OBJECTIVE—After the demonstration that one-third of male patients with type 2 diabetes have hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism, we have shown that patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism also have markedly elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations. We have now hypothesized that type 2 diabetic subjects with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism may have a lower hematocrit because testosterone stimulates, whereas chronic inflammation suppresses, erythropoiesis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Seventy patients with type 2 diabetes at a tertiary referral center were included in this study.

RESULTS—The mean hematocrit in patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (n = 37), defined as calculated free testosterone (cFT) of <6.5 ng/dl, was 40.6 ± 1.1%, whereas that in eugonadal patients (n = 33) was 43.3 ± 0.7% (P = 0.011). The hematocrit was related to cFT concentration (r = 0.46; P < 0.0001); it was inversely related to plasma CRP concentration (r = 0.41; P < 0.0004). Patients with CRP <3 mg/l had a higher hematocrit (42.7 ± 0.7%) than those with CRP >3 mg/l (39.9 ± 1.1%; P < 0.05). The prevalence of normocytic normochromic anemia (hemoglobin <13 g/dl) was 23% in the entire group, whereas it was 37.8% in the men with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism and 3% in the eugonadal men (P < 0.01). Erythropoietin concentration was elevated or high normal in all 11 patients with anemia in whom it was tested.

CONCLUSIONS—We conclude that hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism in male type 2 diabetic subjects is associated with a lower hematocrit and a frequent occurrence of mild normocytic normochromic anemia with normal or high erythropoietin concentrations. In these patients, hematocrit is also inversely related to CRP concentration. Thus, low testosterone and chronic inflammatory mechanisms may contribute to mild anemia. Such patients may also have a high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in view of their markedly elevated CRP concentrations.

After our previous observations that one-third of patients with type 2 diabetes have hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (1), that type 1 diabetic subjects do not suffer from this condition (2), and that the patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism have markedly elevated plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations (V.B., R.T., S.D., A. Chandel, A.C., H.G., P.D., unpublished observations), an index of systemic inflammation, we have now studied whether patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism have lower hemoglobin concentrations. Testosterone is known to exert a stimulatory effect on erythropoiesis in the bone marrow (3). Inflammation, on the other hand, is known to suppress erythropoiesis, partly through its direct action on erythropoiesis and partly through its suppression of erythropoietin secretion (47). Thus, we hypothesized that hematocrit in patients with type 2 diabetes is lower in patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism who also have an elevated CRP concentration, an index of systemic inflammation.

The study was conducted in the Diabetes-Endocrinology Center of Western New York, a tertiary referral center affiliated with the State University of New York and Kaleida Health in Buffalo, New York, and in an endocrinology specialty clinic in Midland, Texas. The study was carried out in 70 male patients (50 from Buffalo and 20 from Midland) referred to the centers for management of type 2 diabetes. Patients with a known history of primary or secondary hypogonadism, hypopituitarism, renal failure, cirrhosis, glucocorticoid therapy, or known HIV infection were excluded from the study. Demographic parameters were collected, and height, weight, glucose, and HbA1c (A1C) were measured. The age of patients (means ± SE) was 56.3 ± 1.6 years (range 24–78), weight was 103.2 ± 2.9 kg (49.5–156), BMI was 32.8 ± 0.9 kg/m2 (18.4–54.1), and A1C was 7.74 ± 0.25% (4.7–14). The clinical and biochemical features of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Fasting blood samples were obtained to measure plasma hemoglobin, hematocrit, serum total testosterone, sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), prolactin, glucose, A1C, and plasma CRP. Serum total iron, iron-binding capacity, ferritin, vitamin B12, and folate concentrations were measured in all 16 patients who had anemia.

Total testosterone was measured by a solid-phase radioimmunoassay (Coat-A-Count; Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA). The lower limit of normal for total testosterone in our clinical laboratory is 10.4 nmol/l (300 ng/dl). SHBG was tested at Specialty Laboratories (Santa Monica, CA) by an immunochemiluminometric assay. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin <13 g/dl or hematocrit <39.0% as per the World Health Organization definition.

