Bardenheier et al. (1) presented data on prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) associated with delivery as a function of state and race. They identified a number of important risk factors including race, maternal age, state, insurance, and obesity. Overlooked in the article was any discussion of the role of vitamin D. Vitamin D deficiency is an important risk factor for GDM. A review found that “serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) <50 nmol/L in pregnancy was significantly related to the incidence of GDM with an odds ratio of 1.61 (95% CI 1.19–2.17; )” (2).

Solar ultraviolet-B (UVB) irradiance is the most important source of vitamin D for most Americans (3). Solar UVB doses in summer have been found protective against many types of cancer (3) and dental caries in youth (4). From Fig. 1 and Table 2 in ref. 1, it is evident that rates of GDM among hospital discharges are higher at higher latitudes and in the northeastern states and lower in the southwestern states—in general agreement with the findings for cancer and dental caries. Thus, given the observational data, it is a very intriguing hypothesis to suggest that vitamin D from solar UVB irradiance reduces risk of GDM. Such definitive studies need to be considered.

Researchers at the Medical University of South Carolina conducted a randomized controlled trial of supplementation of 4,000 IU/day vitamin D3, which led to finding that a serum 25OHD concentration of 40 ng/mL (100 nmol/L) is required for optimal concentrations of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D during pregnancy, and that there are no adverse effects such as hypercalcemia or hypercalcuria (5). 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D is the active metabolite of vitamin D and, among other things, controls expression for at least 200 genes. In addition, there are many other health benefits of high 25OHD, including reduced risk of primary cesarean section, preeclampsia, premature delivery, low birth weight, and maternal infection (5).

W.B.G. has received funding from the UV Foundation (McLean, VA), the Vitamin D Council (San Luis Obispo, CA), and the Vitamin D Society (Woodstock, Ontario, Canada).

W.B.G. has also received funding from Bio-Tech Pharmacal and the Sunlight Research Forum (Veldhoven). No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

1.
Bardenheier
BH
,
Elixhauser
A
,
Imperatore
G
, et al
.
Variation in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus among hospital discharges for obstetric delivery across 23 states in the United States
.
Diabetes Care
2013
;
36
:1209–1214
2.
Poel
YH
,
Hummel
P
,
Lips
P
,
Stam
F
,
van der Ploeg
T
,
Simsek
S
.
Vitamin D and gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Eur J Intern Med
2012
;
23
:
465
469
3.
Grant
WB
,
Garland
CF
.
The association of solar ultraviolet B (UVB) with reducing risk of cancer: multifactorial ecologic analysis of geographic variation in age-adjusted cancer mortality rates
.
Anticancer Res
2006
;
26
:
2687
2699
4.
Grant
WB
.
A review of the role of solar ultraviolet-B irradiance and vitamin D in reducing risk of dental caries
.
Dermatoendocrinol
2011
;
3
:
193
198
5.
Hollis
BW
,
Wagner
CL
.
Vitamin D and pregnancy: Skeletal effects, nonskeletal effects, and birth outcomes
.
Calcif Tissue Int
2013
;
92
:
128
139
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.