IN BRIEF Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an increasingly recognized and common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Although most patients with NAFLD are obese, a smaller group of NAFLD patients are lean. This study explored the long-term outcomes of lean patients with NAFLD in the United States. Compared to lean individuals without NAFLD, lean people with NAFLD were significantly more likely to be older and male and had higher comorbidities (i.e., diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease). The presence of NAFLD in lean individuals was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major cause of liver disease worldwide (1,2). NAFLD is defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis in the absence of secondary causes of fatty liver and chronic infections with hepatitis B and C viruses, excessive alcohol intake, medications, and some hereditary disorders that induce steatosis (35). NAFLD can lead not only to adverse clinical outcomes, but also to patient-reported outcomes such as impairment of health-related quality of life (6,7).

Although the prevalence of NAFLD shows variations across different regions of the world, recent data revealed that the global prevalence of NAFLD is ∼25% (8). In fact, this prevalence is even higher in some specific populations, such as individuals with type 2 diabetes or patients undergoing bariatric surgery (3,4,79). A number of studies have shown that the prevalence of NAFLD has been increasing for the past two to three decades, and this trend is projected to increase in parallel with the global epidemic of obesity (9,10). Although most NAFLD patients are obese or overweight, some individuals with NAFLD are lean (10,11). Some recent data suggest that the prevalence of lean NAFLD is higher in some areas of the world, especially in the rural areas of Asian countries (12). Although long-term outcomes of the typical obese NAFLD cohort has been reported (810,13,14), the long-term outcomes of lean NAFLD subjects from the United States are not available. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of lean patients with NAFLD using U.S. population data from the third National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES III database.

NHANES III is a cross-sectional, population-based sample survey of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States. Surveys were based on a complex, multistage sampling plan. The cross-sectional NHANES III nationally based survey cohort has been described in detail previously (15,16). The survey consists of a household interview and a medical/laboratory examination carried out in a mobile examination center. Data collected for each participant in the initial cohort included clinical, laboratory, and follow-up mortality data. Of the 20,050 adult participants from NHANES III, we excluded 458 participants not followed for mortality and 4,622 missing primary laboratory variables such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), triglycerides, or serum insulin. Of 14,970 participants, we excluded 9,120 due to overweight or obesity (BMI >25 kg/m2). For the purpose of the study, we excluded 475 participants with other causes of chronic liver disease. The final cohort included 5,375 participants (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

Study flow of the analytical cohort selection from NHANES III. ALD, alcoholic liver disease; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus.

FIGURE 1.

Study flow of the analytical cohort selection from NHANES III. ALD, alcoholic liver disease; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus.

Close modal

Participants’ age (20–44, 45–54, 55–64, and >65 years), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American, or other [which included other Hispanics, Asians, and Native Americans]), sex, whether they were a smoker (which included either current smoking or having 100 or more cigarettes during their lifetime), poverty-income ratio (PIR) (PIR <1.3 as low, PIR 1.3 to <3.5 as middle, and PIR >3.5 as high) (16), and health conditions were obtained as self-reported information from the NHANES in-home interview.

Study Covariates

Lean was defined as individuals with BMI ≤25 kg/m2. Diabetes was defined as having a fasting glucose measure of >126 mg/dL or self-reported medical history of diabetes (17). Hypertension was defined as having systolic blood pressure of >140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of >90 mmHg from an average three measurements or history of high blood pressure (18). High total cholesterol was defined as a serum cholesterol level of >240 mg/dL. Insulin resistance (IR) was defined as having a homeostasis model of assessment (HOMA) score of >3. Iron overload was defined as serum transferrin saturation ≥50%. Excessive alcohol consumption was defined as ≥20 g/day in men and ≥10 g/day in women. Alcoholic liver disease was defined by excessive alcohol use and elevated liver enzymes. Chronic hepatitis C was defined as positive hepatitis C virus RNA, and chronic hepatitis B was defined as positive hepatitis B surface antigen. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) was defined by self-reported medical history of congestive heart failure, heart attack, or stroke. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined by either albuminuria or a glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Serum creatinine measurements were standardized by the NHANES recommendation (16). Albuminuria was defined as a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated by using the 2012 CKD Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation (19).

Diagnosis of NAFLD

We initially defined NAFLD as presence of fatty liver by hepatic ultrasound examinations in the absence of other causes of chronic liver disease and excessive alcohol consumption. However, for the NHANES, hepatic ultrasound was only performed on those between 20 and 74 years of age, which created a significant bias group. Two other noninvasive tests for diagnosis of fatty liver were considered. These included the fatty liver index and the index of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (20). Since the fatty liver index is based on BMI, it cannot be used for lean patients with NAFLD. On the other hand, the index of NASH (ION) has good predictive performance for establishing the diagnosis of NAFLD (20). ION uses waist-to-hip ratio, ALT, triglycerides, and HOMA. In fact, we initially performed an agreement test between hepatic ultrasound and ION using the NHANES data set and discovered good agreement, with a kappa score of 0.43 between ultrasound and ION. Since ION was available for all patients and had good agreement with ultrasound, we elected to use it as the noninvasive test to determine the presence of NAFLD for the study. In this context, NAFLD was defined as an ION ≥22 in the absence of any other evidence of chronic liver diseases such as alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, iron overload, and other liver diseases as well as excessive alcohol use (20). Non-NAFLD control subjects were defined as those with absence of NAFLD and any other chronic liver disease.

Mortality Data

The NHANES III Linked Mortality File provides follow-up data on vital status from the date of NHANES III survey participation (1988–1994) through the date of death or 31 December 2011. Mortality verification is based on the results from a probabilistic match between NHANES III and the National Death Index (NDI) death certificate records (21). Participants who were not matched with any death records were presumed alive through the follow-up period. Cause of death was attributed by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) based on the International Classification of Diseases, 9th or 10th revision. For our study, cardiovascular (CV) mortality was defined as death due to diseases of the heart (codes I00-I90, I11, I13, and I20–I51) (22).

Statistical Analysis

The complex survey design elements (clusters, strata, and examination sample weights) provided by NCHS were used to account for the differential selection probabilities, survey nonresponse and noncoverage, and oversampling of older people, black people, and Mexican Americans. Sampling errors were estimated by the Taylor series linearization (23). Data were articulated as weighted means or percentages with SE. Diverse characteristics were compared by NAFLD status among lean individuals using a t statistic for continuous variables and the Rao-Scott χ2 test for categorical variables. Cox proportional hazards models were used to ascertain the associations of NAFLD with all-cause or CV mortality in lean individuals while adjusting for demographic variables, metabolic components, and comorbidities. The proportional hazards assumption of the Cox models was examined by testing time-dependent covariates (24). All analyses were performed with SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.). Statistical tests were considered significant at P <0.05 (two tailed).

General Characteristics of the Total Cohort

A total of 20,050 NHANES III participants were considered. After inclusion and exclusion criteria, 5,375 subjects were considered the study cohort (Figure 1). Of the study cohort, 581 (10.8%) had NAFLD and 4,794 were considered non-NAFLD control subjects. Compared to lean control subjects, the lean NAFLD group was older, more likely to be Hispanic, had lower income, and had reported poorer health and more comorbidities (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of Participants by NAFLD Status Among Lean Individuals, NHANES III (1988–1994)

