Recommendations

  • Most people with type 1 diabetes should be treated with multiple-dose insulin (MDI) injections (three to four injections per day of basal and prandial insulin) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). A

  • Most people with type 1 diabetes should be educated in how to match prandial insulin dose to carbohydrate intake, premeal blood glucose, and anticipated activity. E

  • Most people with type 1 diabetes should use insulin analogs to reduce hypoglycemia risk. A

Insulin Therapy

There are excellent reviews to guide the initiation and management of insulin therapy to achieve desired glycemic goals (1,2,3). Although most studies of MDI versus pump therapy have been small and of short duration, a systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that there were no systematic differences in A1C or severe hypoglycemia rates in children and adults between the two forms of intensive insulin therapy (4). A large randomized trial in type 1 diabetic patients with nocturnal hypoglycemia reported that sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy with the threshold suspend feature reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia, without increasing glycated hemoglobin values (5). Overall, intensive management through pump therapy/continuous glucose monitoring and active patient/family participation should be strongly encouraged (68). For selected individuals who have mastered carbohydrate counting, education on the impact of protein and fat on glycemic excursions can be incorporated into diabetes management (9).

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) clearly showed that intensive insulin therapy (three or more injections per day of insulin) or CSII (insulin pump therapy) was a key part of improved glycemia and better outcomes (10,11). The study was carried out with short- and intermediate-acting human insulins. Despite better microvascular outcomes, intensive insulin therapy was associated with a high rate of severe hypoglycemia (62 episodes per 100 patient-years of therapy). Since the DCCT, a number of rapid-acting and long-acting insulin analogs have been developed. These analogs are associated with less hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes, while matching the A1C lowering of human insulins (1,12).

Recommended therapy for type 1 diabetes consists of the following:

  1. Use MDI injections (three to four injections per day of basal and prandial insulin) or CSII therapy.

  2. Match prandial insulin to carbohydrate intake, premeal blood glucose, and anticipated physical activity.

  3. For most patients (especially those at an elevated risk of hypoglycemia), use insulin analogs.

  4. For patients with frequent nocturnal hypoglycemia and/or hypoglycemia unawareness, a sensor-augmented low glucose threshold suspend pump may be considered.

Pramlintide

Pramlintide, an amylin analog, is an agent that delays gastric emptying, blunts pancreatic secretion of glucagon, and enhances satiety. It is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy for use in type 1 diabetes. It has been shown to induce weight loss and lower insulin dose; however, it is only indicated in adults. Concurrent reduction of prandial insulin dosing is required to reduce the risk of severe hypoglycemia.

Investigational Agents

Metformin

Adding metformin to insulin therapy may reduce insulin requirements and improve metabolic control in overweight/obese patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. In a meta-analysis, metformin in type 1 diabetes was found to reduce insulin requirements (6.6 U/day, P < 0.001) and led to small reductions in weight and total and LDL cholesterol but not to improved glycemic control (absolute A1C reduction 0.11%, P = 0.42) (13).

Incretin-Based Therapies

Therapies approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes are currently being evaluated in type 1 diabetes. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are not currently FDA approved for those with type 1 diabetes, but are being studied in this population.

Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors

Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors provide insulin-independent glucose lowering by blocking glucose reabsorption in the proximal renal tubule by inhibiting SGLT2. These agents provide modest weight loss and blood pressure reduction. Although there are two FDA-approved agents for use in patients with type 2 diabetes, there are insufficient data to recommend clinical use in type 1 diabetes at this time (14).

Recommendations

  • Metformin, if not contraindicated and if tolerated, is the preferred initial pharmacological agent for type 2 diabetes. A

  • In patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and markedly symptomatic and/or elevated blood glucose levels or A1C, consider initiating insulin therapy (with or without additional agents). E

  • If noninsulin monotherapy at maximum tolerated dose does not achieve or maintain the A1C target over 3 months, add a second oral agent, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, or basal insulin. A

  • A patient-centered approach should be used to guide choice of pharmacological agents. Considerations include efficacy, cost, potential side effects, weight, comorbidities, hypoglycemia risk, and patient preferences. E

  • Due to the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes, insulin therapy is eventually indicated for many patients with type 2 diabetes. B

An updated American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes position statement (15) evaluated the data and developed recommendations, including advantages and disadvantages, for antihyperglycemic agents for type 2 diabetic patients. A patient-centered approach is stressed, including patient preferences, cost and potential side effects of each class, effects on body weight, and hypoglycemia risk. Lifestyle modifications that improve health (see Section 4. Foundations of Care) should be emphasized along with any pharmacological therapy.

