OBJECTIVE

Glycated hemoglobin has been suggested to be superior to fasting glucose for the prediction of vascular disease and death from any cause. The aim of the present work was to analyze and compare the predictive value of glycated hemoglobin and fasting glucose on all-cause and cause-specific mortality in subjects who underwent coronary angiography.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We studied 2,686 participants of the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular health study without a history of diabetes. The majority of this cohort had coronary artery disease. Glycated hemoglobin was measured at the baseline examination. The mean (± SD) duration of the follow-up for all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality was 7.54 ± 2.1 years.

RESULTS

A total of 508 deaths occurred during the follow-up. Of those, 299 were accounted for by cardiovascular diseases and 79 by cancer. Baseline glycated hemoglobin was predictive of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) (95% CI) for glycated hemoglobin values of <5.0, 5.0–5.4, 5.5–5.9, 6.0–6.4, 6.5–7.4, and ≥7.5% for all-cause mortality were 1.36 (0.85–2.18), 1.00 (0.76–1.32), 1.00 (reference), 1.11 (0.88–1.41), 1.39 (1.07–1.82), and 2.15 (1.32–3.53), respectively. Similar J-shaped relationships were found between glycated hemoglobin and cardiovascular and cancer mortality. The associations of glycated hemoglobin with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality remained significant after inclusion of fasting glucose as a covariate. However, fasting glucose was not significantly related to mortality when adjusting for glycated hemoglobin.

CONCLUSIONS

Glycated hemoglobin significantly and independently of fasting glucose predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in whites at intermediate to high cardiovascular risk.

The glycated hemoglobin concentration is a measure of the 2–3-month average endogenous exposure to glucose. It has low intraindividual variability and can be determined in the nonfasting state (1). Therefore, glycated hemoglobin is used for the estimation of glucose control in subjects with known diabetes (2,3). Recently, glycated hemoglobin has also been included in the diagnosis algorithm of diabetes because it indicates the risk of microvascular disease (4).

Selvin et al. (5) demonstrated in participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities study who did not have a history of diabetes that glycated hemoglobin was also a strong predictor of future diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. In this community-based cohort of middle-aged white and black subjects, the predictive value of glycated hemoglobin was superior to the prognostic information of fasting glucose (5). It was of particular interest that they found a J-shaped association between glycated hemoglobin and death from any cause (5). Compelling explanations for this observation have not been provided. Thus, the authors suggested further exploration of health risks associated with low-normal glycemia and of confounders affecting glycated hemoglobin values.

This work aimed to investigate and compare the predictive values of glycated hemoglobin and fasting glucose on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in whites who underwent coronary angiography. Another objective was to analyze the relationship of glycated hemoglobin with death from cancer. Furthermore, we were interested in metabolic traits and comorbidity associated with low-normal glycemic state that might implicate increased risk of mortality. We studied participants of the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular (LURIC) health study without a history of diabetes (6). The majority of this cohort had coronary artery disease (CAD) (6).

Study design and participants

LURIC was designed to investigate metabolic and genetic cardiovascular risk factors. A total of 3,316 patients were recruited between July 1997 and January 2000 at the Ludwigshafen Heart Center in South-West Germany (6). Inclusion criteria were as follows: German ancestry; clinical stability, with the exception of acute coronary syndromes; and the availability of a coronary angiogram. The indications for angiography in individuals in clinically stable condition were chest pain and/or noninvasive test results consistent with myocardial ischemia. Individuals suffering from any acute illness other than acute coronary syndromes, chronic noncardiac diseases, or malignancy within the past 5 years and those unable to understand the purpose of the study were excluded. Subjects with a history of type 1 or type 2 diabetes and subjects with incomplete laboratory measurements were additionally excluded, resulting in 2,686 subjects for the present analyses. The cause of death was not known in 15 decedents, and these subjects were excluded when the associations of glycated hemoglobin with cardiovascular mortality and cancer mortality were investigated. The study was approved by the ethics committee at the Ärztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants (6). CAD was diagnosed if the coronary angiograms showed stenoses of one or more vessels ≥50%. The severity of CAD was quantified with the Friesinger score (FS) (7). Maximal luminal narrowing was estimated by visual analysis (6). Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) were performed in 1,772 subjects with fasting glucose <126 mg/dL. Diabetes was diagnosed according to the 2009 criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) (8). Hypertension was diagnosed if the systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure exceeded 140 and/or 90 mmHg or if there was a history of hypertension, evident through the use of antihypertensive drugs (6). We used the Charlson comorbidity index, which has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument to assess comorbidity, to form three groups of patients with 0 score points (group 0), 1 score point (group 1), and 2 or more score points (group 2) (9). The study participants were asked to self-assess the degree of their physical activity on a semiquantitative scale ranging from 1 to 11, whereby the extremes of this scale were labeled as sedentary (avoid walking or exertion) or regular heavy exercise. They were grouped according to the following three categories of physical activity: below average (score, 1–3), average (score, 4–7), and above average (score, 8–11).

Follow-up

There was a follow-up for all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality. The mean (± SD) time of the follow-up was 7.54 ± 2.1 years. Information on the vital status was obtained from local person registries. Death certificates were used for the classification of the causes of death. Two experienced clinicians who were blinded to any data of the study participants independently classified the causes of death. In cases of a disagreement or uncertainty concerning the coding of a specific cause of death, classification was made by a principal investigator of the LURIC study (W.M.) (6).

Laboratory analyses

The standard laboratory methods have been described (6). Glycated hemoglobin was measured with an immunoassay (hemoglobin A1c UNIMATE 5; Hoffmann-LaRoche, Grenzach-Whylen, Germany). Glucose was measured enzymatically on a Hitachi 717 analyzer (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Insulin was analyzed with an immunoenzymometric assay on an AIA pack IRI/AIA 1200 analyzer (Eurogenetics, Eschborn, Germany).

