In the above-cited article, the numbers of patients with classic type 1 diabetes and patients with type 2 diabetes were inadvertently given as 31 and 30, respectively, in the abstract and main article text. The correct number of patients with classic type 1 diabetes is 29, and correct number of patients with type 2 diabetes is 31.

The authors apologize for the typographical errors.

The online version of the article (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2975) and its supplementary material have been updated to correct the errors.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/license.