The American Diabetes Association (ADA) “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes” includes ADA’s current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA’s clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

The prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy has been increasing in the U.S. The majority is gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with the remainder primarily preexisting type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. The rise in GDM and type 2 diabetes in parallel with obesity both in the U.S. and worldwide is of particular concern. Both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy confer significantly greater maternal and fetal risk than GDM, with some differences according to type of diabetes as outlined below. In general, specific risks of uncontrolled diabetes in pregnancy include spontaneous abortion, fetal anomalies, preeclampsia, fetal demise, macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, among others. In addition, diabetes in pregnancy may increase the risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes in offspring later in life (1,2).

Recommendations

  • Starting at puberty, preconception counseling should be incorporated into routine diabetes care for all girls of childbearing potential. A

  • Family planning should be discussed and effective contraception should be prescribed and used until a woman is prepared and ready to become pregnant. A

  • Preconception counseling should address the importance of glycemic control as close to normal as is safely possible, ideally A1C <6.5% (48 mmol/mol), to reduce the risk of congenital anomalies. B

All women of childbearing age with diabetes should be counseled about the importance of tight glycemic control prior to conception. Observational studies show an increased risk of diabetic embryopathy, especially anencephaly, microcephaly, congenital heart disease, and caudal regression, directly proportional to elevations in A1C during the first 10 weeks of pregnancy. Although observational studies are confounded by the association between elevated periconceptional A1C and other poor self-care behaviors, the quantity and consistency of data are convincing and support the recommendation to optimize glycemic control prior to conception, with A1C <6.5% (48 mmol/mol) associated with the lowest risk of congenital anomalies (3,4).

There are opportunities to educate all women and adolescents of reproductive age with diabetes about the risks of unplanned pregnancies and improved maternal and fetal outcomes with pregnancy planning (5). Effective preconception counseling could avert substantial health and associated cost burdens in offspring (6). Family planning should be discussed, and effective contraception should be prescribed and used until a woman is prepared and ready to become pregnant.

To minimize the occurrence of complications, beginning at the onset of puberty or at diagnosis, all women with diabetes of childbearing potential should receive education about 1) the risks of malformations associated with unplanned pregnancies and poor metabolic control and 2) the use of effective contraception at all times when preventing a pregnancy. Preconception counseling using developmentally appropriate educational tools enables adolescent girls to make well-informed decisions (5). Preconception counseling resources tailored for adolescents are available at no cost through the American Diabetes Association (ADA) (7).

Preconception Testing

Recommendation

  • Women with preexisting type 1 or type 2 diabetes who are planning pregnancy or who have become pregnant should be counseled on the risk of development and/or progression of diabetic retinopathy. Dilated eye examinations should occur before pregnancy or in the first trimester, and then patients should be monitored every trimester and for 1-year postpartum as indicated by the degree of retinopathy and as recommended by the eye care provider. B

Preconception counseling visits should include rubella, syphilis, hepatitis B virus, and HIV testing, as well as Pap smear, cervical cultures, blood typing, prescription of prenatal vitamins (with at least 400 μg of folic acid), and smoking cessation counseling if indicated. Diabetes-specific testing should include A1C, thyroid-stimulating hormone, creatinine, and urinary albumin–to–creatinine ratio; review of the medication list for potentially teratogenic drugs, i.e., ACE inhibitors (8), angiotensin receptor blockers (8), and statins (9,10); and referral for a comprehensive eye exam. Women with preexisting diabetic retinopathy will need close monitoring during pregnancy to ensure that retinopathy does not progress.

Recommendations

  • Fasting and postprandial self-monitoring of blood glucose are recommended in both gestational diabetes mellitus and preexisting diabetes in pregnancy to achieve glycemic control. Some women with preexisting diabetes should also test blood glucose preprandially. B

  • Due to increased red blood cell turnover, A1C is slightly lower in normal pregnancy than in normal nonpregnant women. The A1C target in pregnancy is 6–6.5% (42–48 mmol/mol); <6% (42 mmol/mol) may be optimal if this can be achieved without significant hypoglycemia, but the target may be relaxed to <7% (53 mmol/mol) if necessary to prevent hypoglycemia. B

Pregnancy in women with normal glucose metabolism is characterized by fasting levels of blood glucose that are lower than in the nonpregnant state due to insulin-independent glucose uptake by the fetus and placenta and by postprandial hyperglycemia and carbohydrate intolerance as a result of diabetogenic placental hormones. In patients with preexisting diabetes, glycemic targets are usually achieved through a combination of insulin administration and medical nutrition therapy. Because glycemic targets in pregnancy are stricter than in nonpregnant individuals, it is important that women with diabetes eat consistent amounts of carbohydrates to match with insulin dosage and to avoid hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia. Referral to a registered dietitian is important in order to establish a food plan and insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio and to determine weight gain goals.

Insulin Physiology

Early pregnancy is a time of insulin sensitivity, lower glucose levels, and lower insulin requirements in women with type 1 diabetes. The situation rapidly reverses as insulin resistance increases exponentially during the second and early third trimesters and levels off toward the end of the third trimester. In women with normal pancreatic function, insulin production is sufficient to meet the challenge of this physiological insulin resistance and to maintain normal glucose levels. However, in women with GDM or preexisting diabetes, hyperglycemia occurs if treatment is not adjusted appropriately.

Glucose Monitoring

Reflecting this physiology, fasting and postprandial monitoring of blood glucose is recommended to achieve metabolic control in pregnant women with diabetes. Preprandial testing is also recommended for women with preexisting diabetes using insulin pumps or basal-bolus therapy, so that premeal rapid-acting insulin dosage can be adjusted. Postprandial monitoring is associated with better glycemic control and lower risk of preeclampsia (1113). There are no adequately powered randomized trials comparing different fasting and postmeal glycemic targets in diabetes in pregnancy.

Similar to the targets recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (14), the ADA-recommended targets for women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (the same as for GDM; described below) are as follows:

  • ○ Fasting <95 mg/dL (5.3 mmol/L) and either

  • ○ One-hour postprandial <140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) or

  • ○ Two-hour postprandial <120 mg/dL (6.7 mmol/L)

These values represent optimal control if they can be achieved safely. In practice, it may be challenging for women with type 1 diabetes to achieve these targets without hypoglycemia, particularly women with a history of recurrent hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness.

If women cannot achieve these targets without significant hypoglycemia, the ADA suggests less stringent targets based on clinical experience and individualization of care.

A1C in Pregnancy

Observational studies show the lowest rates of adverse fetal outcomes in association with A1C <6–6.5% (42–48 mmol/mol) early in gestation (4,1517). Clinical trials have not evaluated the risks and benefits of achieving these targets, and treatment goals should account for the risk of maternal hypoglycemia in setting an individualized target of <6% (42 mmol/mol) to <7% (53 mmol/mol). Due to physiological increases in red blood cell turnover, A1C levels fall during normal pregnancy (18,19). Additionally, as A1C represents an integrated measure of glucose, it may not fully capture postprandial hyperglycemia, which drives macrosomia. Thus, although A1C may be useful, it should be used as a secondary measure of glycemic control in pregnancy, after self-monitoring of blood glucose.

In the second and third trimesters, A1C <6% (42 mmol/mol) has the lowest risk of large-for-gestational-age infants, whereas other adverse outcomes increase with A1C ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol). Taking all of this into account, a target of 6–6.5% (42–48 mmol/mol) is recommended but <6% (42 mmol/mol) may be optimal as pregnancy progresses. These levels should be achieved without hypoglycemia, which, in addition to the usual adverse sequelae, may increase the risk of low birth weight. Given the alteration in red blood cell kinetics during pregnancy and physiological changes in glycemic parameters, A1C levels may need to be monitored more frequently than usual (e.g., monthly).

Recommendations

  • Lifestyle change is an essential component of management of gestational diabetes mellitus and may suffice for the treatment of many women. Medications should be added if needed to achieve glycemic targets. A

  • Insulin is the preferred medication for treating hyperglycemia in gestational diabetes mellitus as it does not cross the placenta to a measurable extent. Metformin and glyburide may be used, but both cross the placenta to the fetus, with metformin likely crossing to a greater extent than glyburide. All oral agents lack long-term safety data. A

  • Metformin, when used to treat polycystic ovary syndrome and induce ovulation, need not be continued once pregnancy has been confirmed. A

GDM is characterized by increased risk of macrosomia and birth complications and an increased risk of maternal type 2 diabetes after pregnancy. The association of macrosomia and birth complications with oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results is continuous with no clear inflection points (20). In other words, risks increase with progressive hyperglycemia. Therefore, all women should be tested as outlined in Section 2 “Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes.” Although there is some heterogeneity, many randomized controlled trials suggest that the risk of GDM may be reduced by diet, exercise, and lifestyle counseling, particularly when interventions are started during the first or early in the second trimester (2123).

Lifestyle Management

After diagnosis, treatment starts with medical nutrition therapy, physical activity, and weight management depending on pregestational weight, as outlined in the section below on preexisting type 2 diabetes, and glucose monitoring aiming for the targets recommended by the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (24):

  • ○ Fasting <95 mg/dL (5.3 mmol/L) and either

  • ○ One-hour postprandial <140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) or

  • ○ Two-hour postprandial <120 mg/dL (6.7 mmol/L)

Depending on the population, studies suggest that 70–85% of women diagnosed with GDM under Carpenter-Coustan or National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria can control GDM with lifestyle modification alone; it is anticipated that this proportion will be even higher if the lower International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) (25) diagnostic thresholds are used. A recent randomized controlled trial suggests that women with mild GDM (fasting plasma glucose <95 mg/dL [5.3 mmol/L]) who meet glucose goals after a week of medical nutrition therapy can safely perform self-monitoring of blood glucose every other day, rather than daily (26).

Medical Nutrition Therapy

Medical nutrition therapy for GDM is an individualized nutrition plan developed between the woman and a registered dietitian familiar with the management of GDM (27,28). The food plan should provide adequate calorie intake to promote fetal/neonatal and maternal health, achieve glycemic goals, and promote appropriate gestational weight gain. There is no definitive research that identifies a specific optimal calorie intake for women with GDM or suggests that their calorie needs are different from those of pregnant women without GDM. The food plan should be based on a nutrition assessment with guidance from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI). The DRI for all pregnant women recommends a minimum of 175 g of carbohydrate, a minimum of 71 g of protein, and 28 g of fiber. As is true for all nutrition therapy in patients with diabetes, the amount and type of carbohydrate will impact glucose levels, especially postmeal excursions.

Pharmacologic Therapy

Women with greater initial degrees of hyperglycemia may require earlier initiation of pharmacologic therapy. Treatment has been demonstrated to improve perinatal outcomes in two large randomized studies as summarized in a U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review (29). Insulin is the first-line agent recommended for treatment of GDM in the U.S. While individual randomized controlled trials support the efficacy and short-term safety of metformin (30,31) and glyburide (32) for the treatment of GDM, both agents cross the placenta. There is not agreement regarding the comparative advantages and disadvantages of the two oral agents; the most recent systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing metformin and glyburide for GDM found no clear differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes (33). A more recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated that glyburide and metformin are comparable oral treatments for GDM regarding glucose control and adverse effects. In this study, they were combined, with data demonstrating a high efficacy rate with a significantly reduced need for insulin, with a possible advantage for metformin over glyburide as first-line therapy (34). However, more definitive studies are required in this area. Long-term safety data are not available for any oral agent (35).

Sulfonylureas

Concentrations of glyburide in umbilical cord plasma are approximately 70% of maternal levels (36). Glyburide was associated with a higher rate of neonatal hypoglycemia and macrosomia than insulin or metformin in a 2015 systematic review (37).

Metformin

Metformin was associated with a lower risk of neonatal hypoglycemia and less maternal weight gain than insulin in 2015 systematic reviews (3739); however, metformin may slightly increase the risk of prematurity. Furthermore, nearly half of patients with GDM who were initially treated with metformin in a randomized trial needed insulin in order to achieve acceptable glucose control (30). Umbilical cord blood levels of metformin are higher than simultaneous maternal levels (40,41). None of these studies or meta-analyses evaluated long-term outcomes in the offspring. Patients treated with oral agents should be informed that they cross the placenta, and although no adverse effects on the fetus have been demonstrated, long-term studies are lacking.

Randomized, double-blind, controlled trials comparing metformin with other therapies for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome have not demonstrated benefit in preventing spontaneous abortion or GDM (42), and there is no evidence-based need to continue metformin in such patients once pregnancy has been confirmed (4345).

Insulin

Insulin may be required to treat hyperglycemia, and its use should follow the guidelines below. Both multiple daily insulin injections and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion are reasonable alternatives, and neither has been shown to be superior during pregnancy (46).

Insulin Use

Recommendation

  • Insulin is the preferred agent for management of both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy because it does not cross the placenta, and because oral agents are generally insufficient to overcome the insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes and are ineffective in type 1 diabetes. E

The physiology of pregnancy necessitates frequent titration of insulin to match changing requirements and underscores the importance of daily and frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose. In the first trimester, there is often a decrease in total daily insulin requirements, and women, particularly those with type 1 diabetes, may experience increased hypoglycemia. In the second trimester, rapidly increasing insulin resistance requires weekly or biweekly increases in insulin dose to achieve glycemic targets. In general, a smaller proportion of the total daily dose should be given as basal insulin (<50%) and a greater proportion (>50%) as prandial insulin. Late in the third trimester, there is often a leveling off or small decrease in insulin requirements. Due to the complexity of insulin management in pregnancy, referral to a specialized center offering team-based care (with team members including high-risk obstetrician, endocrinologist, or other provider experienced in managing pregnancy in women with preexisting diabetes, dietitian, nurse, and social worker, as needed) is recommended if this resource is available.

None of the currently available insulin preparations have been demonstrated to cross the placenta.

Preeclampsia and Aspirin

Recommendation

  • Women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes should be prescribed low-dose aspirin 60–150 mg/day (usual dose 81 mg/day) from the end of the first trimester until the baby is born in order to lower the risk of preeclampsia. A

Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia (47). Based upon the results of clinical trials, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends the use of low-dose aspirin (81 mg/day) as a preventive medication after 12 weeks of gestation in women who are at high risk for preeclampsia (48). A cost-benefit analysis has concluded that this approach would reduce morbidity, save lives, and lower health care costs (49).

Type 1 Diabetes

Women with type 1 diabetes have an increased risk of hypoglycemia in the first trimester and, like all women, have altered counterregulatory response in pregnancy that may decrease hypoglycemia awareness. Education for patients and family members about the prevention, recognition, and treatment of hypoglycemia is important before, during, and after pregnancy to help to prevent and manage the risks of hypoglycemia. Insulin resistance drops rapidly with delivery of the placenta. Women become very insulin sensitive immediately following delivery and may initially require much less insulin than in the prepartum period.

Pregnancy is a ketogenic state, and women with type 1 diabetes, and to a lesser extent those with type 2 diabetes, are at risk for diabetic ketoacidosis at lower blood glucose levels than in the nonpregnant state. Women with preexisting diabetes, especially type 1 diabetes, need ketone strips at home and education on diabetic ketoacidosis prevention and detection. In addition, rapid implementation of tight glycemic control in the setting of retinopathy is associated with worsening of retinopathy (50).

Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is often associated with obesity. Recommended weight gain during pregnancy for overweight women is 15–25 lb and for obese women is 10–20 lb (51). Glycemic control is often easier to achieve in women with type 2 diabetes than in those with type 1 diabetes but can require much higher doses of insulin, sometimes necessitating concentrated insulin formulations. As in type 1 diabetes, insulin requirements drop dramatically after delivery. The risk for associated hypertension and other comorbidities may be as high or higher with type 2 diabetes as with type 1 diabetes, even if diabetes is better controlled and of shorter apparent duration, with pregnancy loss appearing to be more prevalent in the third trimester in women with type 2 diabetes compared with the first trimester in women with type 1 diabetes (52,53).

Recommendations

  • In pregnant patients with diabetes and chronic hypertension, blood pressure targets of 120–160/80–105 mmHg are suggested in the interest of optimizing long-term maternal health and minimizing impaired fetal growth. E

  • Potentially teratogenic medications (i.e., ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statins) should be avoided in sexually active women of childbearing age who are not using reliable contraception. B

In normal pregnancy, blood pressure is lower than in the nonpregnant state. In a pregnancy complicated by diabetes and chronic hypertension, target goals for systolic blood pressure 120–160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure 80–105 mmHg are reasonable (54). Lower blood pressure levels may be associated with impaired fetal growth. In a 2015 study targeting diastolic blood pressure of 100 mmHg versus 85 mmHg in pregnant women, only 6% of whom had GDM at enrollment, there was no difference in pregnancy loss, neonatal care, or other neonatal outcomes, although women in the less intensive treatment group had a higher rate of uncontrolled hypertension (55).

During pregnancy, treatment with ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers is contraindicated because they may cause fetal renal dysplasia, oligohydramnios, and intrauterine growth restriction (8). Antihypertensive drugs known to be effective and safe in pregnancy include methyldopa, labetalol, diltiazem, clonidine, and prazosin. Chronic diuretic use during pregnancy is not recommended as it has been associated with restricted maternal plasma volume, which may reduce uteroplacental perfusion (56). On the basis of available evidence, statins should also be avoided in pregnancy (57).

