D.B. is a 51-year-old African-American woman referred for an evaluation of type 2 diabetes. She has been on several oral agents and insulin without achieving her blood glucose or hemoglobin A1c (A1C) targets. She was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes by her primary care provider during a routine examination 20 years ago. Her random glucose at that time was ∼ 300 mg/dl. Her medical history also includes obesity, degenerative arthritis, hypertension, sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, and two Cesarian section births. She denies a history of gestational diabetes, alcohol consumption, or cigarette smoking. Her medications include metformin/glyburide, 500 mg/5 mg three times daily;rosiglitazone, 8 mg daily; 60 units of 70/30 premixed insulin before dinner;hydochlorothiazide, 50 mg daily; quinapril, 20 mg daily; fenofibrate, 54 mg daily; and multiple vitamins.

Initial clinical examination reveals a blood pressure of 130/82 mmHg and a BMI of 46.7 kg/m2 . Her cardiac, respiratory, and abdomenal examinations are unremarkable;funduscopic examination reveals no evidence of retinopathy. Her lower extremity examination reveals no evidence of ulcerations. There is adequate peripheral pain sense.

The patient reports self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) before and after breakfast, with readings averaging in the 100-mg/dl range before the meal and 300 mg/dl after the meal. Her A1C is 9.0%. D.B. expresses motivation to intensify her pharmacological therapy regimen and to follow a meal plan and attend diabetes education classes, all of which she hopes will improve her diabetes control.

  1. What are the shortcomings of intensive insulin therapy and possible consequences uniquely associated with uncontrolled postprandial hyperglycemic excursions?

  2. What has the introduction of home continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)revealed about the dynamics and limitations of A1C as a measure of glycemic control?

  3. What role does amylin play in regulating glucose homeostasis, and what are the clinical effects of using pramlintide, a synthetic analog of endogenous amylin, as an adjunctive therapy in type 1 and insulin-requiring type 2 diabetic patients?

  4. How can CGM help to inform successful management of pramlintide therapy in a community-based diabetes center?

The sequelae of symptoms documented at D.B's initial examination represent a veritable clinical Gordian's knot: despite treatment with three oral diabetes medications (metformin, a sulfonylurea, and a thiazolidinedione) all near or at maximally therapeutic doses, her diabetes remained in poor control,as evidenced by an A1C of 9.0%. Marked or complete β-cell failure is likely given the diminished efficacy of the latter therapies and considering that the patient was also administering 60 units of 70/30 premixed insulin before dinner each night.

Mitigating D.B.'s severe hyperglycemia will need to include marked intensification of insulin therapy, which unfortunately substantially increases the likelihood of weight gain. In morbidly obese patients, whether to improve glycemic control at the cost of exacerbating obesity represents a conundrum for health care providers; lowering A1C with an intensive insulin regimen, while reducing the risk for microvascular complications, fails to address and in fact could worsen a patient's risk for obesity-associated macrovascular complications.1,2 

Heart disease and related complications are the leading cause of death among individuals with diabetes.3  Recent glucose-sensing studies have shown that the majority of patients receiving intensive insulin therapy, even while achieving favorable A1C levels,experience severe postmeal hyperglycemia, often with dramatic swings into the hypoglycemic range in the postabsorptive and nocturnal periods.4,5 Furthermore, numerous studies have shown that acute hyperglycemic excursions and perhaps the magnitude of diurnal blood glucose variability increase markers of inflammation and oxidative stress,6,7 which are known risk factors for cardiovascular disease.8  Consistent with these reports, long-term longitudinal trials have indicated that the magnitude of baseline postmeal glucose levels is the aspect of glycemia most strongly associated with future risk for cardiovascular complications.9-11 

Figure 1a.

24-hour CGM profile: baseline.

Figure 1a.

24-hour CGM profile: baseline.