Statistical analysis

We formed six categories of glycated hemoglobin (<5, 5–5.4, 5.5–5.9, 6.0–6.4, 6.5–7.4, and ≥7.5%). The baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics are presented according to the categories of glycated hemoglobin. In the case of continuous variables, we report means with standard deviations or medians with interquartile ranges. Categorical data are expressed as numbers and percentages. Comparisons among the glycated hemoglobin categories were made with the χ2-test for categorical data and with ANOVA for continuous data. The association of glycated hemoglobin with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes was also analyzed with logistic regression using three predefined models of adjustment (model 1: unadjusted; model 2: adjusted for sex and age; and model 3: adjusted for sex, age, and BMI). The results for these analyses are presented as odds ratios with 95% CI. We additionally analyzed the associations of glycated hemoglobin with fasting glucose with linear regression. Triglycerides, insulin, and C-reactive protein (Shapiro-Wilk W test) were transformed logarithmically before being used in parametric statistical procedures. Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the relationships of the glycated hemoglobin categories with all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality. Four predefined models of adjustment were used (model 1: unadjusted; model 2: adjusted for sex and age; model 3: adjusted for sex, age, BMI, hypertension, smoking, glomerular filtration rate, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and FS; and model 4: model 3 with additional adjustment for fasting glucose). Glycated hemoglobin category 5.5–5.9% was used as reference because this subgroup was the largest. The results for these analyses are presented as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI. We also analyzed the relationships of fasting glucose categories (<100, 100–125, and ≥126 mg/dL) with mortality data using Cox proportional hazards models. Again, four predefined models of adjustment were used (model 1–3: as mentioned above; model 4: model 3 with additional adjustment for glycated hemoglobin), and the results are presented as HR with 95% CI. In addition, adjusted survival curves based on Cox proportional hazards models (model 3) were calculated for the relationships of the glycated hemoglobin and fasting glucose categories with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. All statistical tests were two-sided, and P < 0.05 was considered significant. The SPSS 15.0 statistical package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used.

Baseline characteristics according to categories of glycated hemoglobin

The distribution of sex was similar among the five categories of glycated hemoglobin (Table 1). Age, BMI, waist circumference, fasting glucose and insulin, triglycerides, and C-reactive protein increased across the categories of glycated hemoglobin (Table 1). In agreement, glycated hemoglobin used as a continuous variable was significantly correlated with fasting glucose (r = 0.470; P < 0.001; Supplementary Fig. 1). Glomerular filtration rate and HDL cholesterol were inversely related to the categories of glycated hemoglobin (Table 1). Hypertension was more frequent in subjects with high glycated hemoglobin (Table 1). Type 2 diabetes was newly diagnosed in 468 (17.4%) of the 2,686 LURIC participants without a history of diabetes based on fasting glucose and OGTT. There was a strong association of elevated glycated hemoglobin with increased risk of new onset type 2 diabetes. This relationship was independent of sex, age, and BMI (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1). The proportion of subjects with CAD (stenoses of one or more vessels ≥50%) was higher than 60% for all glycated hemoglobin categories. Prevalent CAD (stenoses of one or more vessels ≥50%) was not significantly related to the categories of glycated hemoglobin. However, the FS as a more precise measure of CAD was significantly increased in subjects with high glycated hemoglobin (Table 1). The Charlson comorbidity index was positively correlated with the glycated hemoglobin categories (Table 1). The proportion of subjects with physical activity below average was increased in subjects with high glycated hemoglobin (Table 1). The use of statins, ACE inhibitors, and diuretics was more frequent in subjects with high glycated hemoglobin (Table 1).