Initial Therapy

Most patients should begin with lifestyle changes (lifestyle counseling, weight-loss education, exercise, etc.). When lifestyle efforts alone have not achieved or maintained glycemic goals, metformin monotherapy should be added at, or soon after, diagnosis, unless there are contraindications or intolerance. Metformin has a long-standing evidence base for efficacy and safety, is inexpensive, and may reduce risk of cardiovascular events (16). In patients with metformin intolerance or contraindications, consider an initial drug from other classes depicted in Fig. 7.1 under “Dual therapy” and proceed accordingly.

Figure 7.1

Antihyperglycemic therapy in type 2 diabetes: general recommendations (15). The order in the chart was determined by historical availability and the route of administration, with injectables to the right; it is not meant to denote any specific preference. Potential sequences of antihyperglycemic therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes are displayed, with the usual transition moving vertically from top to bottom (although horizontal movement within therapy stages is also possible, depending on the circumstances). DPP-4-i, DPP-4 inhibitor; fxs, fractures; GI, gastrointestinal; GLP-1-RA, GLP-1 receptor agonist; GU, genitourinary; HF, heart failure; Hypo, hypoglycemia; SGLT2-i, SGLT2 inhibitor; SU, sulfonylurea; TZD, thiazolidinedione. *See ref. 15 for description of efficacy categorization. †Consider starting at this stage when A1C is ≥9%. ‡Consider starting at this stage when blood glucose is ≥300–350 mg/dL (16.7–19.4 mmol/L) and/or A1C is ≥10–12%, especially if symptomatic or catabolic features are present, in which case basal insulin + mealtime insulin is the preferred initial regimen. §Usually a basal insulin (NPH, glargine, detemir, degludec). Adapted with permission from Inzucchi et al. (15).

Figure 7.1

Antihyperglycemic therapy in type 2 diabetes: general recommendations (15). The order in the chart was determined by historical availability and the route of administration, with injectables to the right; it is not meant to denote any specific preference. Potential sequences of antihyperglycemic therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes are displayed, with the usual transition moving vertically from top to bottom (although horizontal movement within therapy stages is also possible, depending on the circumstances). DPP-4-i, DPP-4 inhibitor; fxs, fractures; GI, gastrointestinal; GLP-1-RA, GLP-1 receptor agonist; GU, genitourinary; HF, heart failure; Hypo, hypoglycemia; SGLT2-i, SGLT2 inhibitor; SU, sulfonylurea; TZD, thiazolidinedione. *See ref. 15 for description of efficacy categorization. †Consider starting at this stage when A1C is ≥9%. ‡Consider starting at this stage when blood glucose is ≥300–350 mg/dL (16.7–19.4 mmol/L) and/or A1C is ≥10–12%, especially if symptomatic or catabolic features are present, in which case basal insulin + mealtime insulin is the preferred initial regimen. §Usually a basal insulin (NPH, glargine, detemir, degludec). Adapted with permission from Inzucchi et al. (15).

Close modal

Combination Therapy

Although there are numerous trials comparing dual therapy with metformin alone, few directly compare drugs as add-on therapy. A comparative effectiveness meta-analysis (17) suggests that overall each new class of noninsulin agents added to initial therapy lowers A1C around 0.9–1.1%. A comprehensive listing, including the cost, is available in Table 7.1.

Table 7.1

Properties of available glucose-lowering agents in the U.S. and Europe that may guide individualized treatment choices in patients with type 2 diabetes (15)