Close modal

Advances in medical research during the past several decades have led to new insights into the pathophysiology of diabetes. Multiple hormones,including the glucagon from pancreatic α-cells, amylin from pancreaticβ-cells, and the incretin gut hormones glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), have been demonstrated to play integral roles in sustaining normal glucose homeostasis.12 These breakthroughs have provided a better understanding of the shortcomings of conventional diabetes treatments, including the monohormonal insulin-replacement paradigm, and have led to novel pharmacological approaches for treating diabetes.13-15 

One approach stems from the discovery of the endogenous hormone amylin,first identified in 1987. Amylin is a 37-amino acid peptide that is co-stored and co-secreted with insulin fromβ-cells.16 Amylin and insulin are both absent in patients with type 1 diabetes and decline in direct proportion to the degree of β-cell deterioration in patients with type 2 diabetes.17,18 Animal studies have demonstrated that amylin complements insulin's role in controlling postprandial glycemia by regulating the rate of endogenous and exogenous glucose appearance. While insulin stimulates glucose uptake into bodily tissues (i.e., mediates glucose disappearance), amylin regulates glucose appearance by suppressing postmeal hepatic glucose output,19  slowing the rate of gastric emptying,20  and reducing meal size by inducing satiety.21  The amylin receptor has been identified and fully characterized; it is most densely located within various regions of the hindbrain, including areas unprotected by the blood brain barrier;22  amylin receptors are therefore exposed to nutrients and hormones in peripheral circulation, including glucose, insulin, and amylin.23 Systematic evaluation using various animal models has shown that the glucoregulatory effects of amylin are mediated via binding to its receptor sites in various nuclei of the hindbrain.24,25 

The characterization of amylin physiology and associated glucoregulatory actions provided the impetus for developing pramlintide, a synthetic amylin analog that mimics the actions of the endogenous hormone.26 Mechanistic studies in type 1 and insulin-requiring type 2 diabetic individuals have confirmed that pramlintide, administered via subcutaneous injection adjunctively with mealtime insulin, results in markedly improved postprandial blood glucose levels compared to insulin therapy alone.17,27 In long-term trials, adjunctive pramlintide therapy reduces A1C levels, daily insulin requirements, and body weight.28,29 Pramlintide's contribution to suppressing postprandial blood glucose excursions also appears to significantly attenuate markers of oxidative stress, an effect insulin demonstrated in insulin-treated diabetic patients.30 Pramlintide is contraindicated in patients who have a known hypersensitivity to pramlintide or any of its components, including metacresol; a confirmed diagnosis of gastroparesis; or hypoglycemia unawareness.

Case follow-up. D.B. and the clinician decide to initiate pramlintide in an attempt to improve her overall glycemic control (as measured by A1C), avoid weight gain, mitigate postprandial blood glucose excursions,and decrease her daily insulin requirements. She begins injecting 120 μg pramlintide before meals. During her first week of pramlintide therapy, her premeal insulin dose was reduced by 30%. She experienced transient nausea immediately after dosing; however, the nausea was mild to moderate and dissipated within 2 weeks of starting pramlintide.

To complement A1C assessments, the clinic obtained 24-hour CGM profiles before and 6 months after D.B. started pramlintide therapy. This afforded evaluation of pramlintide's effect on diurnal glucose fluctuations in the patient's normal environment.

Figure 1b.

24-hour CGM profile: 6 months on adjunctive prmlintide 120 mcg TID.

Figure 1b.

24-hour CGM profile: 6 months on adjunctive prmlintide 120 mcg TID.

Close modal

After 6 months on adjunctive pramlintide therapy, D.B.'s A1C level was reduced by 1.0% but was still not at goal. The patient's baseline CGM profile revealed that nearly 70% of glucose readings were > 180 mg/dl between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. with no readings above 180 mg/dl from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. (Figure 1B). CGM re-assessment after 6 months on pramlintide revealed no readings > 180 mg/dl between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. For the full 24-hour profile (288 glucose readings), nearly 85% of D.B.'s values were between 80 and 140 mg/dl,with no value < 72 mg/dl or > 178 mg/dl(Figure 1B). These improvements in glycemic control were achieved without weight gain. Finally, although a second dose of 10 units of 70/30 insulin was added before breakfast during the 6-month period, D.B.'s overall daily insulin requirements decreased by ∼18%.

Until recently, therapeutic approaches for improving glycemic control in patients such as D.B., (i.e., morbidly obese, insulin-requiring type 2 diabetic patients) have been limited. In this case, for example, improving glycemic control in the past would have involved intensifying the insulin regimen, which would likely have had unfavorable consequences, most notably for D.B., weight gain. Today's multihormonal strategy of using pramlintide adjunctively with insulin is an effective new approach to unraveling the Gordian's knot of clinical challenges associated with diabetes and co-existing obesity. New CGM technology offers a valuable complement to routine A1C testing, which can be insensitive to diurnal glucose fluctuations. The use of CGM can be leveraged to determine the quality of day-to-day glycemic control regardless of A1C result. Future research is needed to investigate the long-term effects of improved diurnal blood glucose control on complications of diabetes.

  • CGM technology provides a useful tool for quantifying the magnitude and frequency of acute diurnal blood glucose fluctuations and can be effectively leveraged to assess the effects of a pharmacological anti-hyperglycemic therapy on aspects of glycemic control that are not well characterized by A1C measurement alone.

  • In obese, severely insulin-resistant patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with high doses of exogenous insulin, adjunctive pramlintide therapy can be an effective treatment strategy, affording improved overall glycemic control while:

    • attenuating 24-hour glucose fluctuations,

    • decreasing exogenous insulin requirements, and

    • mitigating weight gain.

Jeffrey S. Freeman, DO, FACOI, is chairman of the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine in Philadelphia, Pa. David M. Capuzzi, MD, PhD, is a professor of medicine,biochemistry, and molecular pharmacology at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, Pa. Karen Rockwell, MSN, CRNP, CDE, is a nurse practitioner at Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases Center in Wilmington,Del.