CharacteristicsNAll (Weighted) n = 5,375No NAFLD (Weighted) n = 4,794NAFLD (Weighted) n = 581P
Age, years 5,375 42.56 ± 0.60 41.8 ± 0.60 50.92 ± 1.26 <0.0001 
Age, %      
 20–44 years ± 64.23 ± 1.49 66.17 ± 1.52 42.72 ± 3.12 <0.0001 
 45–54 years  11.55 ± 0.72 11.32 ± 0.73 14.11 ± 2.71 0.2677 
 55–64 years  9.22 ± 0.61 8.60 ± 0.64 16.07 ± 2.68 0.0011 
 ≥65 years  15.00 ± 1.12 13.91 ± 1.11 27.10 ± 2.72 <0.0001 
Male, % 5,375 40.80 ± 0.75 39.19 ± 0.86 58.67 ± 3.13 <0.0001 
Race, % 5,375     
 White  79.24 ± 1.44 80.36 ± 1.45 66.78 ± 3.22 <0.0001 
 Black  8.28 ± 0.65 8.33 ± 0.68 7.82 ± 1.05 0.6663 
 Mexican  4.01 ± 0.38 3.82 ± 0.38 6.04 ± 0.76 0.0002 
 Other  8.47 ± 0.96 7.49 ± 0.96 19.36 ± 2.85 <0.0001 
Income (PIR), % 4,925 3.19 ± 0.07 3.23 ± 0.07 2.80 ± 0.16 0.0071 
 Low (PIR <1.3)  17.06 ± 1.27 16.56 ± 1.23 22.77 ± 2.75 0.0024 
 Middle (PIR 1.3 to <3.5)  44.16 ± 1.48 43.74 ± 1.48 48.96 ± 3.50 0.1131 
 High (PIR ≥3.5)  38.78 ± 1.63 39.71 ± 1.63 28.27 ± 3.53 0.0013 
Health, reported, % 5,373     
 Excellent/very good  59.19 ± 1.58 60.72 ± 1.53 42.22 ± 4.04 <0.0001 
 Good  29.05 ± 1.06 28.63 ± 1.11 33.67 ± 2.79 0.0752 
 Fair/poor  11.76 ± 0.80 10.64 ± 0.77 24.11 ± 2.57 <0.0001 
Smoker, % 5,373 32.43 ± 1.09 32.81 ± 1.12 28.29 ± 2.81 0.1218 
Comorbidities, %      
 Diabetes with IR 5,371 1.94 ± 0.24 0.29 ± 0.11 20.28 ± 2.27 <0.0001 
 High cholesterol 5,374 14.99 ± 0.74 13.19 ± 0.74 35.03 ± 2.52 <0.0001 
 Hypertension 5,375 14.78 ± 0.81 13.29 ± 0.80 31.29 ± 2.59 <0.0001 
 Metabolic syndrome 4,724 7.96 ± 0.49 5.32 ± 0.42 43.93 ± 3.59 <0.0001 
 Cancer 5,375 8.26 ± 0.66 8.15 ± 0.65 9.43 ± 2.02 0.4862 
 CKD 5,239 9.08 ± 0.53 8.36 ± 0.56 17.26 ± 2.32 <0.0001 
 CVD 5,375 3.91 ± 0.47 3.36 ± 0.41 10.03 ± 1.59 <0.0001 
Emphysema 5,373 2.36 ± 0.24 2.30 ± 0.25 3.03 ± 0.60 0.1949 
All-cause mortality 5,375 19.81 ± 1.03 17.91 ± 0.93 40.92 ± 3.26 <0.0001 
CV mortality 5,362 4.63 ± 0.44 3.68 ± 0.37 15.13 ± 2.23 <0.0001 