Table 1

Baseline characteristics according to categories of glycated hemoglobin

<5%5–5.4%5.5–5.9%6.0–6.4%6.5–7.4%≥7.5%P*
Number 112 481 868 752 400 73  
Glycated hemoglobin (%) 4.7 ± 0.2 5.2 ± 0.1 5.7 ± 0.1 6.2 ± 0.1 6.8 ± 0.3 8.3 ± 0.9 — 
Sex: male 88 (78.6) 347 (72.1) 618 (71.2) 504 (67.0) 286 (71.5) 54 (74.0) 0.097 
Age (years) 55.5 ± 13.0 59.7 ± 11.2 61.5 ± 10.7 62.8 ± 10.6 64.0 ± 9.1 66.1 ± 9.4 <0.001 
BMI (kg/m226.1 ± 3.9 26.8 ± 3.9 27.0 ± 3.7 27.3 ± 3.8 28.3 ± 4.2 28.6 ± 4.1 <0.001 
Waist circumference (cm) 95 ± 12 97 ± 12 97 ± 12 99 ± 11 101 ± 11 104 ± 12 <0.001 
Fasting glucose (mg/dL) 96 ± 13 97 ± 13 100 ± 14 103 ± 14 113 ± 20 144 ± 39 <0.001 
Fasting insulin (mU/L) 7.0 (5.0–13.0) 9.0 (6.0–13.0) 8.0 (6.0–12.0) 9.0 (6.0–14.0) 11 (7–17) 10 (6–19) <0.001§ 
Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes       
 All 8 (7.1) 43 (8.9) 89 (10.3) 113 (15.0) 158 (39.5) 57 (78.1) <0.001 
 Fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL 2 (1.8) 14 (2.9) 23 (2.6) 47 (6.3) 91 (22.8) 53 (72.6) <0.001 
 Glucose 2 h ≥200 mg/dL|| 6 (5.4) 29 (6.0) 66 (7.6) 66 (8.8) 67 (16.7) 4 (7.0) <0.001 
Systemic hypertension 64 (57.1) 308 (64.0) 592 (68.2) 546 (72.6) 304 (76.0) 63 (86.3) <0.001 
Blood lipid level (mg/dL)        
 LDL cholesterol 109 ± 29 117 ± 34 117 ± 33 121 ± 35 118 ± 34 112 ± 34 0.004 
 HDL cholesterol 41 ± 12 39 ± 11 40 ± 11 40 ± 11 38 ± 10 37 ± 10 <0.001 
 Triglycerides 139 (100–195) 138 (101–188) 136 (104–190) 147 (109–197) 153 (114–207) 151 (121–228) <0.001§ 
Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m290 ± 19 85 ± 17 84 ± 18 80 ± 18 79 ± 17 78 ± 16 <0.001 
C-reactive protein (mg/L) 3.8 (0.7–7.7) 3.1 (0.8–7.7) 3.4 (0.6–8.7) 4.0 (1.2–9.7) 5.3 (1.8–12.2) 5.7 (2.7–14.3) <0.001§ 
Smoking       0.255 
 Never smoking 31 (27.7) 170 (35.3) 331 (38.1) 278 (37.0) 128 (32.0) 22 (30.1) — 
 Past smoking 54 (48.2) 207 (43.0) 372 (42.9) 310 (41.2) 186 (46.5) 38 (52.1) — 
 Current smoking 27 (24.1) 104 (21.6) 165 (19.0) 164 (21.8) 86 (21.5) 13 (17.8) — 
Charlson comorbidity index#       <0.001 
 Group 0 36 (33.6) 163 (35.9) 272 (34.9) 212 (31.8) 92 (26.0) 9 (12.9) — 
 Group 1 45 (42.1) 169 (37.2) 287 (36.8) 221 (33.2) 127 (35.9) 33 (47.1) — 
 Group 2 26 (24.3) 122 (26.9) 220 (28.2) 233 (35.0) 135 (38.1) 28 (40.0) — 
History of myocardial infarction 47 (42.0) 190 (39.5) 340 (39.2) 288 (38.3) 160 (40.0) 39 (53.4) 0.242 
CAD (50% stenosis) 69 (61.6) 304 (63.2) 550 (63.4) 500 (66.5) 277 (69.3) 56 (76.7) 0.063 
FS 5 (1–7) 4 (1–8) 5 (1–8) 5 (2–8) 6 (3–8) 6 (3–10) 0.001 
NYHA functional class       0.057 
 1 56 (50.0) 268 (55.7) 503 (57.9) 379 (50.4) 196 (49.0) 32 (43.8) — 
 2 36 (32.1) 143 (29.7) 230 (26.5) 221 (29.4) 131 (32.8) 22 (30.1) — 
 3 18 (16.1) 58 (12.1) 110 (12.7) 130 (17.3) 62 (15.5) 16 (21.9) — 
 4 2 (1.8) 12 (2.5) 25 (2.9) 22 (2.9) 11 (2.8) 3 (4.1) — 
Physical activity**       0.010 
 Below average 10 (9.2) 34 (7.2) 38 (4.5) 38 (5.2) 29 (7.4) 11 (15.3) — 
 Average 76 (69.7) 326 (69.2) 610 (72.0) 547 (74.5) 283 (72.0) 45 (62.5) — 
 Above average 23 (21.1) 111 (23.6) 199 (23.5) 149 (20.3) 81 (20.6) 16 (22.2) — 
Medication use        
 β-Blocker 71 (63.4) 301 (62.6) 558 (64.3) 485 (64.5) 251 (62.8) 44 (60.3) 0.952 
 ACE inhibitor 49 (43.8) 211 (43.9) 438 (50.5) 407 (54.1) 214 (53.5) 50 (68.5) <0.001 
 Calcium antagonist 10 (8.9) 71 (14.8) 116 (13.4) 116 (15.4) 56 (14.0) 15 (20.5) 0.263 
 Diuretic 25 (22.3) 87 (18.1) 168 (19.4) 204 (27.1) 137 (34.3) 32 (43.8) <0.001 
 Statin 47 (42.0) 222 (46.2) 397 (45.7) 388 (51.6) 210 (52.5) 40 (54.8) 0.032 
 Acetyl salicylic acid 78 (69.6) 343 (71.3) 603 (69.5) 536 (71.3) 284 (71.0) 56 (76.7) 0.822 
<5%5–5.4%5.5–5.9%6.0–6.4%6.5–7.4%≥7.5%P*
Number 112 481 868 752 400 73  
Glycated hemoglobin (%) 4.7 ± 0.2 5.2 ± 0.1 5.7 ± 0.1 6.2 ± 0.1 6.8 ± 0.3 8.3 ± 0.9 — 
Sex: male 88 (78.6) 347 (72.1) 618 (71.2) 504 (67.0) 286 (71.5) 54 (74.0) 0.097 
Age (years) 55.5 ± 13.0 59.7 ± 11.2 61.5 ± 10.7 62.8 ± 10.6 64.0 ± 9.1 66.1 ± 9.4 <0.001 
BMI (kg/m226.1 ± 3.9 26.8 ± 3.9 27.0 ± 3.7 27.3 ± 3.8 28.3 ± 4.2 28.6 ± 4.1 <0.001 
Waist circumference (cm) 95 ± 12 97 ± 12 97 ± 12 99 ± 11 101 ± 11 104 ± 12 <0.001 
Fasting glucose (mg/dL) 96 ± 13 97 ± 13 100 ± 14 103 ± 14 113 ± 20 144 ± 39 <0.001 
Fasting insulin (mU/L) 7.0 (5.0–13.0) 9.0 (6.0–13.0) 8.0 (6.0–12.0) 9.0 (6.0–14.0) 11 (7–17) 10 (6–19) <0.001§ 
Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes       
 All 8 (7.1) 43 (8.9) 89 (10.3) 113 (15.0) 158 (39.5) 57 (78.1) <0.001 
 Fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL 2 (1.8) 14 (2.9) 23 (2.6) 47 (6.3) 91 (22.8) 53 (72.6) <0.001 
 Glucose 2 h ≥200 mg/dL|| 6 (5.4) 29 (6.0) 66 (7.6) 66 (8.8) 67 (16.7) 4 (7.0) <0.001 
Systemic hypertension 64 (57.1) 308 (64.0) 592 (68.2) 546 (72.6) 304 (76.0) 63 (86.3) <0.001 
Blood lipid level (mg/dL)        
 LDL cholesterol 109 ± 29 117 ± 34 117 ± 33 121 ± 35 118 ± 34 112 ± 34 0.004 
 HDL cholesterol 41 ± 12 39 ± 11 40 ± 11 40 ± 11 38 ± 10 37 ± 10 <0.001 
 Triglycerides 139 (100–195) 138 (101–188) 136 (104–190) 147 (109–197) 153 (114–207) 151 (121–228) <0.001§ 
Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m290 ± 19 85 ± 17 84 ± 18 80 ± 18 79 ± 17 78 ± 16 <0.001 
C-reactive protein (mg/L) 3.8 (0.7–7.7) 3.1 (0.8–7.7) 3.4 (0.6–8.7) 4.0 (1.2–9.7) 5.3 (1.8–12.2) 5.7 (2.7–14.3) <0.001§ 
Smoking       0.255 
 Never smoking 31 (27.7) 170 (35.3) 331 (38.1) 278 (37.0) 128 (32.0) 22 (30.1) — 
 Past smoking 54 (48.2) 207 (43.0) 372 (42.9) 310 (41.2) 186 (46.5) 38 (52.1) — 
 Current smoking 27 (24.1) 104 (21.6) 165 (19.0) 164 (21.8) 86 (21.5) 13 (17.8) — 
Charlson comorbidity index#       <0.001 
 Group 0 36 (33.6) 163 (35.9) 272 (34.9) 212 (31.8) 92 (26.0) 9 (12.9) — 
 Group 1 45 (42.1) 169 (37.2) 287 (36.8) 221 (33.2) 127 (35.9) 33 (47.1) — 
 Group 2 26 (24.3) 122 (26.9) 220 (28.2) 233 (35.0) 135 (38.1) 28 (40.0) — 
History of myocardial infarction 47 (42.0) 190 (39.5) 340 (39.2) 288 (38.3) 160 (40.0) 39 (53.4) 0.242 
CAD (50% stenosis) 69 (61.6) 304 (63.2) 550 (63.4) 500 (66.5) 277 (69.3) 56 (76.7) 0.063 
FS 5 (1–7) 4 (1–8) 5 (1–8) 5 (2–8) 6 (3–8) 6 (3–10) 0.001 
NYHA functional class       0.057 
 1 56 (50.0) 268 (55.7) 503 (57.9) 379 (50.4) 196 (49.0) 32 (43.8) — 
 2 36 (32.1) 143 (29.7) 230 (26.5) 221 (29.4) 131 (32.8) 22 (30.1) — 
 3 18 (16.1) 58 (12.1) 110 (12.7) 130 (17.3) 62 (15.5) 16 (21.9) — 
 4 2 (1.8) 12 (2.5) 25 (2.9) 22 (2.9) 11 (2.8) 3 (4.1) — 
Physical activity**       0.010 
 Below average 10 (9.2) 34 (7.2) 38 (4.5) 38 (5.2) 29 (7.4) 11 (15.3) — 
 Average 76 (69.7) 326 (69.2) 610 (72.0) 547 (74.5) 283 (72.0) 45 (62.5) — 
 Above average 23 (21.1) 111 (23.6) 199 (23.5) 149 (20.3) 81 (20.6) 16 (22.2) — 
Medication use        
 β-Blocker 71 (63.4) 301 (62.6) 558 (64.3) 485 (64.5) 251 (62.8) 44 (60.3) 0.952 
 ACE inhibitor 49 (43.8) 211 (43.9) 438 (50.5) 407 (54.1) 214 (53.5) 50 (68.5) <0.001 
 Calcium antagonist 10 (8.9) 71 (14.8) 116 (13.4) 116 (15.4) 56 (14.0) 15 (20.5) 0.263 
 Diuretic 25 (22.3) 87 (18.1) 168 (19.4) 204 (27.1) 137 (34.3) 32 (43.8) <0.001 
 Statin 47 (42.0) 222 (46.2) 397 (45.7) 388 (51.6) 210 (52.5) 40 (54.8) 0.032 
 Acetyl salicylic acid 78 (69.6) 343 (71.3) 603 (69.5) 536 (71.3) 284 (71.0) 56 (76.7) 0.822 

Values are means (SD) or medians (interquartile ranges) in cases of continuous variables and numbers (percentages) in cases of categorical variables.

2-Test for categorical data and ANOVA for continuous data;

†number: 108/475/852/741/397/73;

‡number: 111/463/849/738/395/71;

§ANOVA of logarithmically transformed values;

||number: 86/348/613/504/208/13;

¶number: 112/481/867/750/399/73;

#number: 107/454/779/666/354/70;

**number: 109/471/847/734/393/72. NYHA, New York Heart Association.

Association of glycated hemoglobin and fasting glucose with mortality

A total of 508 (18.9%) deaths occurred during the follow-up. Of those, 299 (58.9%) were accounted for by cardiovascular diseases, and 79 (15.6%) were attributed to cancer.

All-cause mortality.

Death from any cause occurred in 20 (17.9%), 76 (15.9%), 141 (16.2%), 148 (19.7%), 97 (24.3%), and 26 (35.6%) individuals of the glycated hemoglobin categories <5, 5–5.4, 5.5–5.9, 6.0–6.4, 6.5–7.4, and ≥7.5%, respectively. Compared with the glycated hemoglobin category 5.5–5.9%, subjects in the highest category of glycated hemoglobin were at significantly elevated risk of death from any cause. This association remained significant after multivariate adjustment (Table 2 and Fig. 1). Even inclusion of fasting glucose as a covariate did not affect the significance of the results (Table 2). We observed a trend for a J-shaped relationship between the glycated hemoglobin categories and death from any cause (Table 2). Fasting glucose categories were also significantly related to all-cause mortality in multivariate models (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 2). However, significance was lost when we additionally adjusted for glycated hemoglobin (Table 3).

