 64 
Age (years) 59.8 ± 10.6 54.1 ± 10.8* 
Sex (male/female) 35/32 31/30 
BMI (kg/m224.8 ± 0.6 26.2 ± 0.77 
L/S ratio 1.063 ± 0.034 1.039 ± 0.036 
VFA (cm2117 ± 11.7 114 ± 7.59 
SFA (cm2180 ± 12.9 180 ± 10.9 
Ferritin (ng/ml) 167.1 ± 17.5 183.9 ± 24.6 
Glucose (mg/dl) 129.2 ± 2.86 105.2 ± 1.43† 
Insulin (μU/ml) 9.10 ± 0.861 9.34 ± 0.746 
HOMA-IR 2.893 ± 0.233 2.100 ± 0.113† 
A1C (%) 6.87 ± 0.128 5.09 ± 0.39† 
C-reactive protein (mg/dl) 0.099 ± 0.014 0.103 ± 0.014 
AST (IU/l) 30.5 ± 3.08 31.6 ± 2.37 
ALT (IU/l) 37.4 ± 5.09 45.6 ± 5.40 
Smoking (%) 20.7 12.8 
DiabeticNondiabetic
n 64 64 
Age (years) 59.8 ± 10.6 54.1 ± 10.8* 
Sex (male/female) 35/32 31/30 
BMI (kg/m224.8 ± 0.6 26.2 ± 0.77 
L/S ratio 1.063 ± 0.034 1.039 ± 0.036 
VFA (cm2117 ± 11.7 114 ± 7.59 
SFA (cm2180 ± 12.9 180 ± 10.9 
Ferritin (ng/ml) 167.1 ± 17.5 183.9 ± 24.6 
Glucose (mg/dl) 129.2 ± 2.86 105.2 ± 1.43† 
Insulin (μU/ml) 9.10 ± 0.861 9.34 ± 0.746 
HOMA-IR 2.893 ± 0.233 2.100 ± 0.113† 
A1C (%) 6.87 ± 0.128 5.09 ± 0.39† 
C-reactive protein (mg/dl) 0.099 ± 0.014 0.103 ± 0.014 
AST (IU/l) 30.5 ± 3.08 31.6 ± 2.37 
ALT (IU/l) 37.4 ± 5.09 45.6 ± 5.40 
Smoking (%) 20.7 12.8 

Data are means ± SE.

*

P < 0.05;

P < 0.01 diabetic vs. nondiabetic.

Table 3—

Correlation* of the serum ferritin concentrations with theVFA and SFA in patients aged 20–79 years

Age (years)
≤2930–3940–4950–5960–6970–79
n 23 30 54 75 57 
VFA — — 0.344 0.214 0.308 0.299 
SFA — 0.256 0.220 — 0.243 0.271 
VFA + SFA — 0.178 0.332 — 0.315 0.323 
Age (years)
≤2930–3940–4950–5960–6970–79
n 23 30 54 75 57 
VFA — — 0.344 0.214 0.308 0.299 
SFA — 0.256 0.220 — 0.243 0.271 
VFA + SFA — 0.178 0.332 — 0.315 0.323 
*

Pearson’s correlation coefficients <0.10 not shown.

Table 4—

Multiple regression analysis of the relationship between L/S ratio and other associated variables for the entire group

Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.012 0.001 0.646 <0.0001 
Sex 0.073 0.035 0.151 0.0394 
Ferritin (ng/ml) −0.0001897 −0.0001129 −0.121 0.0944 
A1C 0.47 0.009 0.308 <0.0001 
Smoking 0.067 0.043 0.114 0.1172 
Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.012 0.001 0.646 <0.0001 
Sex 0.073 0.035 0.151 0.0394 
Ferritin (ng/ml) −0.0001897 −0.0001129 −0.121 0.0944 
A1C 0.47 0.009 0.308 <0.0001 
Smoking 0.067 0.043 0.114 0.1172 

The dependent variable is the L/S ratio. The independent variables are age, sex, serum ferritin, serum A1C, and smoking status. R2 for entire model = 0.975.

Table 5—

Multiple regression analysis of the relationship between L/S ratio and other associated variables for the diabetic group

Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.010 0.001 0.535 <0.0001 
Sex 0.101 0.043 0.219 0.0196 
Ferritin (ng/ml) −0.0002740 −0.0001362 −0.188 0.0465 
A1C 0.057 0.010 0.342 <0.0001 
Smoking 0.047 0.047 0.092 0.3168 
Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.010 0.001 0.535 <0.0001 
Sex 0.101 0.043 0.219 0.0196 
Ferritin (ng/ml) −0.0002740 −0.0001362 −0.188 0.0465 
A1C 0.057 0.010 0.342 <0.0001 
Smoking 0.047 0.047 0.092 0.3168 

The dependent variable is the L/S ratio. The independent variables are age, sex, serum ferritin, serum A1C, and smoking status. R2 for entire model = 0.954.

Table 6—

Multiple regression analysis of the relationship between L/S ratio and other associated variables for the nondiabetic group

Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.008 0.002 0.437 0.0003 
Sex −0.021 0.062 −0.042 0.7309 
Ferritin (ng/ml) −0.0002384 −0.0001921 −0.141 0.2184 
A1C 0.115 0.028 0.167 <0.0001 
Smoking 0.114 0.084 0.152 0.1773 
Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.008 0.002 0.437 0.0003 
Sex −0.021 0.062 −0.042 0.7309 
Ferritin (ng/ml) −0.0002384 −0.0001921 −0.141 0.2184 
A1C 0.115 0.028 0.167 <0.0001 
Smoking 0.114 0.084 0.152 0.1773 

The dependent variable is the L/S ratio. The independent variables are age, sex, serum ferritin, serum A1C, and smoking status. R2 for entire model = 0.949.

Table 7—

Multiple regression analysis of the relationship between the VFA and other associated variables for the entire group

Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.505 0.249 0.101 0.0444 
Sex 31.505 9.232 0.240 0.0008 
Ferritin (ng/ml) 0.121 0.030 0.282 <0.0001 
A1C 8.670 2.397 0.214 0.0004 
Smoking −16.172 11.190 −0.102 0.1499 
Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.505 0.249 0.101 0.0444 
Sex 31.505 9.232 0.240 0.0008 
Ferritin (ng/ml) 0.121 0.030 0.282 <0.0001 
A1C 8.670 2.397 0.214 0.0004 
Smoking −16.172 11.190 −0.102 0.1499 

The dependent variable is the VFA. The independent variables are age, sex, serum ferritin, serum A1C, and smoking status. R2 for entire model = 0.792.

Table 8—

Multiple regression analysis of the relationship between the SFA and other associated variables for the entire group

Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.619 0.319 0.102 0.0538 
Sex −28.925 11.816 −0.181 0.0152 
Ferritin (ng/ml) 0.195 0.038 0.373 <0.0001 
A1C 17.822 3.068 0.360 <0.0001 
Smoking −27.733 14.322 −0.143 0.0542 
Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.619 0.319 0.102 0.0538 
Sex −28.925 11.816 −0.181 0.0152 
Ferritin (ng/ml) 0.195 0.038 0.373 <0.0001 
A1C 17.822 3.068 0.360 <0.0001 
Smoking −27.733 14.322 −0.143 0.0542 

The dependent variable is the SFA. The independent variables are age, sex, serum ferritin, serum A1C, and smoking status. R2 for entire model = 0.816.

Table 9—

Multiple regression analysis of the relationship between the degree of insulin resistance as assessed by HOMA-IR and other associated variables for the entire group

Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.005 0.006 0.005 0.9423 
Sex 0.019 0.218 0.008 0.9311 
Ferritin (ng/ml) 0.003 0.001 0.373 0.0001 
A1C 0.281 0.064 0.303 <0.0001 
Smoking −0.258 0.278 −0.083 0.3547 
Risk factorsRegression coefficientSEStandardized regression coefficientP
Age (years) 0.005 0.006 0.005 0.9423 
Sex 0.019 0.218 0.008 0.9311 
Ferritin (ng/ml) 0.003 0.001 0.373 0.0001 
A1C 0.281 0.064 0.303 <0.0001 
Smoking −0.258 0.278 −0.083 0.3547 

The dependent variable is insulin resistance assessed by HOMA-IR. The independent variables are age, sex, serum ferritin, serum A1C, and smoking status. R2 for entire model = 0.817.

This work was supported by the Yokohama City University Center of Excellence Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

1.
Banerji MA, Buckley MC, Chaiken RL, Gordon D, Lebovitz HE, Kral JG: Liver fat, serum triglycerides and visceral adipose tissue in insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant black men with NIDDM.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
19
:
846
–850,
1995
2.
Busetto L, Tregnaghi A, De Marchi F, Segato G, Foletto M, Sergi G, Favretti F, Lise M, Enzi G: Liver volume and visceral obesity in women with hepatic steatosis undergoing gastric banding.
Obes Res
10
:
408
–411,
2002
3.
Tuomainen TP, Nyyssonen K, Salonen R, Tervahauta A, Korpela H, Lakka T, Kaplan GA, Salonen JT: Body iron stores are associated with serum insulin and blood glucose concentrations: population study in 1,013 eastern Finnish men.
Diabetes Care
20
:
426
–428,
1997
4.
Fernandez-Real JM, Ricart-Engel W, Arroyo E, Balanca R, Casamitjana-Abella R, Cabrero D, Fernandez-Castaner M, Soler J: Serum ferritin as a component of the insulin resistance syndrome.
Diabetes Care
21
:
62
–68,
1998
5.
Jehn M, Clark JM, Guallar E: Serum ferritin and risk of the metabolic syndrome in U.S. adults.
Diabetes Care
27
:
2422
–2428,
2004
6.
Oshaug A, Bugge KH, Bjonnes CH, Borch-Iohnsen B, Neslein IL: Associations between serum ferritin and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy young men: a cross sectional study.
Eur J Clin Nutr
49
:
430
–438,
1995
7.
Gillum RF: Association of serum ferritin and indices of body fat distribution and obesity in Mexican American men: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
25639–25645, 2001
8.
Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Croft JB, Ballew C, Byers T: Relation of body fat distribution to ischemic heart disease: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I (NHANES I) Epidemiologic Follow-up Study.
Am J Epidemiol
142
:
53
–63,
1995
9.
Ono T, Shiga N, Taneda Y, Umemura S: The fasting-plasma glucose range in which insulin resistance measured by homeostasis model assessment correlates with euglycemic clamping.
J Jpn Diabetes Soc
42
:
1005
–1011,
1999
10.
Yoshizumi T, Nakamura T, Yamane M, Islam AHMW, Menju M, Yamasaki K, Arai T, Kotani K, Funahashi T, Yamashita S, Matsuzawa Y: Abdominal fat: standardized technique for measurement at CT.
Radiology
211
:
283
–286,
1999
11.
Piekarski J, Goldberg HI, Royal SA, Axel L, Moss AA: Difference between liver and spleen CT numbers in the normal adult: its usefulness in predicting the presence of diffuse liver disease.
Radiology
137
:
727
–729,
1980
12.
Ricci C, Longo R, Gioulis E, Bosco M, Pollesello P, Masutti F, Croce LS, Paoletti S, de Bernard B, Tiribelli C, Dalla Palma L: Noninvasive in vivo quantitative assessment of fat content in human liver.
J Hepatol
27
:
108
–113,
1997
13.
Balla G, Jacob HS, Balla J, Rosenberg M, Nath K, Apple F, Eaton JW, Vercellotti GM: Ferritin: a cytoprotective antioxidant strategem of endothelium.
J Biol Chem
267
:
18148
–18153,
1992
14.
Loguercio C, De Simone T, D’Auria MV, de Sio I, Federico A, Tuccillo C, Abbatecola AM, Del Vecchio Blanco C; the Italian AISF Clinical Group: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a multicentre clinical study by the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.
Dig Liver Dis
36
:
398
–405,
2004
15.
Fernandez-Real JM, Gutierrez C, Ricart W, Casamitjana R, Fernandez-Castaner M, Vendrell J, Richart C, Soler J: The TNF-alpha gene Nco I polymorphism influences the relationship among insulin resistance, percent body fat, and increased serum leptin levels.
Diabetes
46
:
1468
–1472,
1997
16.
Berge LN, Bonaa KH, Nordoy A: Serum ferritin, sex hormones, and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy women.
Arterioscler Thromb
14
:
857
–861,
1994
17.
Festa M, Ricciardelli G, Mele G, Pietropaolo C, Ruffo A, Colonna A: Overexpression of H ferritin and upregulation of iron regulatory protein genes during differentiation of 3T3–L1 pre-adipocytes.
J Biol Chem
275
:
36708
–36712,
2000

A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.