OBJECTIVE—To evaluate the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor alogliptin in drug-naïve patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study included 329 patients with poorly controlled diabetes randomized to once-daily treatment with 12.5 mg alogliptin (n = 133), 25 mg alogliptin (n = 131), or placebo (n = 65) for 26 weeks. Primary efficacy end point was mean change from baseline in A1C at the final visit.

RESULTS—At week 26, mean change in A1C was significantly greater (P < 0.001) for 12.5 mg (−0.56%) and 25 mg (−0.59%) alogliptin than placebo (−0.02%). Reductions in fasting plasma glucose were also greater (P < 0.001) in alogliptin-treated patients than in those receiving placebo. Overall, incidences of adverse events (67.4–70.3%) and hypoglycemia (1.5–3.0%) were similar across treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS—Alogliptin monotherapy was well tolerated and significantly improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, without raising the incidence of hypoglycemia.

Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) increases the concentration of glucagon-like peptide-1, an incretin hormone that stimulates glucose-dependent insulin release, suppresses glucagon production, slows gastric emptying, reduces appetite, and may promote preservation of β-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes (1). Alogliptin is a novel, high-affinity, high-specificity DPP-4 inhibitor that produces rapid and sustained DPP-4 inhibition and significantly reduces postprandial plasma glucose concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes (2,3). A phase-three study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin in adults with type 2 diabetes that was inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.

Eligible patients were treatment-naïve (i.e., no current antidiabetes therapy and <7 days of therapy in the past 3 months) men and women, aged 18–80 years, with type 2 diabetes. Key inclusion criteria included A1C 7–10%, BMI 23–45 kg/m2, treatment with diet and exercise for ≥1 month, and systolic/diastolic blood pressure ≤180/≤110 mmHg. Patients received counseling on diet and exercise. Patients who completed a 4-week, single-blind run-in period with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <275 mg/ml (15.27 mmol/l) and ≥75% compliance (by tablet count) were randomized (2:2:1) to 26 weeks of double-blind treatment with 12.5 mg alogliptin, 25 mg alogliptin, or placebo taken once daily before the first meal. Additional antidiabetes agents were prohibited.

Efficacy assessments included all randomized patients who received the double-blind study drug. The primary end point was mean change from baseline in A1C at week 26. Other efficacy measures included changes in FPG, clinical response rates, incidences of marked hyperglycemia (FPG ≥200 mg/dl [11.10 mmol/l]) and hyperglycemic rescue, and changes in body weight. Exploratory end points included changes in measures of pancreatic function (fasting insulin, fasting proinsulin, and homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function) and lipid profiles. Treatment group differences for the primary end point were analyzed through ANCOVA, with treatment and geographic region as variables and baseline A1C and diabetes duration as covariates. The last observation carried forward method was used for imputing missing data; testing was two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. Continuous secondary efficacy analyses were performed as for the primary analysis, except that the baseline covariate corresponds with the tested end point. Incidence variables were compared using nonparametric, extended Mantel-Haenszel X2 tests; covariates were the same as for the primary end point.

The safety population included patients who took at least one dose of the study drug (double blind). Safety assessments included adverse events, clinical laboratory findings, 12-lead electrocardiograms, physical examination findings, vital signs, and hypoglycemic events. Skin and digits were specifically examined because of lesions previously observed in monkeys given DPP-4 inhibitors other than alogliptin (46). Safety findings were summarized with descriptive statistics.

Of 420 patients enrolled (see online appendix, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1035), 329 were randomized to double-blind treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar among treatment groups. Participants had a mean ± SD age of 53.4 ± 11.1 years and baseline A1C 7.9 ± 0.08% and were predominantly male (53.2%) and white (66.9%).

Mean A1C decreased significantly more with 12.5 mg (−0.56%; P < 0.001) or 25 mg (−0.59%; P < 0.001) alogliptin than with placebo (−0.02%) by week 26. Significant A1C reductions were observed as early as week 4 (P < 0.001). FPG reductions were significantly greater with alogliptin than with placebo at week 26 (P < 0.001) and as early as week 1 (P ≤ 0.002). The percentage of patients who required hyperglycemic rescue was significantly less with alogliptin (12.5 mg, 9.8%; 25 mg, 7.6%; P ≤ 0.001) than with placebo (29.7%). Minor reductions in weight with alogliptin were neither clinically nor statistically significant relative to placebo. Results for secondary efficacy measures and exploratory assessments are summarized in Table 1.