Table 2

Mortality according to categories of glycated hemoglobin

HbA1c (%)Model 1*
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4§
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
All-cause mortality  
 <5.0 1.08 (0.68–1.72) 0.751 1.48 (0.92–2.36) 0.105 1.36 (0.85–2.19) 0.198 1.36 (0.85–2.18) 0.200 
 5.0–5.4 0.93 (0.71–1.23) 0.621 1.02 (0.77–1.35) 0.888 1.00 (0.76–1.32) 0.996 1.00 (0.76–1.32) 0.992 
 5.5–5.9 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 6.0–6.4 1.24 (0.98–1.56) 0.072 1.17 (0.92–1.47) 0.196 1.11 (0.88–1.41) 0.365 1.11 (0.88–1.41) 0.364 
 6.5–7.4 1.59 (1.23–2.06) <0.001 1.43 (1.10–1.85) 0.007 1.39 (1.07–1.81) 0.014 1.39 (1.07–1.82) 0.015 
 ≥7.5 2.64 (1.74–4.02) <0.001 2.12 (1.39–3.22) <0.001 2.12 (1.39–3.25) 0.001 2.15 (1.32–3.53) 0.002 
Cardiovascular mortality||  
 <5.0 1.16 (0.61–2.18) 0.657 1.55 (0.82–2.92) 0.179 1.43 (0.75–2.71) 0.275 1.42 (0.75–2.70) 0.279 
 5.0–5.4 1.20 (0.84–1.72) 0.325 1.32 (0.92–1.89) 0.137 1.29 (0.90–1.85) 0.168 1.29 (0.90–1.85) 0.173 
 5.5–5.9 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 6.0–6.4 1.51 (1.11–2.05) 0.009 1.44 (1.05–1.96) 0.022 1.34 (0.98–1.83) 0.063 1.35 (0.99–1.84) 0.066 
 6.5–7.4 1.84 (1.30–2.60) 0.001 1.66 (1.17–2.35) 0.004 1.58 (1.11–2.24) 0.011 1.59 (1.11–2.28) 0.011 
 ≥7.5 3.36 (1.98–5.71) <0.001 2.73 (1.61–4.64) <0.001 2.72 (1.59–4.66) <0.001 2.86 (1.54–5.31) 0.001 
Cancer mortality||  
 <5.0 1.67 (0.63–4.38) 0.302 2.24 (0.85–5.93) 0.103 1.98 (0.75–5.27) 0.170 2.03 (0.76–5.40) 0.156 
 5.0–5.4 0.76 (0.36–1.59) 0.460 0.83 (0.39–1.74) 0.617 0.81 (0.38–1.70) 0.575 0.82 (0.39–1.72) 0.595 
 5.5–5.9 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 6.0–6.4 0.93 (0.50–1.71) 0.803 0.88 (0.47–1.63) 0.685 0.94 (0.50–1.75) 0.845 0.93 (0.50–1.74) 0.824 
 6.5–7.4 1.93 (1.05–3.54) 0.035 1.73 (0.94–3.18) 0.077 1.97 (1.06–3.65) 0.032 1.85 (0.98–3.48) 0.058 
 ≥7.5 2.53 (0.88–7.32) 0.087 2.07 (0.72–6.01) 0.180 2.32 (0.79–6.86) 0.127 1.67 (0.46–6.11) 0.438 
HbA1c (%)Model 1*
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4§
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
All-cause mortality  
 <5.0 1.08 (0.68–1.72) 0.751 1.48 (0.92–2.36) 0.105 1.36 (0.85–2.19) 0.198 1.36 (0.85–2.18) 0.200 
 5.0–5.4 0.93 (0.71–1.23) 0.621 1.02 (0.77–1.35) 0.888 1.00 (0.76–1.32) 0.996 1.00 (0.76–1.32) 0.992 
 5.5–5.9 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 6.0–6.4 1.24 (0.98–1.56) 0.072 1.17 (0.92–1.47) 0.196 1.11 (0.88–1.41) 0.365 1.11 (0.88–1.41) 0.364 
 6.5–7.4 1.59 (1.23–2.06) <0.001 1.43 (1.10–1.85) 0.007 1.39 (1.07–1.81) 0.014 1.39 (1.07–1.82) 0.015 
 ≥7.5 2.64 (1.74–4.02) <0.001 2.12 (1.39–3.22) <0.001 2.12 (1.39–3.25) 0.001 2.15 (1.32–3.53) 0.002 
Cardiovascular mortality||  
 <5.0 1.16 (0.61–2.18) 0.657 1.55 (0.82–2.92) 0.179 1.43 (0.75–2.71) 0.275 1.42 (0.75–2.70) 0.279 
 5.0–5.4 1.20 (0.84–1.72) 0.325 1.32 (0.92–1.89) 0.137 1.29 (0.90–1.85) 0.168 1.29 (0.90–1.85) 0.173 
 5.5–5.9 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 6.0–6.4 1.51 (1.11–2.05) 0.009 1.44 (1.05–1.96) 0.022 1.34 (0.98–1.83) 0.063 1.35 (0.99–1.84) 0.066 
 6.5–7.4 1.84 (1.30–2.60) 0.001 1.66 (1.17–2.35) 0.004 1.58 (1.11–2.24) 0.011 1.59 (1.11–2.28) 0.011 
 ≥7.5 3.36 (1.98–5.71) <0.001 2.73 (1.61–4.64) <0.001 2.72 (1.59–4.66) <0.001 2.86 (1.54–5.31) 0.001 
Cancer mortality||  
 <5.0 1.67 (0.63–4.38) 0.302 2.24 (0.85–5.93) 0.103 1.98 (0.75–5.27) 0.170 2.03 (0.76–5.40) 0.156 
 5.0–5.4 0.76 (0.36–1.59) 0.460 0.83 (0.39–1.74) 0.617 0.81 (0.38–1.70) 0.575 0.82 (0.39–1.72) 0.595 
 5.5–5.9 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 6.0–6.4 0.93 (0.50–1.71) 0.803 0.88 (0.47–1.63) 0.685 0.94 (0.50–1.75) 0.845 0.93 (0.50–1.74) 0.824 
 6.5–7.4 1.93 (1.05–3.54) 0.035 1.73 (0.94–3.18) 0.077 1.97 (1.06–3.65) 0.032 1.85 (0.98–3.48) 0.058 
 ≥7.5 2.53 (0.88–7.32) 0.087 2.07 (0.72–6.01) 0.180 2.32 (0.79–6.86) 0.127 1.67 (0.46–6.11) 0.438 

