Fructose is a sweet tasting sugar that is found naturally in fruits and some vegetables and has been part of the human diet—in modest amounts—for eons. The increasing consumption of sugar has dramatically increased our exposure to fructose (1). Sugar consumption has risen more than 40-fold since the Declaration of Independence was signed 250 years ago, and more than 40% of the added sugars in our diet are in sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit drinks (2,3). Thus, the principal sources of fructose in our diet are now sugar and high-fructose corn syrup, each of which has about 50% fructose. The intake of soft drinks has risen fivefold since 1950 (4,5) (Fig.1) and with it the intake of fructose. The rise in the consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages has paralleled the rise in the prevalence of obesity and the metabolic syndrome and is associated with the appearance of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (68). Although association does not prove causation, it has stimulated research to understand whether current levels of fructose intake in beverages pose a health risk.

Over the past decade fructose from either sucrose or high-fructose corn syrup has received growing attention as it has been associated with a widening group of health-related problems. Several meta-analyses have shown a relationship between the consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks and obesity (911). The relation of these beverages to obesity can be attributed to the increased caloric intake and to the fact that beverages do not suppress the intake of other foods to an appropriate degree—thus beverage calories serve as “add-on” calories enhancing the risk of obesity (12) (Fig. 1). Meta-analyses have also suggested that the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is related to the risk of diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease (13).

Figure 1

Model showing some potential consequences of increasing fructose and energy intake from sugar or high-fructose corn syrup in beverages. VAT, visceral adipose tissue.

Figure 1

Model showing some potential consequences of increasing fructose and energy intake from sugar or high-fructose corn syrup in beverages. VAT, visceral adipose tissue.

Close modal

Several short-term clinical trials have provided insights into the metabolic consequences of ingesting sugar-sweetened beverages. In one study there was an increase in body weight, blood pressure, and inflammatory markers (14,15), and in a second study there was an increase in triglycerides levels (particularly at night), a stimulation of de novo lipogenesis, and an increase in visceral fat (16,17). In the third study, which compared milk, diet cola, a sugar-sweetened cola, and water, the sugar-sweetened beverage increased liver fat, visceral fat, and triglycerides over the 6 months of beverage intake (18). The latter study suggests that consuming two 16-ounce sugar-containing beverages per day for 6 months can mimic many of the features of the metabolic syndrome and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

The article by Aeberli et al. (19) in this issue of Diabetes Care and their previous study (20) have added important data on the responses to fructose. They conducted a 4-week randomized crossover study with a 4-week wash-out between each diet in 9 healthy young men comparing 4 different soft drinks with levels of fructose, glucose, and sucrose that are closer to “normal” intake than some other studies. The low-fructose beverage had 40 g per day of fructose, which was the same amount of fructose as in the 80 g per day sucrose beverage (40 g). This is less fructose than is contained in two 16-ounce sugar-sweetened soft drinks with 10% sugar. There was also a high-glucose beverage (80 g per day), which is twice what was in the sucrose beverage, and an 80 g per day fructose beverage, which is also twice the amount in the sucrose and low-fructose beverages. With the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, the authors examined insulin sensitivity of the liver and the whole body. Compared with the high-glucose beverage, the low-fructose beverage impaired hepatic insulin sensitivity, but not whole-body insulin sensitivity, pointing again to the pathophysiological effects that fructose can have on the liver. In addition, they found that total and LDL cholesterol were increased by fructose relative to glucose and that free fatty acids were increased or showed a trend toward an increase in the fructose beverage groups.

This article has several strengths, one of which is that it is a randomized crossover comparison of four beverages with two levels of fructose, glucose, and sucrose (50% fructose). Another strength is that the study used modest amounts of fructose and had a glucose control. One limitation is that it had only a small number of subjects and that they were all male, so we cannot be absolutely sure that these results extrapolate to females.

The authors did not find any effect on fasting triglycerides. However, they did not design the study to look at postprandial or nocturnal levels of triglycerides where they might have detected differences. In the comparison of the effect of glucose, fructose, and sucrose on plasma triglycerides, Cohen and Schall (21) found that both fructose in the amount found in sucrose AND sucrose increased triglycerides following a meal, but that glucose did not—leading them to conclude that the effects on lipids were due to the fructose either alone or as part of sucrose (table sugar), and not glucose.

This study adds to the information about the role of fructose either from sucrose (ordinary table sugar) or from high-fructose corn syrup in initiating liver dysfunction and possibly leading to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome, which have become increasingly prevalent. Figure 1 relates the findings from this study to those of other studies (13,1618,22). The increasing intake of soft drinks (4,5) is viewed as the driver for the increase in energy and fructose, which may play a part in the development of obesity and the metabolic consequences depicted here (22). The caffeine present in these beverages is viewed as a positive feedback signal because of its ability to stimulate the central nervous system.

Two other meta-analyses of crystalline fructose added to the diet appeared to reach different conclusions. Livesey and Taylor (23) and Sievenpiper et al. (24) examined the effects of replacing carbohydrates in the diet with crystalline fructose. Both excluded high-fructose corn syrup and thus the beverage form of fructose, which seems to play the central role in the response to the fructose in beverages. Crystalline fructose added to the food supply represents only a few percent of the total “added sugars” and behaves differently from the fructose that is in beverages. The largest amount of dietary fructose comes from the fructose in sucrose or high-fructose corn syrup, both of which are the major components of calorie-sweetened beverages but were excluded from these meta-analyses.

One key question which Aeberli et al. begin to address is whether the detrimental effects of fructose are simply the result of a linear dose-response to our increasing dietary intake of fructose or whether there is a threshold below which fructose is without harm. The current data suggest that it is a “linear” response, and the reason we are now detecting the pathophysiological consequences of fructose is that its dietary load has continued to increase, largely as a consequence of increased soft drink and fruit drink consumption.

