OBJECTIVE—We investigated the morphological characteristics of coronary arteries in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) using computer-assisted quantitative coronary angiography. IGT is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, the morphological changes developing in the coronary arteries of patients with IGT remain unknown.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 534 patients with angina pectoris were studied. Of these, 144 patients were being treated for diabetes. The remaining 390 patients were classified as follows depending on the results of a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test: normal glucose tolerance (NGT) (n = 117), impaired fasting glucose (n = 3), IGT (n = 136), and diabetes pattern (preclinical diabetes) (n = 134). The diameters of the middle section of all major coronary artery segments were measured and averaged to determine the averaged vessel diameter (AVD). We defined segments of a diameter of ≤1.5 mm as diseased lesions and determined the averaged lesion length (ALL).

RESULTS—AVD and ALL were significantly different among patients with IGT and those with NGT. Patients with diabetes (preclinical and/or treated) had smaller AVD and longer ALL than those with IGT. By multivariate analysis, postprandial glucose levels were shown to be independently associated with an AVD <3.0 mm and an ALL >20 mm.

CONCLUSIONS—Diffuse coronary artery narrowing develops not only in patients with diabetes but also in those with IGT. This morphological change is associated with postprandial hyperglycemia.

Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) has been regarded as intermediate between normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and overt diabetes. Recently, evidence has been accumulating that IGT may play a pathological role as one aspect of the metabolic syndrome. Epidemiological studies, i.e., the Funagata and DECODE (Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative Analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe) studies (1,2), indicated that IGT characterized as postprandial hyperglycemia is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, it is not known whether morphological changes develop in the coronary arteries of patients with IGT, as in those of diabetic patients for whom small vessel diameter and long lesion length (diffuse narrowing) are found in multiple vessels (3,4). In the present study, we assessed coronary angiographic features in patients with IGT by using computer-assisted quantitative analysis.

From April 2000 to June 2002, 1,529 patients were hospitalized due to nonischemic and ischemic heart disease in our facility of the National Cardiovascular Center, a tertiary referral hospital in the northern district of Osaka, Japan. We obtained informed consent and performed quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in patients with recurrent chest pain associated with electrocardiographic and/or echocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischemia and without contraindications to the administration of iodinated contrast agent (e.g., predialysis state of renal failure). Thus, a total of 914 patients who had organic stenosis were diagnosed with angina pectoris. Of these patients, the 112 patients who previously underwent coronary artery bypass surgery and the 126 patients with chronic total occlusion were excluded because of difficulty of QCA analysis. Among the remaining 676 patients, 144 patients in whom diabetes had previously been diagnosed and who were being treated by diet therapy alone (n = 48), oral hypoglycemic agents (n = 70), or insulin (n = 26) were defined as the treated diabetes group. The average duration of diabetes in this patient group was 17 years. Also, a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was refused or could not be performed in some very old or severely ill patients who underwent urgent coronary artery bypass surgery, required mechanical circulatory support, or had refractory infectious diseases (n = 142). Finally, 390 patients with angina pectoris underwent a 75-g OGTT and were divided into the following four groups: 117 patients with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), 3 patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), 136 patients with IGT, and 134 patients who showed diabetes pattern (preclinical diabetes).

The 75-g OGTT

The 75-g OGTT was performed after overnight fasting. Venous blood samples were taken during fasting and at 120 min after the glucose load to measure blood glucose level. The World Health Organization criteria were used for classifying the OGTT results (5) in the present study. The NGT group was defined as having a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level <6.1 mmol/l and a postprandial glucose level <7.8 mmol/l. The IFG group was defined as having a FPG level ≥6.1 mmol/l but <7.0 mmol/l and a postprandial glucose level <7.8 mmol/l. The IGT group was defined as having a FPG level <7.0 mmol/l and a postprandial glucose level ≥7.8 mmol/l but <11.1 mmol/l. The preclinical diabetes group was defined as having a FPG level ≥7.0 mmol/l and a postprandial glucose level ≥11.1 mmol/l.

Coronary angiography and quantitative analysis

Selective coronary angiography was performed in multiple projections after administration of intracoronary nitroglycerin (0.125–0.25 mg). Coronary angiographic measurements were performed using computer-assisted quantitative analysis (CMS-QCA version 4.0; MEDIS medical imaging systems, Leiden, the Netherlands). In addition to the Gensini score, which has been validated previously (6), the following parameters were used for the assessment of morphological characteristics in global coronary trees. We measured the diameters of the middle section in each major coronary artery segment: segments 1, 2, and 3 of the right coronary artery; segments 6, 7, and 8 of the left anterior descending artery; and segments 11 and 13 of the left circumflex artery. For each patient, we calculated the average diameter of these segments, which was defined as averaged vessel diameter (AVD). We also defined segments narrowed to a diameter of ≤1.5 mm as diseased lesions (with the exception of the far distal portion of segments 8 and 13 showing a smooth and regular edge) and determined averaged lesion length (ALL). The data from QCA were assessed by an experienced cardiologist (I.M.), who was blind to the glucose tolerance status. The interobserver correlation coefficient and the percent error were 0.99 and 7.3 ± 4.9% for AVD and 0.93 and 7.4 ± 5.9% for ALL. The intraobserver correlation coefficient and the percent error were 0.93 and 3.6 ± 2.2% for AVD and 0.98 and 3.9 ± 2.6% for ALL.

Study design

All the patients underwent history screening, a physical examination and angiographic and laboratory analyses including HbA1c (A1C), total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and creatinine levels. In addition, patients were assessed for the prevalence of coronary risk factors, i.e., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking habits, and family history, and for the presence of diabetes complications, i.e., nephropathy, a history of myocardial and cerebral infarction, and the presence of arteriosclerotic obliterance. BMI was calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters (2). Blood glucose levels measured 2 h after breakfast or the 75-g OGTT were defined as those in the postprandial state in the present study. Among the four groups (NGT, IGT, preclinical diabetes, and treated diabetes), ANOVA was performed followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing. For univariate analysis, the following clinical variables and risk factors were regarded as covariates: age, sex, glycemic status (fasting, postprandial glucose level, and A1C level), lipid profiles (total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol levels), creatinine level, BMI, and the use of cardiovascular medications. On the basis of the results of univariate analysis, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to investigate the independent predictors of small AVD (<3.0 mm) and long ALL (>20 mm). A P value of <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All analyses were performed using Stat-View software, version 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Most of the parameters, with the exception of BMI, triglyceride and HDL cholesterol levels, and the prevalence of β-blocker treatment, were not different between the IGT and NGT groups. The prevalence of renal failure (serum creatinine level ≥177 μmol/l) was higher in the treated diabetes group than in the IGT group.

Glucose metabolism

As shown in Table 1, the fasting glucose and A1C levels were similar between the NGT and IGT groups. However, the postprandial glucose level was significantly different between the NGT and IGT groups (P < 0.05). All of these parameters relating to glucose metabolism were significantly higher in the preclinical and treated diabetes groups than in the IGT group (P < 0.05).

QCA

The results of QCA are summarized in Fig. 1. In the IGT group, smaller AVD and longer ALL were found than in the NGT group (P < 0.05). These angiographic changes were more prominent in the treated diabetes group (P < 0.05). When assessed by the Gensini score, statistics reached significance only between the NGT and the treated diabetes groups.

Univariate and multivariate analyses

We found that the angiographic characteristics of the IGT and diabetes groups were small AVD and long ALL. Therefore, to investigate which clinical variables and risk factors were associated with these morphological changes in the coronary artery, we performed univariate and multivariate analyses (Table 2). Age, female sex, and postprandial glucose and creatinine levels were significant predictors of small AVD (<3.0 mm) by univariate analysis. By multivariate analysis, female sex and postprandial glucose and creatinine levels were independent predictors. In addition, age, female sex and fasting and postprandial glucose levels, A1C, and lower HDL cholesterol levels were significant predictors of long ALL (>20 mm) by univariate analysis. Among these parameters, age, female sex, and postprandial glucose and lower HDL cholesterol levels were independent predictors by multivariate analysis.

The major findings of the present study using computer-assisted QCA analysis are that the morphological changes of small vessel diameter and diffuse vessel narrowing developed not only in the diabetes groups but also in the IGT group. Furthermore, these changes were associated with postprandial hyperglycemia.

