Control of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients is important for optimal clinical outcomes, but can be very challenging. This article provides practical recommendations for insulin therapy for common situations that arise during hospitalization.

Uncontrolled hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients with or without a previous diagnosis of diabetes is associated with adverse outcomes and longer lengths of stay. In addition to the increasing prevalence of diabetes in the United States, many patients without preexisting diabetes experience stress-related hyperglycemia during hospitalization.1  It is estimated that one-third of hospitalized patients will experience significant hyperglycemia.2  The cost associated with hospitalization for patients with diabetes accounts for half of all health care expenditures for this disease.35  Controlling glucose levels for inpatients should be a priority for hospitals and practicing physicians. Recent guidelines for optimal glucose goals in hospitalized patients have been developed by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA).6 

Controlling glucose and avoiding hypoglycemia is challenging even for experienced clinicians. Acute illness, inconsistent caloric intake, changes from home medications, and limitations regarding the timing of glucose monitoring and insulin administration are all significant obstacles to managing inpatient hyperglycemia.

A good understanding of the principles of physiological insulin delivery is essential to overcoming these obstacles and achieving glucose goals. The purpose of this article is to provide practical advice on managing inpatient hyperglycemia.

Hyperglycemia is defined as blood glucose > 140 mg/dl, and treatment is recommended when glucose levels are persistently > 140–180 mg/dl.6  A1C is an important laboratory test that should be ordered in nondiabetic hyperglycemic patients and diabetic patients who have not had a recent test. An A1C value ≥ 6.5% can now be used for diagnosing diabetes and is valuable in distinguishing between preexisting diabetes and acute stress hyperglycemia. In patients with preexisting diabetes, A1C testing will indicate the adequacy of prehospitalization treatment and can help guide discharge planning. Red blood cell transfusion during hospitalization will falsely decrease A1C levels.7 

Patients with diabetes or hyperglycemia who are eating should be on a consistent-carbohydrate diet, and glucose monitoring should be ordered before each meal and at bedtime. Typically, oral agents should be discontinued during acute illness unless it is a very brief hospitalization. Oral agents can be restarted as patients approach discharge or transfer to a nonacute setting.

Metformin cannot be used when there is any possibility of the need for iodinated contrast studies or renal insufficiency. Sulfonylureas and metaglinides can cause unpredictable hypoglycemia in patients who are not eating reliably. Thiazolidinediones can cause fluid retention, especially in combination with insulin. Parenteral glucagon-like peptide-1 and amylin agonists can cause nausea and should be withheld in acutely ill patients. For these reasons, inpatient hyperglycemia is best managed with insulin only.

Insulin works reliably, and doses can be rapidly adjusted depending on changes in glucose levels and food intake. Use of insulin does not necessarily commit patients to chronic insulin therapy as outpatients, and this should be discussed with patients to allay any potential anxiety. If the A1C value indicates the need for chronic insulin therapy, it is a good idea to begin discussion and training as soon as possible.

Many types of insulin and insulin regimens can be used effectively to control glucose in the outpatient setting. Insulin therapy during hospitalization requires flexibility to change rapidly with the patients' condition and is best provided by what has been termed a basal/bolus insulin regimen. It should be emphasized that using a correction scale insulin regimen, also known as “sliding scale insulin,” alone is not appropriate to treat sustained hyperglycemia (> 140 mg/dl). Scheduled basal/bolus insulin is designed to prevent hyperglycemia, whereas correction scale insulin only attempts to lower hyperglycemia after it has occurred. A study comparing scheduled basal/bolus insulin to sliding scale insulin only showed a significantly higher percentage of patients achieving goal glucose levels in the basal/bolus group than in the sliding scale only group (66 vs. 38%) without an increase in hypoglycemia.8 

There are three components to a basal/bolus regimen: basal insulin, meal or nutritional bolus insulin, and correction insulin (Figure 1).9  The ideal basal insulin provides a constant 24-hour peakless level of insulin to suppress the liver's release of glucose during the fasting state and between meals. NPH insulin has a pronounced and variable peak and should be avoided during hospitalization because it can cause unpredictable hypoglycemia, especially in patients who are not eating reliably.10,11  Glargine and detemir are newer insulin analogs that provide relatively peakless basal insulin. Glargine is preferred because of its longer duration of action with once-daily administration.12  Basal insulin, when dosed correctly, should not cause hypoglycemia when patients are restricted from oral nutritional intake (NPO).