Postpartum care should include psychosocial assessment and support for self-care.

Lactation

In light of the immediate nutritional and immunological benefits of breastfeeding for the baby, all women including those with diabetes should be supported in attempts to breastfeed. Breastfeeding may also confer longer-term metabolic benefits to both mother (58) and offspring (59).

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Initial Testing

Because GDM may represent preexisting undiagnosed type 2 or even type 1 diabetes, women with GDM should be tested for persistent diabetes or prediabetes at 4–12 weeks postpartum with a 75-g OGTT using nonpregnancy criteria as outlined in Section 2 “Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes.”

Postpartum Follow-up

The OGTT is recommended over A1C at the time of the 4- to 12-week postpartum visit because A1C may be persistently impacted (lowered) by the increased red blood cell turnover related to pregnancy or blood loss at delivery and because the OGTT is more sensitive at detecting glucose intolerance, including both prediabetes and diabetes. Reproductive-aged women with prediabetes may develop type 2 diabetes by the time of their next pregnancy and will need preconception evaluation. Because GDM is associated with an increased lifetime maternal risk for diabetes estimated at 50–70% after 15–25 years (60,61), women should also be tested every 1–3 years thereafter if the 4- to 12-week 75-g OGTT is normal, with frequency of testing depending on other risk factors including family history, prepregnancy BMI, and need for insulin or oral glucose-lowering medication during pregnancy. Ongoing evaluation may be performed with any recommended glycemic test (e.g., A1C, fasting plasma glucose, or 75-g OGTT using nonpregnant thresholds).

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Type 2 Diabetes

Women with a history of GDM have a greatly increased risk of conversion to type 2 diabetes over time and not solely within the 4- to 12-week postpartum time frame (60). In the prospective Nurses' Health Study II, subsequent diabetes risk after a history of GDM was significantly lower in women who followed healthy eating patterns (62). Adjusting for BMI moderately, but not completely, attenuated this association. Interpregnancy or postpartum weight gain is associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in subsequent pregnancies (63) and earlier progression to type 2 diabetes.

Both metformin and intensive lifestyle intervention prevent or delay progression to diabetes in women with prediabetes and a history of GDM. Of women with a history of GDM and prediabetes, only 56 women need to be treated with either intervention to prevent one case of diabetes over 3 years (64). In these women, lifestyle intervention and metformin reduced progression to diabetes by 35% and 40%, respectively, over 10 years compared with placebo (65). If the pregnancy has motivated the adoption of a healthier diet, building on these gains to support weight loss is recommended in the postpartum period.

Preexisting Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

Insulin sensitivity increases with delivery of the placenta and then returns to prepregnancy levels over the following 1–2 weeks. In women taking insulin, particular attention should be directed to hypoglycemia prevention in the setting of breastfeeding and erratic sleep and eating schedules.

Contraception

A major barrier to effective preconception care is the fact that the majority of pregnancies are unplanned. Planning pregnancy is critical in women with preexisting diabetes due to the need for preconception glycemic control and preventive health services. Therefore, all women with diabetes of childbearing potential should have family planning options reviewed at regular intervals. This applies to women in the immediate postpartum period. Women with diabetes have the same contraception options and recommendations as those without diabetes. The risk of an unplanned pregnancy outweighs the risk of any given contraception option.

Suggested citation: American Diabetes Association. 13. Management of diabetes in pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018. Diabetes Care 2018;41(Suppl. 1):S137–S143

