OBJECTIVE

In children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), elevated levels of antitissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibody may spontaneously normalize, despite continued consumption of gluten. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of spontaneous normalization of anti-tTG levels and the existence of factors predictive for this outcome.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

All children referred from 2002 to 2012 were screened for celiac disease (CD) at diabetes onset and at specific intervals. In the presence of a high anti-tTG titer or clinical symptoms, children were offered endoscopy, and asymptomatic patients with a low anti-tTG titer were invited to a second serological test after 6 months of eating a gluten-containing diet.

RESULTS

The study included 446 children. Of these, 65 (14.5%) became positive for celiac serology: 38 (58%) had a persistently elevated anti-tTG titer and 27 (41%) fluctuating anti-tTG titer; 18 (28%) became negative. The prevalence of positive CD autoimmunity and overt CD was 14.3% (95% CI 11–17) and 8.5% (95% CI 5–10), 15- and 8-times higher than the general pediatric population, respectively. Asymptomatic children older than 9.1 years at T1DM onset had the lowest risk to develop CD.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum anti-tTG levels decreased spontaneously in 40% of children with T1DM and became negative in 20%, despite gluten consumption. This finding supports the hypothesis of a state of temporary positivity of celiac serology in children with diabetes. In absence of clinical symptoms or signs of CD, histological confirmation of the disease and the gluten-free diet should be postponed to avoid unnecessary procedures and reduce an additional psychological burden.

The prevalence of celiac disease (CD) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is between 3 and 10%, being more than 10 times the prevalence in the general population (1). Both diseases result from a complex interplay between genetic susceptibility and environmental exposure, being associated with the major histocompatibility complex class II antigen DQ2, and share non-HLA loci (2).

Guidelines of pediatric diabetes (3) and gastroenterology societies (4) recommend screening children with T1DM for CD. From a medical perspective, numerous advantages may exist in screening asymptomatic patients with T1DM, including the potential of improving diabetes control and avoidance of long-term manifestations of CD (5). However, the observation that elevated levels of antitissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibody may spontaneously normalize in children with diabetes, despite continued consumption of gluten (6) and the absence of symptoms in most of these patients (5), would suggest caution before starting a gluten-free diet (GFD) in a particularly delicate group of children already struggling with a complex chronic disease in whom the addition of a second limiting dietetic condition might be remarkably difficult in front of limited benefit (7).

Indeed, whether treating silent CD improves diabetes-related outcomes is still an open issue; to date, results suggest uncertain benefit (8), with no benefit on the control of diabetes (9) and just a slight decrease in HbA1c (10). Therefore, the benefit of early detection and treatment remains unproved and subject of continuing investigation.

The aim of the current study was to describe a large cohort of children with T1DM consecutively enrolled in a tertiary referral center for the diagnosis and follow-up of pediatric T1DM to investigate the prevalence of spontaneous normalization of tTG antibody levels and the existence of factors predictive for this outcome.

Giovanni XXII Children’s Hospital is one of the largest pediatric hospitals in Southern Italy and is the tertiary referral center for pediatric T1DM, covering an estimated population of 700,000 children with more than 800 children followed up in the diabetes clinic. San Paolo Hospital serves Giovanni XXII Hospital for pediatric gastroenterology and endoscopy. In 2002, we adopted a diagnostic protocol according to which all children with T1DM were screened for CD at onset and then annually. In presence of a high CD antibody titer or clinical symptoms (diarrhea, abdominal pain or distension, short stature, iron-deficiency anemia, constipation, vomiting, reduced BMI, diminished mass bone, delayed puberty, raised levels of transaminases), children were offered endoscopy for the histological diagnosis. Asymptomatic patients showing low CD antibody titer were invited to a second serological determination after 6 months of eating a gluten-containing diet.

Patients

All children referred to our unit from 2002 onward were screened for CD according to a predetermined diagnostic protocol at T1DM onset and during follow-up at 6–12-month intervals. The following data were recorded in a database: sex, mode of delivery, date of birth, duration of breast-feeding, infections or acute gastroenteritis in the first year of life (requiring admission), chronic disease, and age at onset of T1DM. Patients with major acute or chronic illnesses other than T1DM or CD were excluded from the study and handled case-by-case. The last patient enrolled in the current study was in 2012 to have a minimal follow-up of 2 years.

Weight and height data were measured at diagnosis and annually thereafter. Height was measured with a wall-mounted stadiometer (Harpenden-Holtain) and weight with a calibrated scales. Age- and sex-specific centiles were calculated according to the World Health Organization growth reference.