HR (95% CI) calculated with Cox proportional hazards model.

*Unadjusted.

†Adjusted for sex and age.

‡Adjusted for sex, age, BMI, hypertension, smoking, glomerular filtration rate, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and FS.

§Adjusted for sex, age, BMI, hypertension, smoking, glomerular filtration rate, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, FS, and fasting glucose.

||Death certificates were missing for 15 subjects.

Figure 1

Survival curves for (A) all-cause and (B) cardiovascular mortality calculated with Cox proportional hazards models (model 3) according to categories of glycated hemoglobin (1: <5%, 2: 5–5.4%, 3: 5.5–5.9%, 4: 6.0–6.4%, 5: 6.5–7.4%, and 6: ≥7.5%).

Figure 1

Survival curves for (A) all-cause and (B) cardiovascular mortality calculated with Cox proportional hazards models (model 3) according to categories of glycated hemoglobin (1: <5%, 2: 5–5.4%, 3: 5.5–5.9%, 4: 6.0–6.4%, 5: 6.5–7.4%, and 6: ≥7.5%).

Close modal
Table 3

Mortality according to categories of fasting glucose

Fasting glucose (mg/dL)Model 1*
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4§
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
All-cause mortality 
 <100 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 100–125 1.18 (0.98–1.42) 0.080 1.08 (0.90–1.30) 0.417 1.12 (0.93–1.36) 0.228 1.10 (0.91–1.33) 0.350 
 ≥126 1.56 (1.17–2.08) 0.002 1.33 (0.99–1.77) 0.055 1.39 (1.03–1.87) 0.034 1.16 (0.83–1.63) 0.379 
Cardiovascular mortality|| 
 <110 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 100–125 1.25 (0.98–1.59) 0.067 1.14 (0.90–1.45) 0.288 1.17 (0.92–1.50) 0.203 1.14 (0.89–1.46) 0.304 
 ≥126 1.55 (1.06–2.27) 0.024 1.31 (0.90–1.92) 0.165 1.35 (0.90–2.01) 0.143 1.09 (0.70–1.71) 0.693 
Cancer mortality|| 
 <100 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 100–125 1.39 (0.87–2.22) 0.168 1.27 (0.79–2.03) 0.322 1.40 (0.87–2.27) 0.170 1.34 (0.83–2.18) 0.231 
 ≥126 1.71 (0.82–3.56) 0.153 1.47 (0.70–3.06) 0.308 1.81 (0.84–3.90) 0.131 1.34 (0.56–3.21) 0.507 
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)Model 1*
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4§
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
All-cause mortality 
 <100 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 100–125 1.18 (0.98–1.42) 0.080 1.08 (0.90–1.30) 0.417 1.12 (0.93–1.36) 0.228 1.10 (0.91–1.33) 0.350 
 ≥126 1.56 (1.17–2.08) 0.002 1.33 (0.99–1.77) 0.055 1.39 (1.03–1.87) 0.034 1.16 (0.83–1.63) 0.379 
Cardiovascular mortality|| 
 <110 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 100–125 1.25 (0.98–1.59) 0.067 1.14 (0.90–1.45) 0.288 1.17 (0.92–1.50) 0.203 1.14 (0.89–1.46) 0.304 
 ≥126 1.55 (1.06–2.27) 0.024 1.31 (0.90–1.92) 0.165 1.35 (0.90–2.01) 0.143 1.09 (0.70–1.71) 0.693 
Cancer mortality|| 
 <100 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 1.0 reference — 
 100–125 1.39 (0.87–2.22) 0.168 1.27 (0.79–2.03) 0.322 1.40 (0.87–2.27) 0.170 1.34 (0.83–2.18) 0.231 
 ≥126 1.71 (0.82–3.56) 0.153 1.47 (0.70–3.06) 0.308 1.81 (0.84–3.90) 0.131 1.34 (0.56–3.21) 0.507 

HR (95% CI) calculated with Cox proportional hazards model.

*Unadjusted.

†Adjusted for sex and age.

‡Adjusted for sex, age, BMI, hypertension, smoking, glomerular filtration rate, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and FS.

§Adjusted for sex, age, BMI, hypertension, smoking, glomerular filtration rate, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, FS, and glycated hemoglobin.

||Death certificates were missing for 15 subjects.

Cardiovascular mortality.

A total of 11 (9.8%), 50 (10.4%), 72 (8.4%), 92 (12.3%), 57 (14.4%), and 17 (23.3%) subjects of the glycated hemoglobin categories <5, 5–5.4, 5.5–5.9, 6.0–6.4, 6.5–7.4, and ≥7.5%, respectively, died from cardiovascular diseases. Compared with glycated hemoglobin category 5.5–5.9%, subjects in the highest category of glycated hemoglobin were more likely to die from cardiovascular diseases using univariate and multivariate models, including the FS and fasting glucose as covariates (Table 2 and Fig. 1). Fasting glucose categories were also predictive of cardiovascular mortality (Table 3). However, the associations of fasting glucose categories with cardiovascular mortality did not remain significant after multivariate adjustment (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 2).