Overall incidences of adverse events (67.4–70.3%) and proportions of patients who discontinued because of adverse events (1.5–2.3%) were similar across treatment groups. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity. Serious adverse events occurred without relation to dose (12.5 mg, 3.8%; 25 mg, 0.8%; and placebo, 3.1%) and were considered unrelated to treatment. No patient died during the study. Adverse events from the most commonly observed categories occurred with similar or lower frequency in those given alogliptin versus placebo (infection, 28.0–37.6%; gastrointestinal, 12.1–14.3%). Headache occurred more frequently with alogliptin (6.8–7.5%) than with placebo (4.7%). Despite increased surveillance for skin-related adverse events, their overall incidence remained low (12.5%), albeit higher with alogliptin (12.8–15.2%) than with placebo (6.3%), mostly because of pruritic events. Two patients discontinued because of skin-related adverse events: one adverse event was considered possibly related to the study drug (25 mg, moderate subcorneal pustular dermatosis); the other was judged unrelated to the study drug (12.5 mg, moderate exacerbation of contact dermatitis). No skin lesions resembling those noted in nonclinical studies of other DPP-4 inhibitors were observed. Hypoglycemia was rare (1.5–3.0%), and no hypoglycemic event was considered an adverse event or was severe enough to require assistance. No clinically meaningful changes in laboratory test results, vital sign measurements, or electrocardiogram recordings were observed.

Alogliptin monotherapy administered for 26 weeks to treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes produced significant and clinically meaningful improvements in A1C. Glycemic improvements with alogliptin were rapid, sustained, and independent of age, race, and sex. Alogliptin treatment was well tolerated and was not associated with treatment-related serious adverse events. A low incidence of hypoglycemia occurred with alogliptin and with placebo.

Weight gain is common among patients taking sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones and may reduce treatment adherence (7,8); thus, the weight neutrality of alogliptin and other DPP-4 inhibitors may offer a therapeutic advantage (915). Increases in the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio with alogliptin versus placebo and a trend toward increased homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function suggest that alogliptin, similarly to other DPP-4 inhibitors (911,14,15), may modestly improve pancreatic function.

In summary, the efficacy and safety of alogliptin monotherapy were comparable with those of other DPP-4 inhibitors (915). Alogliptin represents an effective treatment option whether given alone or in combination with antihyperglycemic agents from other classes.

Table 1—

Results of secondary efficacy end points and exploratory assessments

ParameterPlacebo12.5 mg AlogliptinP (vs. placebo)25 mg AlogliptinP (vs. placebo)
n 64 133 — 131 — 
A1C (%)      
    ≤6.5% 7 (10.9) 23 (17.3) 0.818 27 (20.6) 0.294 
    ≤7.0% 15 (23.4) 63 (47.4) 0.001 58 (44.3) 0.008 
    Reduction ≥0.5% 19 (29.7) 67 (50.4) 0.005 72 (55.0) <0.001 
    Reduction ≥1.0% 7 (10.9) 38 (28.6) 0.003 39 (29.8) <0.001 
FPG 11.3 ± 5.24 −10.3 ± 3.6 <0.001 −16.4 ± 3.7 <0.001 
Hyperglycemic rescue 19 (29.7) 13 (9.8) 0.001 10 (7.6) <0.001 
Marked hyperglycemia 30 (46.9) 44 (33.1) 0.110 33 (25.4) 0.005 
Body weight (kg) 0.18 ± 0.37 −0.09 ± 0.26 0.539 −0.22 ± 0.26 0.379 
Proinsulin-to-insulin ratio 0.046 ± 0.022 −0.040 ± 0.015 0.001 −0.038 ± 0.015 0.002 
HOMA-B −0.26 ± 5.98 7.53 ± 3.99 0.279 9.70 ± 4.08 0.172 
Total cholesterol (mg/d)l 10.1 ± 3.3 −1.2 ± 2.3 0.006 −3.9 ± 2.3 <0.001 
HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) 1.3 ± 0.9 0.9 ± 0.6 0.724 0.4 ± 0.6 0.417 
LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) 4.6 ± 3.0 −0.5 ± 2.1 0.169 −0.4 ± 2.1 0.178 
Triglycerides (mg/dl) 26.5 ± 14.8 −5.8 ± 10.2 0.074 −17.8 ± 10.4 0.015 
ParameterPlacebo12.5 mg AlogliptinP (vs. placebo)25 mg AlogliptinP (vs. placebo)
n 64 133 — 131 — 
A1C (%)      
    ≤6.5% 7 (10.9) 23 (17.3) 0.818 27 (20.6) 0.294 
    ≤7.0% 15 (23.4) 63 (47.4) 0.001 58 (44.3) 0.008 
    Reduction ≥0.5% 19 (29.7) 67 (50.4) 0.005 72 (55.0) <0.001 
    Reduction ≥1.0% 7 (10.9) 38 (28.6) 0.003 39 (29.8) <0.001 
FPG 11.3 ± 5.24 −10.3 ± 3.6 <0.001 −16.4 ± 3.7 <0.001 
Hyperglycemic rescue 19 (29.7) 13 (9.8) 0.001 10 (7.6) <0.001 
Marked hyperglycemia 30 (46.9) 44 (33.1) 0.110 33 (25.4) 0.005 
Body weight (kg) 0.18 ± 0.37 −0.09 ± 0.26 0.539 −0.22 ± 0.26 0.379 
Proinsulin-to-insulin ratio 0.046 ± 0.022 −0.040 ± 0.015 0.001 −0.038 ± 0.015 0.002 
HOMA-B −0.26 ± 5.98 7.53 ± 3.99 0.279 9.70 ± 4.08 0.172 
Total cholesterol (mg/d)l 10.1 ± 3.3 −1.2 ± 2.3 0.006 −3.9 ± 2.3 <0.001 
HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) 1.3 ± 0.9 0.9 ± 0.6 0.724 0.4 ± 0.6 0.417 
LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) 4.6 ± 3.0 −0.5 ± 2.1 0.169 −0.4 ± 2.1 0.178 
Triglycerides (mg/dl) 26.5 ± 14.8 −5.8 ± 10.2 0.074 −17.8 ± 10.4 0.015 