All children underwent the following serological determinations at the onset of T1DM and then at established intervals: a) serum levels of anti-tTG–IgA antibody, antiendomysial antibody (EmA), and total serum IgA (for children <2 years of age serum levels of antigliadin [AGA]-IgA antibody were included); b) HLA class II antigens (in children with positive celiac serology); c) hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) concentration; d) nutritional parameters (cholesterol, triglycerides, iron, ferritin, hemoglobin); and e) thyroid function tests (free T3, free T4, thyroid-stimulating hormone, anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies).

Serum AGA and anti-tTG (–IgG and –IgA class) were assessed by an indirect solid-phase ELISA test (ORGENTEC Diagnostika, Mainz, Germany). The cutoff value was set for values >10 arbitrary units for both, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (11). Serological autoantibody titers were recorded as times the upper limit of normal (ULN). EmA-IgA was determined by indirect immunofluorescence using monkey esophagus sections as the substrate (Euroimmun Italia Diagnostica Medica SRL, Padua, Italy). Dilutions greater than 1:10 were considered positive and then titrated. In presence of IgA deficiency, the diagnosis of CD was based on IgG class serology. All celiac serology testing was repeated twice.

Class II antigens HLA typing (HLA-DRB1* [01, 15, 16, 03, 04, 11, 12, 13, 14, 07, 08, 09, 10], HLA-DRB3*, HLA-DRB4*, HLA-DRB5*, and HLA-DQB1*[01, 02, 03]) was done by PCR sequence-specific oligonucleotide, a low-resolution molecular method, using a commercial kit (12).

Capillary HbA1c was measured by an automated immunochemical technique (DCA 2000; Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY; normal values: 4.3–5.8%).

Endoscopy and Histology

Upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy was performed by the same physician (S.C.) during the time the child was eating a gluten-containing diet. Four biopsy specimens were obtained (two from the distal and one from the proximal duodenum and bulb). A pathologist, unaware of the clinical and laboratory results, interpreted the sample according to the criteria defined by the Marsh classification (13). CD diagnosis was based on the coexistence of 1) positivity of tTG-IgA and EmA, 2) presence of positive histological evidence of villous atrophy with crypt hyperplasia and increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes, and 3) normalization of positive serum-specific antibodies on GFD.

Group Comparison

To compare the clinical and laboratory data of children with T1DM with and without CD, 60 children with T1DM without CD were frequency-matched for sex, age (± 1 year), and T1DM duration (± 1 year). The data presented refer to the time of first appearance of CD serology.

The institutional review board approved the study protocol. Informed consent was obtained from the parents. The reporting of this study conforms to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.

Statistics

Normally distributed grouped data are expressed as the mean ± SD and were compared using paired and unpaired t tests. Nonparametric grouped data are expressed as medium (95% CI) and were compared with the Mann-Whitney rank sum test (paired) or the Wilcoxon signed rank test (unpaired). Proportionate data were compared with the Fisher exact test or the χ2 test. Differences between groups were analyzed by the two-tailed Student t test for independent samples. One-way ANOVA was used to compare means of more than two samples. P values <0.05 were regarded as significant.

Risk models were developed using a decision tree. Briefly, a decision tree is a flowchart-like structure in which the internal node represents a test on an attribute, each branch represents the outcome of the test, and each leaf node represents a class label (decision taken after computing all attributes). To investigate the presence of attributes with predictive power, the algorithm builds a tree in a stepwise fashion analyzing potential predictors and possible cut points (if continuous). Two models were developed: one to predict the onset of CD in children with T1DM and the second to predict those children with positive celiac serology who became seronegative. The data set included 444 patients with 38 overt CD cases. The following attributes were studied: 1) presence or absence of CD (class label attribute); 2) age at diagnosis of T1DM; 3) sex; 4) breast-feeding duration (0–12 months; 5) infection in the first year of life (yes or no); 6) acute gastroenteritis in the first year of life (yes or no); 7) anti-tTG level (expressed as multiple of the ULN); and 8) EmA (positive or negative). Precision rate, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the decision tree were calculated.

The relationship of several risk factors to outcome (serological evidence of CD, diagnosis of CD, transient CD) was evaluated using logistic regression. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

A total of 446 children (200 girls [44.8%]) were diagnosed during the study period; of these, 272 (61%) were born by vaginal delivery, 380 (85%) received breast milk for at least 4 months, and 76 (17%) had an infection in the first year of life (21 acute gastroenteritis). The median age at T1DM onset was 8.5 ± 4.1 years (95% CI 4.2–12.5). Two children had a diagnosis of CD before T1DM onset, and none had positive serological evidence for CD (anti-tTG-A and/or EmA) at T1DM onset.

During follow-up, 65 children (14.5%) became serologically positive for CD (anti-tTG–IgA and/or EmA). Of these, 38 (58.4%) had persistently elevated anti-tTG antibody and EmA levels, whereas 27 (41.5%) showed a fluctuating titer of anti-tTG antibody levels (9 EmA positive) and therefore entered a serological follow-up while eating a gluten-containing diet. Overall, 47 children were EmA and tTG-IgA positive, whereas 18 children were tTG-IgA positive and EmA negative; we never found EmA positivity in tTG-IgA negative cases. A progressive decline of celiac serology titer was achieved in 9 of 27 (13.8%) and complete negativity (anti-tTG-A and EmA) in 18 (27.6%); during follow-up, 3 became subsequently positive. The evolution of the cohort is reported in Fig. 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of the 446 children with T1DM according to CD serology and histologically proven diagnosis.

Figure 1

Flowchart of the 446 children with T1DM according to CD serology and histologically proven diagnosis.

Close modal

Our cohort is therefore composed of three groups of children with diabetes: a) 381 without CD (T1DM-only); b) 38 with CD (T1DM-CD); and c) 27 with fluctuating (spontaneous decline or negativity) CD serology (T1DM-FCS). The main clinical characteristics of the three groups are reported in Table 1.

Table 1

The main clinical characteristics of the three groups of children: those with T1DM only, those with T1DM-CD, and those with T1DM-FCS

T1DM onlyT1DM-CDT1DM-FCSP
n = 381n = 38n = 27
Female sex 164 (42)a 23 (60)a 12 (46) NS 
Cesarean delivery 137 (38) 15 (39) 10 (38) NS 
Breast milk (≥4 months) 206 (58) 29 (78) 16 (72) NS 
Infections in the first year 60 (17) 5 (13) 5 (23) NS 
Acute gastroenteritis in the first year 17 (4.4) 2 (5.2) 1 (3.8) NS 
Age of T1DM onset (years) 9.8 ± 4 5.7 ± 3.4 7.0 ± 3.7 <0.0001 
Age of CD onset (years) — 7.4 ± 3.6 10.1 ± 4.5 <0.02 
Follow-up (years) 7.5 ± 3.1 7.8 ± 2.7 6.8 ± 3.7 NS 
T1DM onlyT1DM-CDT1DM-FCSP
n = 381n = 38n = 27
Female sex 164 (42)a 23 (60)a 12 (46) NS 
Cesarean delivery 137 (38) 15 (39) 10 (38) NS 
Breast milk (≥4 months) 206 (58) 29 (78) 16 (72) NS 
Infections in the first year 60 (17) 5 (13) 5 (23) NS 
Acute gastroenteritis in the first year 17 (4.4) 2 (5.2) 1 (3.8) NS 
Age of T1DM onset (years) 9.8 ± 4 5.7 ± 3.4 7.0 ± 3.7 <0.0001 
Age of CD onset (years) — 7.4 ± 3.6 10.1 ± 4.5 <0.02 
Follow-up (years) 7.5 ± 3.1 7.8 ± 2.7 6.8 ± 3.7 NS 

Data are shown as number (%) or as mean ± SD. NS, not significant.

aP < 0.05.

Prevalence of CD in Children With T1DM

Overall, the prevalence of positive CD autoimmunity and overt CD in children with T1DM is 14.3% (95% CI 10.8–17.5) and 8.5% (95% CI 5.2–10.3), respectively. Considering that the reported highest prevalence of CD in a large sample of the Italian pediatric population is 1.09% (35 of 3,188) (14), children with T1DM have an 8-times higher risk of overt CD (odds ratio 8.39; 95% CI 5.2–13.4; P < 0.0001) and a 15-times higher risk of positive celiac serology (odds ratio 15.36; 95% CI 10–23.5; P < 0.0001) compared with the general pediatric population. Female sex (P < 0.03) and younger age at onset of T1DM (P < 0.0001; Fig. 2) were associated with a higher risk for developing overt and CD autoimmunity, respectively. No role was found for mode of delivery, infection or acute gastroenteritis in the first year of life, or duration of breast-feeding (Table 1).

Figure 2

Age at onset of T1DM in the three groups of children with T1DM, T1DM/CD, and T1DM-FCS. Horizontal line, median; top and bottom borders of box, interquartile range; whiskers, 95% CI. NS, not significant.

