The purpose of the study was to assess the value of 24-h urinary estriols in the management of diabetic pregnancies. Twenty-seven pregnant diabetic patients (White's class B through R) received insulin dosages twice daily as a combination of NPH and regular insulin. Laboratory and home monitored blood glucose was maintained within the range of 70–150 mg/dl. From 32 wk onward daily 24-h urinary estriols, weekly fetal heart rate monitoring, and, when indicated, amniotic fluid lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio were used to evaluate fetal well-being. Fetal heart rate and amniotic fluid testing were of value while urinary estriols failed to be useful in management or timing of delivery. We conclude that when third-trimester normoglycemia is maintained in pregnant diabetic patients, one obviates the need for the costly and odious task of daily urine estriol measurements.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Articles|
May 01 1982
Urinary Estriols: Are They of Value in Normoglycemic Diabetic Pregnancy?
Peter E Fern;
Peter E Fern
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Clinical Investigation Center, Naval Regional Medical Center
Oakland, California
Search for other works by this author on:
George M Grunert;
George M Grunert
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Clinical Investigation Center, Naval Regional Medical Center
Oakland, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephen B Lewis
Stephen B Lewis
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Clinical Investigation Center, Naval Regional Medical Center
Oakland, California
Search for other works by this author on:
1
The opinions and assertions contained here are those of the authors. They are not official nor do they reflect the views of the Navy Department or the Naval Service.
Address reprint requests to S. B. Lewis, Clinical Investigation Center, Naval Regional Medical Center, Oakland, California 94627.
Citation
Peter E Fern, George M Grunert, Stephen B Lewis; Urinary Estriols: Are They of Value in Normoglycemic Diabetic Pregnancy?. Diabetes Care 1 May 1982; 5 (3): 316–318. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.5.3.316
Download citation file: