Wolfram syndrome (WFS), caused by recessive mutations in WFS1, is characterized by neurodegeneration due to apoptosis provoked by increased endothelial reticulum stress (1). Currently, it is incurable and leads to a premature death at an average age of 35 years (2). Despite initial success with spectroscopy-based studies (3), there is a lack of repeatable and robust markers for monitoring the clinical course of WFS. The aim of our study was to evaluate retinal parameters, measured with optical coherence tomography, as biomarkers of WFS progression. The Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz approved the project (RNN/140/13/KE). Optical coherence tomography was performed after mydriasis using the Topcon 3D OCT-2000 system. Average retinal thickness and central thickness were measured using three-dimensional disc and macula scans covering a retinal area of 6 × 6 mm. The study was performed between August 2013 and April 2014. Two cohorts were enrolled: a pediatric/adolescent group and an adult one. The first consisted of patients with genetically confirmed WFS (median age 17.25 [interquartile range 14.00–18.90] years, duration of diabetes 10.70 [7.10–13.80] years, n = 10) recruited from the largest repository of WFS data (EURO-WABB) (4), patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) (median age 16.45 [12.20–17.51] years, duration of diabetes 1.48 [0.46–8.84] years, n = 12), and healthy control subjects (median age 16.45 [15.51–17.31] years, n = 16). The second cohort consisted of adult heterozygous carriers of WFS1 mutations (median age 44.70 [40.50–46.00] years, n = 10) and healthy adults (median age 50.01 [49.09–60.88] years, n = 13). Details on the study group characteristics were presented in previous studies (5).

Average retinal thickness was significantly lower in pediatric/adolescent patients with WFS compared with both patients with T1DM (median 229 [25–75% interquartile range 221–232] vs. 273 [269–286] μm) and control subjects (229 [221–232] vs. 264 [262–276] μm, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1A). No differences were noted between children/adolescents with T1DM and control subjects (P > 0.05) or between adult WFS1 mutation carriers and control subjects (273.85 [266.30–291.95] vs. 275.65 [266.60–277.80] μm, P > 0.05) (Fig. 1A). Adjustment for age at examination and duration of diabetes in the pediatric/adolescent cohort did not alter the results, confirming the impact of WFS on average retinal thickness. No differences of central thickness were observed between the three groups of the pediatric/adult cohort (P > 0.05). However, WFS1 mutation carriers did show significantly lower central thickness than control subjects (199.75 [188.00–204.00] and 224.00 [203.00–244.00] μm, P = 0.032), although this difference was not significant after adjustment for age (P = 0.138).

Figure 1

A: Comparison of retinal parameters in the pediatric cohort and adult cohort showed that children and adolescents with WFS had significantly lower average retinal thickness than healthy peers and children with T1DM (P < 0.05 in Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with post hoc Dunn test). No such differences were noted in the adult group (P > 0.05 in Mann-Whitney U test). B: In pediatric/adolescent patients with WFS, there was a significant negative correlation of average retinal thickness with age (Spearman rank correlation coefficient r = −0.90, P = 0.0003); no such effects were noted in the T1DM group.

Figure 1

A: Comparison of retinal parameters in the pediatric cohort and adult cohort showed that children and adolescents with WFS had significantly lower average retinal thickness than healthy peers and children with T1DM (P < 0.05 in Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with post hoc Dunn test). No such differences were noted in the adult group (P > 0.05 in Mann-Whitney U test). B: In pediatric/adolescent patients with WFS, there was a significant negative correlation of average retinal thickness with age (Spearman rank correlation coefficient r = −0.90, P = 0.0003); no such effects were noted in the T1DM group.

Close modal

For patients with WFS, we noted strong negative correlations between both age at examination (r = −0.77, P = 0.009) (Fig. 1B) and duration of diabetes and average retinal thickness (r = −0.90, P < 0.001). Age did not correlate with central thickness in WFS and T1DM groups, but a statistically significant correlation was noted between duration of diabetes and central thickness (r = 0.68, P = 0.029) among patients with WFS. No significant correlations of average retinal thickness or central thickness with either age or duration of diabetes were observed in patients with T1DM (both P > 0.05).

Despite a limited sample size caused by the extreme rarity of WFS, our results have shown retinal thinning to be a clinical feature of the syndrome and potential marker of disease progression in patients with WFS.

Acknowledgments. The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Daryl Henderson from Squirrel Scribe Editing, Inc. for linguistic correction of the manuscript.

Funding. This study was supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (grant no. N 407 100040) and the EURO-WABB Project. W.F. received financial support from the National Science Center (grant no. 2012/05/E/NZ5/02130) and the research fund of the Medical University of Lodz (grant no. 502-03/1-090-01/502-14-161).

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. A.Z. collected clinical data and wrote the draft of the manuscript. W.F. performed statistical analysis and contributed to writing of the manuscript. A.N. and M.L.-P. performed ophthalmologic examinations. M.B. and K.A. performed genetic studies in patients with WFS. A.S. collected clinical data and contributed to writing of the manuscript. W.M. designed the study and prepared the final version of the manuscript. W.M. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

1.
Fonseca
SG
,
Ishigaki
S
,
Oslowski
CM
, et al
.
Wolfram syndrome 1 gene negatively regulates ER stress signaling in rodent and human cells
.
J Clin Invest
2010
;
120
:
744
755
2.
Barrett
TG
,
Bundey
SE
,
Macleod
AF
.
Neurodegeneration and diabetes: UK nationwide study of Wolfram (DIDMOAD) syndrome
.
Lancet
1995
;
346
:
1458
1463
3.
Hershey
T
,
Lugar
HM
,
Shimony
JS
, et al.;
Washington University Wolfram Study Group
.
Early brain vulnerability in Wolfram syndrome
.
PLoS One
2012
;
7
:
e40604
4.
Farmer
A
,
Aymé
S
,
de Heredia
ML
, et al
.
EURO-WABB: an EU rare diseases registry for Wolfram syndrome, Alström syndrome and Bardet-Biedl syndrome
.
BMC Pediatr
2013
;
13
:
130
5.
Zmyslowska
A
,
Borowiec
M
,
Antosik
K
, et al
.
Wolfram syndrome in the Polish population: novel mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation
.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
2011
;
75
:
636
641