1.
Holmes
VA
,
Young
IS
,
Patterson
CC
, et al.;
Diabetes and Pre-eclampsia Intervention Trial Study Group
.
Optimal glycemic control, pre-eclampsia, and gestational hypertension in women with type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes and Pre-eclampsia Intervention Trial
.
Diabetes Care
2011
;
34
:
1683
1688
2.
Dabelea
D
,
Hanson
RL
,
Lindsay
RS
, et al
.
Intrauterine exposure to diabetes conveys risks for type 2 diabetes and obesity: a study of discordant sibships
.
Diabetes
2000
;
49
:
2208
2211
3.
Guerin
A
,
Nisenbaum
R
,
Ray
JG
.
Use of maternal GHb concentration to estimate the risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring of women with prepregnancy diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2007
;
30
:
1920
1925
4.
Jensen
DM
,
Korsholm
L
,
Ovesen
P
, et al
.
Peri-conceptional A1C and risk of serious adverse pregnancy outcome in 933 women with type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2009
;
32
:
1046
1048
5.
Charron-Prochownik
D
,
Sereika
SM
,
Becker
D
, et al
.
Long-term effects of the booster-enhanced READY-Girls preconception counseling program on intentions and behaviors for family planning in teens with diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2013
;
36
:
3870
3874
6.
Peterson
C
,
Grosse
SD
,
Li
R
, et al
.
Preventable health and cost burden of adverse birth outcomes associated with pregestational diabetes in the United States
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
2015
;
212
:
74.e1
74.e9
7.
Charron-Prochownik
D
,
Downs
J
.
Diabetes and Reproductive Health for Girls
.
Alexandria, VA
,
American Diabetes Association
,
2016
8.
Bullo
M
,
Tschumi
S
,
Bucher
BS
,
Bianchetti
MG
,
Simonetti
GD
.
Pregnancy outcome following exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists: a systematic review
.
Hypertension
2012
;60:444–450
9.
Taguchi
N
,
Rubin
ET
,
Hosokawa
A
, et al
.
Prenatal exposure to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: effects on fetal and neonatal outcomes
.
Reprod Toxicol
2008
;
26
:
175
177
10.
Bateman
BT
,
Hernandez-Diaz
S
,
Fischer
MA
, et al
.
Statins and congenital malformations: cohort study
.
BMJ
2015
;
350
:
h1035
11.
Manderson
JG
,
Patterson
CC
,
Hadden
DR
,
Traub
AI
,
Ennis
C
,
McCance
DR
.
Preprandial versus postprandial blood glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetic pregnancy: a randomized controlled clinical trial
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
2003
;
189
:
507
512
12.
de Veciana
M
,
Major
CA
,
Morgan
MA
, et al
.
Postprandial versus preprandial blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy
.
N Engl J Med
1995
;
333
:
1237
1241
13.
Jovanovic-Peterson
L
,
Peterson
CM
,
Reed
GF
, et al
.
Maternal postprandial glucose levels and infant birth weight: the Diabetes in Early Pregnancy Study. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development--Diabetes in Early Pregnancy Study
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
1991
;
164
:
103
111
14.
Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics
.
Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus
.
Obstet Gynecol
2013
;
122
:
406
416
15.
Nielsen
GL
,
Møller
M
,
Sørensen
HT
.
HbA1c in early diabetic pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes: a Danish population-based cohort study of 573 pregnancies in women with type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2006
;
29
:
2612
2616
16.
Suhonen
L
,
Hiilesmaa
V
,
Teramo
K
.
Glycaemic control during early pregnancy and fetal malformations in women with type I diabetes mellitus
.
Diabetologia
2000
;
43
:
79
82
17.
Maresh
MJA
,
Holmes
VA
,
Patterson
CC
, et al.;
Diabetes and Pre-eclampsia Intervention Trial Study Group
.
Glycemic targets in the second and third trimester of pregnancy for women with type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2015
;
38
:
34
42
18.
Nielsen
LR
,
Ekbom
P
,
Damm
P
, et al
.
HbA1c levels are significantly lower in early and late pregnancy
.
Diabetes Care
2004
;
27
:
1200
1201
19.
Mosca
A
,
Paleari
R
,
Dalfrà
MG
, et al
.
Reference intervals for hemoglobin A1c in pregnant women: data from an Italian multicenter study
.
Clin Chem
2006
;
52
:
1138
1143
20.
Metzger
BE
,
Lowe
LP
,
Dyer
AR
, et al.;
HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group
.
Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes
.
N Engl J Med
2008
;
358
:
1991
2002
21.
Bain
E
,
Crane
M
,
Tieu
J
,
Han
S
,
Crowther
CA
,
Middleton
P
.
Diet and exercise interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2015
;
4
:
CD010443
22.
Koivusalo
SB
,
Rönö
K
,
Klemetti
MM
, et al
.
Gestational diabetes mellitus can be prevented by lifestyle intervention: the Finnish Gestational Diabetes Prevention Study (RADIEL): a randomized controlled trial
.
Diabetes Care
2015
23.
Wang
C
,
Wei
Y
,
Zhang
X
, et al
.
A randomized clinical trial of exercise during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus and improve pregnancy outcome in overweight and obese pregnant women
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
2017
;
216
:
340
351
24.
Metzger
BE
,
Buchanan
TA
,
Coustan
DR
, et al
.
Summary and recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
.
Diabetes Care
2007
;
30
(
Suppl. 2
):
S251
S260
25.
Mayo
K
,
Melamed
N
,
Vandenberghe
H
,
Berger
H
.
The impact of adoption of the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
2015
;
212
:
224.e1
224.e9
26.
Mendez-Figueroa
H
,
Schuster
M
,
Maggio
L
,
Pedroza
C
,
Chauhan
SP
,
Paglia
MJ
.
Gestational diabetes mellitus and frequency of blood glucose monitoring: a randomized controlled trial
.
Obstet Gynecol
2017
;
130
:
163
170
27.
Han
S
,
Crowther
CA
,
Middleton
P
,
Heatley
E
.
Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2013
;
3
:
CD009275
28.
Viana
LV
,
Gross
JL
,
Azevedo
MJ
.
Dietary intervention in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on maternal and newborn outcomes
.
Diabetes Care
2014
;
37
:
3345
3355
29.
Hartling
L
,
Dryden
DM
,
Guthrie
A
,
Muise
M
,
Vandermeer
B
,
Donovan
L
.
Benefits and harms of treating gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research
.
Ann Intern Med
2013
;
159
:
123
129
30.
Rowan
JA
,
Hague
WM
,
Gao
W
,
Battin
MR
,
Moore
MP
;
MiG Trial Investigators
.
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes
.
N Engl J Med
2008
;
358
:
2003
2015
31.
Gui
J
,
Liu
Q
,
Feng
L
.
Metformin vs insulin in the management of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis
.
PLoS One
2013
;
8
:
e64585
32.
Langer
O
,
Conway
DL
,
Berkus
MD
,
Xenakis
EM-J
,
Gonzales
O
.
A comparison of glyburide and insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus
.
N Engl J Med
2000
;
343
:
1134
1138
33.
Brown
J
,
Martis
R
,
Hughes
B
,
Rowan
J
,
Crowther
CA
.
Oral anti-diabetic pharmacological therapies for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2017
;
1
:
CD011967
34.
Nachum
Z
,
Zafran
N
,
Salim
R
, et al
.
Glyburide versus metformin and their combination for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled study
.
Diabetes Care
2017
;
40
:
332
337
35.
Coustan
DR
.
Pharmacological management of gestational diabetes: an overview
.
Diabetes Care
2007
;
30
(
Suppl. 2
):
S206
S208
36.
Hebert
MF
,
Ma
X
,
Naraharisetti
SB
, et al.;
Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Unit Network
.
Are we optimizing gestational diabetes treatment with glyburide? The pharmacologic basis for better clinical practice
.
Clin Pharmacol Ther
2009
;
85
:
607
614
37.
Balsells
M
,
García-Patterson
A
,
Solà
I
,
Roqué
M
,
Gich
I
,
Corcoy
R
.
Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
BMJ
2015
;
350
:
h102
38.
Jiang
Y-F
,
Chen
X-Y
,
Ding
T
,
Wang
X-F
,
Zhu
Z-N
,
Su
S-W
.
Comparative efficacy and safety of OADs in management of GDM: network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2015
;
100
:
2071
2080
39.
Camelo Castillo
W
,
Boggess
K
,
Stürmer
T
,
Brookhart
MA
,
Benjamin
DK
 Jr
,
Jonsson Funk
M
.
Association of adverse pregnancy outcomes with glyburide vs insulin in women with gestational diabetes
.
JAMA Pediatr
2015
;
169
:
452
458
40.
Vanky
E
,
Zahlsen
K
,
Spigset
O
,
Carlsen
SM
.
Placental passage of metformin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
.
Fertil Steril
2005
;
83
:
1575
1578
41.
Charles
B
,
Norris
R
,
Xiao
X
,
Hague
W
.
Population pharmacokinetics of metformin in late pregnancy
.
Ther Drug Monit
2006
;
28
:
67
72
42.
Vanky
E
,
Stridsklev
S
,
Heimstad
R
, et al
.
Metformin versus placebo from first trimester to delivery in polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, controlled multicenter study
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2010
;
95
:
E448
E455
43.
Legro
RS
,
Barnhart
HX
,
Schlaff
WD
, et al.;
Cooperative Multicenter Reproductive Medicine Network
.
Clomiphene, metformin, or both for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome
.
N Engl J Med