Figure 2

Age at onset of T1DM in the three groups of children with T1DM, T1DM/CD, and T1DM-FCS. Horizontal line, median; top and bottom borders of box, interquartile range; whiskers, 95% CI. NS, not significant.

Close modal

Prevalence of CD in Children With T1DM

Overall, the prevalence of positive CD autoimmunity and overt CD in children with T1DM is 14.3%.

Histology

Among the 45 children who underwent endoscopy, only 7 children were among those with spontaneous decline/normalization of CD serology. We found an atrophic lesion in all of the 38 children classified as T1DM-CD, whereas among the 7 T1DM-FCS children, 2 had entirely normal mucosa and 5 had an infiltrative lesion.

Decision Tree Analysis

Two decision trees were built to predict the best characteristics to identify children with diabetes who will show positive celiac serology/disease and became negative after a positive celiac serology test.

The result of the first decision tree analysis for prediction of CD is shown in Fig. 3A. The lowest risk to develop CD was assigned to asymptomatic children with T1DM onset at more than 9.1 years. This tree correctly classified 321 of 445 children (72.1%), with a sensitivity of 0.35, specificity of 0.87, positive predictive value of 0.7, and negative predictive value of 0.28. A logistic regression analysis confirmed a statistically significant positive association between CD and a) being symptomatic (67% vs. 12%; P < 0.0001) and b) lower age at T1DM onset (6.3 ± 3.6 vs. 8.9 ± 4.1 years; P < 0.0001) and duration of breast milk of less than 4 months (8.1% vs. 18.4%; P < 0.02). A trend for an increased risk was found in girls (55% vs. 45%; P < 0.06).

Figure 3

Decision tree algorithm of the variables associated with overt (A) and transient (B) CD. Starting from the “root” of the tree (top) and progressing down to the “leaves,” a classification decision is chosen. The numbers in brackets indicate the number of patients that are correctly classified.

Figure 3

Decision tree algorithm of the variables associated with overt (A) and transient (B) CD. Starting from the “root” of the tree (top) and progressing down to the “leaves,” a classification decision is chosen. The numbers in brackets indicate the number of patients that are correctly classified.

Close modal

The result of the second decision tree analysis for prediction of CD serology becoming negative is shown in Fig. 3B. The highest chance was assigned to children with EmA negativity, tTG values lower than 7.8-fold the ULN, and asymptomatic. This tree correctly classified 56 of 64 children (87.5%), with sensitivity of 0.50, specificity of 1.0, positive predictive value of 1.0, and negative predictive value of 0.24. A logistic regression analysis confirmed that the likelihood of becoming serologically negative was associated with: a) EmA negativity (100% vs. 12%; P < 0.0001), b) lower levels of tTG (2.3 ± 2.1 vs. 7.4 ± 2.9 ULN; P < 0.0001), c) being asymptomatic (100% vs. 49%; P < 0.0001), and d) older age at first CD serological positivity (10.1 ± 4.5 vs. 7.4 ± 4.6 years; P < 0.009).

Profile of Children With T1DM-FCS

Older age at onset of CD autoimmunity (10.1 ± 4.5 [95% CI 8.3–11.9] vs. 7.4 ± 3.6 [95% CI 6.2–8.6] years; P < 0.02) and lower titer of anti-tTG–IgA (3.1 ± 3.3 [95% CI 1.8–4.4] vs. 7.9 ± 5.1 [95% CI 5.9–10.1] ULN; P < 0.02) were associated with the higher chance of a fluctuating CD phenotype. The 27 children in the T1DM-FCS group were monitored periodically for anti-tTG antibody levels for a mean of 3.7 ± 2.3 years (95% CI 3.1–4.5). Endoscopy was performed in 7 of 27 children (26%), and histologic analysis showed the absence of atrophic lesions (Table 2). The median time to normalization of anti-tTG antibody was 1.3 ± 1.1 years (95% CI 0.8–1.8).