1.
The DCCT Research Group: Effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
N Engl J Med
329
:
977
-986,
1993
2.
The DCCT Research Group: Weight gain associated with intensive therapy in the diabetes control and complications trial.
Diabetes Care
11
:
567
-573,
1988
3.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases:
National diabetes statistics fact sheet:general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States,2005
. Bethesda, Md., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,National Institutes of Health,
2005
4.
Boland E, Monsod T, Delucia M, Brandt CA, Fernando S, Tamborlane WV: Limitations of conventional methods of self-monitoring of blood glucose: lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care
24
:
1858
-1862,
2001
5.
Bonora E, Corrao G, Bagnardi V, Ceriello A, Comaschi M, Montanari P, Meigs JB: Prevalence and correlates of post-prandial hyperglycaemia in a large sample of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Diabetologia
49
:
846
-854,
2006
6.
Temelkova-KurktschievTS, Koehler C, Henkel E, Leonhardt W, Fuecker K,Hanefeld M: Postchallenge plasma glucose and glycemic spikes are more strongly associated with atherosclerosis than fasting glucose or HbA1c level.
Diabetes Care
23
:
1830
-1834,
2000
7.
Monnier L, Mas E,Ginet C, Michel F, Villon L, Cristol JP, Colette C: Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.
JAMA
29
:
1681
-1687,
2006
8.
Andriollo-SanchezM, Hininger-Favier I, Meunier N, Venneria E, O'Connor JM, Maiani G, Coudray C, Roussel AM: Age-related oxidative stress and antioxidant parameters in middle-aged and older European subjects: the ZENITH study.
Eur J Clin Nutr
59
(Suppl. 2):
S58
-S62,
2005
9.
Meigs JB, Nathan DM, D'Agostino RB Sr, Wilson PW: Fasting and post-challenge glycemia and cardiovascular disease risk: the Framingham Offspring Study.
Diabetes Care
25
:
1845
-1850,
2002
10.
DECODE Study group: Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality
. Arch Intern Med
161
:
397
-405,
2001
11.
Cavalot F,Petrelli A, Traversa M, Bonomo K, Fiora E, Conti M, Anfossi G, Costa G,Trovati M: Postprandial blood glucose is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than fasting blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus,particularly in women: lessons from the San Luigi Gonzaga Diabetes Study.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
91
:
813
-819,
2006
12.
Crean J, Maggs D:Beyond insulin therapy: other hormonal approaches. In
Clinical Diabetes: A Practical Approach Based on Pathophysiology and Evidence
. Vivian Fonseca, Ed. Philadelphia, Pa., Elsevier Science,
2006
, p.
395
-418
13.
Symlin prescribing information.San Diego, Calif., Amylin Pharmaceuticals, 2005. Available online from http://symlin.com/pdf/SYMLIN-pi-combined.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2006
14.
Byetta prescribing information. San Diego, Calif., and Indianapolis, Ind., Amylin Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly and Company, 2005. Available online from http://pi.lilly.com/us/byetta-pi.pdf. Accessed 1 February 2007
15.
Januvia prescribing information. Whitehouse Station, N.J., Merck and Co., 2006-2007. Available online from www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/j/januvia/januvia_pi.pdf. Accessed 1 February 2007
16.
Cooper GJS, Willis AC, Clark A, Turner RC, Sim RB, Reid KB: Purification and characterization of a peptide from amyloid-rich pancreases of type 2 diabetic patients.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
84
:
8628
-8632,
1987
17.
Thompson RG,Peterson J, Gottlieb A, Mullane J: Effects of pramlintide, an analog of human amylin, on plasma glucose profiles in patients with IDDM: results of a multicenter trial.
Diabetes
46
:
632
-636,
1997
18.
Enoki S, Mitsukawa T, Takemura J, Nakazato M, Aburaya J, Toshimori H, Matsukara S: Plasma islet amyloid polypeptide levels in obesity, impaired glucose tolerance and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
15
:
97
-102,
1992
19.
Gedulin BR, Rink TJ, Young AA: Dose-response for glucagonostatic effect of amylin in rats.
Metabolism
46
:
67
-70,
1997
20.
Young AA, Gedulin B, Vine W, Percy A, Rink TJ: Gastric emptying is accelerated in diabetic BB rats and is slowed by subcutaneous injections of amylin.
Diabetologia
38
:
642
-648,
1995
21.
Young A: Role of amylin in nutrient intake: animal studies.
Diabet Med
14
:
S14
-S18,
1997
22.
Mulder H,Leckstrom A, Uddman R, Ekbald E, Westermark P, Sundler F: Islet amyloid polypeptide (amylin) is expressed in sensory neurons.
J Neurosci
15
:
7625
-7632,
1995
23.
Banks WA, Kastin AJ, Maness LM, Huang WT, Jaspan JB: Permeability of the blood-brain barrier to amylin.
Life Sci
57
:
1993
-2001,
1995
24.
Young A: Amylin:physiology and pharmacology.
Adv Pharmacol
52
:
289
-320,
2005
25.
Gedulin BR, Jodka CM, Herrmann K, Young AA: Role of endogenous amylin in glucagon secretion and gastric emptying in rats demonstrated with the selective antagonist AC187.
Regul Pept
137
:
121
-127,
2006
26.
Young AA, Gedulin B, Vine W, Percy A, Rink TJ: Preclinical pharmacology of pramlintide in the rat: comparisons with human and rat amylin.
Drug Dev Res
37
:
231
-248,
1996
27.
Thompson RG,Gottlieb A, Organ K, Koda J, Kisicki J, Kolterman OG: Pramlintide: a human amylin analogue reduced postprandial plasma glucose, insulin and c-peptide concentrations in patients with type II diabetes.
Diabet Med
14
:
547
-555,
1997
28.
Ratner RE, Dickey R, Fineman M, Maggs DG, Shen L, Strobel SA, Weyer C, Kolterman OG: Amylin replacement with pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin therapy improves long-term glycaemic and weight control in type 1 diabetes mellitus:aA 1-year randomized controlled trial.
Diabet Med
21
:
1204
-1212,
1996
29.
Ratner RE, Want LL, Fineman MS, Velte MJ, Ruggles JA, Gottlieb A, Weyer C, Kolterman OG:Adjunctive therapy with amylin analogue pramlintide leads to a combined improvement in glycemic and weight control in insulin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Technol Ther
4
:
51
-61,
2002
30.
Ceriello A, Piconi L, Quagliaro L, Wang Y, Schnabel CA, Ruggles JA, Gloster MA, Maggs DG, Weyer C: Effects of pramlintide on postprandial glucose excursions and measures of oxidative stress in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care
28
:
632
-637,
2005