Calculated free testosterone (cFT) was determined from SHBG and total testosterone using the method of Vermeulen et al. (8), using a computer program and Web site address (http://www.issam.ch/freetesto.htm) provided by Dr. T. Fiers, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. This cFT value has been shown to correlate very well (r = 0.9) with free testosterone measured by equilibrium dialysis (9). For cFT, 0.225 nmol/l (6.5 ng/dl) was taken as the lower limit of normal (10). It is known that cFT values are generally 10–15% higher than those for free testosterone measured by equilibrium dialysis. Bioavailable testosterone (non–SHBG-bound testosterone) was also calculated similarly using SHBG and testosterone. The lower limit of normal was considered to be 5.2 nmol/l (150 ng/dl) (10). LH and FSH were measured by chemiluminescent immunometric assays. The lower limit of total testosterone was 300 ng/dl, that for cFT was 6.5 ng/dl, and that for bioavailable testosterone was 150 ng/dl in normal subjects. Hypogonadism was defined as cFT <6.5 ng/dl. Hypogonadotrophic state was defined as inappropriately low FSH and LH concentrations for the concomitant subnormal cFT concentrations. Thus, LH and FSH concentrations in the normal reference range would be considered to be “low” when associated with low cFT concentrations. CRP levels >3 mg/l were termed “high” because those concentrations are known to be associated with increased cardiovascular events. Plasma CRP concentrations were measured using a high-sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit from Alpha Diagnostics International (San Antonio, TX).

Erythropoietin was measured in duplicate using the Advantage erythropoietin chemiluminescence immunoassay (Nichols Institute Diagnostic, San Clemente, CA), which has a sensitivity of 1.2 mU/ml and a coefficient of variation <6%. The mean of the two assays was used in the analysis. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated by calculating creatinine clearance from the serum creatinine concentration using the Cockcroft-Gault formula.

Statistical methods

Data are presented as means ± SE. Student’s t test was used to compare parametric data, and the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test was used to compare nonparametric data. Fisher’s exact test or the χ2 test was also used to compare the groups whenever appropriate. Spearman correlation (for nonparametric data) and Pearson correlation (for parametric data) were used to establish correlations. Multiple regression analysis between variables was performed if there was more than one independent variable. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Sigma Stat software was used for analysis.

The plasma total testosterone and cFT concentrations (means ± SE) in hypogonadal men (n = 37) were 212.84 ± 13.56 ng/dl (range 20–291) and 4.43 ± 0.22 ng/dl (0.26–6.39), respectively, and were significantly lower (P < 0.01) than those in eugonadal men (n = 33; 469.35 ± 32.39 ng/dl [305–1,428] and 9.19 ± 0.38 ng/dl [6.56–13.9], respectively). The mean CRP concentrations were 6.5 mg/l in hypogonadal patients and 3.2 ng/dl in eugonadal patients (P < 0.001); 40 patients (57.1%) had CRP ≤3 mg/l and 30 (42.9%) had CRP >3 mg/l. Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of patients with low and high CRP concentrations. Mean hematocrit was 40.6 ± 1.1% in hypogonadal men, whereas it was 43.3 ± 0.7% in eugonadal men (P = 0.011) (Fig. 1). The hematocrit was 42.7 ± 0.7% in patients with CRP <3 mg/l compared with 39.9 ± 1.1% in patients with CRP >3 mg/l (P = 0.05) (Fig. 2). Anemia was observed in 16 of 70 (23%) patients. In 15 of these 16 anemic patients, the anemia was normocytic and normochromic and was not associated with iron, folate, or vitamin B12 deficiency. In one patient, it was microcytic and hypochromic and was associated with iron deficiency. Fourteen of 15 (93%) patients with normocytic normochromic anemia had low cFT concentrations. Erythropoietin concentrations were normal or elevated in all of the 11 patients with normocytic normochromic anemia in whom they were measured. Bone marrow biopsy was available in one patient with hypogonadism and normocytic normochromic anemia. It demonstrated normal iron stores and had normal cellularity (40%) with normal erythroid, myeloid, and megakaryocytic cell lines. The prevalence of normocytic normochromic anemia was 37.83% in hypogonadal men, whereas it was 3% in eugonadal men (P < 0.05). The prevalence of anemia was 13.2% in patients with CRP <3 mg/l, whereas it was 33.3% in those with CRP >3 mg/l (P < 0.05). The frequency of anemia in those with both low cFT and high CRP was 50%. SHBG concentrations tended to be lower in patients with anemia and in those with elevated CRP.

