Lipodystrophy is a group of rare disorders characterized by generalized or partial loss of adipose tissue. Diabetes secondary to lipodystrophy is hardly responsive to standard treatment modalities and may lead to microvascular and macrovascular complications (1). Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a chronic complication of diabetes and a leading cause of lower-limb loss due to amputations. DFUs are an important cause of diabetes-related mortality (2).
In this observational retrospective cohort study, we report on 18 DFU episodes that developed in metreleptin-naive patients with lipodystrophy. These DFU episodes were compared with a series of DFUs (n = 399) that occurred in a well-established cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 290). The study was approved by the Dokuz Eylul University ethical review board.
Among 206 patients with lipodystrophy registered in our national cohort, DFUs were observed in 9 of 90 subjects with diabetes (10%). Four of these patients (44.4%) had multiple DFU episodes. Six patients had generalized lipodystrophy: five congenital generalized lipodystrophy (CGL) type 1 caused by AGPAT2 p.R68X (c.202C>T), p.E229X (c.685G>T), p.K216X (c.646A>T), and p.D180PfsX5 (c.538_539delGA) variants, and one CGL type 2 caused by BSCL2 p.Q94X (c.280C>T) variant. Three patients had partial lipodystrophy: one familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD) type 1, one FPLD type 2 caused by LMNA p.R482W (c.144C>T) variant, and one acquired partial lipodystrophy. The median age at first DFU episode was 32 years, ranging from 24 to 66 years (one male and eight females). Median leptin level was 0.79 ng/mL (range <0.10–12.57 ng/mL). Median HbA1c at DFU admission was 9.3% (79 mmol/mmol), ranging from 6.6% (49 mmol/mmol) to 13.3% (122 mmol/mmol). All patients were on insulin. Neuropathy was involved in all episodes, though several patients also had peripheral arterial disease.
Table 1 summarizes wound characteristics and ulcer outcomes in patients with lipodystrophy. Ulcer size and localizations were similar to those in subjects with type 2 diabetes, but patients with lipodystrophy were significantly younger when they presented with a DFU episode (median age 31 years [interquartile range 26–35] vs. 63 [55–70]; P < 0.001). Osteomyelitis was more frequently detected (12 episodes [67%] vs. 158 [40%]; P = 0.027). The risk of amputation was higher in patients with lipodystrophy than in their matched counterparts with type 2 diabetes (odds ratio 3.53 [95% CI 1.09–11.46], P = 0.036; data controlled for age, sex, and smoking history). One of the patients with CGL died during short-term follow-up due to sepsis caused by a disseminated foot infection.
Wound characteristics and ulcer outcomes in patients with lipodystrophy who develop DFUs
Patient/ episode . | Age at presentation (years) . | Wound localization . | Type of ulcer . | Outcome . | Hospital stay . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1/E1 | 66 | Dorsum, R | Mixed (ischemia dominant) | Healed | None |
P2/E1 | 27 | Middle toe, R | Neuropathic | Toe amputation | 42 days |
P2/E2 | 28 | Big toe, anterior tibia, R | Neuropathic | Cellulitis healed, discharged with wound care | 11 days |
P2/E3 | 29 | Big and little toes, R | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Healed after debridement | 35 days |
P2/E4 | 30 | Metatarsal head, R | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Curettage of first metatarsal bone, healed | 22 days |
P2/E5 | 31 | Big toe, L | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Healed | None |
P2/E6 | 33 | Medial plantar aspect, R | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Below-the-knee amputation | 50 days |
P3/E1 | 24 | Big toe and 1st metatarsus, L | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Above-the-knee amputation | 5 days |
P3/E2 | 26 | Lateral malleolus, R | Neuropathic | Healed | 7 days |
P3/E3 | 26 | Big toe, R | Neuropathic | Healed | None |
P4/E1 | 50 | Metatarsal head, R | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Healed after debridement | 14 days |
P5/E1 | 25 | Big toe, R | Neuropathic | Toe amputation | N/A |
P6/E1 | 24 | Big and 4th toes, L | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Autoamputation of the left big and 4th toes, ulcer not healed, later died because of sepsis | 10 days |
P7/E1 | 65 | Forefoot, R | Mixed (ischemia dominant) | Transmetatarsal amputation | N/A |
P7/E2 | 65 | Stump extending the suture line, R | Mixed (ischemia dominant) | Below-the-knee amputation | 15 days |
P8/E1 | 32 | Plantar surfaces of toes, L | Neuropathic | Healed | None |
P9/E1 | 35 | Forefoot/midfoot, L | Neuropathic | Healed | 21 days |
P9/E2 | 34 | Big toe, forefoot/midfoot, R | Neuropathic | Toe amputation, not healed yet | 16 days |
Patient/ episode . | Age at presentation (years) . | Wound localization . | Type of ulcer . | Outcome . | Hospital stay . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1/E1 | 66 | Dorsum, R | Mixed (ischemia dominant) | Healed | None |
P2/E1 | 27 | Middle toe, R | Neuropathic | Toe amputation | 42 days |
P2/E2 | 28 | Big toe, anterior tibia, R | Neuropathic | Cellulitis healed, discharged with wound care | 11 days |
P2/E3 | 29 | Big and little toes, R | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Healed after debridement | 35 days |
P2/E4 | 30 | Metatarsal head, R | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Curettage of first metatarsal bone, healed | 22 days |
P2/E5 | 31 | Big toe, L | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Healed | None |
P2/E6 | 33 | Medial plantar aspect, R | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Below-the-knee amputation | 50 days |
P3/E1 | 24 | Big toe and 1st metatarsus, L | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Above-the-knee amputation | 5 days |
P3/E2 | 26 | Lateral malleolus, R | Neuropathic | Healed | 7 days |
P3/E3 | 26 | Big toe, R | Neuropathic | Healed | None |
P4/E1 | 50 | Metatarsal head, R | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Healed after debridement | 14 days |
P5/E1 | 25 | Big toe, R | Neuropathic | Toe amputation | N/A |
P6/E1 | 24 | Big and 4th toes, L | Mixed (neuropathy dominant) | Autoamputation of the left big and 4th toes, ulcer not healed, later died because of sepsis | 10 days |
P7/E1 | 65 | Forefoot, R | Mixed (ischemia dominant) | Transmetatarsal amputation | N/A |
P7/E2 | 65 | Stump extending the suture line, R | Mixed (ischemia dominant) | Below-the-knee amputation | 15 days |
P8/E1 | 32 | Plantar surfaces of toes, L | Neuropathic | Healed | None |
P9/E1 | 35 | Forefoot/midfoot, L | Neuropathic | Healed | 21 days |
P9/E2 | 34 | Big toe, forefoot/midfoot, R | Neuropathic | Toe amputation, not healed yet | 16 days |
E, episode; L, left; N/A, not available; P, patient; R, right.
Here, for the first time, we report on DFUs in a population with lipodystrophy. Our observations reveal that DFUs tend to develop at younger ages in patients with lipodystrophy and are associated with serious outcomes. Neuropathy, one of the most important predictors of DFUs, was involved in all cases (2). The loss of subcutaneous fat pads in pressure areas would be an additional potential mechanism contributing to the increased risk of ulceration, although it is known that adipose tissue can be partially preserved in the soles of patients with several subtypes of lipodystrophy (1).
Infections related to DFUs seem to progress rapidly in patients with lipodystrophy, as evidenced by the fact that osteomyelitis was more commonly detected at presentation. It is unclear whether this observation can be explained by an immune system dysfunction secondary to leptin deficiency. Leptin stimulates the immune response by activating antigen-presenting cells, enhancing T helper 1 cell action, and modulating cytokine secretion by immune system cells. The defective immune system is a well-documented characteristic of leptin-deficient ob/ob mice (3). Immune defects have been reported in humans with congenital leptin deficiency (4). Also, circulating low levels of leptin have been associated with defective immune responses and bacterial infections in malnutrition (3). On the other hand, the association between low leptin levels and infections is not clear in humans with lipodystrophy, although T-cell abnormalities were previously reported (5) and sepsis seems to be a major cause of mortality in CGL (1).
The limitations of our study include the sample size, multicenter data collection, and its retrospective design. The sample size and multicenter design of the study reflect the rarity of these syndromes. Data on DFUs in lipodystrophy were collected from five different tertiary centers in Turkey; however, the type 2 diabetes cohort is from Dokuz Eylul University. Differences in clinical care are likely; however, all Turkish centers follow a similar algorithm.
In conclusion, patients with lipodystrophy represent a high-risk group for DFU, which can develop in relatively younger patients and lead to severe clinical outcomes. Our observations highlight the importance of developing preventive strategies against DFUs in this rare patient population.
F.B., E.A.O., and B.A. share senior authorship.
Article Information
Funding. No funding was received specifically for this study. B.A. was supported by the Turkiye Egitim Vakfi (TEV) Lipodystrophy Grant. E.A.O. was partially supported by the Lipodystrophy Fund at the University of Michigan, graciously contributed by the Sopha Family and the White Point Foundation of Turkey.
Duality of Interest. E.A.O. reports grant support from Aegerion Pharmaceuticals (now Amryt Pharma), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Akcea Therapeutics, Gemphire Therapeutics, GI Dynamics (current), and AstraZeneca (past two years); consultant or advisor services for AstraZeneca, Thera Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb (past), Aegerion Pharmaceuticals (now Amryt Pharma), and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (current); drug support from Aegerion Pharmaceuticals (now Amryt Pharma), Akcea Therapeutics, and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals (all current); and other support from Aegerion Pharmaceuticals (now Amryt Pharma) and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (current). B.A. has attended scientific advisory board meetings organized by Aegerion Pharmaceuticals (now Amryt Pharma) and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and has received honoraria as a speaker from AstraZeneca, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, and Sanofi. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Author Contributions. O.S. and B.O.S. created the table and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. B.A. designed the study, performed data analyses, and wrote the manuscript. F.B. and B.A. generated the type 2 diabetes cohort at Dokuz Eylul University. A.B. and C.A. performed radiological studies to detect osteomyelitis. E.A.O. edited the manuscript. C.S.A., M.S.I., M.A.E., F.E.K., H.B., M.D., S.K., and G.A. contributed to data collection regarding DFU episodes and provided key pieces of the data. B.A. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.