Comparison of Cystic Fibrosis–Related Diabetes With Type 1 Diabetes Based on a German/Austrian Pediatric Diabetes Registry

Data were collected during routine care from specialized diabetes centers in Germany and Austria by means of a computerized documentation called the Diabetes Prospective Documentation Initiative (Diabetes Patienten Verlaufsdokumentation [DPV]). The DPV register started in 1995 in Germany on a nationwide basis. For quality management, all centers use the same computer-based program for continuous documentation of treatment and outcome (16). Three-hundred thirty-five diabetes centers (including eight centers from Austria) contributed to this analysis. Participating centers transmit anonymous, standardized, prospective data from all their diabetic patients for central validation, benchmarking, and research twice per year to the central administrative unit in Ulm (Germany). To ensure optimal data plausibility, all inconsistent data are reported back to the respective centers for correction every 6 months (16). Sex, age, diabetes duration, type of diabetes, migration background, BMI, height, weight, insulin requirement, and number of severe hypoglycemia and HbA_1c levels are documented. By March 2011, the total number of patient visits documented in the system was 2,008,389 from 242,153 diabetic patients. Total number of pediatric patient visits (younger than 20 years of age) was 870,531 from 51,307 patients; 48,368 (94%) of these patients had T1DM, 864 (2%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and 1,930 (4%) had other types of diabetes mellitus. This group included 381 patients with CFRD (0.7% of total patient population).

Analyses based on the last 12 months of care documented in each patient for 47,227 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria with complete data and a pediatric onset (younger than 20 years of age) of either CFRD (n = 381) or T1DM (n = 46.846) were performed. Only records from patients 21 years of age or younger at the time of the visits were included. Migration background was defined as at least one parent not born in Germany or Austria. In addition, a subpopulation of patients with complete data was observed during the first (total: n = 8,805; CFRD: n = 163; T1DM: n = 8,642) or fifth year (total: n = 6,335; CFRD: n = 42; T1DM: n = 6,293) of diabetes.

Height and weight standard deviation scores (SDS) were calculated using contemporary, officially recommended national reference data for German children from Kromeyer-Hauschild (17). BMI values were adjusted for age and sex using BMI SDS. Definitions of underweight, overweight, and obesity in children and adolescents were based on BMI as follows: BMI values >90th percentile for age and sex were defined as overweight; BMI values >97th percentile were defined as obesity; and BMI values >99th percentile were defined as extreme obesity. BMI values <10th percentile for age and sex were considered underweight (18). Arterial hypertension was defined as blood pressure >95th percentile according to the American Heart Association’s normal values (19).

HbA_1c measurements from different centers were mathematically standardized to the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial reference range of 4.05–6.05% using the multiple of the mean method (20).

Treatment regimen was categorized as insulin therapy alone, use of oral antidiabetic drugs (sulphonylureas, glinides with or without insulin), or nonpharmacological treatment with lifestyle modification only. Insulin therapy was documented as the number of daily injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), daily insulin dose per kilogram of body weight, and the use of long-acting or rapid-acting insulin analogs.

Data were analyzed using the SAS statistical software package (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and presented as median and interquartile range or percentage. For group comparison of continuous variables, Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Binary variables were compared by χ² test. Because multiple tests were performed, P values were adjusted using the Bonferroni step-down correction (method of Holm). To adjust for confounding effects of age, sex, and diabetes duration, multivariable mixed regression analysis was applied including a random term for treatment center in the model with Cholesky covariance structure. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For graphical representation (Fig. 1), data of HbA_1c and BMI were calculated for a typical patient with chronological age of 15 years and 2 years of diabetes, assuming equal sex distribution.

Anthropometric and clinical data of pediatric patients with CFRD or T1DM are given in Table 1. Diabetes diagnosis was 6 years later in CFRD patients, 14.5 years (quartile 1–quartile 3: 11.8–16.3) compared with T1DM, 8.5 years (quartile 1–quartile 3: 4.9–11.8) (P < 0.001). A female preponderance was found for CFRD, 59.1% were female compared with 47.5% with T1DM (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups for migration background (T1DM, 15%; CFRD, 14%; P = 1.0). CFRD patients were shorter (height SDS, −1.30; −2.25 to −0.43) and had lower body weight (weight SDS, −1.51; −2.49 to −0.68), resulting in a lower BMI (BMI SDS, −0.85; −1.59 to −0.12) compared with T1DM patients (height SDS, −0.04; −0.72 to +0.63; weight SDS: +0.43; −0.23 to +1.09; BMI SDS, +0.52; −0.10 to +1.16; all P < 0.001). The rates of overweight and obesity were higher in T1DM, with 2% of patients being extremely obese, 6% obese, 13% overweight, and only 79% of patients with normal weight. In comparison, none of the CFRD patients was extremely obese or obese, and just 1.3% of CFRD patients were overweight. In contrast, the rate of underweight was significantly higher in the CF group (31.5% vs. 3% in T1DM).

Glycemic control, measured by HbA_1c, was better in CFRD than in T1DM (6.87% [6.00–8.30%] vs. 7.97% [7.11–9.20%]; P < 0.001).

There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to diabetes complications such as retinopathy (T1DM 1.7% vs. CFRD 3.0%; not significant) or nephropathy (T1DM 12.6% vs. CFRD 7.7%; not significant), but 26% of T1DM patients were hypertensive compared with only 9.7% in the CFRD group (P < 0.001).

Data on diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and initial blood glucose at diabetes onset also were analyzed. None of the CFRD patients presented with ketoacidosis (pH <7.3), whereas 17% of patients with T1DM presented with DKA. Blood glucose levels at diabetes onset were documented for 35,395 patients with T1DM and 267 CFRD patients. We found significant differences with blood glucose levels of 249 mg/dL (180.0–331.0) in T1DM and 194.0 (126.0–272.0) in CFRD at diagnosis of diabetes (P < 0.001).

In addition, subpopulations of our patients were observed 1 year (n = 8,805) or 5 (n = 6,335) years after the diagnosis of diabetes. After 1 year of diabetes, CFRD patients also had lower HbA_1c (6.46% [5.84–7.43%] vs. 7.68% [6.70 – 9.30%];P < 0.0001), were shorter (height SDS: −1.16 [−2.09 to −0.33]), and had lower body weight (weight SDS: −1.61 [−2.57 to −0.69]), resulting in a lower BMI (BMI SDS, −1.02 [−1.93 to −0.27]) compared with T1DM patients (height SDS, 0.11 [−0.53 to 0.77]; weight SDS, 0.26 [−0.42 to 0.95]; BMI SDS, 0.26 [−0.40 to 0.96]; all P < 0.0001). Differences in auxological parameters persist 5 years after the diagnosis of diabetes with height SDS of −1.60 (−2.84 to −0.69), weight SDS of −1.73 (−2.51 to −0.83), and BMI SDS of −0.92 (−1.63 to −0.40) in CFRD compared with T1DM (height SDS, −0.01 [−0.67 to −0.65]; weight SDS, 0.48 [−0.14 to −1.11]; BMI SDS, 0.57 [−0.01 to 1.17], all P = 0.0001). Glycemic control, measured by HbA_1c, becomes similar in both groups after 5 years (CFRD 7.88% [6.67–9.40%] vs. T1DM 7.89% [7.10–8.93%]). However, after adjustment for age and sex, a difference in HbA_1c was still present (CFRD 7.81 vs. T1DM 8.36; P < 0.05).

Treatment modalities differed between the two groups, as summarized in Table 2. All patients with T1DM received insulin therapy (99.4% insulin alone, 0.6% in combination with metformin), whereas in CFRD 72% of patients were treated with insulin (67% insulin alone, 5% in combination with OAD; P < 0.001). In insulin-treated patients with T1DM, 12% were treated with conventional therapy (one to three injections per day), 64% were treated with multiple injections (four to eight injections per day), and 23% were treated with CSII. In insulin-treated patients with CFRD, 41% received conventional therapy, 54% received multiple injections of insulin, and only 5% were treated with CSII (P < 0.001). Fast-acting insulin analogs were used more frequently in T1DM patients (47% vs. 39%; P < 0.05). Similarly, the use of long-acting insulin analogs was significantly more frequent in T1DM than in CFRD (37% vs. 28%; P < 0.01).

Insulin dose per kilogram of body weight, analyzed without adjusting for confounding effects, did not differ significantly between the two groups (T1DM 0.82 [0.65 – 1.02] vs. CFRD 0.80 [0.40 – 1.14]; not significant). However, after adjustment for age, sex, and diabetes duration, a significant difference was present (T1DM 0.79 vs. CFRD 0.83; P < 0.05).

In the CFRD group, oral antidiabetic agents (sulfonylureas, glinides) alone were used by 8% of the patients; 20% of the CFRD patients were treated with nonpharmacological therapy only (lifestyle intervention). Corticosteroid use was documented in 18% of all CFRD patients, whereas 0.3% of 47,227 T1DM patients had received systemic steroids as a comedication during the course of their disease (P < 0.001).

Out of 46,846 patients with T1DM, 73% were treated in diabetes centers with >100 patients compared with 62% of 381 patients with CFRD (P < 0.001). After adjustment for sex, age, and diabetes duration, this difference was no longer present (T1DM 56.2% vs. CFRD 55.9%; not significant). In CFRD, 70% of all patients were treated at universities; however, for T1DM only 31% of all patients were treated at universities (P < 0.001).

Significant differences were also found for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) per day (T1DM, 4.6; CFRD, 3.7; P < 0.001) and number of visits per year (T1DM, 3.30; CFRD, 2.12; P < 0.001).

In addition, we investigated differences with regard to metabolic control and BMI in CFRD patients treated with or without insulin. Our results are demonstrated in Table 3. The corrected P values for HbA_1c showed significant differences, with better metabolic control in patients without insulin therapy compared with CFRD patients with insulin treatment (HbA_1c, 6.00% [5.56–6.76%] vs. 7.12% [6.14–8.67%]; P < 0.001). However, duration of disease was significant shorter in patients without insulin treatment: 0.8 years (0.1–2.4) compared with 2.4 years (0.6–4.6; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference for BMI SDS between patients without insulin (BMI SDS, −0.78 [−1.58 to −0.12]) compared with insulin-treated patients with CFRD (BMI SDS, −0.85 [−1.61 to −0.12]). If not otherwise stated, then all described differences could be confirmed after data were adjusted for confounding effects of age, sex, and diabetes duration.

All patients with T1DM received insulin 1 year and 5 years after diabetes diagnosis. In the CFRD group, only 59% of patients received insulin after 1 year. This percentage increased 5 years after diagnosis, when 88% of CFRD patients were treated with insulin.

Insulin dose per kilogram of body weight, adjusted for age and sex, did not differ significantly between the groups (1 year: CFRD 0.69 vs. T1DM 0.67; 5 years: CFRD 0.95 vs. T1DM 0.90; both not significant).

In both groups, insulin pump therapy and multiple daily injections were used more often 5 years after diagnosis compared with the first treatment year. In insulin-treated patients with T1DM, 23.3% were treated with conventional therapy, 66% were treated with multiple daily injections, and 10.7% were treated with CSII 1 year after diabetes diagnosis. After 5 years of diabetes, only 9.6% of T1DM patients were treated with conventional therapy, 63.3% were treated with multiple daily injections, and 27.1% were treated with CSII. Similar changes are found in CFRD. One year after diabetes diagnosis, 59% of patients were treated with insulin, 25.2% of all patients were treated with conventional therapy, 33.1% were treated with multiple daily injections, and 6% were treated with CSII. Five years after diagnosis, 88.1% of CFRD patients were treated with insulin, 33.3% were treated with conventional therapy, 52.4% were treated with multiple daily injections, and 24% were treated with CSII. Similar to changes in insulin injections, use of short-acting and long-acting insulin analogs increased during the first 5 years of diabetes. In both T1DM and CFRD, insulin analogs were used more often 5 years after diagnosis (short-acting: CFRD 45.9% vs. T1DM 52.5%; long-acting: CFRD 40.5% vs. T1DM 34.8; not significant) compared with the first year (short-acting: CFRD 40.1% vs. T1DM 35.1%; long-acting: CFRD 18.8% vs. T1DM 20.0%; not significant).

Our data show that patients with CFRD have clear demographic and metabolic differences compared with patients with T1DM. Previous data described female sex as a risk factor for development of CFRD (3). In our cohort, 59% of CFRD patients were female. In comparison, in T1DM, male-to-female ratio was close to 1. Hormonal differences and later onset of CFRD in adolescence or young adulthood are possible explanations. Estrogen and its receptors are especially important regulators of body weight and insulin sensitivity (21,22). In our analysis, diabetes diagnosis was later in CFRD than in T1DM. Our data show that patients with CFRD differ from patients with T1DM in auxological parameters. CF patients have a significant reduction in height and weight and a lower BMI. This is concordant with previous data. In a recent retrospective analysis, growth velocity was significantly lower in children with CFRD compared with controls matched for age, sex, and CF mutation (23). Reduced height and BMI are attributable to recurrent infections, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, calorie loss because of malabsorption, and increased work of breathing. These differences in auxological parameters persist on follow-up, reflecting disease progression of CF.

In T1DM, DKA is a frequent acute complication at diabetes onset and remains a major cause of hospitalization and death in children and adolescents with diabetes (24,25). Previous data described that DKA also can occur at the time of initial presentation during the clinical course of CFRD, but DKA is rare in children with CFRD, most likely because of the persistence of endogenous insulin secretion or because glucagon secretion also is impaired (26). In our analysis, ketoacidosis at onset was not present in patients with CFRD, in contrast to T1DM.

For glycemic control after disease onset, we compared HbA_1c levels. In contrast to T1DM, patients with CFRD present with recurrent infections and hemolysis that influences HbA_1c levels, which are often falsely low in patients with CF (6,7). In our study, HbA_1c in CFRD was lower than in T1DM. Further investigations are needed to establish whether therapeutic goals for HbA_1c should be the same for CFRD and T1DM. Interestingly, HbA_1c levels became similar in T1DM and CFRD in a subgroup of patients after 5 years of diabetes. Worsening in glycemic control in the CF group might be attributable to less follow-up visits and still less intense treatment compared with T1DM, systemic steroids, or recurrent exacerbations.

After the diagnosis of CFRD is made, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends quarterly visits to a multidisciplinary team with expertise in diabetes and CF. Furthermore, similar to treatment of other patients with diabetes, HbA_1c should be measured every 3 months (14). In our data, CFRD patients were followed-up less frequently in diabetes centers than T1DM patients. Patients with CFRD were seen twice per year compared with T1DM patients, who were seen three to four times. Fewer visits to diabetes centers for CF might be explained by additional visits to CF clinics or less intense treatment.

To safely achieve glucose goals, ADA recommends that all patients using insulin should perform SMBG at least three times daily (27). In our analysis, SMBG in CFRD was performed three to four times daily in accordance to ADA guidelines. In T1DM, SMBG was more frequent, on average four to five times daily.

Diabetes microvascular complications, such as retinopathy or nephropathy, have been described in case reports and small series of CFRD patients. In Denmark, 36% of patients with >10 years of duration of diabetes were reported to have retinopathy (28). In a larger series of 285 CFRD patients, none of the patients without fasting hyperglycemia had microvascular complications; in those with fasting hyperglycemia, complications were rare before 10 years of duration (29). Of the 39 patients who had CFRD with fasting hyperglycemia of >10 years duration, microalbuminuria was found in 14% and retinopathy was found in 16%. Other studies described similar risk for development of microvascular complications compared with T1DM (28,30). The risk is related to duration and progression of the primary disease and inversely to metabolic control of diabetes. In our cohort, disease duration was <10 years. This is the most likely explanation for us finding less microvascular complications in our cohort. The prevalence of diabetes microvascular complications appears to be lower in CFRD, but it remains important to screen annually for these complications, starting 5 years after diagnosis (27). Macrovascular complications have not been described among the CFRD population (29). With regard to hypertension, we found a higher risk in pediatric patients with T1DM. Our results concur with previous data on the risk of hypertension and other cardiovascular risks in young patients with T1DM (15). In adult CF patients, hypertension also is not uncommon, particularly after transplantation (28) or with systemic steroids. In our pediatric cohort, hypertension in CFRD was less frequent compared with T1DM. Nevertheless, patients with CFRD should have their blood pressure measured at every routine diabetes visit, as recommended by the ADA guidelines (27).

Because the major cause of diabetes in CF seems to be severe insulin insufficiency, insulin therapy is recommended. Furthermore, acute illness, use of corticosteroids, and other therapeutic agents are associated with increased insulin resistance and altered insulin release (10,31), complicating therapy in CF patients. In our cohort, use of corticosteroids was documented in 18% of patients with CFRD.

To improve weight gain and lung function, and to avoid infections, current guidelines stated insulin therapy should be started as soon as the CFRD diagnosis is made to benefit from anabolic effects of insulin (12,13). Basis–bolus insulin regimen is recommended as first choice to avoid postprandial hyperglycemia (14).

Treatment regimen differed in both groups. Insulin pump therapy was especially less frequent in CFRD. Recent data demonstrated efficiency of insulin pump therapy. In a group of nine adults with CFRD, 6 months of insulin pump therapy was associated with improvements in body weight, lean muscle mass, glycemic control, and a decrease in protein catabolism and hepatic glucose output as compared with their baseline status using basal subcutaneous insulin injections (32). Pumps allow easy adjustment in basal rates during episodes of increased insulin resistance or variable carbohydrate intake, such as continuous tube feeding (33). To prove a long-time benefit of insulin pump therapy compared with other treatment regimen, further studies over a longer period of time with larger patient numbers are necessary.

Our subgroup analysis at 1 year or 5 years of diabetes showed that insulin pump therapy was used more frequently with increasing diabetes duration in both patient groups. This reflects intensification of diabetes therapy in response to deteriorating metabolic control.

To describe differences within the CFRD patient group, we compared CFRD patients with and without insulin therapy. Patients with insulin therapy in our cohort had a longer duration of disease and their metabolic control was worse than in patients without insulin.

With regard to BMI SDS, no difference was found between insulin-treated or noninsulin-treated patients. We could not analyze longitudinal data once insulin therapy was started. According to published data, improvement in metabolic control and BMI should be expected (34).

In addition to recommendations for insulin treatment, the available data suggest that oral antidiabetic agents are not as effective as insulin to improve glycemic control, weight, protein anabolism, pulmonary function, and survival in CFRD (34–36). In small case or cohort studies of CFRD patients, oral sulfonylureas or glinides have shown limited benefit in improving insulin secretion and glycemic control. In our cohort, 8% of patients with CFRD in Germany and Austria are treated with oral antidiabetic agents alone, and 20% of the CF patients received nonpharmacological therapy. In T1DM, oral antidiabetic agents were used in addition to insulin for a very small number of patients. These patients received metformin to improve glycemic control in cases of insulin resistance during puberty (37). However, a recent systemic literature study concluded that additional benefit by adding metformin in T1DM remains unclear (38).

In insulin-treated patients, insulin dose per kilogram of body weight adjusted for age, sex, and diabetes duration differed significantly between patients with CFRD and T1DM. High caloric intake, including carbohydrates, insulin resistance, and use of corticosteroids in CFRD might be possible explanations for high insulin requirement in CFRD.

In conclusion, the results of our multicenter analysis of current DPV data show statistically significant demographic, clinical, and treatment differences between pediatric CFRD and T1DM patients. CFRD shares some features with T1DM, but it is a special entity of diabetes with specific characteristics. With progression of CFRD, treatment modalities and glycemic control become more similar to T1DM, whereas differences in auxological parameters persist.

This analysis was funded by a grant from Mucoviszidose-EV Bonn, Germany.

The DPV initiative is funded by the Competence Network for Diabetes Mellitus (Kompetenznetz Diabetes mellitus), of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ 01GI1106), by the European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD), and by Novo Nordisk. Study sponsors were not involved in data collection or analysis. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

K.K. wrote the manuscript. K.K., A.T., and M.F. edited the manuscript. A.T., M.F., E.F.-R., E.L., and R.W.H. contributed to discussion. A.T., M.F., S.A.W., and R.W.H. reviewed the manuscript. R.W.H. conceptualized the study and researched data. R.W.H. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

The authors thank Prof. B.P. Hauffa, Department of Pediatrics II, University Children’s Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany, for reviewing the manuscript. The authors also thank the following centers for participating in the DPV initiative and contributing their data to this study: Aachen-Uni-Kinderklinik RWTH, Aalen Kinderklinik, Ahlen St Franziskus Kinderklinik, Altötting Zentrum Inn-Salzach, Arnsberg-Hüsten Karolinenhospital Kinderabteilung, Asbach Kamillus-Klinik Innere, Aue Helios Kinderklink, Augsburg Innere, Augsburg Kinderklinik Zentralklinikum, Aurich Kinderklinik, Bad Aibling Internist. Praxis, Bad Driburg/ Bad Hermannsborn Innere, Bad Hersfeld Kinderklinik, Bad Kösen Kinder-Rehaklinik, Bad Lauterberg Diabeteszentrum Innere, Bad Mergentheim-Gemeinschaftspraxis Althausen, Bad Oeynhausen Diabetesfachklinik, Bad Waldsee Kinderarztpraxis, Bautzen Oberlausitz KK, Berchtesgaden CJD, Berchtesgaden MVZ Innere Med, Berlin DRK-Kliniken, Berlin Kinderklinik Lindenhof, Berlin Oskar Zieten Krankenhaus Innere, Berlin Schlosspark- Klinik Innere, Berlin St Josephskrankenhaus Innere, Berlin Virchow- Kinderklinik, Berlin Vivantes Hellersdorf Innere, Bielefeld Kinderklinik Gilead, Bocholt Kinderklinik, Bochum Universitätskinderklinik St Josef, Bonn Uni-Kinderklinik, Bottrop Knappschaftskrankenhaus Innere, Bremen–Kinderklinik Nord, Bremen - Mitte Innere, Bremen Kinderklinik St Jürgenstrasse, Bremen-Epidemiologieprojekt, Bremerhaven Kinderklinik, Celle Kinderklinik, Chemnitz Kinderklinik, Chemnitz-Hartmannsdorf Innere Medizin-DIAKOMED- Coesfeld Kinderklinik, Darmstadt Innere Medizin, Darmstadt Kinderklinik Prinz. Margareth, Datteln Vestische Kinderklinik, Deggendorf Kinderarztpraxis, Deggendorf Kinderklinik, Delmenhorst Kinderklinik, Detmold Kinderklinik, Dornbirn Kinderklinik, Dortmund Kinderklinik, Dortmund Knappschaftskrankenhaus Innere, Dresden Neustadt Kinderklinik, Dresden Uni-Kinderklinik, Duisburg Malteser St Anna Innere, Düren-Birkesdorf Kinderklinik, Düsseldorf Uni-Kinderklinik, Erfurt Kinderklinik, Erlangen Uni-Kinderklinik, Essen Diabetes-Schwerpunktpraxis, Essen Elisabeth