Mealtime bolus insulin is designed to prevent the predicted postprandial rise in glucose. Bolus insulin is best provided with one of the rapid-acting analogs (lispro, aspart, or glulisine) with each meal. These insulin analogs have a rapid onset of action and usually reach peak levels within 60 minutes. Numerous studies have shown that rapid-acting insulin analogs will control the postprandial rise in glucose and reduce later hypoglycemia better than regular insulin.1315  Rapid-acting insulin analogs should be given 0–15 minutes before a meal, whereas regular insulin must be given at least 30 minutes before a meal because of its slower onset of action. The timing requirements for premeal regular insulin administration are not usually realistic in a busy hospital unit. Bolus insulin should be withheld when patients are NPO or when premeal glucose levels are < 70 mg/dl.

Figure 1.

Physiological principles of the basal/bolus insulin regimen.9 

Figure 1.

Physiological principles of the basal/bolus insulin regimen.9 

Close modal

Correction insulin is intended to lower hyperglycemic glucose levels, not to cover nutritional hyperglycemia. But, as with mealtime bolus insulin, rapid-acting analog formulations are the best choice for correctional insulin for patients who are able to eat. Before each meal, the mealtime bolus insulin dose and the correction insulin dose can be added and administered simultaneously. However, it is best to order them separately so they can be adjusted independently. The mealtime bolus insulin should be withheld when patients are not eating, but correction doses should still be given when needed to treat hyperglycemia.

Standardized, preprinted, or computerized insulin order forms improve the ease of ordering insulin and guide physicians to include all three components of subcutaneous therapy. Standardized insulin orders have been shown to improve glucose control and reduce medication errors.1618  For these reasons, many hospitals have made the use of such orders mandatory. A sample preprinted insulin order from the authors' institution is provided in Figure 2.

Estimating patients' total daily insulin requirement, or total daily dose (TDD), is the first step in ordering insulin. For patients who were on insulin before admission, the best indicator of insulin requirement is their TDD before admission. Regardless of their previous insulin regimen, it is best to use a basal/bolus regimen during their hospital stay and to explain to patients that this is being done to allow for greater flexibility. Patients with an elevated A1C value may require an increase, and those whose glycemia was too tightly controlled or who were admitted with hypoglycemia may require a reduction in their prehospitalization TDD. For patients who are insulin naive, insulin can safely be initiated at a TDD of 0.3–0.6 units/kg body weight.16,17  The lower starting dose is recommended for leaner patients and for those with renal insufficiency, and the higher starting dose is recommended for obese patients and those on glucocorticoids (Table 1).

Figure 2.

Standardized subcutaneous insulin orders at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania.35 

Figure 2.

Standardized subcutaneous insulin orders at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania.35 

Close modal

Studies in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes have consistently shown that optimal glycemic control can be achieved with subcutaneous insulin in patients who are eating normally when approximately 50% of their TDD is provided as basal insulin, and 50% is provided as bolus insulin.16,17  However, it is important to remember that mealtime bolus doses must be adjusted according to how much patients are actually eating. Mealtime doses may need to be adjusted daily based on patients' anticipated caloric intake and withheld if patients are not eating or if their premeal glucose level is < 70 mg/dl. For patients who are eating unreliably, rapid-acting analog insulin can be ordered to be given immediately after they have eaten, and the mealtime dose can then be adjusted to match their actual intake (e.g., reducing the dose by 50% if only half of the food on the tray was consumed).