Cancer mortality.

Death from cancer occurred in 5 (4.5%), 10 (2.1%), 23 (2.7%), 18 (2.4%), 19 (4.8%), and 4 (5.5%) subjects of the of the glycated hemoglobin categories <5, 5–5.4, 5.5–5.9, 6.0–6.4, 6.5–7.4, and ≥7.5%, respectively. Increased glycated hemoglobin was significantly correlated with higher cancer mortality (Table 2).When fasting glucose was included as an additional covariate, the association of the glycated hemoglobin categories with cancer mortality reached borderline significance (Table 2). The relationship of the fasting glucose categories with cancer mortality did not reach statistical significance (Table 3).

The main findings of this study in patients who predominantly had CAD are as follows. First, glycated hemoglobin is a significant predictor of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality showing trends toward J-shaped associations with all three end points. Second, the relationships of glycated hemoglobin with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality are independent of fasting glucose. Third, the association of fasting glucose with mortality is not significant when glycated hemoglobin is included as a covariate. Finally, high glycated hemoglobin is strongly associated with increased risk of new onset diabetes diagnosed according to the ADA criteria of 2009 (8).

Several previous studies have demonstrated continuous positive correlations of glycated hemoglobin with mortality and even subclinical cardiovascular disease in subjects without a history of diabetes (1015). However, in the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities study, a J-shaped relationship between glycated hemoglobin and all-cause mortality was observed (5). Similarly, U-shaped relationships of glycated hemoglobin with all-cause and cause-specific mortality, including death from cardiovascular diseases and cancer, were found in a large New Zealand collective (16). These data were supported by a study in insurance applicants (17). We also observed a trend toward a J-shaped correlation between glycated hemoglobin and mortality in our cohort of subjects at intermediate-to-high cardiovascular risk. In agreement, analyses in the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study and the San Antonio Heart Study showed an association between low fasting glucose and increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (18).Low glycated hemoglobin and low fasting glucose potentially reflect chronic consuming illness that may lead to early death (18). Apart from that, the lowest glycated hemoglobin quintile was prima vista characterized by a favorable cardiovascular risk factor profile and low comorbidity as reflected by the Charlson comorbidity index.

A main objective was to compare the predictive value of fasting glucose and glycated hemoglobin in participants of the LURIC study. It is noteworthy that we were able to confirm that the association of glycated hemoglobin with mortality is independent of fasting glucose but not vice versa. This finding suggests that glycated hemoglobin may be superior to fasting glucose in the prediction of mortality (5).

Finally, our data confirm that glycated hemoglobin is strongly correlated with new onset or future type 2 diabetes diagnosed according to the ADA criteria of 2009 (5,1922). However, type 2 diabetes was also diagnosed in 7.1% of the LURIC participants belonging to the lowest glycated hemoglobin category. This proportion is markedly increased compared with the 0.8% reported by Selvin et al. (5). The difference between the two studies is accounted for by the fact that we performed OGTT in the majority of the LURIC participants with fasting glucose levels <126 mg/dL. Based on fasting glucose levels, new onset type 2 diabetes would have been diagnosed in 1.8% of the LURIC participants in the lowest glycated hemoglobin category only (5). Because postchallenge glucose is associated with prognosis (23), our data confirm the findings by Woerle et al. (24) that OGTT will help to identify subjects with increased cardiovascular risk.

Some limitations pertain to our study. Considering the racial and ethnic differences in the glycated hemoglobin concentration, our findings are restricted to whites (25). Furthermore, the LURIC participants have been recruited at a tertiary referral center and underwent coronary angiography; therefore, the results may not be representative of a random population sample. However, the aim of this work was to specifically address the question whether glycated hemoglobin was a significant and independent predictor of mortality in subjects with elevated cardiovascular risk. Because this study was observational in design, we are not able to prove causality either. In addition, the number of participants in the subgroup with the lowest glycated hemoglobin values was not very large. This may account for the nonsignificant association of low-normal glycemic state with mortality. Nevertheless, the number of participants in the highest glycated hemoglobin category was even smaller compared with the lowest category, and a high level of significance was achieved by analyzing the mortality data for this subgroup. Another aspect to be mentioned is that glycated hemoglobin was only measured once at baseline. Hence, we were not able to control for possible alterations of glycated hemoglobin during the follow-up. Finally, the questionnaire used to estimate physical activity has not been stringently validated. The major strengths of the LURIC cohort are the precise clinical and metabolic characterization of the participants, including the availability of coronary angiograms, its cross-sectional and prospective design, and the completeness of the follow-up.

In conclusion, we found that glycated hemoglobin significantly and independently of fasting glucose predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in individuals who underwent coronary angiography.

LURIC has received funding through the 6th Framework Program (integrated project Bloodomics, grant LSHM-CT-2004-503485) and 7th Framework Program (integrated project Atheroremo, grant agreement number 201668) of the European Union. B.O.B. received grants from the German Research Foundation GrK 1041 and the Centre of Excellence Metabolic Disorders Baden-Wuerttemberg.

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

G.S. performed statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. T.B.G. performed statistical analysis, contributed to the interpretation of the results, and reviewed the manuscript. B.R.W. designed the study and reviewed the manuscript. B.O.B. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. W.M. designed the study, performed statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript.

The authors extend appreciation to the participants of the LURIC study. Without their collaboration, this article would not have been written. The authors also thank the LURIC study team either temporarily or permanently involved in patient recruitment and sample and data handling, the laboratory staff at the Ludwigshafen General Hospital, and the Universities of Freiburg and Ulm.