Table 2

Serological, genetic, and histological data of children with T1DM-CD or with T1DM-FCS

T1DM-CDT1DM-FCSP
n = 38n = 27
Anti-tTG–IgA* (ULN) 7.9 ± 5.1 (5.9–10.1) 3.1 ± 3.3 (1.8–4.4) 0.0001 
EmA positivity 38 (100) 22 (81) NS 
Cholesterol (mg/dL) 170 ± 34 (157–183) 151 ± 26 (137–166) 0.06 
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 71 ± 56 (49–92) 50 ± 14 (42–59) NS 
Aspartate aminotransferase (units/L) 22 ± 5 (20–24) 24 ± 5 (21–27) NS 
Iron (μg/dL) 76 ± 25 (66–87) 88 ± 24 (74–102) NS 
Free T3 (pg/dL) 3.8 ± 0.6 (3.6–3.9) 4 ± 1.2 (3.3–4.7) NS 
Free T4 (pg/dL) 1.6 ± 2.1 (1–2.3) 1.7 ± 0.7 (1.2–2.1) NS 
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (mIU/L) 4 ± 6.2 (2.1–5.9) 2.6 ± 1.7 (1.6–3.6) NS 
HLA DQ2 32 (84) 23 (85) NS 
HLA DQ8 6 (16) 4 (15) NS 
Marsh lesion    
 0 — 2 (28) NS 
 1 — 4 (57) NS 
 2 — 1 (14) NS 
 3a 3 (8) — NS 
 3b 9 (24) — NS 
 3c 26 (68) — NS 
T1DM-CDT1DM-FCSP
n = 38n = 27
Anti-tTG–IgA* (ULN) 7.9 ± 5.1 (5.9–10.1) 3.1 ± 3.3 (1.8–4.4) 0.0001 
EmA positivity 38 (100) 22 (81) NS 
Cholesterol (mg/dL) 170 ± 34 (157–183) 151 ± 26 (137–166) 0.06 
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 71 ± 56 (49–92) 50 ± 14 (42–59) NS 
Aspartate aminotransferase (units/L) 22 ± 5 (20–24) 24 ± 5 (21–27) NS 
Iron (μg/dL) 76 ± 25 (66–87) 88 ± 24 (74–102) NS 
Free T3 (pg/dL) 3.8 ± 0.6 (3.6–3.9) 4 ± 1.2 (3.3–4.7) NS 
Free T4 (pg/dL) 1.6 ± 2.1 (1–2.3) 1.7 ± 0.7 (1.2–2.1) NS 
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (mIU/L) 4 ± 6.2 (2.1–5.9) 2.6 ± 1.7 (1.6–3.6) NS 
HLA DQ2 32 (84) 23 (85) NS 
HLA DQ8 6 (16) 4 (15) NS 
Marsh lesion    
 0 — 2 (28) NS 
 1 — 4 (57) NS 
 2 — 1 (14) NS 
 3a 3 (8) — NS 
 3b 9 (24) — NS 
 3c 26 (68) — NS 

Data are reported as median ± SD (95% CI) or as number (%). NS, not significant.

*Anti-tTG–IgA antibody titer reported as times the ULN.

Follow-up of Children With T1DM-CD

The 38 children in T1DM-CD group underwent endoscopy and histology, which showed an atrophic lesion (Marsh 3) in all. The adherence to the GFD was followed by a progressive resolution of symptoms and normalization of anti-tTG antibodies.

Comparison of Children in the Three Groups

At the time of the first appearance of positive CD serology, we found that children with T1DM-CD had lower levels of blood triglycerides than those with T1DM-only and T1DM-FCS (109 ± 149 mg/dL vs. 59 ± 35 mg/dL vs. 88 ± 39 mg/dL; P < 0.01). No differences were found for nutritional, hormonal, and other biochemical parameters.

This prospective study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to describe the occurrence of fluctuating celiac serology in a large population of children and adolescents with T1DM, evaluated from the onset of the disease. Our study demonstrates that serum anti-tTG antibody levels decrease spontaneously in 40% and become persistently negative in at least 20% while eating a gluten-containing diet. Moreover, we confirm that the prevalence of overt CD and positive CD autoimmunity are significantly higher than in the general pediatric population (15,16). This finding suggests that in children with T1DM there may be a state of temporary positivity of celiac serology. Consequently, in the absence of clinical symptoms or signs of CD, the histological confirmation of the disease and the GFD should be postponed to avoid unnecessary procedures and reduce the psychological burden that a GFD would add, further affecting quality of life (17).

Although CD is considered a life-long disorder, transient or fluctuating anti-tTG–IgA seropositivity has been observed in children with T1DM eating a gluten-containing diet. Barera et al. (18) reported that 30% of EmA-positive children with diabetes became negative during follow-up and concluded that these patients have either a transient false-positive test, as described for antireticulin antibodies (19) and EmA (20) or a form of CD that has not yet manifested in significant mucosal injury. In our study, the false positivity of CD serology was unlikely, mainly because we used anti-tTG antibodies, an automatized and not operator-dependent ELISA test. Furthermore, although the study by Barera et al. (18) described a single EmA positivity, our study shows a persistent (at least twice) positivity of celiac autoimmunity and HLA typing consistent with CD predisposition. A more recent retrospective study of 738 children with T1DM reported anti-tTG antibody levels normalized in 35% of children consuming a gluten-containing diet (6).

The clinical significance of transient or fluctuating tTG-IgA autoantibodies while eating a gluten-containing diet remains obscure; however, it is remarkable that in our cohort of 27 children with fluctuating anti-tTG levels, the spontaneous loss of serum CD autoimmunity (anti-tTG antibodies and EmA) was the most frequent outcome, occurring in 67% of cases, although overt CD developed in three children during follow-up. Serology is becoming increasingly relevant for the identification of CD, showing a very high sensitivity and specificity for CD (up to 95%); however, because the occurrence of false-positive results for IgA tTG antibodies is possible, especially at low titers, EmA-IgA should be determined as a confirmatory test before proceeding to an intestinal biopsy that might be unnecessary (21). A lifelong and careful follow-up of such individuals with transient serology is needed, as is the clinicians’ alertness to recognizing the heterogeneous presentation of this condition.

The reason underlying the spontaneous disappearance of CD autoantibodies in children with T1DM is still unclear. That a different genetic background may drive the clinical outcome of CD has been hypothesized. The finding of CD-related autoantibodies in patients with T1DM bearing the HLA predisposing genes suggests that these children may have a genetic make-up facilitating an adaptive antigluten immune response but decreasing the overall risk to develop villous atrophy. Another hypothesis is that a regulatory immune response extinguishing the incipient CD could be operating in HLA-positive patients with T1DM (22).

Presence of CD symptoms and age at onset of T1DM younger than 9 years were the strongest predictors of positive CD serology, whereas being EmA positive and having an IgA-tTG antibody level greater than the seven- to eightfold ULN value were the strongest predictors of an overt CD diagnosis. We first demonstrated the existence of a path in the decision tree that brings together the data presented in previous articles: the presence of symptoms in family-risk infants (23) and the age at onset of T1DM (24,25) as a strong predictor of overt CD.

Our long-term data show that children with diabetes with a spontaneous decline or normalization of CD serology have no hidden signs of malabsorption and have normal values of nutritional, biochemical, and growth parameters, whereas children with overt CD have some abnormality of triglyceride that reverses after a GFD. The benefits of the adherence to a GFD in patients with T1DM regarding growth parameters, HbA1c levels, and hypoglycemic episodes are still debated (2628). The discordant findings among studies, the small numbers of patients, and the lack of distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients make it difficult to comment on the real effect of adherence to a GFD in patients with T1DM. Recent studies suggest that no significant adverse outcomes take place in anti-tTG–positive children with T1DM who delay starting a GFD for 2 years (29) and that positive antibodies are insufficient to cause a noticeable effect on important outcomes (microvascular complications, neuropathy) for which coexisting enteropathy is required (30).

The main limitation of our study is that only seven children among those with spontaneous decline or normalization of CD serology (26%) underwent endoscopy and histology: the mucosa was entirely normal in two, and an infiltrative lesion was present in seven; therefore, the absence of an atrophic lesion in this subgroup of patients is still questionable.

In conclusion, we have shown that children with T1DM symptomatic for CD and with a high anti-tTG titer are at high risk of having overt CD and need a GFD (26,27), and we propose that the absence of CD symptoms, the negativity of EmA, and a low anti-tTG level should induce serological testing to be repeated on a gluten-containing diet rather than to go for an immediate intestinal biopsy considering that benefit of early GFD is limited (7,8,31). Nevertheless, we suggest adoption of the recommendation of the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes that all children diagnosed with T1DM be screened for CD at the time of diagnosis and every 1–2 years thereafter (32).

Finally, considering that patients with T1DM can show minimal lesions of intestinal mucosa as an expression of their autoimmune condition without the coexistence of CD (5), being very cautious before prescribing a GFD is mandatory. In practice, a diagnosis of intraepithelial lymphocytosis with normal villous architecture should be accompanied by a comment emphasizing the nonspecific nature of this finding (33), and patients should be left on a gluten-containing diet with a clear indication to attend a careful serological and histological follow-up.

Acknowledgments. The authors thank Dr. Marilina Tampoia (Laboratory of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of Bari) for her expert help in the interpretation and proper disclosure of laboratory data related to the serology of celiac disease. The authors also thank Dr. Aldo Torelli and Dr. Elda Frezza who, until their retirement (Giovanni XXII Children's Hospital), had been involved in the clinical management of children with diabetes.

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. S.C. and R.F. contributed to study concept and design and to analysis and interpretation of data. E.P. supervised the study. M.O., F.C., and F.O. acquired data. M.V. performed statistical analysis. F.P. and R.F. drafted the manuscript. C.C. and L.C. critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. R.F. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

1.
Elfström
P
,
Sundström
J
,
Ludvigsson
JF
.
Systematic review with meta-analysis: associations between coeliac disease and type 1 diabetes
.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
2014
;
40
:
1123
1132
[PubMed]
2.
Smyth
DJ
,
Plagnol
V
,
Walker
NM
, et al
.
Shared and distinct genetic variants in type 1 diabetes and celiac disease
.
N Engl J Med
2008
;
359
:
2767
2777
[PubMed]
3.
Silverstein J, Klingensmith G, Copeland K, et al.; American Diabetes Association. Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2005;28:186–212.
4.
Husby
S
,
Koletzko
S
,
Korponay-Szabó
IR
, et al.;
ESPGHAN Working Group on Coeliac Disease Diagnosis
;
ESPGHAN Gastroenterology Committee
;
European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition
.
European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease
.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
2012
;
54
:
136
160
[PubMed]
5.
Volta
U
,
Tovoli
F
,
Caio
G
.
Clinical and immunological features of celiac disease in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus
.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
2011
;
5
:
479
487
[PubMed]
6.
Waisbourd-Zinman
O
,
Hojsak
I
,
Rosenbach
Y
, et al
.
Spontaneous normalization of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody levels is common in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus
.
Dig Dis Sci
2012
;
57
:
1314
1320
[PubMed]
7.
Artz
E
,
Warren-Ulanch
J
,
Becker
D
,
Greenspan
S
,
Freemark
M
.
Seropositivity to celiac antigens in asymptomatic children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: association with weight, height, and bone mineralization
.
Pediatr Diabetes
2008
;
9
:
277
284
[PubMed]
8.
Rami
B
,
Sumnik
Z
,
Schober
E
, et al
.
Screening detected celiac disease in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: effect on the clinical course (a case control study)
.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
2005
;
41
:
317
321
[PubMed]
9.
Westman
E
,
Ambler
GR
,
Royle
M
,
Peat
J
,
Chan
A
.
Children with coeliac disease and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus—growth, diabetes control and dietary intake
.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab
1999
;
12
:
433
442
[PubMed]
10.
Amin
R
,
Murphy
N
,
Edge
J
,
Ahmed
ML
,
Acerini
CL
,
Dunger
DB
.
A longitudinal study of the effects of a gluten-free diet on glycemic control and weight gain in subjects with type 1 diabetes and celiac disease
.
Diabetes Care
2002
;
25
:
1117
1122
[PubMed]
11.
Reeves
GE
,
Squance
ML
,
Duggan
AE
, et al
.
Diagnostic accuracy of coeliac serological tests: a prospective study
.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
2006
;
18
:
493
501
[PubMed]
12.
Buyse
I
,
Decorte
R
,
Baens
M
, et al
.
Rapid DNA typing of class II HLA antigens using the polymerase chain reaction and reverse dot blot hybridization
.
Tissue Antigens
1993
;
41
:
1
14
[PubMed]
13.
Oberhuber
G
,
Granditsch
G
,
Vogelsang
H
.
The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists
.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
1999
;
11
:
1185
1194
[PubMed]
14.
Tommasini
A
,
Not
T
,
Kiren
V
, et al
.
Mass screening for coeliac disease using antihuman transglutaminase antibody assay
.
Arch Dis Child
2004
;
89
:
512
515
[PubMed]
15.
Narula
P
,
Porter
L
,
Langton
J
, et al
.
Gastrointestinal symptoms in children with type 1 diabetes screened for celiac disease
.
Pediatrics
2009
;
124
:
e489
e495
[PubMed]
16.
Karavanaki
K
,
Kakleas
K
,
Paschali
E
, et al
.
Screening for associated autoimmunity in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)
.
Horm Res
2009
;
71