Correctional insulin requirements depend on individuals' insulin sensitivity. Many physicians mistakenly order a scale depending on the degree of hyperglycemia, but the appropriate scale is based on each patient's insulin sensitivity, which is best estimated by their TDD.

A “1700 rule” has been used to estimate how much 1 unit of insulin will lower glucose.19  A sensitivity, or correction, factor is calculated by dividing 1700 by the TDD. Most hospitals use low, medium, and high scales that provide doses of insulin when glucose levels exceeds 140–150 mg/dl and increase with additional glucose increments of 40–50 mg/dl (Figure 2). A low scale increases by 1 unit of insulin for each increment of 40–50 mg/dl and corresponds to a sensitivity factor of 40–50 or a TDD of 20–42 units. Therefore, patients requiring insulin doses in this range would be ordered a low-dose correctional scale. A moderate scale would be used for patients requiring a TDD of 43–84 units, and a high-dose scale should be ordered for patients requiring 85–126 units/day. An individualized correctional scale may be necessary for patients with extremely low or high insulin TDDs (< 20 or > 126 units). An example for ordering subcutaneous insulin is provided in Table 2.

Guidelines for insulin initiation dosing are just a starting point.

Table 1.

Determining a TDD for Insulin-Naive Patients

Determining a TDD for Insulin-Naive Patients
Determining a TDD for Insulin-Naive Patients

Insulin doses may need to be adjusted on a daily basis depending on patients' blood glucose testing results and caloric intake. Fasting glucose is the best indicator of adequacy of the basal insulin dose. Glargine can be adjusted every 24–48 hours until fasting glucose is < 120–140 mg/dl. Glucose levels during the rest of the day reflect the appropriateness of mealtime bolus insulin doses. Prelunch glucose measurements reflect the adequacy of the breakfast dose, predinner glucose reflects the lunchtime insulin dose, and bedtime glucose reflects the dinnertime dose of rapid-acting insulin. Because the correctional scale is based on insulin sensitivity, it is unlikely to be changed unless there is a significant change in a patient's TDD.

Although there are extensive data indicating that uncontrolled hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients, the optimal glucose range remains the topic of ongoing research and debate. Recent consensus guidelines have recommended a goal range of 140–180 mg/dl in acute critical illness.6 However, in specific subgroups of patients, such as open heart surgery patients, there is evidence that a tighter goal of 110–140 mg/dl may be beneficial.6,20  Severe hypoglycemia (< 40 mg/dl) during critical illness should be avoided because it has been associated with increased mortality.21,22 

Table 2.

Sample Order for Subcutaneous Insulin in a Hospitalized Patient

Sample Order for Subcutaneous Insulin in a Hospitalized Patient
Sample Order for Subcutaneous Insulin in a Hospitalized Patient

Continuous intravenous (IV) insulin is the safest and most effective way to achieve glucose control within a specified range and respond rapidly to changing clinical conditions. IV insulin should be initiated when glucose is > 180 mg/dl and adjusted to maintain glucose in the 140–180 mg/dl range as much as possible.6 

Standardized orders promote familiarity with guidelines among physicians and nursing staff and minimize errors.19  Many IV insulin regimens have been used safely and effectively. An analysis of IV insulin infusion protocols has indicated that orders that adjust insulin based on current glucose values and rate of change of glucose are more effective than protocols that adjust insulin dose based on current glucose levels.24  Each institution should implement a standard IV insulin protocol that is feasible and best suited to the needs of specific units.23,28 

IV insulin provides basal insulin for critically ill patients who are not eating. Once patients start eating, mealtime bolus insulin should be provided. If IV insulin is increased to respond to postprandial hyperglycemia, there is a significant risk of hypoglycemia occurring after the postprandial hyperglycemia declines. Therefore, it is best to transition to subcutaneous basal/bolus insulin once patients are eating reliably. IV insulin should be continued for at least 4 hours after the glargine insulin dose is administered or, more conveniently, can be discontinued sooner after the glargine is given by discontinuing it immediately after a rapid-acting analog is provided as a mealtime bolus dose.25 

