An implantable glucose sensor is needed before a reliable artificial pancreas can be realized. The principles and current status of one such device, the glucose enzyme electrode, is presented and discussed. While monitoring glucose this enzyme sensor consumes enough oxygen to become oxygen-limited. This problem has been solved by developing hydrophobic membranes that are more permeable to oxygen than to glucose. Two types of membranes with this property made from (1) cross-linked albumin and (2) sebacyl chloride (nylon) are described. Placing these membranes over the glucose enzyme electrode solves the problem of oxygen limitation. Furthermore, the addition of this type of membrane increases the linear response range of the electrode to glucose to include the entire clinical range of interest (0-400 mg/dl). Other problems in developing an implantable glucose sensor are discussed. Competing strategies to achieve an implantable artificial pancreas without using electronic or mechanical components are presented and evaluated.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Symposium on Potentially Implantable Glucose Sensors|
May 01 1982
Implanting the Glucose Enzyme Electrode: Problems, Progress, and Alternative Solutions
In Special Collection:
Review Articles
Stuart J Updike;
Stuart J Updike
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Center for Health Sciences
Madison, Wisconsin
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Shults;
Mark Shults
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Center for Health Sciences
Madison, Wisconsin
Search for other works by this author on:
Bo Ekman
Bo Ekman
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Center for Health Sciences
Madison, Wisconsin
Search for other works by this author on:
Address reprint requests to Stuart J. Updike, University of Wisconsin, Center for Health Sciences 1600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792.
Citation
Stuart J Updike, Mark Shults, Bo Ekman; Implanting the Glucose Enzyme Electrode: Problems, Progress, and Alternative Solutions. Diabetes Care 1 May 1982; 5 (3): 207–212. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.5.3.207
Download citation file: