Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), which complicates 3–7% of all pregnancies, is associated with increased maternal and fetal morbidity (1). Identification of early risk markers may result in improved understanding of disease pathogenesis and identification of potential targets for intervention. We sought to determine the association between early pregnancy insulin resistance and subsequent abnormal glucose tolerance in pregnancy.

We conducted two institutional review board–approved, prospective, nested, case-control studies within Massachusetts General Hospital’s Obstetrical Maternal Study (MOMS) comparing subjects with GDM and subjects with abnormal glucose loading test (GLT) results but no GDM with control subjects. Consecutive MOMS participants with singleton gestations between February 2002 and February 2004 who provided fasting blood samples between 16–18 weeks’ gestation, underwent GLT testing at 24–28 weeks’ gestation, and delivered after 34 weeks were eligible. To limit confounding by other etiologies of insulin resistance, women with pregestational diabetes, preeclampsia, or gestational hypertension were excluded. All eligible women who met the criteria for GDM (1) were included. Women with an abnormal 1-h post-GLT glucose level (≥7.8 mmol/l) but no GDM were randomly selected from 115 eligible women. Control subjects (∼2:1) were randomly selected from 1,016 eligible women who had normal 1-h post-GLT glucose levels. The mean age at GLT testing was comparable between case and control subjects (Table 1).

Plasma glucose was measured using standard techniques. Serum insulin was measured using a radioimmunoassay from Linco Research (St. Louis, MO). Clinical data were obtained from a previously validated and prospectively maintained electronic clinical record (2). Analyses were performed with Stata (Stata, College Park, TX). The homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) was used as an index of insulin resistance (3). The population that did not have GDM or an abnormal GLT served as the reference group in all analyses. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Baseline characteristics (Table 1) demonstrate that fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and HOMA were significantly higher in women who subsequently developed GDM compared with control subjects. Fasting glucose and HOMA were also significantly higher in the group with abnormal GLT and no GDM than in the control subjects.

The risk of GDM was significantly increased for each log-unit increase in HOMA in both univariate analysis (OR 4.9 [95% CI 2.1–11.2], P < 0. 01) and after adjustment for maternal age, race, BMI, gestational age at serum sampling, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and parity (adjusted OR 4.2 [1.3–13.5], P = 0.02). Similarly, for each millimole increase in fasting glucose, the risk of GDM increased significantly in univariate- (OR 5.9 [2.2–15.6], P < 0.01) and multivariable-adjusted (adjusted OR 4.7 [1.5–14.9], P = 0.01) models. Neither HOMA (adjusted OR 2.5 [0.73–9.1], P = 0.14) nor fasting glucose (adjusted OR 3.4 [0.81–14.0], P = 0.09) was significantly associated with subsequent abnormal GLT with no GDM.

In this prospective study, we found that women in whom GDM was diagnosed at 24–28 weeks of gestation demonstrated higher levels of fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and HOMA at ∼17 weeks in pregnancy compared with women who had normoglycemic pregnancies. The risk of GDM increased significantly with increasing HOMA and fasting glucose levels, independent of other variables that are known to be associated with GDM. While there are prior reports with similar findings (47), such studies either examined small numbers of high-risk women (4,5) or used surrogate markers of insulin resistance (6). Similar results have been noted in nonpregnant populations, where HOMA has been shown to be associated with the later development of type 2 diabetes (8,9). Our findings lend support to the hypothesis that increased insulin resistance and increased fasting glucose at 16–18 weeks’ gestation are associated with the subsequent development of overt glucose intolerance later in pregnancy.

Table 1—

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of the study population

Control subjectsSubjects with abnormal GLT* and no GDMSubjects with GDM
n 73 37 35 
Baseline characteristics    
    Age (years) 31.4 ± 5.7 32.9 ± 4.4 33.6 ± 5.1 
    Gestational age at fasting serum sampling (weeks) 17.3 ± 1.3 17.2 ± 1.2 17.3 ± 1.3 
    Nulliparous (%) 47 59 43 
    BMI (kg/m226 ± 5 26 ± 4 29 ± 6 
    Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 111 ± 12 113 ± 11 115 ± 10 
    Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 69 ± 8 70 ± 9 73 ± 8 
    Race (%)    
Non-Hispanic white 79 57 69 
Hispanic 15 16 14 
African American 
Asian 
Other/Unknown 16 
    Fasting glucose (mmol/l) 4.4 ± 0.4 4.6 ± 0.4 4.8 ± 0.6 
    Fasting insulin (μU/ml) 10.1 ± 5.9 11.5 ± 6.3 15.8 ± 9.6 
    HOMA§ 2.0 ± 1.3 2.4 ± 1.7 3.5 ± 2.5 
    GLT glucose (mmol/l) 5.9 ± 0.9 8.6 ± 0.7 9.3 ± 0.1 
    Gestational age at GLT testing (weeks) 27.8 ± 1.0 28.3 ± 1.0 27.4 ± 2.2 
Delivery characteristics    
    Gestational age at delivery (weeks) 39.2 ± 1.2 39.3 ± 1.5 38.9 ± 1.3 
    Birth weight (g) 3,494 ± 456 3,456 ± 444 3,518 ± 528 
Control subjectsSubjects with abnormal GLT* and no GDMSubjects with GDM
n 73 37 35 
Baseline characteristics    
    Age (years) 31.4 ± 5.7 32.9 ± 4.4 33.6 ± 5.1 
    Gestational age at fasting serum sampling (weeks) 17.3 ± 1.3 17.2 ± 1.2 17.3 ± 1.3 
    Nulliparous (%) 47 59 43 
    BMI (kg/m226 ± 5 26 ± 4 29 ± 6 
    Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 111 ± 12 113 ± 11 115 ± 10 
    Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 69 ± 8 70 ± 9 73 ± 8 
    Race (%)    
Non-Hispanic white 79 57 69 
Hispanic 15 16 14 
African American 
Asian 
Other/Unknown 16 
    Fasting glucose (mmol/l) 4.4 ± 0.4 4.6 ± 0.4 4.8 ± 0.6 
    Fasting insulin (μU/ml) 10.1 ± 5.9 11.5 ± 6.3 15.8 ± 9.6 
    HOMA§ 2.0 ± 1.3 2.4 ± 1.7 3.5 ± 2.5 
    GLT glucose (mmol/l) 5.9 ± 0.9 8.6 ± 0.7 9.3 ± 0.1 
    Gestational age at GLT testing (weeks) 27.8 ± 1.0 28.3 ± 1.0 27.4 ± 2.2 
Delivery characteristics    
    Gestational age at delivery (weeks) 39.2 ± 1.2 39.3 ± 1.5 38.9 ± 1.3 
    Birth weight (g) 3,494 ± 456 3,456 ± 444 3,518 ± 528 

Data are means ± SD.

*

An abnormal GLT was defined as a glucose level ≥7.8 mmol/l 1 h following a nonfasting 50-g oral glucose load (ref. 1).

GDM was defined using the results of a fasting 100-g oral glucose tolerance test, according to criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ref. 1).

P < 0.05 compared with control subjects.

§

HOMA = [fasting glucose (in mmol/l) × fasting insulin (in μU/ml)]/22.5 (ref. 4).

This work was supported by grants from the American Kidney Fund (to K.V.S.), the American Diabetes Association (to J.L.E. and R.T.), and the National Institutes of Health (HD39223 to R.T. and RR17376 to M.W.).

1.
Gestational diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Care
27 (Suppl. 1)
:
S88
–S90,
2004
2.
Wolf M, Sandler L, Hsu K, Vossen-Smirnakis K, Ecker JL, Thadhani R: First-trimester C-reactive protein and subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Care
26
:
819
–824,
2003
3.
Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC: Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man.
Diabetologia
28
:
412
–419,
1985
4.
Catalano PM, Tyzbir ED, Wolfe RR, Calles J, Roman NM, Amini SB, Sims EA: Carbohydrate metabolism during pregnancy in control subjects and women with gestational diabetes.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
264
:
E60
–E67,
1993
5.
Catalano P, Huston L, Amini S, Kalhan S: Longitudinal changes in glucose metabolism during pregnancy in obese women with normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
180
:
903
–916,
1999
6.
Thadhani R, Wolf M, Hsu-Blatman K, Sandler L, Nathan D, Ecker JL: First trimester sex hormone binding-globulin and subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
189
:
171
–176,
2003
7.
Sacks D, Chen W, Wolde-Tsadik G, Buchanan T: Fasting plasma glucose test at the first prenatal visit as a screen for gestational diabetes.
Obstet Gynecol
101
:
1197
–1203,
2003
8.
Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit J, Oberhollenzer F, Egger G, Meigs J, Bonadonna R, Muggeo M: Population-based incidence rates and risk factors for type 2 diabetes in white individuals: the Bruneck study.
Diabetes
53
:
1782
–1789,
2004
9.
Osei K, Rhinesmith S, Gaillard T, Schuster D: Impaired insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and glucose effectiveness predict future development of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes in pre-diabetic African Americans.
Diabetes Care
27
:
1439
–1446,
2004

J.L.E. and R.T. contributed equally to this work as senior authors.

A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.