High prevalence of IGT in patients with coronary artery disease

A previous study reported a high prevalence of abnormal glucose tolerance (IGT 35% and diabetes 31%) in 181 patients with acute myocardial infarction (6). In the present study of patients with angina pectoris, the prevalences of IGT and diabetes (preclinical and treated) were 24.9 and 52.5%, respectively. Also, FPG and A1C levels were similar between the IGT and NGT groups. These findings indicate that IGT plays a pathological role and its diagnosis based on a 75-g OGTT is important in patients with coronary artery diseases.

Angiographic characteristics in patients with IGT

Although IGT is a risk factor not only for the development of diabetes but also for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (1,710), there have been few reports of the angiographic characteristics in patients with IGT. In a previous study of 99 patients with coronary artery disease (11), abnormal glucose tolerance (IGT and diabetes) was found in 37 patients, for whom the degree of coronary atherosclerosis, assessed by a hand-held caliper method, was the same as that for patients with NGT. Another study (12) was performed using 466 patients who were undergoing coronary angiography, including patients with chest pain syndrome (10%) and those with nonischemic cardiac disease (21%). QCA analysis could not reveal differences between the NGT group (n = 291) and the IFG group (n = 82), which would be due to the high percentage of patients without significant coronary artery narrowings (67–73%) in these two groups. Therefore, in the present study, we focused on patients both with angina pectoris and with angiographically documented coronary artery narrowings.

QCA analysis has the advantage of being more accurate and reproducible than visual hand-held caliper measurements (1316). However, in particular patients with diffuse narrowings it is difficult to identify a reference segment against which diseased lesions can be compared. In these patients, there is the possibility of underestimating the severity of vascular disease when it is assessed by “percent” diameter of stenosis. In fact, as shown in Fig. 1, this could happen with the measurement of Gensini score, which enabled us to detect changes in patients with IGT. In the present study, we defined segments narrowed to a diameter of ≤1.5 mm as diseased lesions in the major proximal segment of coronary trees. Although further modification of methodology to consider left main coronary artery lesions is needed, the present study using QCA analysis, which assesses absolute values, is a novel method to assess pathological changes of diffuse and small coronary lesions.

We found that there were significant differences in AVD and ALL between the NGT and IGT groups, indicating that angiographic atherosclerotic changes (smaller vessel diameter and longer lesion length) develop in coronary arteries in patients with IGT. The degree of changes found in patients with IGT was similar to that in patients with preclinical diabetes but was less than that in treated diabetic patients in whom FPG and A1C levels were markedly elevated.

Postprandial hyperglycemia as an important determinant for coronary atherosclerosis

As seen in previous epidemiological studies, such as the DECODE study (2), the risk of cardiovascular disease is strongly associated with postprandial hyperglycemia. In the present study, multivariate analysis showed that the postprandial glucose level was an independent predictor for both small AVD (<3.0 mm) and long ALL (>20 mm) (1722), indicating that postprandial hyperglycemia is strongly associated with diffuse and small coronary artery narrowing in patients with abnormal glucose tolerance.

Hyperglycemia promotes atherogenesis by several possible mechanisms, including increased generation of free radicals (oxidative stress), decreased production of nitric oxide, activation of the polyol pathway and the diacylglycerol–protein kinase C system, and increases in nonenzymatic glycation products and the glycosylation of certain proteins (2328). A recent in vivo study (29) demonstrated that inflammatory cytokine levels were more affected by oscillatory than continuous hyperglycemia and that this inflammatory response to hyperglycemic spikes was attenuated by antioxidants. These findings may explain, in part, why acute hyperglycemia occurring postprandially could produce cardiovascular damage.

Limitation

Because this is a retrospective clinical investigation, we acknowledge the possibility of a selection bias for some patients. Also, a statistical association does not prove that the risk factor directly promotes coronary artery atherosclerosis. Thus, in addition to measurements of potential confounders (e.g., fat distribution, physical fitness, or inflammation), prospective studies of an interventional nature will be required to determine whether postprandial hyperglycemia has a causal role in development of coronary artery disease.

In summary, the present study using quantitative angiographic analysis demonstrates that postprandial hyperglycemia is associated with the development of diffuse coronary artery narrowings in patients with angina pectoris.

Figure 1—

Comparison of QCA results of AVD, ALL, and Gensini score among the four groups. DM, diabetes.