Hematocrit was related to total testosterone (r = 0.36; P < 0.001) and cFT (r = 0.46; P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3). There was an inverse relationship between plasma CRP concentrations (r = 0.41; P < 0.0004) and hematocrit (Fig. 4). There was also an inverse relationship between plasma cFT and CRP concentrations (r = −0.27; P = 0.02) (Fig. 5). Serum creatinine concentrations were not significantly different between hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism and eugonadal patients, nor was there a relationship between serum creatinine clearance and hematocrit. GFR was estimated from serum creatinine concentration of the patients using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. The mean calculated creatinine clearance was 130 ± 8.6 ml/min in the hypogonadal group, whereas it was 135 ± 6.1 ml/min in the eugonadal groups, and the difference was not significant (P = 0.33). No significant relationship was found between GFR and hematocrit (r = 0.2; P = 0.8). On multivariate analysis, both cFT (P < 0.001) and CRP (P < 0.01) but not BMI were related independently to hematocrit. In an another multivariate analysis using CRP as the dependent variable and cFT, BMI, and age as independent variables, only cFT and age were independently related to CRP (P < 0.001 and 0.006, respectively). SHBG concentrations were inversely related to CRP (r = −0.23; P < 0.02) but were not related to either the hematocrit or cFT.

This demonstration of a significantly lower hematocrit in hypogonadal men and a direct relationship between the hematocrit and testosterone in type 2 diabetic subjects, described for the first time, suggests that a low testosterone concentration may contribute to the pathogenesis of the mild anemia in these patients. Testosterone is known to stimulate erythropoiesis in the bone marrow and to increase the hematocrit (3). Consistent with a diminished erythropoietic drive was the fact that in 15 of 16 anemic patients, the anemia was normocytic normochromic and 14 of 15 patients had a subnormal cFT. Only 1 patient of 16 had iron deficiency with a hypochromic microcytic anemia. None of the 15 patients with normocytic normochromic anemia had iron, folate, or vitamin B12 deficiency. Eleven of 15 patients with normocytic normochromic anemia had erythropoietin concentrations measured; all 11 had high normal or elevated erythropoietin concentrations. Thus, the anemia was not due to erythropoietin deficiency.

The highly significant inverse relationship between CRP concentrations and the hematocrit, independent of testosterone concentrations, suggests that inflammatory processes in type 2 diabetes probably also suppress the hematocrit. CRP has for a long time been considered a marker of systemic inflammation; therefore, it is also a prognosticator of cardiovascular events (1113) because atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammation of the arterial wall. However, there is now evidence that CRP may be a mediator of inflammation (1416). It induces intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 in endothelial cells in vitro and probably exerts this effect through the FcII receptor (17). More recently, it has been shown to exert a proinflammatory effect after an injection into normal human subjects in vivo (18). Thus, the relationship of CRP with hematocrit may either be through the direct action of CRP or through other inflammatory mediators associated with CRP or both. Inflammatory mechanisms may affect the hematocrit in two ways. First, they may suppress erythropoietin secretion (4), and second, they may cause increased apoptotic death of red cell precursors, resulting in no increase in erythropoiesis despite elevated erythropoietin levels (4,1921). These mechanisms are relevant to the pathogenesis of anemia of chronic inflammatory disease. Thus, the mild anemia of type 2 diabetes may in part be attributable to processes similar to those involved in chronic inflammatory disease in addition to the contribution by low testosterone concentrations. The overwhelming predominance of the normocytic normochromic picture in the anemic patients is also consistent with marrow suppression secondary to inflammatory mechanisms. Elevated erythropoietin levels associated with anemia in these patients suggest an inadequate response to erythropoietin rather than a deficiency of erythropoietin.

The relationship of inflammatory mechanisms with hematocrit becomes even more intricate because these mechanisms may be involved in the pathogenesis of hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism itself in patients with type 2 diabetes. We have previously reported and confirmed again in this study that there is a highly significant inverse relationship between plasma testosterone and CRP concentrations (V.B., R.T., S.D., A. Chandel, A.C., H.G., P.D., unpublished observations). It has previously been shown that insulin may facilitate gonadotropin-releasing hormone release from hypothalamic neurons in vitro and that interference with insulin signal transduction may reduce gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion (22). Because inflammatory mediators interfere with insulin signal transduction, they may contribute to the pathogenesis of hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Consistent with our previous report, LH and FSH concentrations in patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism were significantly lower than those in eugonadal patients.

One recent European study (23) showed a mild elevation of hematocrit in patients with type 2 diabetes. The lowest quartile of hematocrit in this study had values that were similar to those in patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism in our study. Although we cannot confirm elevated hematocrit in type 2 diabetes in our study, it would be worth investigating whether low hematocrit in other studies is associated with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism.

We conclude that the hematocrit is significantly lower in hypogonadal men with type 2 diabetes compared with eugonadal men and that there is a significant direct relationship between cFT and hematocrit. There is also an inverse relationship between hematocrit and CRP. Thus, both a low testosterone concentration and inflammatory mechanisms may play an important role in the pathogenesis of the low-grade anemia observed in patients with type 2 diabetes. Because high CRP concentrations are known to be associated with atherosclerosis and there are early data showing that low testosterone concentrations may be associated with increased cardiovascular events (24), the anemic diabetic patient may have an increased risk of atherogenesis.

Figure 1—

Mean hematocrit in the hypogonadal (cFT <6.5 ng/dl; n = 37) versus the eugonadal (cFT >6.5 ng/dl; n = 33) group. *P = 0.011 using the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test.

Figure 1—

Mean hematocrit in the hypogonadal (cFT <6.5 ng/dl; n = 37) versus the eugonadal (cFT >6.5 ng/dl; n = 33) group. *P = 0.011 using the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test.

Close modal
Figure 2—

Mean hematocrit in patients with CRP <3 mg/l versus CRP >3 mg/l. *P = 0.05 using the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test.

Figure 2—

Mean hematocrit in patients with CRP <3 mg/l versus CRP >3 mg/l. *P = 0.05 using the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test.

Close modal
Figure 3—

The relationship between cFT and hematocrit (r = 0.46; P < 0.0001). There was also a significant relationship between total testosterone and hematocrit (r = 0.36; P = 0.002).

Figure 3—

The relationship between cFT and hematocrit (r = 0.46; P < 0.0001). There was also a significant relationship between total testosterone and hematocrit (r = 0.36; P = 0.002).

Close modal
Figure 4—

The inverse relationship between CRP and hematocrit (r = −0.41; P < 0.0004).

Figure 4—

The inverse relationship between CRP and hematocrit (r = −0.41; P < 0.0004).

Close modal
Figure 5—

The inverse relationship between cFT and CRP (r = −0.27; P = 0.02).

Figure 5—

The inverse relationship between cFT and CRP (r = −0.27; P = 0.02).

Close modal
Table 1—

Characteristics of patients with low cFT and normal cFT values

cFT <6.5 ng/dl (HH)cFT >6.5 ng/dl (eugonadal)
n 37 33 
Age (years) 56.8 ± 1.2 56.7 ± 1.9 
A1C (%) 7.81 ± 0.29 7.78 ± 0.31 
BMI (kg/m234.8 ± 1.3 30.7 ± 1.1* 
Hematocrit (%) 40.6 ± 1.1 43.3 ± 0.7 
CRP (mg/l) 6.5 ± 0.9 3.2 ± 0.5 
Total testosterone (ng/dl) 212.84 ± 13.56 469.35 ± 32.39 
cFT (ng/dl) 4.423 ± 0.22 9.193 ± 0.39 
HDL (mg/dl) 36.1 ± 1.1 41.5 ± 1.4* 
LDL (mg/dl) 94.9 ± 6.9 92.1 ± 7.1 
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 120.19 ± 1.9 121.42 ± 2.9 
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 73.45 ± 1.5 73.67 ± 1.2 
Serum creatinine (mg/dl) 1.1 0.9 
GFR (ml/min) 130.11 ± 8.6 135.22 ± 6.1 
FSH (mIU/ml) 8.2 ± 2.4 10.11 ± 0.89§ 
LH (mIU/ml) 4.2 ± 0.9 5.5 ± 0.73 
ACE inhibitor therapy 23 (62.1) 21 (63.6) 
Angiotensin receptor blocker therapy 6 (16.2) 5 (15.1) 
Statins 26 (70.2) 23 (69.7) 
Aspirin 30 (81.1) 25 (75.8) 
Insulin 27 (73) 22 (66.7) 
cFT <6.5 ng/dl (HH)cFT >6.5 ng/dl (eugonadal)
n 37 33 
Age (years) 56.8 ± 1.2 56.7 ± 1.9 
A1C (%) 7.81 ± 0.29 7.78 ± 0.31 
BMI (kg/m234.8 ± 1.3 30.7 ± 1.1* 
Hematocrit (%) 40.6 ± 1.1 43.3 ± 0.7 
CRP (mg/l) 6.5 ± 0.9 3.2 ± 0.5 
Total testosterone (ng/dl) 212.84 ± 13.56 469.35 ± 32.39 
cFT (ng/dl) 4.423 ± 0.22 9.193 ± 0.39 
HDL (mg/dl) 36.1 ± 1.1 41.5 ± 1.4* 
LDL (mg/dl) 94.9 ± 6.9 92.1 ± 7.1 
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 120.19 ± 1.9 121.42 ± 2.9 
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 73.45 ± 1.5 73.67 ± 1.2 
Serum creatinine (mg/dl) 1.1 0.9 
GFR (ml/min) 130.11 ± 8.6 135.22 ± 6.1 
FSH (mIU/ml) 8.2 ± 2.4 10.11 ± 0.89§ 
LH (mIU/ml) 4.2 ± 0.9 5.5 ± 0.73 
ACE inhibitor therapy 23 (62.1) 21 (63.6) 
Angiotensin receptor blocker therapy 6 (16.2) 5 (15.1) 
Statins 26 (70.2) 23 (69.7) 
Aspirin 30 (81.1) 25 (75.8) 
Insulin 27 (73) 22 (66.7) 

Data are means ± SE or n (%). Note that patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (HH) were significantly heavier.

*

P < 0.05;

P = 0.01;

P < 0.01;

§

P = 0.014;

P = 0.022.

Table 2—

Characteristics of patients with CRP concentrations < and >3 mg/l

CRP <3 mg/lCRP >3 mg/l
n 40 30 
Age (years) 56.1 ± 1.9 57.1 ± 1.6 
A1C (%) 7.71 ± 0.36 7.82 ± 0.27 
BMI (kg/m230.8 ± 1.1 33.9 ± 1.3 
Hematocrit (%) 42.7 ± 0.7 39.9 ± 1.1* 
Total testosterone (ng/dl) 437.7 ± 37.0 274 ± 24.2 
cFT (ng/dl) 7.7 ± 0.4 5.5 ± 0.5 
Bound testosterone (ng/dl) 175.7 ± 12.2 127.9 ± 11.3 
HDL (mg/dl) 40.1 ± 2.1 34.4 ± 1.4 
LDL (mg/dl) 90.9 ± 5.3 93.10.2 ± 6.7 
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 121.22 ± 2.1 123.33 ± 2.2 
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 72.1 ± 1.1 72.6 ± 1.3 
FSH (mIU/ml) 9.9 ± 0.71 7.7 ± 1.1§ 
LH (mIU/ml) 5.1 ± 0.52 4.7 ± 0.4 
Serum creatinine (mg/dl) 1.1 1.0 
GFR (ml/min) 132.21 ± 4.7 136.49 ± 5.2 
CRP <3 mg/lCRP >3 mg/l
n 40 30 
Age (years) 56.1 ± 1.9 57.1 ± 1.6 
A1C (%) 7.71 ± 0.36 7.82 ± 0.27 
BMI (kg/m230.8 ± 1.1 33.9 ± 1.3 
Hematocrit (%) 42.7 ± 0.7 39.9 ± 1.1* 
Total testosterone (ng/dl) 437.7 ± 37.0 274 ± 24.2 
cFT (ng/dl) 7.7 ± 0.4 5.5 ± 0.5 
Bound testosterone (ng/dl) 175.7 ± 12.2 127.9 ± 11.3 
HDL (mg/dl) 40.1 ± 2.1 34.4 ± 1.4 
LDL (mg/dl) 90.9 ± 5.3 93.10.2 ± 6.7 
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 121.22 ± 2.1 123.33 ± 2.2 
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 72.1 ± 1.1 72.6 ± 1.3 
FSH (mIU/ml) 9.9 ± 0.71 7.7 ± 1.1§ 
LH (mIU/ml) 5.1 ± 0.52 4.7 ± 0.4 
Serum creatinine (mg/dl) 1.1 1.0 
GFR (ml/min) 132.21 ± 4.7 136.49 ± 5.2 

Data are means ± SE.

*

P = 0.05;

P < 0.01;

P = 0.05;

§

P = 0.032;

P = 0.11.