Kinderklinik, Essen Uni-Kinderklinik, Esslingen, Städtische Kinderklinik, Eutin Kinderklinik, Eutin St Elisabeth Innere, Frankenthal Kinderarztpraxis, Frankfurt Uni-Kinderklinik, Frankfurt Uni-Klinik Innere, Freiburg Uni Innere, Freiburg Uni-Kinderklinik, Friedberg Innere Klinik, Friedrichshafen Kinderklinik, Fulda Innere Medizin, Fulda Kinderklinik, Fürth Kinderklinik, Gaissach Fachklinik der Deutschen Rentenversicherung Bayern Süd, Garmisch- Partenkirchen Kinderklinik, Geislingen Klinik Helfenstein Innere, Gelnhausen Kinderklinik, Gelsenkirchen Kinderklinik Marienhospital, Gera, Kinderklinik, Gießen Uni- Kinderklinik, Graz Universitäts-Kinderklinik, Göppingen Innere Medizin, Göppingen Kinderklinik am Eichert, Görlitz Städtische Kinderklinik, Göttingen Uni- Kinderklinik, Hachenburg Kinderpraxis, Hagen Kinderklinik, Halle Uni- Kinderklinik, Halle-Dölau Städtische Kinderklinik, Hamburg Altonaer Kinderklinik, Hamburg Kinderklinik Wilhelmstift, Hamburg-Nord Kinderklinik Heidberg, Hameln Kinderklinik, Hamm Kinderklinik, Hanau Kinderklinik, Hanau St Vincenz - Innere, Hannover Kinderklinik MHH, Hannover Kinderklinik auf der Bult, Haren Kinderarztpraxis, Heide Kinderklinik, Heidelberg Uni-Kinderklinik, Heidelberg Uniklinik Innere, Heidenheim Kinderklinik, Heilbronn Innere Klinik, Heilbronn Kinderklinik, Herdecke Kinderklinik, Herford Kinderarztpraxis, Herford Klinikum Kinder & Jugendliche, Heringsdorf Inselklinik, Hermeskeil Kinderpraxis, Herten St Elisabeth Innere Medizin, Hildesheim Innere, Hildesheim Kinderarztpraxis, Hildesheim Kinderklinik, Hinrichsegen-Bruckmühl Diabetikerjugendhaus, Hof Kinderklinik, Homburg Uni-Kinderklinik Saarland, Idar Oberstein Innere, Ingolstadt Klinikum Innere, Innsbruck Universitätskinderklinik, Iserlohn Innere Medizin, Itzehoe Kinderklinik, Jena Uni-Kinderklinik, Kaiserslautern-Westpfalzklinikum Kinderklinik, Karlsburg Klinik für Diabetes & Stoffwechsel, Karlsruhe, Städtische Kinderklinik, Kassel Kinderklinik Park Schönfeld, Kassel Städtische Kinderklinik, Kaufbeuren Innere Medizin, Kempen Heilig Geist-Innere, Kiel Städtische Kinderklinik, Kiel Universitäts-Kinderklinik, Kirchen DRK Klinikum Westerwald, Kinderklinik, Kirchheim- Nürtingen Innere, Koblenz Kemperhof 1. Med. Klinik, Koblenz Kinderklinik Kemperhof, Konstanz Innere Klinik, Konstanz Kinderklinik, Krefeld Innere Klinik, Krefeld Kinderklinik, Kreischa-Zscheckwitz, Klinik Bavaria, Köln Kinderklinik Amsterdamerstrasse, Köln Uni-Kinderklinik, Landshut Kinderklink, Leipzig Uni-Kinderklinik, Leverkusen Kinderklinik, Limburg Innere Medizin, Lindenfels Luisenkrankenhaus Innere, Lingen Kinderklinik St Bonifatius, Linz Kinderklinik, Lippstadt Evangelische Kinderklinik, Ludwigsburg Kinderklinik, Ludwigshafen Kinderklinik St Anna-Stift, Lübeck Uni-Kinderklinik, Lübeck Uni-Klinik Innere Medizin, Lüdenscheid Kinderklinik, Magdeburg Uni-Kinderklinik, Mainz Uni-Kinderklinik, Mannheim - Innere, Mannheim