See Aeberli et al., p. 150

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

1.
Havel
PJ
.
Dietary fructose: implications for dysregulation of energy homeostasis and lipid/carbohydrate metabolism
.
Nutr Rev
2005
;
63
:
133
157
[PubMed]
2.
Vos
MB
,
Kimmons
JE
,
Gillespie
C
,
Welsh
J
,
Blanck
HM
.
Dietary fructose consumption among US children and adults: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
.
Medscape J Med
2008
;
10
:
160
[PubMed]
3.
Marriott
BP
,
Olsho
L
,
Hadden
L
,
Connor
P
.
Intake of added sugars and selected nutrients in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2006
.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr
2010
;
50
:
228
258
[PubMed]
4.
Duffey
KJ
,
Popkin
BM
.
Shifts in patterns and consumption of beverages between 1965 and 2002
.
Obesity (Silver Spring)
2007
;
15
:
2739
2747
[PubMed]
5.
Putnam JJ, Allshouse JE. Food Consumption, Prices and Expenditure, 1970-1997. U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Rural Economics Division, Economic Research Service Bulletin, No. 965, p. 34
6.
Bray
GA
,
Nielsen
SJ
,
Popkin
BM
.
Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2004
;
79
:
537
543
[PubMed]
7.
Bray
GA
.
How bad is fructose?
Am J Clin Nutr
2007
;
86
:
895
896
[PubMed]
8.
Dekker
MJ
,
Su
Q
,
Baker
C
,
Rutledge
AC
,
Adeli
K
.
Fructose: a highly lipogenic nutrient implicated in insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, and the metabolic syndrome
.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
2010
;
299
:
E685
E694
[PubMed]
9.
Vartanian
LR
,
Schwartz
MB
,
Brownell
KD
.
Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Am J Public Health
2007
;
97
:
667
675
[PubMed]
10.
Olsen
NJ
,
Heitmann
BL
.
Intake of calorically sweetened beverages and obesity
.
Obes Rev
2009
;
10
:
68
75
[PubMed]
11.
Malik
VS
,
Willett
WC
,
Hu
FB
.
Sugar-sweetened beverages and BMI in children and adolescents: reanalyses of a meta-analysis
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2009
;
89
:
438
439; author reply 439–440
[PubMed]
12.
Mourao
DM
,
Bressan
J
,
Campbell
WW
,
Mattes
RD
.
Effects of food form on appetite and energy intake in lean and obese young adults
.
Int J Obes (Lond)
2007
;
31
:
1688
1695
[PubMed]
13.
Malik
VS
,
Popkin
BM
,
Bray
GA
,
Després
JP
,
Willett
WC
,
Hu
FB
.
Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis
.
Diabetes Care
2010
;
33
:
2477
2483
[PubMed]
14.
Raben
A
,
Vasilaras
TH
,
Møller
AC
,
Astrup
AA
.
Sucrose compared with artificial sweeteners: different effects on ad libitum food intake and body weight after 10 wk of supplementation in overweight subjects
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2002
;
76
:
721
729
[PubMed]
15.
Sørensen
LB
,
Raben
A
,
Stender
S
,
Astrup
A
.
Effect of sucrose on inflammatory markers in overweight humans
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2005
;
82
:
421
427
[PubMed]
16.
Stanhope
KL
,
Schwarz
JM
,
Keim
NL
, et al
.
Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans
.
J Clin Invest
2009
;
119
:
1322
1334
[PubMed]
17.
Stanhope
KL
,
Bremer
AA
,
Medici
V
, et al
.
Consumption of fructose and high fructose corn syrup increase postprandial triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol, and apolipoprotein-B in young men and women
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2011
;
96
:
E1596
E1605
[PubMed]
18.
Maersk
M
,
Belza
A
,
Stødkilde-Jørgensen
H
, et al
.
Sucrose-sweetened beverages increase fat storage in the liver, muscle, and visceral fat depot: a 6-mo randomized intervention study
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2012
;
95
:
283
289
[PubMed]
19.
Aeberli
I
,
Hochuli
M
,
Gerber
PA
, et al
.
Moderate amounts of fructose consumption impair insulin sensitivity in healthy young men: a randomized controlled trial
.
Diabetes Care
2013
;
36
:
150
156
20.
Aeberli
I
,
Gerber
PA
,
Hochuli
M
, et al
.
Low to moderate sugar-sweetened beverage consumption impairs glucose and lipid metabolism and promotes inflammation in healthy young men: a randomized controlled trial
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2011
;
94
:
479
485
[PubMed]
21.
Cohen
JC
,
Schall
R
.
Reassessing the effects of simple carbohydrates on the serum triglyceride responses to fat meals
.
Am J Clin Nutr
1988
;
48
:
1031
1034
[PubMed]
22.
Welsh
JA
,
Sharma
A
,
Abramson
JL
,
Vaccarino
V
,
Gillespie
C
,
Vos
MB
.
Caloric sweetener consumption and dyslipidemia among US adults
.
JAMA
2010
;
303
:
1490
1497
[PubMed]
23.
Livesey
G
,
Taylor
R
.
Fructose consumption and consequences for glycation, plasma triacylglycerol, and body weight: meta-analyses and meta-regression models of intervention studies
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2008
;
88
:
1419
1437
[PubMed]
24.
Sievenpiper
JL
,
de Souza
RJ
,
Mirrahimi
A
, et al
.
Effect of fructose on body weight in controlled feeding trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Ann Intern Med
2012
;
156
:
291
304
[PubMed]