CharacteristicsNAll (Weighted) n = 5,375No NAFLD (Weighted) n = 4,794NAFLD (Weighted) n = 581P
Age, years 5,375 42.56 ± 0.60 41.8 ± 0.60 50.92 ± 1.26 <0.0001 
Age, %      
 20–44 years ± 64.23 ± 1.49 66.17 ± 1.52 42.72 ± 3.12 <0.0001 
 45–54 years  11.55 ± 0.72 11.32 ± 0.73 14.11 ± 2.71 0.2677 
 55–64 years  9.22 ± 0.61 8.60 ± 0.64 16.07 ± 2.68 0.0011 
 ≥65 years  15.00 ± 1.12 13.91 ± 1.11 27.10 ± 2.72 <0.0001 
Male, % 5,375 40.80 ± 0.75 39.19 ± 0.86 58.67 ± 3.13 <0.0001 
Race, % 5,375     
 White  79.24 ± 1.44 80.36 ± 1.45 66.78 ± 3.22 <0.0001 
 Black  8.28 ± 0.65 8.33 ± 0.68 7.82 ± 1.05 0.6663 
 Mexican  4.01 ± 0.38 3.82 ± 0.38 6.04 ± 0.76 0.0002 
 Other  8.47 ± 0.96 7.49 ± 0.96 19.36 ± 2.85 <0.0001 
Income (PIR), % 4,925 3.19 ± 0.07 3.23 ± 0.07 2.80 ± 0.16 0.0071 
 Low (PIR <1.3)  17.06 ± 1.27 16.56 ± 1.23 22.77 ± 2.75 0.0024 
 Middle (PIR 1.3 to <3.5)  44.16 ± 1.48 43.74 ± 1.48 48.96 ± 3.50 0.1131 
 High (PIR ≥3.5)  38.78 ± 1.63 39.71 ± 1.63 28.27 ± 3.53 0.0013 
Health, reported, % 5,373     
 Excellent/very good  59.19 ± 1.58 60.72 ± 1.53 42.22 ± 4.04 <0.0001 
 Good  29.05 ± 1.06 28.63 ± 1.11 33.67 ± 2.79 0.0752 
 Fair/poor  11.76 ± 0.80 10.64 ± 0.77 24.11 ± 2.57 <0.0001 
Smoker, % 5,373 32.43 ± 1.09 32.81 ± 1.12 28.29 ± 2.81 0.1218 
Comorbidities, %      
 Diabetes with IR 5,371 1.94 ± 0.24 0.29 ± 0.11 20.28 ± 2.27 <0.0001 
 High cholesterol 5,374 14.99 ± 0.74 13.19 ± 0.74 35.03 ± 2.52 <0.0001 
 Hypertension 5,375 14.78 ± 0.81 13.29 ± 0.80 31.29 ± 2.59 <0.0001 
 Metabolic syndrome 4,724 7.96 ± 0.49 5.32 ± 0.42 43.93 ± 3.59 <0.0001 
 Cancer 5,375 8.26 ± 0.66 8.15 ± 0.65 9.43 ± 2.02 0.4862 
 CKD 5,239 9.08 ± 0.53 8.36 ± 0.56 17.26 ± 2.32 <0.0001 
 CVD 5,375 3.91 ± 0.47 3.36 ± 0.41 10.03 ± 1.59 <0.0001 
Emphysema 5,373 2.36 ± 0.24 2.30 ± 0.25 3.03 ± 0.60 0.1949 
All-cause mortality 5,375 19.81 ± 1.03 17.91 ± 0.93 40.92 ± 3.26 <0.0001 
CV mortality 5,362 4.63 ± 0.44 3.68 ± 0.37 15.13 ± 2.23 <0.0001 