The basal insulin dose can be estimated by calculating the IV insulin requirement while the patient was not eating. The stress of surgery or critical illness will increase insulin requirements, and, as stress decreases, basal insulin requirements will also decrease. During transition from IV to subcutaneous insulin, a reduction in the basal dose by 20–33% to account for decreasing requirements has been found to be safe and effective.25,26  For patients with stress-induced hyperglycemia only, insulin may continue to be decreased and discontinued as their condition improves.

Mealtime bolus doses depend on patients' caloric intake. Patients recovering from critical illness will not be eating full meals, so a convenient starting dose would be 10% of the basal dose, given at each meal. Mealtime boluses will likely need to be increased daily as the diet advances. Table 3 provides an example of converting from an insulin drip to a basal/bolus regimen.

Hyperglycemia is a common complication of enteral feedings and can contribute to adverse clinical outcomes.28  Enteral formulas with reduced carbohydrate and modified fat content have been shown to result in lower glucose levels and should be used if possible in hyperglycemic patients.29  Persistent hyperglycemia should be treated with scheduled insulin doses. Once-daily glargine insulin, premixed human 70/30 insulin given every 8 hours, or a combination of NPH given every 12 hours and regular insulin given every 6 hours have all been recommended, with limited data.3032  Regular insulin for correction doses may be a better choice with enteral feedings when a less pronounced peak of insulin is desirable and glucose is monitored every 6 hours.

Table 3.

Sample Conversion From IV to Basal/Bolus Insulin

Sample Conversion From IV to Basal/Bolus Insulin
Sample Conversion From IV to Basal/Bolus Insulin

Regardless of the insulin regimen used, the insulin TDD can be calculated at 0.3–0.6 units/kg body weight. This is a starting dose, which should be adjusted daily based on patients' glucose response and the amount of correctional insulin that was required the previous day. It has been recommended that 80% of the correctional insulin be added to the long- or intermediate-acting insulin the next day. The goal is to eventually arrive at a regimen that will maintain glucose in the goal range while patients are on continuous feedings.

If tube feedings are provided only nocturnally, NPH is preferable and should be given to coincide with the onset of the feedings. If patients on nocturnal tube feedings are eating meals, they may require mealtime bolus insulin to prevent postprandial hyperglycemia. Bolus tube feedings should be covered the same as ingested meals with a dose of rapid-acting analog insulin at the time of each bolus feeding.

The biggest challenge in treating hyperglycemia caused by enteral feedings is that unexpected interruption of feedings can lead to hypoglycemia. Insulin should be adjusted appropriately if there is a planned withholding of feedings. If the enteral feeding is unexpectedly interrupted for more than 2 hours, all insulin should be withheld and 10% dextrose should be administered intravenously at the same rate as that of the enteral feedings to prevent hypoglycemia. It is best to have a standardized policy for this common occurrence. Monitoring electrolytes and providing adequate free water is very important. Dehydration is a common complication of enteral feedings and a frequently overlooked cause of hyperglycemia.28  A sample calculation of insulin requirements for a patient on enteral feeds is shown in Table 4.

Hyperglycemia occurs commonly with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and is associated with significant adverse outcomes.33  Mild hyperglycemia can be managed by addition of regular insulin to the TPN using a starting dose of 0.1 units for every gram of carbohydrate in the TPN. If glucose remains elevated, the insulin dose in TPN can be adjusted daily by adding 80% of the previous day's correctional insulin. If glucose levels are extremely elevated, IV insulin can be employed to control hyperglycemia more rapidly.

Table 4.