:
201
206
[PubMed]
17.
Freemark
M
,
Levitsky
LL
.
Screening for celiac disease in children with type 1 diabetes: two views of the controversy
.
Diabetes Care
2003
;
26
:
1932
1939
[PubMed]
18.
Barera
G
,
Bonfanti
R
,
Viscardi
M
, et al
.
Occurrence of celiac disease after onset of type 1 diabetes: a 6-year prospective longitudinal study
.
Pediatrics
2002
;
109
:
833
838
[PubMed]
19.
Saukkonen
T
,
Savilahti
E
,
Reijonen
H
,
Ilonen
J
,
Tuomilehto-Wolf
E
,
Akerblom
HK
;
Childhood Diabetes in Finland Study Group
.
Coeliac disease: frequent occurrence after clinical onset of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
.
Diabet Med
1996
;
13
:
464
470
[PubMed]
20.
Carlsson
AK
,
Axelsson
IEM
,
Borulf
SK
, et al
.
Prevalence of IgA-antiendomysium and IgA-antigliadin autoantibodies at diagnosis of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in Swedish children and adolescents
.
Pediatrics
1999
;
103
:
1248
1252
[PubMed]
21.
Volta
U
,
Rodrigo
L
,
Granito
A
, et al
.
Celiac disease in autoimmune cholestatic liver disorders
.
Am J Gastroenterol
2002
;
97
:
2609
2613
[PubMed]
22.
Sperandeo
MP
,
Tosco
A
,
Izzo
V
, et al
.
Potential celiac patients: a model of celiac disease pathogenesis
.
PLoS One
2011
;
6
:
e21281
[PubMed]
23.
Lionetti
E
,
Castellaneta
S
,
Pulvirenti
A
, et al.;
Italian Working Group of Weaning and Celiac Disease Risk
.
Prevalence and natural history of potential celiac disease in at-family-risk infants prospectively investigated from birth
.
J Pediatr
2012
;
161
:
908
914
[PubMed]
24.
Cerutti
F
,
Bruno
G
,
Chiarelli
F
,
Lorini
R
,
Meschi
F
,
Sacchetti
C
;
Diabetes Study Group of the Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology
.
Younger age at onset and sex predict celiac disease in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: an Italian multicenter study
.
Diabetes Care
2004
;
27
:
1294
1298
[PubMed]
25.
Tiberti
C
,
Panimolle
F
,
Bonamico
M
, et al
.
IgA anti-transglutaminase autoantibodies at type 1 diabetes onset are less frequent in adult patients and are associated with a general celiac-specific lower immune response in comparison with nondiabetic celiac patients at diagnosis
.
Diabetes Care
2012
;
35
:
2083
2085
[PubMed]
26.
Hansen
D
,
Brock-Jacobsen
B
,
Lund
E
, et al
.
Clinical benefit of a gluten-free diet in type 1 diabetic children with screening-detected celiac disease: a population-based screening study with 2 years’ follow-up
.
Diabetes Care
2006
;
29
:
2452
2456
[PubMed]
27.
Saadah
OI
,
Zacharin
M
,
O’Callaghan
A
,
Oliver
MR
,
Catto-Smith
AG
.
Effect of gluten-free diet and adherence on growth and diabetic control in diabetics with coeliac disease
.
Arch Dis Child
2004
;
89
:
871
876
[PubMed]
28.
Sun
S
,
Puttha
R
,
Ghezaiel
S
,
Skae
M
,
Cooper
C
,
Amin
R
;
North West England Paediatric Diabetes Network
.
The effect of biopsy-positive silent coeliac disease and treatment with a gluten-free diet on growth and glycaemic control in children with Type 1 diabetes
.
Diabet Med
2009
;
26
:
1250
1254
[PubMed]
29.
Simmons
JH
,
Klingensmith
GJ
,
McFann
K
, et al
.
Celiac autoimmunity in children with type 1 diabetes: a two-year follow-up
.
J Pediatr
2011
;
158
:
276
278, e1
[PubMed]
30.
Leeds
JS
,
Hopper
AD
,
Hadjivassiliou
M
,
Tesfaye
S
,
Sanders
DS
.
Potential coeliac disease in type 1 diabetes mellitus: does a positive antibody lead to increased complications
?
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
2014
;
24
:
378
383
[PubMed]
31.
Simmons
JH
,
Klingensmith
GJ
,
McFann
K
, et al
.
Impact of celiac autoimmunity on children with type 1 diabetes
.
J Pediatr
2007
;
150
:
461
466
[PubMed]
32.
Kordonouri O, Klingensmith G, Knip M, et al. Other complications and diabetes-associated conditions in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2014;15(Suppl. 20):270–278
[PubMed]
33.
Kakar
S
,
Nehra
V
,
Murray
JA
,
Dayharsh
GA
,
Burgart
LJ
.
Significance of intraepithelial lymphocytosis in small bowel biopsy samples with normal mucosal architecture
.
Am J Gastroenterol
2003
;
98
:
2027
2033
[PubMed]