Figure 1—

Comparison of QCA results of AVD, ALL, and Gensini score among the four groups. DM, diabetes.

Close modal
Table 1—

Patient characteristics

NGTIGTPreclinical diabetesTreated diabetes
n 117 136 134 144 
Age (years) 68 ± 10 68 ± 10 69 ± 10 70 ± 8 
Male 97 (83) 113 (83) 111 (83) 106 (74) 
BMI (kg/m222.9 ± 2.8* 23.8 ± 2.7 24.0 ± 3.4 23.4 ± 3.1 
Unstable angina pectoris 36 (31) 50 (37) 53 (39) 58 (40) 
Coronary risk factors     
    Hypertension 80 (68) 105 (77) 108 (81) 113 (79) 
    Hypercholesterolemia 80 (68) 101 (74) 97 (72) 105 (73) 
    Smoking 38 (33) 45 (33) 40 (30) 39 (27) 
    Family history of CAD 26 (22) 37 (27) 22 (16) 27 (19) 
    Serum creatinine ≥177 μmol/l 4 (3) 1 (1) 4 (3) 15 (11)* 
    Peripheral vascular disease 9 (8) 12 (9) 22 (17) 19 (13) 
    Stroke 27 (23) 23 (17) 28 (21) 31 (22) 
    Previous MI 26 (22) 20 (15) 14 (11) 31 (22) 
    Previous PCI 55 (47) 64 (47) 64 (48) 67 (46) 
    PCI 78 (91) 98 (72) 83 (62) 104 (72) 
    Stent 66 (73) 78 (80) 58 (69) 79 (76) 
Glycemic status     
    Fasting glucose (mmol/l) 5.02 ± 0.43 5.11 ± 0.49 6.05 ± 1.44 7.26 ± 2.00* 
    Postprandial glucose (mmol/l) 6.16 ± 1.24* 9.42 ± 1.09 12.95 ± 1.87* 12.16 ± 3.41* 
    A1C (%) 5.3 ± 0.4 5.5 ± 0.4 6.1 ± 0.9* 7.3 ± 1.2* 
Lipid profile     
    Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 4.93 ± 0.88 4.93 ± 0.91 5.03 ± 0.94 4.79 ± 0.89 
    Triglycerides (mmol/l) 2.78 ± 1.56* 3.29 ± 1.54 3.48 ± 2.09 3.53 ± 1.99 
    HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.21 ± 0.35* 1.07 ± 0.32 1.06 ± 0.29 1.03 ± 0.29 
    LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 3.18 ± 0.75 3.19 ± 0.86 3.27 ± 0.86 3.06 ± 0.82 
Medical treatment     
    Aspirin 112 (96) 119 (88) 119 (89) 127 (88) 
    β-Blocker 55 (47)* 95 (70) 94 (70) 87 (60) 
    Calcium blocker 85 (73) 88 (65) 95 (71) 97 (67) 
    ACE inhibitor 27 (23) 36 (27) 43 (32) 44 (31) 
    Statin 54 (46) 63 (46) 67 (50) 63 (44) 
NGTIGTPreclinical diabetesTreated diabetes
n 117 136 134 144 
Age (years) 68 ± 10 68 ± 10 69 ± 10 70 ± 8 
Male 97 (83) 113 (83) 111 (83) 106 (74) 
BMI (kg/m222.9 ± 2.8* 23.8 ± 2.7 24.0 ± 3.4 23.4 ± 3.1 
Unstable angina pectoris 36 (31) 50 (37) 53 (39) 58 (40) 
Coronary risk factors     
    Hypertension 80 (68) 105 (77) 108 (81) 113 (79) 
    Hypercholesterolemia 80 (68) 101 (74) 97 (72) 105 (73) 
    Smoking 38 (33) 45 (33) 40 (30) 39 (27) 
    Family history of CAD 26 (22) 37 (27) 22 (16) 27 (19) 
    Serum creatinine ≥177 μmol/l 4 (3) 1 (1) 4 (3) 15 (11)* 
    Peripheral vascular disease 9 (8) 12 (9) 22 (17) 19 (13) 
    Stroke 27 (23) 23 (17) 28 (21) 31 (22) 
    Previous MI 26 (22) 20 (15) 14 (11) 31 (22) 
    Previous PCI 55 (47) 64 (47) 64 (48) 67 (46) 
    PCI 78 (91) 98 (72) 83 (62) 104 (72) 
    Stent 66 (73) 78 (80) 58 (69) 79 (76) 
Glycemic status     
    Fasting glucose (mmol/l) 5.02 ± 0.43 5.11 ± 0.49 6.05 ± 1.44 7.26 ± 2.00* 
    Postprandial glucose (mmol/l) 6.16 ± 1.24* 9.42 ± 1.09 12.95 ± 1.87* 12.16 ± 3.41* 
    A1C (%) 5.3 ± 0.4 5.5 ± 0.4 6.1 ± 0.9* 7.3 ± 1.2* 
Lipid profile     
    Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 4.93 ± 0.88 4.93 ± 0.91 5.03 ± 0.94 4.79 ± 0.89 
    Triglycerides (mmol/l) 2.78 ± 1.56* 3.29 ± 1.54 3.48 ± 2.09 3.53 ± 1.99 
    HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.21 ± 0.35* 1.07 ± 0.32 1.06 ± 0.29 1.03 ± 0.29 
    LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 3.18 ± 0.75 3.19 ± 0.86 3.27 ± 0.86 3.06 ± 0.82 
Medical treatment     
    Aspirin 112 (96) 119 (88) 119 (89) 127 (88) 
    β-Blocker 55 (47)* 95 (70) 94 (70) 87 (60) 
    Calcium blocker 85 (73) 88 (65) 95 (71) 97 (67) 
    ACE inhibitor 27 (23) 36 (27) 43 (32) 44 (31) 
    Statin 54 (46) 63 (46) 67 (50) 63 (44) 