Sample Insulin Requirement Calculation for a Patient on Enteral Feedings

Sample Insulin Requirement Calculation for a Patient on Enteral Feedings
Sample Insulin Requirement Calculation for a Patient on Enteral Feedings

Once a stable IV rate has been determined, it can be extrapolated to a 24-hour TDD, with 75% of this dose is added to TPN. Patients with preexisting diabetes may benefit from receiving 40% of their TDD as basal insulin subcutaneously and the remainder provided as regular insulin in TPN. When TPN is discontinued, glucose control will be maintained with the basal long-acting insulin, and mealtime bolus insulin can be added as the patient begins to eat.

Glucocorticoids are known to significantly increase glucose levels, primarily by inhibiting glucose uptake into muscle. Postprandial glucose levels are generally most affected, and patients who are treated with a basal/bolus regimen will probably require a higher percentage of their TDD as bolus insulin while they are on glucocorticoids. It is important to reduce insulin doses as glucocorticoids are tapered to avoid hypoglycemia.

The A1C test result is valuable in determining the most appropriate treatment strategy at discharge. For patients with diabetes, the current recommendation is a goal A1C of < 7%; however, for patients of advanced age or with life-shortening illnesses, a higher A1C is acceptable.

Although insulin is recommended during hospitalization, many patients will not need insulin at discharge. A newly diagnosed patient should be treated according to the current guidelines for initiating pharmacological therapy based on the severity of their disease.34  Patients with a history of diabetes with acceptable control and whose A1C is in the goal range can probably be discharged on their prehospitalization medication or insulin regimen. Patients with suboptimal control should have intensification of therapy, either by addition or increase in oral agents, addition of basal insulin, or a complex insulin regimen as warranted by their A1C level.

For patients new to insulin therapy, it is important to begin education as soon as possible. Although the use of a basal/bolus regimen is advocated in the hospital for flexibility, this regimen may not be feasible or necessary in the outpatient setting. For many patients with type 2 diabetes, once-daily basal insulin in combination with oral agents or twice-daily premixed insulin may be adequate. It is necessary to assess the patient's daily schedule, meal plan, insulin self-administration ability, and financial resources. Patients who do not have prescription coverage will probably need to use generic oral agents and human insulin (NPH and regular) individually or premixed whenever possible. With decreasing lengths of stay, it is only possible to provide “survival skills” education in the hospital. This includes the safe administration of insulin and medications, basic understanding of meal planning, and recognition and treatment of hypoglycemia. Patients with newly diagnosed diabetes, those who are new to insulin therapy, and those with educational deficits should be referred to an outpatient diabetes educator for more comprehensive education.

Managing diabetes and hyperglycemia during hospitalization is vital for optimal clinical outcomes. Insulin is the best treatment for inpatient management but can be very challenging given the stress of illness, frequently changing caloric intake throughout the hospital stay, and limitations to care provided by hospital personnel. An understanding of physiological insulin administration and the use of the three components of subcutaneous insulin therapy (basal, mealtime bolus, and correctional insulin) helps to achieve glucose goals and provide needed flexibility. Standardized orders for subcutaneous and IV insulin can guide physicians and minimize errors. Early and thoughtful discharge planning will help to ensure continued glucose control in the outpatient setting.

1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
:
Crude and age-adjusted percentage of civilian, noninstitutionalized population with diagnosed diabetes, United States, 1980–2008 [article online]
. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/prev/national/figage.htm.
Accessed July 2010
2.
Levetan
CS
,
Passaro
M
,
Jablonski
K
,
Kass
M
,
Ratner
RE
:
Unrecognized diabetes among hospitalized patients
.
Diabetes Care
21
:
246
249
,
1998
3.
Krinsley
JS
:
Association between hyperglycemia and increased hospital mortality in a heterogeneous population of critically ill patients
.
Mayo Clin Proc
78
:
1471
1478
,
2003
4.
Falciglia
M
,
Freyberg
RW
,
Almenoff
PL
,
D'Alessio
DA
,
Render
ML
:
Hyperglycemia-related mortality in critically ill patients varies with admission diagnosis
.
Crit Care Med
37
:
3001
3009
,
2009
5.
American Diabetes Association
:
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007
.
Diabetes Care
31
:
596
615
,
2008
6.
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association
:
Consensus statement on inpatient glucose control
.
Endocr Pract
15
:
353
369
,
2009
7.
The International Expert Committee
:
International expert committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
32
:
1327
1334
,
2009
8.
Umpierrez
GE
,
Smiley
D
,
Zisman
A
,
Prieto
LM
,
Palacio
A
,
Ceron
M
,
Puig
A
,
Mejia
R
:
Randomized study of basal-bolus insulin therapy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes (RABBIT 2 Trial)
.
Diabetes Care
30
:
2409
2410
,
2007
9.
Polonsky
KS
,
Given
BD
,
Van Cauter
E
:
Twenty-four-hour profiles and pulsatile patterns of insulin secretion in normal and obese subjects
.
J Clin Invest
81
:
442
448
,
1988
10.
Raskin
P
,
Klaff
L
,
Bergenstal
R
,
Hallé
JP
,
Donley
D
,
Mecca
T
:
A 16-week comparison of the novel insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE 901) and NPH human insulin used with insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
23
:
1666
1671
,
2000
11.
Ratner
RE
,
Hirsch
IB
,
Neifing
JL
,
Garg
SK
,
Mecca
TE
,
Wilson
CA
U.S. Study Group of Insulin Glargine in Type 1 Diabetes
:
Less hypoglycemia with insulin glargine in intensive insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
23
:
639
643
,
2000
12.
Porcellati
F
,
Rossetti
P
,
Busciantella
NR
,
Marzotti
S
,
Lucidi
P
,
Luzio
S
,
Owens
DR
,
Bolli
GB
,
Fanelli
CG
:
Comparison of pharmacokinetics and dynamics of the long-acting insulin analogs glargine and detemir at steady state in type 1 diabetes: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study
.
Diabetes Care
30
:
2447
2452
,
2007
13.
Raskin
P
,
Guthrie
RA
,
Leiter
L
,
Riis
A
,
Jovanovic
L
:
Use of insulin aspart, a fast-acting insulin analog, as the mealtime insulin in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
23
:
583
588
,
2000
14.
Garg
S
,
Ampudia-Blasco
FJ
,
Pfohl
M
:
Rapid-acting insulin analogues in basalbolus regimens in type 1 diabetes mellitus
.
Endocr Pract
16
:
486
505
,
2010
15.
Bode
BW
:
Use of rapid-acting insulin analogues in the treatment of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: insulin pump therapy versus multiple daily injections
.
Clin Ther
29
(
Suppl. D
):
S135
S144
,
2007
16.
Schnipper
JL
,
Ndumele
CD
,
Liang
CL
,
Pendergrass
ML
:
Effects of a subcutaneous insulin protocol, clinical education, and computerized order set on the quality of inpatient management of hyperglycemia: results of a clinical trial
.
J Hosp Med
4
:
16
27
,
2009
17.
Maynard
G
,
Lee
J
,
Phillips
G
,
Fink
E
,
Renvall
M
:
Improved inpatient use of basal insulin, reduced hypoglycemia, and improved glycemic control: effect of structured subcutaneous insulin orders and an insulin management algorithm
.
J Hosp Med
4
:
3
15
,
2009
18.
Donihi
AC
,
DiNardo
MM
,
DeVita
MA
,
Korytkowski
MT
:
Use of a standardized protocol to decrease medication errors and adverse events related to sliding scale insulin
.
Qual Saf Health Care
15
:
89
91
,
2006
19.
Davidson
PC
,
Hebblewhite
HR
,
Bode
BW
,
Steed
RD
,
Welch
NS
,
Greenlee
MC
,
Richardson
PL
,
Johnson
J
:
Statistically based CSII parameters: correction factor (CF) (1700 rule), carbohydrate-insulin ratio (CIR) (2.8 rule), and basal-to-total ratio
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
5
:
237
,
2003
20.
Furnary
AP
,
Gao
G
,
Grunkemeier
GL
,
Wu
Y
,
Zerr
KJ
,
Bookin
SO
,
Foten
HS
,
Starr
A
:
Continuous insulin infusion reduces mortality in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
125
:
1007
1021
,
2003
21.
NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators
:
Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients
.
N Engl J Med
360
:
1283
1297
,
2009
22.
Wiener
RS
,
Wiener
DC
,
Larson
RJ
:
Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults
.
JAMA
300
:
933
944
,
2008
23.
Magaji
V
,
Marina
A
,
Mohatasebi
Y
,
Johnston
JM
:
Safety and efficacy of insulin infusion in surgical patients in the non-critical care setting [Abstract No. 218]
.
Presented at the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists annual meeting
,
Houston, Tex.
,
May
11–13
,
2009
24.
Nazer
LH
,
Chow
SL
,
Moghissi
ES
:
Insulin infusion protocols for critically ill patients: a highlight of differences and similarities
.
Endocr Pract
13
:
137
146
,
2007
25.
Schmeltz
LR
,
DeSantis
AJ
,
Schmidt
K
,
O'Shea-Mahler
E
,
Rhee
C
,
Brandt
S
,
Peterson
S
,
Molitch
ME
:
Conversion of intravenous insulin infusions to subcutaneously administered insulin glargine in patients with hyperglycemia
.
Endocr Pract
12
:
641
650
,
2006
26.
Bode
BW
,
Braithwaite
SS
,
Steed
RD
,
Davidson
PC
:
Intravenous insulin infusion therapy: indications, methods and transition to subcutaneous insulin therapy
.
Endocr Pract
10
(
Suppl. 2
):
71
80
,
2004
27.
Krikorian
A
,
Ismail-Beigi
F
,
Moghissi
ES
:
Comparisons of different insulin infusion protocols: a review of recent literature
.
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care
13
:
198
204
,
2010
28.
Pancorbo-Hidalgo
PL
,
Garcia-Fernandez
FP
,
Ramirez-Perez
C
:
Complications associated with enteral nutrition by nasogastric tube in an internal medicine unit
.
J Clin Nurs
10
:
482
490
,
2001
29.
Elia
M
,
Ceriello
A
,
Laube
H
,
Sinclair
AJ
,
Engfer
M
,
Stratton
RJ
:
Enteral nutritional support and use of diabetes-specific formulas for patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Diabetes Care
28
:
2267
2279
,
2005
30.
Korytkowski
MT
,
Salata
RJ
,
Koerbel
GL
,
Selzer
F
,
Karslioglu
E
,
Idriss
AM
,
Lee
KK
,
Moser
AJ
,
Toledo
FG
:
Insulin therapy and glycemic control in hospitalized patients with diabetes during enteral nutrition therapy
.
Diabetes Care
32
:
594
596
,
2009
31.
Clement
S
,
Braithwaite
SS
,
Magee
MF
,
Ahmann
A
,
Smith
EP
,
Schafer
RG
,
Hirsch
IB
:
Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals
.
Diabetes Care
27
:
553
591
,
2004
32.
Leahy
JL
:
Insulin management of diabetic patients on general medical and surgical floors
.
Endocr Pract
12
(
Suppl. 3
):
86
90
,
2006
33.
Cheung
NW
,
Napier
B
,
Zaccaria
C
,
Fletcher
JP
:
Hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition
.
Diabetes Care
28
:
2367
2371
,
2005
34.
American Diabetes Association
:
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2010
.
Diabetes Care
33
(
Suppl. 1
):
S11
S61
,
2010
35.
Noschese
M
,
Donihi
A
,
Curll
M
,
DiNardo
M
,
Koerbel
G
,
Karslioglu
E
,
Banks
T
,
Korytkowski
M
:
The effect of a diabetes order set on glycaemic management and control in the hospital
.
Qual Saf Health Care
17
:
464
468
,
2008