Older adults with diabetes are at high risk for having multiple chronic conditions and diabetes complications and often take multiple medications concomitantly. Studies have shown that many Americans are using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to either improve or manage their health (1,2). Individuals have diverse purposes for using CAM, from treating specific conditions, such as back and neck pain (e.g., acupuncture and chiropractic), to improving general health and wellness (e.g., meditation and tai chi). Since relatively little is known about the prevalence and patterns of CAM use in older adults with diabetes, we investigated this topic to guide integrated, patient-centered health care use for this population.

We used data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), which is an annual cross-sectional in-person interview survey demonstrating health care trends among noninstitutionalized civilians in the U.S. (3). The NHIS collects comprehensive CAM-related information every 5 years. The sample included adults aged 65 or older who reported having any type of diabetes (n = 1,475 unweighted). We estimated key selected characteristics (e.g., age, sex, and race/ethnicity) of older CAM users with diabetes. We calculated prevalence rates of past-year CAM use by type and reason for use (i.e., treatment only, wellness only, and both treatment and wellness) (1,2,4). We performed all analyses using Stata/SE version 13.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX), accounting for the survey sampling design (e.g., unequal probability of selection, clustering, and stratification) (5). All research procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board at Yale School of Medicine (approval ID #2000021662).

In 2012, more than 2 million older adults with diabetes (25.0%) used some form of CAM in the past year. Among older CAM users with diabetes, the mean age was 72.4 years and 54.3% were female. Race/ethnicity consisted primarily of non-Hispanic whites (73.4%), non-Hispanic blacks (8.8%), and Hispanics (10.6%). Of this sample, over half (56.2%) had some college or higher education.

Table 1 presents the prevalence of CAM use by type and reason for use and lists the individual modalities under each class. The most commonly used classes of CAM were biologically based therapies (62.8%) and manipulative body therapies (36.8%). The most commonly used individual therapies were herbal therapies (62.8%), chiropractic (23.9%), massage (14.7%), acupuncture (10.2%), and yoga (5.2%). Significant prevalence differences by reason for use (for treatment, wellness, or both) were found for herbal therapies, chiropractic, and meditation.

Table 1

Prevalence of past-year CAM use by reason in older adults with diabetes, 2012 NHIS

Among CAM users with diabetes, CAM used for:
Treatment onlyWellness onlyBoth treatment and wellnessTotalP value
Alternative medical systems 8.5 14.8 7.7 10.2 0.272 
 Acupuncture 6.0 5.6 3.6 4.5 0.733 
 Ayurveda 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 — 
 Naturopathy 0.0 0.3 1.4 0.8 0.290 
 Homeopathy 1.7 8.7 3.5 4.8 0.096 
 Traditional healers 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.278 
Biologically based therapies 45.7 67.6 66.4 62.8 0.030 
 Chelation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 — 
 Herbal therapies 45.7 67.6 66.4 62.8 0.030 
Manipulative body therapies 53.3 27.2 36.9 36.8 0.015 
 Chiropractic 47.7 10.9 23.2 23.9 <0.001 
 Massage 7.1 17.4 15.8 14.7 0.202 
 Movement therapies 0.0 1.2 0.4 0.6 0.558 
Mind-body therapies 6.6 10.6 14.2 11.6 0.365 
 Meditation 0.5 2.5 5.0 3.3 0.046 
 Yoga 0.0 4.9 7.4 5.2 0.158 
 Tai chi 0.0 5.5 4.2 3.8 0.217 
 Qi gong 0.0 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.566 
 Biofeedback 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.8 0.419 
 Othersa 5.0 1.4 0.6 1.7 0.049 
Energy therapiesb 0.3 0.4 1.6 1.0 0.185 
Sample size (n     
 Unweighted sample 65 124 188 377  
 Weighted population 383,840 653,279 975,717 2,012,836  
Among CAM users with diabetes, CAM used for:
Treatment onlyWellness onlyBoth treatment and wellnessTotalP value
Alternative medical systems 8.5 14.8 7.7 10.2 0.272 
 Acupuncture 6.0 5.6 3.6 4.5 0.733 
 Ayurveda 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 — 
 Naturopathy 0.0 0.3 1.4 0.8 0.290 
 Homeopathy 1.7 8.7 3.5 4.8 0.096 
 Traditional healers 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.278 
Biologically based therapies 45.7 67.6 66.4 62.8 0.030 
 Chelation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 — 
 Herbal therapies 45.7 67.6 66.4 62.8 0.030 
Manipulative body therapies 53.3 27.2 36.9 36.8 0.015 
 Chiropractic 47.7 10.9 23.2 23.9 <0.001 
 Massage 7.1 17.4 15.8 14.7 0.202 
 Movement therapies 0.0 1.2 0.4 0.6 0.558 
Mind-body therapies 6.6 10.6 14.2 11.6 0.365 
 Meditation 0.5 2.5 5.0 3.3 0.046 
 Yoga 0.0 4.9 7.4 5.2 0.158 
 Tai chi 0.0 5.5 4.2 3.8 0.217 
 Qi gong 0.0 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.566 
 Biofeedback 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.8 0.419 
 Othersa 5.0 1.4 0.6 1.7 0.049 
Energy therapiesb 0.3 0.4 1.6 1.0 0.185 
Sample size (n     
 Unweighted sample 65 124 188 377  
 Weighted population 383,840 653,279 975,717 2,012,836  

Data are percent unless otherwise indicated. P value compares proportion differences by reason for use, using weight-corrected Pearson χ2 statistic.

a

Includes guided imagery, progressive muscle relaxation, and hypnosis.

b

Includes energy healing and craniosacral therapies.

More than 25% of older adults with diabetes used some type of CAM in the past year, which is only slightly less than the prevalence rate among the general adult population with diabetes (2). Older CAM users with diabetes utilized diverse types of CAM, and some of these CAM types had different prevalence rates by reason for use. Clinicians should actively query older patients with diabetes about CAM use. This can potentially prevent harm (e.g., drug-herb interactions and herb-disease interactions). Furthermore, patients should be educated to proactively discuss their CAM use with their health care providers, so that patient-centered care can be provided to meet the needs of older adults with diabetes. There are several limitations in this study, which are mentioned elsewhere (1,2). Despite the limitations, our findings highlight that CAM is widely used in older adults with diabetes. Future research should address integrative and holistic approaches for self-management of diabetes in older adults.

Acknowledgments. Publicly available data were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Analyses, interpretation, and conclusions are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the CDC’s Division of Health Interview Statistics or NCHS.

Funding. T.G.R. received funding support from the National Institutes of Health National Institute on Aging (grant T32AG019134). The funding agency had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. T.G.R. conceived and designed the study, acquired the data, performed statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. All authors interpreted the data and participated in critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. T.G.R. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

1.
Johnson
PJ
,
Jou
J
,
Rhee
TG
,
Rockwood
TH
,
Upchurch
DM
.
Complementary health approaches for health and wellness in midlife and older US adults
.
Maturitas
2016
;
89
:
36
42
2.
Rhee
TG
,
Westberg
SM
,
Harris
IM
.
Complementary and alternative medicine in U.S. adults with diabetes: reasons for use and perceived benefits
.
J Diabetes
. 12 September 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Public Use Data Release: NHIS Survey Description [Internet], 2013
.
4.
Clarke
TC
,
Black
LI
,
Stussman
BJ
,
Barnes
PM
,
Nahin
RL
.
Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002–2012
.
Natl Health Stat Rep
2015
;
79
:
1
16
5.
StataCorp
.
Survey Data Reference Manual
.
College Station, TX
,
Stata Press
,
2013
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.