1.
Selvin
E
,
Crainiceanu
CM
,
Brancati
FL
,
Coresh
J
.
Short-term variability in measures of glycemia and implications for the classification of diabetes
.
Arch Intern Med
2007
;
167
:
1545
1551
[PubMed]
2.
American Diabetes Association
.
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2009
.
Diabetes Care
2009
;
32
(
Suppl. 1
):
S13
S61
[PubMed]
3.
Nathan
DM
,
Kuenen
J
,
Borg
R
,
Zheng
H
,
Schoenfeld
D
,
Heine
RJ
;
A1c-Derived Average Glucose Study Group
.
Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values
.
Diabetes Care
2008
;
31
:
1473
1478
[PubMed]
4.
American Diabetes Association
.
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus
.
Diabetes Care
2010
;
33
(
Suppl. 1
):
S62
S69
[PubMed]
5.
Selvin
E
,
Steffes
MW
,
Zhu
H
, et al
.
Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic adults
.
N Engl J Med
2010
;
362
:
800
811
[PubMed]
6.
Winkelmann
BR
,
Marz
W
,
Boehm
BO
, et al
;
LURIC Study Group (Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health)
.
Rationale and design of the LURIC study–a resource for functional genomics, pharmacogenomics and long-term prognosis of cardiovascular disease
.
Pharmacogenomics
2001
;
2
(
Suppl. 1
):
S1
S73
7.
Friesinger
GC
,
Page
EE
,
Ross
RS
.
Prognostic significance of coronary arteriography
.
Trans Assoc Am Physicians
1970
;
83
:
78
92
[PubMed]
8.
American Diabetes Association
.
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus
.
Diabetes Care
2009
;
32
(
Suppl. 1
):
S62
S67
[PubMed]
9.
de Groot
V
,
Beckerman
H
,
Lankhorst
GJ
,
Bouter
LM
.
How to measure comorbidity: a critical review of available methods
.
J Clin Epidemiol
2003
;
56
:
221
229
[PubMed]
10.
de Vegt
F
,
Dekker
JM
,
Ruhé
HG
, et al
.
Hyperglycaemia is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the Hoorn population: the Hoorn Study
.
Diabetologia
1999
;
42
:
926
931
[PubMed]
11.
Khaw
KT
,
Wareham
N
,
Bingham
S
,
Luben
R
,
Welch
A
,
Day
N
.
Association of hemoglobin A1c with cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer in Norfolk
.
Ann Intern Med
2004
;
141
:
413
420
[PubMed]
12.
Levitan
EB
,
Liu
S
,
Stampfer
MJ
, et al
.
HbA1c measured in stored erythrocytes and mortality rate among middle-aged and older women
.
Diabetologia
2008
;
51
:
267
275
[PubMed]
13.
Gerstein
HC
,
Swedberg
K
,
Carlsson
J
, et al
;
CHARM Program Investigators
.
The hemoglobin A1c level as a progressive risk factor for cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, or death in patients with chronic heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) program
.
Arch Intern Med
2008
;
168
:
1699
1704
[PubMed]
14.
Sarwar N, Aspelund T, Eiriksdottir G, et al. Markers of dysglycaemia and risk of coronary heart disease in people without diabetes: Reykjavik prospective study and systematic review. PLoS Med 2010 25;7:e1000278
15.
McNeely
MJ
,
McClelland
RL
,
Bild
DE
, et al
.
The association between A1C and subclinical cardiovascular disease: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis
.
Diabetes Care
2009
;
32
:
1727
1733
[PubMed]
16.
Brewer
N
,
Wright
CS
,
Travier
N
, et al
.
A New Zealand linkage study examining the associations between A1C concentration and mortality
.
Diabetes Care
2008
;
31
:
1144
1149
[PubMed]
17.
Stout
RL
,
Fulks
M
,
Dolan
VF
,
Magee
ME
,
Suarez
L
.
Relationship of hemoglobin A1c to mortality in nonsmoking insurance applicants
.
J Insur Med
2007
;
39
:
174
181
[PubMed]
18.
Wei
M
,
Gibbons
LW
,
Mitchell
TL
,
Kampert
JB
,
Stern
MP
,
Blair
SN
.
Low fasting plasma glucose level as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality
.
Circulation
2000
;
101
:
2047
2052
[PubMed]
19.
Selvin
E
,
Zhu
H
,
Brancati
FL
.
Elevated A1C in adults without a history of diabetes in the U.S.
Diabetes Care
2009
;
32
:
828
833
[PubMed]
20.
Zhang
X
,
Gregg
EW
,
Williamson
DF
, et al
.
A1C level and future risk of diabetes: a systematic review
.
Diabetes Care
2010
;
33
:
1665
1673
[PubMed]
21.
Carson
AP
,
Reynolds
K
,
Fonseca
VA
,
Muntner
P
.
Comparison of A1C and fasting glucose criteria to diagnose diabetes among U.S. adults
.
Diabetes Care
2010
;
33
:
95
97
[PubMed]
22.
Selvin
E
,
Steffes
MW
,
Gregg
E
,
Brancati
FL
,
Coresh
J
.
Performance of A1C for the classification and prediction of diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2011
;
34
:
84
89
[PubMed]
23.
Meigs
JB
,
Nathan
DM
,
D’Agostino
RB
 Sr
,
Wilson
PW
;
Framingham Offspring Study
.
Fasting and postchallenge glycemia and cardiovascular disease risk: the Framingham Offspring Study
.
Diabetes Care
2002
;
25
:
1845
1850
[PubMed]
24.
Woerle
HJ
,
Pimenta
WP
,
Meyer
C
, et al
.
Diagnostic and therapeutic implications of relationships between fasting, 2-hour postchallenge plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c values
.
Arch Intern Med
2004
;
164
:
1627
1632
[PubMed]
25.
Herman
WH
,
Ma
Y
,
Uwaifo
G
, et al
;
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group
.
Differences in A1C by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention Program
.
Diabetes Care
2007
;
30
:
2453
2457
[PubMed]
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

Supplementary data