Uni-Kinderklinik, Marburg Uni-Kinderklinik, Mechernich Kinderklinik, Memmingen Kinderklinik, Merzig Kinderklinik, Minden Kinderklinik, Moers-St Josefskrankenhaus Innere, Moers Kinderklinik, Mutterstadt Kinderarztpraxis, Mönchengladbach Kinderklinik Rheydt Elisabethkrankenhaus, München 3. Orden Kinderklinik, München Kinderarztpraxis, München von Haunersche Kinderklinik, München-Gauting Kinderarztzentrum, München-Harlaching Kinderklinik, München-Schwabing Kinderklinik, Münster St Franziskus Kinderklinik, Münster Uni-Kinderklinik, Münster pädiat. Schwerpunktpraxis, Nauen Havellandklinik, Neuburg Kinderklinik, Neunkirchen Marienhausklinik Kohlhof Kinderklinik, Neuss Lukaskrankenhaus Kinderklinik, Neuwied Kinderklinik Elisabeth, Nürnberg Kinderklinik, Oberhausen Innere, Oberhausen Kinderklinik, Oberhausen Kinderpraxis, Offenbach/Main Kinderklinik, Offenburg Kinderklinik, Oldenburg Kinderklinik, Oldenburg Schwerpunktpraxis, Osnabrück Kinderklinik, Oy-Mittelberg Hochgebirgsklinik Kinder-Reha, Paderborn St Vincenz Kinderklinik, Papenburg Marienkrankenhaus Kinderklinik, Passau Kinderarztpraxis, Passau Kinderklinik, Pforzheim Kinderklinik, Pirmasens Städtisches Krankenhaus Innere, Rastatt Gemeinschaftspraxis, Rastatt Kreiskrankenhaus Innere, Ravensburg Kinderklink St Nikolaus, Recklinghausen Dialysezentrum Innere, Regensburg Kinderklinik St Hedwig, Remscheid Kinderklinik, Rendsburg Kinderklinik, Reutlingen Kinderarztpraxis, Reutlingen Klinikum Steinenberg Innere, Rheine Mathiasspital Kinderklinik, Rosenheim Innere Medizin, Rosenheim Kinderklinik, Rosenheim Schwerpunktpraxis, Rostock Uni- Kinderklinik, Rotenburg/Wümme Kinderklinik, Rüsselsheim Kinderklinik, Saaldorf-Surheim Diabetespraxis, Saalfeld Thüringenklinik Kinderklinik, Saarbrücken Kinderklinik Winterberg, Saarlouis Kinderklinik, Scheidegg Reha- Kinderklinik Maximilian, Schwäbisch Gmünd Margaritenhospital Kinderklinik, Schweinfurt Kinderklinik, Schwerin Innere Medizin, Schwerin Kinderklinik, Schwäbisch Hall Diakonie Kinderklinik, Siegen Kinderklinik, Singen – Hegauklinik Kinderklinik, Sinsheim Innere, Spaichingen Innere, St Augustin Kinderklinik, Stade Kinderklinik, Stolberg Kinderklinik, Stuttgart Olgahospital Kinderklinik, Suhl Kinderklinik, Sylt Rehaklinik, Tettnang Innere Medizin, Traunstein SPP Praxis, Trier Kinderklinik der Borromärinnen, Tübingen Uni-Kinderklinik, Ulm Endokrinologikum, Ulm Schwerpunktpraxis Bahnhofsplatz, Ulm Uni-Kinderklinik, Vechta Kinderklinik, Viersen Kinderklinik, Waiblingen Kinderklinik, Waldshut Kinderpraxis, Waldshut-Tiengen Kinderpraxis Biberbau, Weiden Kinderklinik, Weingarten Kinderarztpraxis, Wernberg-Köblitz SPP, Wetzlar/Braunfels Innere, Wien Uni-Kinderklinik, Wiesbaden Horst-Schmidt- Kinderkliniken, Wiesbaden Kinderklinik DKD, Wilhelmshaven Reinhard-Nieter-Kinderklinik, Wilhelmshaven, St Willehad Innere, Wolgast Kinderklinik, Worms Kinderklinik, Wuppertal Kinderklinik.