ClassCompound(s)Cellular mechanism(s)Primary physiological action(s)AdvantagesDisadvantagesCost*
Biguanides • Metformin Activates AMP-kinase  (? other) • ↓ Hepatic glucose production • Extensive experience • Gastrointestinal side effects (diarrhea, abdominal cramping) Low 
• No hypoglycemia • Lactic acidosis risk (rare) 
• ↓ CVD events (UKPDS) • Vitamin B12 deficiency 
• Multiple contraindications: CKD, acidosis, hypoxia, dehydration, etc. 
Sulfonylureas 2nd Generation Closes KATP channels on  β-cell plasma membranes • ↑ Insulin secretion • Extensive experience • Hypoglycemia Low 
• Glyburide/glibenclamide • ↓ Microvascular risk (UKPDS) • ↑ Weight 
• Glipizide • ? Blunts myocardial ischemic preconditioning 
• Gliclazide • Low durability 
• Glimepiride 
Meglitinides (glinides) • Repaglinide Closes KATP channels on  β-cell plasma membranes • ↑ Insulin secretion • ↓Postprandial glucose excursions • Hypoglycemia Moderate 
• Nateglinide • Dosing flexibility • ↑ Weight 
• ? Blunts myocardial ischemic preconditioning 
• Frequent dosing schedule 
TZDs • Pioglitazone Activates the nuclear  transcription factor PPAR-γ • ↑ Insulin sensitivity • No hypoglycemia • ↑ Weight Low 
• Rosiglitazone§ • Durability • Edema/heart failure 
• ↑ HDL-C • Bone fractures 
• ↓ Triglycerides (pioglitazone) • ↑ LDL-C (rosiglitazone) 
• ? ↓ CVD events (PROactive, pioglitazone) • ? ↑ MI (meta-analyses, rosiglitazone) 
α-Glucosidase inhibitors • Acarbose Inhibits intestinal  α-glucosidase • Slows intestinal carbohydrate digestion/absorption • No hypoglycemia • Generally modest A1C efficacy Moderate 
• Miglitol • ↓Postprandial glucose excursions 
• ? ↓ CVD events (STOP-NIDDM) • Gastrointestinal side effects (flatulence, diarrhea) 
• Nonsystemic • Frequent dosing schedule 
DPP-4 inhibitors • Sitagliptin Inhibits DPP-4 activity,  increasing postprandial  active incretin (GLP-1, GIP) concentrations • ↑ Insulin secretion (glucose-dependent) • No hypoglycemia • Angioedema/urticaria and other immune-mediated dermatological effects High 
• Vildagliptin • ↓ Glucagon secretion (glucose-dependent) • Well tolerated • ? Acute pancreatitis 
• Saxagliptin 
• Linagliptin • ? ↑ Heart failure hospitalizations 
• Alogliptin 
Bile acid sequestrants • Colesevelam Binds bile acids in  intestinal tract, increasing  hepatic bile acid  production • ? ↓ Hepatic glucose production • No hypoglycemia • Generally modest A1C efficacy High 
• ? ↑ Incretin levels • ↓ LDL-C • Constipation 
• ↑ Triglycerides 
• May ↓ absorption of other medications 
Dopamine-2 agonists • Bromocriptine (quick release)§ Activates dopaminergic  receptors • Modulates hypothalamic regulation of metabolism • No hypoglycemia • Generally modest A1C efficacy High 
• Dizziness/syncope 
• ↑ Insulin sensitivity • ? ↓ CVD events (Cycloset Safety Trial) • Nausea 
• Fatigue 
• Rhinitis 
SGLT2 inhibitors • Canagliflozin Inhibits SGLT2 in the proximal nephron • Blocks glucose reabsorption by the kidney, increasing glucosuria • No hypoglycemia • Genitourinary infections High 
• Dapagliflozin • ↓ Weight • Polyuria 
• Empagliflozin • Volume depletion/hypotension/dizziness 
• ↓ Blood pressure • ↑ LDL-C 
• Effective at all stages of T2DM • ↑ Creatinine (transient) 
GLP-1 receptor agonists • Exenatide Activates GLP-1 receptors • ↑ Insulin secretion (glucose-dependent) • No hypoglycemia • Gastrointestinal side effects (nausea/vomiting/diarrhea) High 
• Exenatide extended release • ↓ Glucagon secretion (glucose-dependent) • ↑ Heart rate 
• Liraglutide • ↓ Weight • ? Acute pancreatitis 
• Albiglutide • Slows gastric emptying • ↓ Postprandial glucose excursions • C-cell hyperplasia/medullary thyroid tumors in animals 
• Lixisenatide • ↑ Satiety • ↓ Some cardiovascular risk factors • Injectable 
• Dulaglutide • Training requirements 
Amylin mimetics • Pramlintide§ Activates amylin receptors • ↓ Glucagon secretion • ↓ Postprandial glucose excursions • Generally modest A1C efficacy High 
• ↑ Satiety • ↓ Weight • Gastrointestinal side effects (nausea/vomiting) 
• Hypoglycemia unless insulin dose is simultaneously reduced 
• Slows gastric emptying • Injectable 
• Frequent dosing schedule 
• Training requirements 
Insulins • Rapid-acting analogs Activates insulin receptors • ↑ Glucose disposal • Nearly universal response • Hypoglycemia Variable# 
 - Lispro 
 - Aspart 
 - Glulisine 
• Short-acting 
 - Human Regular 
• Intermediate-acting • Weight gain 
 - Human NPH 
• Basal insulin analogs • ↓ Hepatic glucose production • ↓ Microvascular risk (UKPDS) • ? Mitogenic effects 
 - Glargine • Injectable 
 - Detemir • Training requirements 
 - Degludec • Other • Theoretically unlimited efficacy • Patient reluctance 
• Premixed (several types) 
ClassCompound(s)Cellular mechanism(s)Primary physiological action(s)AdvantagesDisadvantagesCost*
Biguanides • Metformin Activates AMP-kinase  (? other) • ↓ Hepatic glucose production • Extensive experience • Gastrointestinal side effects (diarrhea, abdominal cramping) Low 
• No hypoglycemia • Lactic acidosis risk (rare) 
• ↓ CVD events (UKPDS) • Vitamin B12 deficiency 
• Multiple contraindications: CKD, acidosis, hypoxia, dehydration, etc. 
Sulfonylureas 2nd Generation Closes KATP channels on  β-cell plasma membranes • ↑ Insulin secretion • Extensive experience • Hypoglycemia Low 
• Glyburide/glibenclamide • ↓ Microvascular risk (UKPDS) • ↑ Weight 
• Glipizide • ? Blunts myocardial ischemic preconditioning 
• Gliclazide • Low durability 
• Glimepiride 
Meglitinides (glinides) • Repaglinide Closes KATP channels on  β-cell plasma membranes • ↑ Insulin secretion • ↓Postprandial glucose excursions • Hypoglycemia Moderate 
• Nateglinide • Dosing flexibility • ↑ Weight 
• ? Blunts myocardial ischemic preconditioning 
• Frequent dosing schedule 
TZDs • Pioglitazone Activates the nuclear  transcription factor PPAR-γ • ↑ Insulin sensitivity • No hypoglycemia • ↑ Weight Low 
• Rosiglitazone§ • Durability • Edema/heart failure 
• ↑ HDL-C • Bone fractures 
• ↓ Triglycerides (pioglitazone) • ↑ LDL-C (rosiglitazone) 
• ? ↓ CVD events (PROactive, pioglitazone) • ? ↑ MI (meta-analyses, rosiglitazone) 
α-Glucosidase inhibitors • Acarbose Inhibits intestinal  α-glucosidase • Slows intestinal carbohydrate digestion/absorption • No hypoglycemia • Generally modest A1C efficacy Moderate 
• Miglitol • ↓Postprandial glucose excursions 
• ? ↓ CVD events (STOP-NIDDM) • Gastrointestinal side effects (flatulence, diarrhea) 
• Nonsystemic • Frequent dosing schedule 
DPP-4 inhibitors • Sitagliptin Inhibits DPP-4 activity,  increasing postprandial  active incretin (GLP-1, GIP) concentrations • ↑ Insulin secretion (glucose-dependent) • No hypoglycemia • Angioedema/urticaria and other immune-mediated dermatological effects High 
• Vildagliptin • ↓ Glucagon secretion (glucose-dependent) • Well tolerated • ? Acute pancreatitis 
• Saxagliptin 
• Linagliptin • ? ↑ Heart failure hospitalizations 
• Alogliptin 
Bile acid sequestrants • Colesevelam Binds bile acids in  intestinal tract, increasing  hepatic bile acid  production • ? ↓ Hepatic glucose production • No hypoglycemia • Generally modest A1C efficacy High 
• ? ↑ Incretin levels • ↓ LDL-C • Constipation 
• ↑ Triglycerides 
• May ↓ absorption of other medications 
Dopamine-2 agonists • Bromocriptine (quick release)§ Activates dopaminergic  receptors • Modulates hypothalamic regulation of metabolism • No hypoglycemia • Generally modest A1C efficacy High 
• Dizziness/syncope 
• ↑ Insulin sensitivity • ? ↓ CVD events (Cycloset Safety Trial) • Nausea 
• Fatigue 
• Rhinitis 
SGLT2 inhibitors • Canagliflozin Inhibits SGLT2 in the proximal nephron • Blocks glucose reabsorption by the kidney, increasing glucosuria • No hypoglycemia • Genitourinary infections High 
• Dapagliflozin • ↓ Weight • Polyuria 
• Empagliflozin • Volume depletion/hypotension/dizziness 
• ↓ Blood pressure • ↑ LDL-C 
• Effective at all stages of T2DM • ↑ Creatinine (transient) 
GLP-1 receptor agonists • Exenatide Activates GLP-1 receptors • ↑ Insulin secretion (glucose-dependent) • No hypoglycemia • Gastrointestinal side effects (nausea/vomiting/diarrhea) High 
• Exenatide extended release • ↓ Glucagon secretion (glucose-dependent) • ↑ Heart rate 
• Liraglutide • ↓ Weight • ? Acute pancreatitis 
• Albiglutide • Slows gastric emptying • ↓ Postprandial glucose excursions • C-cell hyperplasia/medullary thyroid tumors in animals 
• Lixisenatide • ↑ Satiety • ↓ Some cardiovascular risk factors • Injectable 
• Dulaglutide • Training requirements 
Amylin mimetics • Pramlintide§ Activates amylin receptors • ↓ Glucagon secretion • ↓ Postprandial glucose excursions • Generally modest A1C efficacy High 
• ↑ Satiety • ↓ Weight • Gastrointestinal side effects (nausea/vomiting) 
• Hypoglycemia unless insulin dose is simultaneously reduced 
• Slows gastric emptying • Injectable 
• Frequent dosing schedule 
• Training requirements 
Insulins • Rapid-acting analogs Activates insulin receptors • ↑ Glucose disposal • Nearly universal response • Hypoglycemia Variable# 
 - Lispro 
 - Aspart 
 - Glulisine 
• Short-acting 
 - Human Regular 
• Intermediate-acting • Weight gain 
 - Human NPH 
• Basal insulin analogs • ↓ Hepatic glucose production • ↓ Microvascular risk (UKPDS) • ? Mitogenic effects 
 - Glargine • Injectable 
 - Detemir • Training requirements 
 - Degludec • Other • Theoretically unlimited efficacy • Patient reluctance 
• Premixed (several types) 

CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; MI, myocardial infarction; PPAR-γ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ; PROactive, Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macrovascular Events (30); STOP-NIDDM, Study to Prevent Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (31); TZD, thiazolidinedione; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; UKPDS, UK Prospective Diabetes Study (32,33). Cycloset trial of quick-release bromocriptine (34).

*

Cost is based on lowest-priced member of the class (see ref. 15).

Not licensed in the U.S.

Initial concerns regarding bladder cancer risk are decreasing after subsequent study.

§

Not licensed in Europe for type 2 diabetes.

#

Cost is highly dependent on type/brand (analogs > human insulins) and dosage.

Adapted with permission from Inzucchi et al. (15).

If the A1C target is not achieved after approximately 3 months, consider a combination of metformin and one of these six treatment options: sulfonylurea, thiazolidinedione, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, or basal insulin (Fig. 7.1). Drug choice is based on patient preferences as well as various patient, disease, and drug characteristics, with the goal of reducing blood glucose levels while minimizing side effects, especially hypoglycemia. Figure 7.1 emphasizes drugs commonly used in the U.S. and/or Europe.

Rapid-acting secretagogues (meglitinides) may be used instead of sulfonylureas in patients with irregular meal schedules or who develop late postprandial hypoglycemia on a sulfonylurea. Other drugs not shown in the figure (e.g., α-glucosidase inhibitors, colesevelam, bromocriptine, pramlintide) may be tried in specific situations, but are generally not favored due to modest efficacy, the frequency of administration, and/or side effects.

For all patients, consider initiating therapy with a dual combination when A1C is ≥9% to more expeditiously achieve the target A1C level. Insulin has the advantage of being effective where other agents may not be and should be considered as part of any combination regimen when hyperglycemia is severe, especially if symptoms are present or any catabolic features (weight loss, ketosis) are in evidence. Consider initiating combination insulin injectable therapy when blood glucose is ≥300–350 mg/dL (16.7–19.4 mmol/L) and/or A1C is ≥10–12%. As the patient’s glucose toxicity resolves, the regimen can, potentially, be subsequently simplified.

Insulin Therapy

Many patients with type 2 diabetes eventually require and benefit from insulin therapy. Providers may wish to consider regimen flexibility when devising a plan for the initiation and adjustment of insulin therapy in people with type 2 diabetes (Fig. 7.2). The progressive nature of type 2 diabetes and its therapies should be regularly and objectively explained to patients. Providers should avoid using insulin as a threat or describing it as a failure or punishment. Equipping patients with an algorithm for self-titration of insulin doses based on self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients initiating insulin (18).

Figure 7.2

Approach to starting and adjusting insulin in type 2 diabetes (15). FBG, fasting blood glucose; GLP-1-RA, GLP-1 receptor agonist; hypo, hypoglycemia; mod., moderate; PPG, postprandial glucose; #, number. Adapted with permission from Inzucchi et al. (15).

Figure 7.2

Approach to starting and adjusting insulin in type 2 diabetes (15). FBG, fasting blood glucose; GLP-1-RA, GLP-1 receptor agonist; hypo, hypoglycemia; mod., moderate; PPG, postprandial glucose; #, number. Adapted with permission from Inzucchi et al. (15).

Close modal

Basal insulin alone is the most convenient initial insulin regimen, beginning at 10 U or 0.1–0.2 U/kg, depending on the degree of hyperglycemia. Basal insulin is usually prescribed in conjunction with metformin and possibly one additional noninsulin agent. If basal insulin has been titrated to an acceptable fasting blood glucose level, but A1C remains above target, consider advancing to combination injectable therapy (Fig. 7.2) to cover postprandial glucose excursions. Options include adding a GLP-1 receptor agonist or mealtime insulin, consisting of one to three injections of rapid-acting insulin analog (lispro, aspart, or glulisine) administered just before eating. A less studied alternative, transitioning from basal insulin to twice-daily premixed (or biphasic) insulin analog (70/30 aspart mix, 75/25 or 50/50 lispro mix), could also be considered. Regular human insulin and human NPH-Regular premixed formulations (70/30) are less costly alternatives to rapid-acting insulin analogs and premixed insulin analogs, respectively, but their pharmacodynamic profiles make them suboptimal for the coverage of postprandial glucose excursions. A less commonly used and more costly alternative to “basal–bolus” therapy with multiple daily injections is CSII (insulin pump). In addition to the suggestions provided for determining the starting dose of mealtime insulin under a basal–bolus regimen, another method consists of adding up the total current insulin dose and then providing one-half of this amount as basal and one-half as mealtime insulin, the latter split evenly between three meals.

Figure 7.2 focuses solely on sequential insulin strategies, describing the number of injections and the relative complexity and flexibility of each stage. Once an insulin regimen is initiated, dose titration is important, with adjustments made in both mealtime and basal insulins based on the prevailing blood glucose levels and an understanding of the pharmacodynamic profile of each formulation (pattern control).

Noninsulin agents may be continued, although sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists are typically stopped once more complex insulin regimens beyond basal are used. In patients with suboptimal blood glucose control, especially those requiring increasing insulin doses, adjunctive use of thiazolidinediones (usually pioglitazone) or SGLT2 inhibitors may be helpful in improving control and reducing the amount of insulin needed. Comprehensive education regarding SMBG, diet, exercise, and the avoidance of and response to hypoglycemia are critically important in any patient using insulin.

Recommendations

  • Bariatric surgery may be considered for adults with BMI >35 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes, especially if diabetes or associated comorbidities are difficult to control with lifestyle and pharmacological therapy. B

  • Patients with type 2 diabetes who have undergone bariatric surgery need lifelong lifestyle support and medical monitoring. B

  • Although small trials have shown glycemic benefit of bariatric surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes and BMI 30–35 kg/m2, there is currently insufficient evidence to generally recommend surgery in patients with BMI <35 kg/m2. E

Bariatric and metabolic surgeries, either gastric banding or procedures that involve resecting, bypassing, or transposing sections of the stomach and small intestine, can be effective weight-loss treatments for severe obesity when performed as part of a comprehensive weight-management program with lifelong lifestyle support and medical monitoring. National guidelines support consideration for bariatric surgery for people with type 2 diabetes with BMI >35 kg/m2.

Advantages

Treatment with bariatric surgery has been shown to achieve near- or complete normalization of glycemia 2 years following surgery in 72% of patients (compared with 16% in a matched control group treated with lifestyle and pharmacological interventions) (19). A study evaluated the long-term (3-year) outcomes of surgical intervention (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) and intensive medical therapy (quarterly visits, pharmacological therapy, SMBG, diabetes education, lifestyle counseling, and encouragement to participate in Weight Watchers) compared with just intensive medical therapy on achieving a target A1C ≤6% among obese patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (mean A1C 9.3%). This A1C target was achieved by 38% (P < 0.001) in the gastric bypass group, 24% (P = 0.01) in the sleeve gastrectomy group, and 5% in those receiving medical therapy (20). Diabetes remission rates tend to be higher with procedures that bypass portions of the small intestine and lower with procedures that only restrict the stomach.

Younger age, shorter duration of type 2 diabetes, lower A1C, higher serum insulin levels, and nonuse of insulin have all been associated with higher remission rates after bariatric surgery (21).

Although bariatric surgery has been shown to improve the metabolic profiles of morbidly obese patients with type 1 diabetes, the role of bariatric surgery in such patients will require larger and longer studies (22).

Disadvantages

Bariatric surgery is costly and has associated risks. Morbidity and mortality rates directly related to the surgery have decreased considerably in recent years, with 30-day mortality rates now 0.28%, similar to those for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (23). Outcomes vary depending on the procedure and the experience of the surgeon and center. Longer-term concerns include vitamin and mineral deficiencies, osteoporosis, and rare but often severe hypoglycemia from insulin hypersecretion. Cohort studies attempting to match surgical and nonsurgical subjects suggest that the procedure may reduce longer-term mortality rates (19). In contrast, a propensity score-adjusted analysis of older, severely obese patients in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers found that bariatric surgery was not associated with decreased mortality compared with usual care (mean follow-up 6.7 years) (24). Retrospective analyses and modeling studies suggest that bariatric surgery may be cost-effective for patients with type 2 diabetes, but the results are largely dependent on assumptions about the long-term effectiveness and safety of the procedures (2527). Understanding the long-term benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in individuals with type 2 diabetes, especially those who are not severely obese, will require well-designed clinical trials, with optimal medical therapy as the comparator (28). Unfortunately, such studies may not be feasible (29).

Suggested citation: American Diabetes Association. Approaches to glycemic treatment. Sec. 7. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2015. Diabetes Care 2015;38(Suppl. 1):S41–S48