2007
;
356
:
551
566
44.
Palomba
S
,
Orio
F
 Jr
,
Falbo
A
, et al
.
Prospective parallel randomized, double-blind, double-dummy controlled clinical trial comparing clomiphene citrate and metformin as the first-line treatment for ovulation induction in nonobese anovulatory women with polycystic ovary syndrome
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2005
;
90
:
4068
4074
45.
Palomba
S
,
Orio
F
 Jr
,
Nardo
LG
, et al
.
Metformin administration versus laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in clomiphene citrate-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective parallel randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2004
;
89
:
4801
4809
46.
Farrar
D
,
Tuffnell
DJ
,
West
J
,
West
HM
.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2016
;
6
:
CD005542
47.
Duckitt
K
,
Harrington
D
.
Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies
.
BMJ
2005
;
330
:
565
48.
Henderson
JT
,
Whitlock
EP
,
O’Conner
E
,
Senger
CA
,
Thompson
JH
,
Rowland
MG
.
Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [article online], 2014. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
.
Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK196392/. Accessed 25 September 2017
49.
Werner
EF
,
Hauspurg
AK
,
Rouse
DJ
.
A cost-benefit analysis of low-dose aspirin prophylaxis for the prevention of preeclampsia in the United States
.
Obstet Gynecol
2015
;
126
:
1242
1250
50.
Chew
EY
,
Mills
JL
,
Metzger
BE
, et al
.
Metabolic control and progression of retinopathy: The Diabetes in Early Pregnancy Study
.
Diabetes Care
1995
;
18
:
631
637
51.
Institute of Medicine and National Research Council
.
Weight Gain during Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines
.
Washington, DC
,
The National Academies Press
,
2009
52.
Clausen
TD
,
Mathiesen
E
,
Ekbom
P
,
Hellmuth
E
,
Mandrup-Poulsen
T
,
Damm
P
.
Poor pregnancy outcome in women with type 2 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2005
;
28
:
323
328
53.
Cundy
T
,
Gamble
G
,
Neale
L
, et al
.
Differing causes of pregnancy loss in type 1 and type 2 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2007
;
30
:
2603
2607
54.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1122–1131
55.
Magee
LA
,
von Dadelszen
P
,
Rey
E
, et al
.
Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy
.
N Engl J Med
2015
;
372
:
407
417
56.
Sibai
BM
.
Treatment of hypertension in pregnant women
.
N Engl J Med
1996
;
335
:
257
265
57.
Kazmin
A
,
Garcia-Bournissen
F
,
Koren
G
.
Risks of statin use during pregnancy: a systematic review
.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can
2007
;
29
:
906
908
58.
Stuebe
AM
,
Rich-Edwards
JW
,
Willett
WC
,
Manson
JE
,
Michels
KB
.
Duration of lactation and incidence of type 2 diabetes
.
JAMA
2005
;
294
:
2601
2610
59.
Pereira
PF
,
Alfenas
R de CG
,
Araújo
RMA
.
Does breastfeeding influence the risk of developing diabetes mellitus in children? A review of current evidence
.
J Pediatr (Rio J)
2014
;
90
:
7
15
60.
Kim
C
,
Newton
KM
,
Knopp
RH
.
Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review
.
Diabetes Care
2002
;
25
:
1862
1868
61.
Sutherland
HW
,
Stowers
JM
,
Pearson
DWM
(Eds.).
Carbohydrate Metabolism in Pregnancy and the Newborn IV
.
Edinburgh
,
Churchill Livingstone
,
1984
62.
Tobias
DK
,
Hu
FB
,
Chavarro
J
,
Rosner
B
,
Mozaffarian
D
,
Zhang
C
.
Healthful dietary patterns and type 2 diabetes mellitus risk among women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus
.
Arch Intern Med
2012
;
172
:
1566
1572
63.
Villamor
E
,
Cnattingius
S
.
Interpregnancy weight change and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study
.
Lancet
2006
;
368
:
1164
1170
64.
Ratner
RE
,
Christophi
CA
,
Metzger
BE
, et al.;
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group
.
Prevention of diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes: effects of metformin and lifestyle interventions
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2008
;
93
:
4774
4779
65.
Aroda
VR
,
Christophi
CA
,
Edelstein
SL
, et al.;
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group
.
The effect of lifestyle intervention and metformin on preventing or delaying diabetes among women with and without gestational diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study 10-year follow-up
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2015
;
100
:
1646
1653
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.