Data are means ± SD or n (%).

*

P < 0.05 vs. IGT;

P < 0.05 vs. preclinical diabetes;

P < 0.05 vs. treated diabetes. CAD, coronary artery disease; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Table 2—

Univariate and multivariate analyses

Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Odds ratio (95% CI)P valueOdds ratio (95% CI)P value
Predictors for small vessel diameter (AVD <3.0 mm)     
    Age 1.035 (1.008–1.064) 0.0117 1.028 (0.999–1.056) 0.055 
    Female sex 3.293 (1.288–8.419) 0.0128 2.916 (1.118–7.608) 0.0287 
    Fasting glucose 1.005 (0.995–1.015) 0.3712   
    Postprandial glucose 1.008 (1.004–1.013) 0.0007 1.008 (1.003–1.013) 0.0016 
    A1C 1.181 (0.922–1.513) 0.1874   
    Total cholesterol 1.001 (0.994–1.009) 0.7682   
    HDL cholesterol 1.009 (0.987–1.032) 0.4166   
    LDL cholesterol 0.998 (0.990–1.006) 0.6129   
    Creatinine 1.145 (1.030–1.273) 0.0125 1.171 (1.031–1.331) 0.0155 
    Hypertension 0.883 (0.471–1.655) 0.6977   
    Smoking habit 0.843 (0.486–1.461) 0.5425   
Predictors for long lesion length (ALL >20 mm)     
    Age 1.041 (1.010–1.073) 0.0091 1.040 (1.007–1.074) 0.0187 
    Female sex 2.040 (1.115–3.735) 0.0208 2.051 (1.021–4.120) 0.0434 
    Fasting glucose 1.010 (1.002–1.018) 0.0106 1.002 (0.991–1.013 0.3780 
    Postprandial glucose 1.009 (1.005–1.014) <0.0001 1.009 (1.002–1.015) 0.0059 
    A1C 1.398 (1.148–1.703) 0.0009 1.211 (0.928–1.579) 0.1584 
    Total cholesterol 1.000 (0.992–1.008) 0.9550   
    HDL cholesterol 0.969 (0.944–0.995) 0.0206 0.969 (0.943–0.997) 0.0296 
    LDL cholesterol 1.005 (0.997–1.014) 0.2346   
    Creatinine 1.021 (0.885–1.178) 0.7762   
    Hypertension 1.317 (0.660–2.628) 0.4347   
    Smoking habit 0.510 (0.257–1.012) 0.0540   
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Odds ratio (95% CI)P valueOdds ratio (95% CI)P value
Predictors for small vessel diameter (AVD <3.0 mm)     
    Age 1.035 (1.008–1.064) 0.0117 1.028 (0.999–1.056) 0.055 
    Female sex 3.293 (1.288–8.419) 0.0128 2.916 (1.118–7.608) 0.0287 
    Fasting glucose 1.005 (0.995–1.015) 0.3712   
    Postprandial glucose 1.008 (1.004–1.013) 0.0007 1.008 (1.003–1.013) 0.0016 
    A1C 1.181 (0.922–1.513) 0.1874   
    Total cholesterol 1.001 (0.994–1.009) 0.7682   
    HDL cholesterol 1.009 (0.987–1.032) 0.4166   
    LDL cholesterol 0.998 (0.990–1.006) 0.6129   
    Creatinine 1.145 (1.030–1.273) 0.0125 1.171 (1.031–1.331) 0.0155 
    Hypertension 0.883 (0.471–1.655) 0.6977   
    Smoking habit 0.843 (0.486–1.461) 0.5425   
Predictors for long lesion length (ALL >20 mm)     
    Age 1.041 (1.010–1.073) 0.0091 1.040 (1.007–1.074) 0.0187 
    Female sex 2.040 (1.115–3.735) 0.0208 2.051 (1.021–4.120) 0.0434 
    Fasting glucose 1.010 (1.002–1.018) 0.0106 1.002 (0.991–1.013 0.3780 
    Postprandial glucose 1.009 (1.005–1.014) <0.0001 1.009 (1.002–1.015) 0.0059 
    A1C 1.398 (1.148–1.703) 0.0009 1.211 (0.928–1.579) 0.1584 
    Total cholesterol 1.000 (0.992–1.008) 0.9550   
    HDL cholesterol 0.969 (0.944–0.995) 0.0206 0.969 (0.943–0.997) 0.0296 
    LDL cholesterol 1.005 (0.997–1.014) 0.2346   