1.
Dhindsa S, Prabhakar S, Sethi M, Bandyopadhyay A, Chaudhuri A, Dandona P: Frequent occurrence of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in type 2 diabetes.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
89
:
5462
–5468,
2004
2.
Tomar R, Dhindsa S, Chaudhuri A, Mohanty P, Garg R, Dandona P: Contrasting testosterone concentrations in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care
29
:
1120
–1122,
2006
3.
Shahidi NT: Androgens and erythropoiesis.
N Engl J Med
289
:
72
–80,
1973
4.
Means RT Jr, Krantz SB: Progress in understanding the pathogenesis of the anemia of chronic disease.
Blood
80
:
1639
–1647,
1992
5.
Means RT Jr, Krantz SB: Inhibition of human erythroid colony-forming units by tumor necrosis factor requires beta interferon.
J Clin Invest
91
:
416
–419,
1993
6.
Means RT, Jr, Krantz SB, Luna J, Marsters SA, Ashkenazi A: Inhibition of murine erythroid colony formation in vitro by interferon gamma and correction by interferon receptor immunoadhesin.
Blood
83
:
911
–915,
1994
7.
Voulgari PV, Kolios G, Papadopoulos GK, Katsaraki A, Seferiadis K, Drosos AA: Role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of anemia of chronic disease in rheumatoid arthritis.
Clin Immunol
92
:
153
–160,
1999
8.
Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM: A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
84
:
3666
–3672,
1999
9.
Morley JE, Patrick P, Perry HM 3rd: Evaluation of assays available to measure free testosterone.
Metabolism
51
:
554
–559,
2002
10.
Vermeulen A, Kaufman JM: Diagnosis of hypogonadism in the aging male.
Aging Male
5
:
170
–176,
2002
11.
Yeh ET: CRP as a mediator of disease.
Circulation
109
:
II11
–II14,
2004
12.
Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH: Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men.
N Engl J Med
336
:
973
–979,
1997
13.
Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH: Plasma concentration of C-reactive protein and risk of developing peripheral vascular disease.
Circulation
97
:
425
–428,
1998
14.
Woollard KJ, Phillips DC, Griffiths HR: Direct modulatory effect of C-reactive protein on primary human monocyte adhesion to human endothelial cells.
Clin Exp Immunol
130
:
256
–262,
2002
15.
Nan B, Yang H, Yan S, Lin PH, Lumsden AB, Yao Q, Chen C: C-reactive protein decreases expression of thrombomodulin and endothelial protein C receptor in human endothelial cells.
Surgery
138
:
212
–222,
2005
16.
Yang H, Nan B, Yan S, Li M, Yao Q, Chen C: C-reactive protein decreases expression of VEGF receptors and neuropilins and inhibits VEGF165-induced cell proliferation in human endothelial cells.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
333
:
1003
–1010,
2005
17.
Singh U, Devaraj S, Jialal I: C-reactive protein decreases tissue plasminogen activator activity in human aortic endothelial cells: evidence that C-reactive protein is a procoagulant.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
25
:
2216
–2221,
2005
18.
Bisoendial RJ, Kastelein JJ, Levels JH, Zwaginga JJ, van den Bogaard B, Reitsma PH, Meijers JC, Hartman D, Levi M, Stroes ES: Activation of inflammation and coagulation after infusion of C-reactive protein in humans.
Circ Res
96
:
714
–716,
2005
19.
Papadaki HA, Kritikos HD, Gemetzi C, Koutala H, Marsh JC, Boumpas DT, Eliopoulos GD: Bone marrow progenitor cell reserve and function and stromal cell function are defective in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence for a tumor necrosis factor α-mediated effect.
Blood
99
:
1610
–1619,
2002
20.
Papadaki HA, Kritikos HD, Valatas V, Boumpas DT, Eliopoulos GD: Anemia of chronic disease in rheumatoid arthritis is associated with increased apoptosis of bone marrow erythroid cells: improvement following anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibody therapy.
Blood
100
:
474
–482,
2002
21.
Schilling RF: Anemia of chronic disease: a misnomer.
Ann Intern Med
115
:
572
–573,
1991
22.
Salvi R, Castillo E, Voirol MJ, Glauser M, Rey JP, Gaillard RC, Vollenweider P, Pralong FP: GnRH-expressing neurons immortalized conditionally are activated by insulin: implication of the MAP kinase pathway.
Endocrinology
147
:
816
–826,
2006
23.
Natali A, Toschi E, Baldeweg S, Casolaro A, Baldi S, Sironi AM, Yudkin JS, Ferrannini E: Haematocrit, type 2 diabetes, and endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of resistance vessels.
Eur Heart J
26
:
464
–471,
2005
24.
Smith GD, Ben-Shlomo Y, Beswick A, Yarnell J, Lightman S, Elwood P: Cortisol, testosterone, and coronary heart disease: prospective evidence from the Caerphilly study.
Circulation
112
:
332
–340,
2005

A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.