1.
DeWitt
DE
,
Hirsch
IB
.
Outpatient insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: scientific review
.
JAMA
2003
;
289
:
2254
2264
2.
American Diabetes Association
.
Intensive Diabetes Management
. 4th ed.
Wolfsdorf
JI
, Ed.
Alexandria, VA
,
American Diabetes Association
,
2009
3.
Mooradian
AD
,
Bernbaum
M
,
Albert
SG
.
Narrative review: a rational approach to starting insulin therapy
.
Ann Intern Med
2006
;
145
:
125
134
4.
Yeh
H-C
,
Brown
TT
,
Maruthur
N
, et al
.
Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Ann Intern Med
2012
;
157
:
336
347
5.
Bergenstal
RM
,
Klonoff
DC
,
Garg
SK
, et al
ASPIRE In-Home Study Group
.
Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia
.
N Engl J Med
2013
;
369
:
224
232
6.
Wood
JR
,
Miller
KM
,
Maahs
DM
, et al
T1D Exchange Clinic Network
.
Most youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D Exchange clinic registry do not meet American Diabetes Association or International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes clinical guidelines
.
Diabetes Care
2013
;
36
:
2035
2037
7.
Kmietowicz
Z
.
Insulin pumps improve control and reduce complications in children with type 1 diabetes
.
BMJ
2013
;
347
:
f5154
8.
Phillip
M
,
Battelino
T
,
Atlas
E
, et al
.
Nocturnal glucose control with an artificial pancreas at a diabetes camp
.
N Engl J Med
2013
;
368
:
824
833
9.
Wolpert
HA
,
Atakov-Castillo
A
,
Smith
SA
,
Steil
GM
.
Dietary fat acutely increases glucose concentrations and insulin requirements in patients with type 1 diabetes: implications for carbohydrate-based bolus dose calculation and intensive diabetes management
.
Diabetes Care
2013
;
36
:
810
816
10.
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group
.
The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
.
N Engl J Med
1993
;
329
:
977
986
11.
Nathan
DM
,
Cleary
PA
,
Backlund
J-YC
, et al
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group
.
Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes
.
N Engl J Med
2005
;
353
:
2643
2653
12.
Rosenstock
J
,
Dailey
G
,
Massi-Benedetti
M
,
Fritsche
A
,
Lin
Z
,
Salzman
A
.
Reduced hypoglycemia risk with insulin glargine: a meta-analysis comparing insulin glargine with human NPH insulin in type 2 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2005
;
28
:
950
955
13.
Vella
S
,
Buetow
L
,
Royle
P
,
Livingstone
S
,
Colhoun
HM
,
Petrie
JR
.
The use of metformin in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review of efficacy
.
Diabetologia
2010
;
53
:
809
820
14.
Chiang
JL
,
Kirkman
MS
,
Laffel
LM
,
Peters
AL
;
Type 1 Diabetes Sourcebook Authors. Type 1 diabetes through the life span: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association
.
Diabetes Care
2014
;
37
:
2034
2054
15.
Inzucchi
SE
,
Bergenstal
RM
,
Buse
JB
, et al
.
Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach. Update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2015
;
38
:
140
149
16.
Holman
RR
,
Paul
SK
,
Bethel
MA
,
Matthews
DR
,
Neil
HA
.
10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes
.
N Engl J Med
2008
;
359
:
1577
1589
17.
Bennett
WL
,
Maruthur
NM
,
Singh
S
, et al
.
Comparative effectiveness and safety of medications for type 2 diabetes: an update including new drugs and 2-drug combinations
.
Ann Intern Med
2011
;
154
:
602
613
18.
Blonde
L
,
Merilainen
M
,
Karwe
V
,
Raskin
P
TITRATE Study Group
.
Patient-directed titration for achieving glycaemic goals using a once-daily basal insulin analogue: an assessment of two different fasting plasma glucose targets - the TITRATE study
.
Diabetes Obes Metab
2009
;
11
:
623
631
19.
Sjöström
L
,
Peltonen
M
,
Jacobson
P
, et al
.
Association of bariatric surgery with long-term remission of type 2 diabetes and with microvascular and macrovascular complications
.
JAMA
2014
;
311
:
2297
2304
20.
Schauer
PR
,
Bhatt
DL
,
Kirwan
JP
, et al
STAMPEDE Investigators
.
Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—3-year outcomes
.
N Engl J Med
2014
;
370
:
2002
2013
21.
Still
CD
,
Wood
GC
,
Benotti
P
, et al
.
Preoperative prediction of type 2 diabetes remission after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a retrospective cohort study
.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
2014
;
2
:
38
45
22.
Brethauer
SA
,
Aminian
A
,
Rosenthal
RJ
,
Kirwan
JP
,
Kashyap
SR
,
Schauer
PR
.
Bariatric surgery improves the metabolic profile of morbidly obese patients with type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2014
;
37
:
e51
e52
23.
Buchwald
H
,
Estok
R
,
Fahrbach
K
,
Banel
D
,
Sledge
I
.
Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Surgery
2007
;
142
:
621
632
24.
Maciejewski
ML
,
Livingston
EH
,
Smith
VA
, et al
.
Survival among high-risk patients after bariatric surgery
.
JAMA
2011
;
305
:
2419
2426
25.
Hoerger
TJ
,
Zhang
P
,
Segel
JE
,
Kahn
HS
,
Barker
LE
,
Couper
S
.
Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for severely obese adults with diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2010
;
33
:
1933
1939
26.
Makary
MA
,
Clark
JM
,
Shore
AD
, et al
.
Medication utilization and annual health care costs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus before and after bariatric surgery
.
Arch Surg
2010
;
145
:
726
731
27.
Keating
CL
,
Dixon
JB
,
Moodie
ML
,
Peeters
A
,
Playfair
J
,
O’Brien
PE
.
Cost-efficacy of surgically induced weight loss for the management of type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
.
Diabetes Care
2009
;
32
:
580
584
28.
Wolfe
BM
,
Belle
SH
.
Long-term risks and benefits of bariatric surgery: a research challenge
.
JAMA
2014
;
312
:
1792
1793
29.
Courcoulas
AP
,
Goodpaster
BH
,
Eagleton
JK
, et al
.
Surgical vs medical treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial
.
JAMA Surg
2014
;
149
:
707
715
30.
Dormandy
JA
,
Charbonnel
B
,
Eckland
DJ
, et al
PROactive Investigators
.
Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macrovascular Events): a randomised controlled trial
.
Lancet
2005
;
366
:
1279
1289
31.
Chiasson
JL
,
Gomis
R
,
Hanefeld
M
,
Josse
RG
,
Karasik
A
,
Laakso
M
STOP-NIDDM Trial Research Group
.
The STOP-NIDDM Trial: an international study on the efficacy of an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor to prevent type 2 diabetes in a population with impaired glucose tolerance: rationale, design, and preliminary screening data
.
Diabetes Care
1998
;
21
:
1720
1725
32.
UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group
.
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)
.
Lancet
1998
;
352
:
837
853
33.
UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group
.
Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34)
.
Lancet
1998
;
352
:
854
865
34.
Gaziano
JM
,
Cincotta
AH
,
O’Connor
CM
, et al
.
Randomized clinical trial of quick-release bromocriptine among patients with type 2 diabetes on overall safety and cardiovascular outcomes
.
Diabetes Care
2010
;
33
:
1503
1508