    Creatinine 1.021 (0.885–1.178) 0.7762   
    Hypertension 1.317 (0.660–2.628) 0.4347   
    Smoking habit 0.510 (0.257–1.012) 0.0540   
1
Tominaga M, Eguchi H, Manaka H, Igarashi K, Kato T, Sekikawa A: Impaired glucose tolerance is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but not impaired fasting glucose: the Funagata Diabetes Study.
Diabetes Care
22
:
920
–924,
1999
2
The DECODE study group, the European Diabetes Epidemiology Group: Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality: comparison of fasting and 2-hour diagnostic criteria.
Arch Intern Med
161
:
397
–404,
2001
3
Natali A, Vichi S, Landi P, Severi S, L′Abbate A, Ferrannini E: Coronary atherosclerosis in type II diabetes: angiographic findings and clinical outcome.
Diabetologia
43
:
632
–641,
2000
4
Vigorita VJ, Moore GW, Hutchins GM: Absence of correlation between coronary arterial atherosclerosis and severity or duration of diabetes mellitus of adult onset.
Am J Cardiol
46
:
535
–542,
1980
5
Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ: Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.
Diabet Med
15
:
539
–553,
1998
6
Gensini GG: Coronary Angiography. Mount Kisco, NY, Futura,
1975
7
Norhammar A, Tenerz A, Nilsson G, Hamsten A, Efendic S, Ryden L, Malmberg K: Glucose metabolism in patients with acute myocardial infarction and no previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: a prospective study.
Lancet
359
:
2140
–2144,
2002
8
Balkau B, Shipley M, Jarrett RJ, Pyorala K, Pyorala M, Forhan A, Eschwege E: High blood glucose concentration is a risk factor for mortality in middle-aged nondiabetic men. 20-year follow-up in the Whitehall Study, the Paris Prospective Study, and the Helsinki Policemen Study.
Diabetes Care
21
:
360
–365,
1998
9
Laakso M, Lehto SI: Epidemiology of risk factors for cardiovascular disease in diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance.
Atherosclerosis
137
:
S65
–S73,
1998
10
Harris MI: Impaired glucose tolerance: prevalence and conversion to NIDDM.
Diabet Med
13
:
S40
–S45,
1996
11
Baron AD: Impaired glucose tolerance as a disease.
Am J Cardiol
88 (Suppl. 6A)
:
16H
–19H, 2001
12
Seibaek M, Sloth C, Vallebo L, Hansen T, Urhammer SA Burchardt H, Torp-Pedersen C, Pedersen O, Hildebrandt P: Glucose tolerance status and severity of coronary artery disease in men referred to coronary arteriography.
Am Heart J
133
:
622
–629,
1997
13
Ledru F, Ducimetiere P, Battaglia S, Courbon D Beverelli F, Guize L, Guermonprez JL, Diebold B: New diagnostic criteria for diabetes and coronary artery disease: insights from an angiographic study.
J Am Coll Cardiol
37
:
1543
–1550,
2001
14
Brown BG, Bolson F, Frimer M, Dodge HT: Quantitative coronary angiography: estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance and atheroma mass of coronary lesions using the arteriogram and digital computation.
Circulation
55
:
329
–335,
1977
15
Mancini JGB: Quantitative coronary arteriography: Development of methods, limitations and clinical applications.
Am J Cardiac Imaging
2
:
98
–109,
1988
16