Data are n (%) or change in least-squares means ± SE unless otherwise indicated. *HOMA-B, homeostasis model of assessment of β-cell function.

Financial support for completion of this study and for data analysis was provided by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Deerfield, Illinois.

This study was presented at the 68th Annual Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, San Francisco, CA, 6–10 June 2008, and at the 44th European Association for the Study for Diabetes Annual Meeting, Rome, Italy, 7–11 September 2008.

Editorial assistance with manuscript preparation was provided by Scientific Connections, Newtown, PA.

1.
Drucker DJ, Nauck MA: The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes.
Lancet
368
:
1696
–1705,
2006
2.
Feng J, Zhang Z, Wallace MB, Stafford JA, Kaldor SW, Kassel DB, Navre M, Shi L, Skene RJ, Asakawa T, Takeuchi K, Xu R, Webb DR, Gwaltney SL 2nd: Discovery of alogliptin: a potent, selective, bioavailable, and efficacious inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV.
J Med Chem
50
:
2297
–2300,
2007
3.
Covington P, Christopher R, Davenport M, Fleck P, Mekki QA, Wann ER, Karim A: Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and tolerability profiles of the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor alogliptin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multiple-dose study in adult patients with type 2 diabetes.
Clin Ther
30
:
499
–512,
2008
4.
European Medicines Agency: European public assessment report for Galvus—scientific discussion,
2007
. Available from http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/galvus/H-771-en6.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2008
5.
Lee B, Shi L, Kassel DB, Asakawa T, Takeuchi K, Christopher RJ: Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy profiles of alogliptin, a novel inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4, in rats, dogs, and monkeys.
Eur J Pharmacol
589
:
306
–314,
2008
6.
Sato K, Ozaki H, Salamon CM, Christopher RJ, Yamamoto M: Lack of dermal toxicity with the highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in monkeys (Abstract).
Diabetes
57
(Suppl. 1):
A580
,
2008
7.
Bolen S, Feldman L, Vassy J, Wilson L, Yeh HC, Marinopoulos S, Wiley C, Selvin E, Wilson R, Bass EB, Brancati FL: Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Ann Intern Med
147
:
386
–399,
2007
8.
Barnett A, Allsworth J, Jameson K, Mann R: A review of the effects of antihyperglycaemic agents on body weight: the potential of incretin targeted therapies.
Curr Med Res Opin
23
:
1493
–1507,
2007
9.
Aschner P, Kipnes MS, Lunceford JK, Sanchez M, Mickel C, Williams-Herman DE, the Sitagliptin Study 021 Group: Effect of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin as monotherapy on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care
29
:
2632
–2637,
2006
10.
Pratley RE, Jauffret-Kamel S, Galbreath E, Holmes D: Twelve-week monotherapy with the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin improves glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
Horm Metab Res
38
:
423
–428,
2006
11.
Scott R, Wu M, Sanchez M, Stein P: Efficacy and tolerability of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin as monotherapy over 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Int J Clin Pract
61
:
171
–180,
2007
12.
Pi-Sunyer FX, Schweizer A, Mills D, Dejager S: Efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin monotherapy in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
76
:
132
–138,
2007
13.
Dejager S, Razac S, Foley JE, Schweizer A: Vildagliptin in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study.
Horm Metab Res
39
:
218
–223,
2007
14.
Bosi E, Camisasca RP, Collober C, Rochotte E, Garber AJ: Effects of vildagliptin on glucose control over 24 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin.
Diabetes Care
30
:
890
–895,
2007
15.
DeFronzo RA, Hissa M, Blauwet MB, Chen RS: Saxagliptin added to metformin improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (Abstract).
Diabetes
56
(Suppl. 1):
A74
,
2007

Published ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 22 September 2008. Clinical trial reg. no. NCT00286455, clinicaltrials.gov.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Supplementary data