Reiber JH, Kooijman CJ, Slager CJ, Gerbrands JJ, Schuurbiers JCH, Boer AD, Wijns W, Serruys PW, Hugenholtz PG: Coronary artery dimension from cineangiograms: methodology and validation of a computer assisted analysis procedure.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging
MI- 
3
:
131
–141,
1984
17
Hanekamp C, Koolen J, Bonnier H, Oldroyd K, de Boer MJ, Heublein B, Visser C, Small Vessel Study Group: Randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty versus silicon carbon-coated stent implantation for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries.
Am J Cardiol
93
:
1233
–1237,
2004
18
Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M, Reeves F, Traboulsi M, Title LM Kuntz RE, Popma JJ, C-SIRIUS investigators: The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS).
J Am Coll Cardiol
43
:
1110
–1115,
2004
19
Kereiakes DJ: Coronary small-vessel stenting in the era of drug elution.
Rev Cardiovasc Med
5(Suppl. 2)
:
S34
–S45,
2004
20
Di Sciascio G, Patti G, Nasso G, Manzoli A, D′Ambrosio A, Abbate A: Early and long-term results of stenting of diffuse coronary artery disease.
Am J Cardiol
86
:
1166
–1170,
2000
21
Singh M, Gersh BJ, McClelland RL, Ho KK, Willerson JT, Penny WF, Holmes DR Jr: Clinical and angiographic predictors of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the prevention of restenosis with tranilast and its outcomes (PRESTO) trial.
Circulation
109
:
2727
–2731,
2004
22
Ross MJ, Herrmann HC, Moliterno DJ, Blankenship JC, Demopoulos L, DiBattiste PM, Ellis SG, Ghazzal Z, Martin JL White J, Topol EJ: Angiographic variables predict increased risk for adverse ischemic events after coronary stenting with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: results from the TARGET trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol
42
:
981
–988,2003
23
Brownlee M: Advanced protein glycosylation in diabetes and aging.
Annu Rev Med
46
:
223
–234,
1995
24
Inoguchi T, Battan R, Handler E, Sportsman JR, Heath W, King GL: Preferential elevation of protein kinase C isoform β2 and diacylglycerol levels in the aorta and heart of diabetic rats: differential reversibility to glycemic control by islet cell transplantation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
89
:
11059
–22063,
1992
25
Baynes JW: Role of oxidative stress in development of complications in diabetes.
Diabetes
40
:
405
–412,
1991
26
Haffner SM: The importance of hyperglycemia in the nonfasting state to the development of cardiovascular disease.
Endocr Rev
19
:
583
–592,
1998
27
de Vegt F, Dekker JM, Ruhe HG, Stehouwer CD, Nijpels G, Bouter LM, Heine RJ: Hyperglycemia is associated with all cause and cardiovascular mortality in the Hoorn population: the Hoorn Study.
Diabetologia
42
:
926
–931,
1999
28
Harold EL: Effect of the postprandial state on nontraditional risk factors.
Am J Cardiol
88 (Suppl. 6A)
:
20H
–25H, 2001
29
Esposito K, Nappo F, Marfella R, Giugliano G, Giugliano F, Ciotola M, Quagliaro L, Ceriello A, Giugliano D: Inflammatory cytokine concentrations are acutely increased by hyperglycemia in humans: role of oxidative stress.
Circulation
106
:
2067
–2072,
2002

A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.