Data are presented as the mean or percentage ± standard error; N = number of NHANES III participants.

Risks for All-Cause Mortality

For the entire lean cohort, the median follow-up was 229 months, while for the lean NAFLD cohort, it was 214 months. The weighted unadjusted all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the lean NAFLD group than in lean control subjects without NAFLD (40.9 vs. 17.9%, P <0.001). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality in lean NAFLD patients was 2.44 (95% CI 1.77–3.37). Even after adjusting for demographic variables, metabolic components, and primary comorbidities, NAFLD remained independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.25–1.89) (Figure 2). Additionally, older age, male sex, being a smoker, presence of diabetes/IR, having high cholesterol, CKD, CVD, and emphysema were all associated with increased mortality (Table 2).

FIGURE 2.

Adjusted survival curves on Cox proportion hazards model for all-cause mortality among lean individuals, NHANES III (1988–1994). aHR, adjusted HR.

FIGURE 2.

Adjusted survival curves on Cox proportion hazards model for all-cause mortality among lean individuals, NHANES III (1988–1994). aHR, adjusted HR.

Close modal
TABLE 2.

Independent Predictors of All-Cause and CVD Mortality Among Lean Individuals, NHANES III (1988–1994)

All-Cause Mortality HR (95% CI)PCVD mortality HR (95% CI)P
Lean NAFLD 1.54 (1.25–1.89) 0.0002 2.38 (1.50–3.77) 0.0004 
Age, years  <0.0001  <0.0001 
 20–44 Reference  Reference  
 45–54 3.97 (2.51–6.29) <0.0001 4.69 (1.44–15.21) 0.0112 
 55–64 10.85 (7.40–15.91) <0.0001 14.63 (4.46–48.02) <0.0001 
 ≥65 37.29 (26.83–51.81) <0.0001 58.99 (20.24–171.93) <0.0001 
Male 1.43 (1.24–1.65) <0.0001 1.80 (1.42–2.28) <0.0001 
Race  0.0020  0.0356 
 White Reference  Reference  
 Black 1.12 (0.92–1.37) 0.2627 0.81 (0.55–1.20) 0.2824 
 Mexican 0.75 (0.60–0.94) 0.0140 0.49 (0.31–0.78) 0.0034 
 Other 0.59 (0.39–0.88) 0.0107 0.67 (0.32–1.39) 0.2710 
Income (PIR)  0.0001  0.0311 
 Low (PIR <1.3) Reference  Reference  
 Middle (PIR 1.3 to <3.5) 0.68 (0.56–0.83) 0.0003 0.59 (0.38–0.90) 0.0162 
 High (PIR ≥3.5) 0.57 (0.45–0.73) <0.0001 0.55 (0.34–0.88) 0.0149 
Smoker 1.76 (1.48–2.09) <0.0001 1.68 (1.09–2.58) 0.0193 
Comorbidities     
 Diabetes/IR 1.35 (1.04–1.75) 0.0269 1.64 (0.95–2.82) 0.0738 
 Hypertension 0.90 (0.77–1.06) 0.2136 1.05 (0.72–1.55) 0.7872 
 High cholesterol 1.36 (1.11–1.65) 0.0032 1.37 (0.96–1.95) 0.0810 
 Cancer 1.13 (0.93–1.36) 0.2131 1.00 (0.74–1.34) 0.9717 
 CKD 2.05 (1.70–2.46) <0.0001 2.71 (1.97–3.73) <0.0001 
 CVD 1.69 (1.35–2.11) <0.0001 2.76 (2.02–3.77) <0.0001 
 Emphysema 1.93 (1.36–2.75) 0.0004 1.28 (0.68–2.42) 0.4410 
All-Cause Mortality HR (95% CI)PCVD mortality HR (95% CI)P
Lean NAFLD 1.54 (1.25–1.89) 0.0002 2.38 (1.50–3.77) 0.0004 
Age, years  <0.0001  <0.0001 
 20–44 Reference  Reference  
 45–54 3.97 (2.51–6.29) <0.0001 4.69 (1.44–15.21) 0.0112 
 55–64 10.85 (7.40–15.91) <0.0001 14.63 (4.46–48.02) <0.0001 
 ≥65 37.29 (26.83–51.81) <0.0001 58.99 (20.24–171.93) <0.0001 
Male 1.43 (1.24–1.65) <0.0001 1.80 (1.42–2.28) <0.0001 
Race  0.0020  0.0356 
 White Reference  Reference  
 Black 1.12 (0.92–1.37) 0.2627 0.81 (0.55–1.20) 0.2824 
 Mexican 0.75 (0.60–0.94) 0.0140 0.49 (0.31–0.78) 0.0034 
 Other 0.59 (0.39–0.88) 0.0107 0.67 (0.32–1.39) 0.2710 
Income (PIR)  0.0001  0.0311 
 Low (PIR <1.3) Reference  Reference  
 Middle (PIR 1.3 to <3.5) 0.68 (0.56–0.83) 0.0003 0.59 (0.38–0.90) 0.0162 
 High (PIR ≥3.5) 0.57 (0.45–0.73) <0.0001 0.55 (0.34–0.88) 0.0149 
Smoker 1.76 (1.48–2.09) <0.0001 1.68 (1.09–2.58) 0.0193 
Comorbidities     
 Diabetes/IR 1.35 (1.04–1.75) 0.0269 1.64 (0.95–2.82) 0.0738 
 Hypertension 0.90 (0.77–1.06) 0.2136 1.05 (0.72–1.55) 0.7872 
 High cholesterol 1.36 (1.11–1.65) 0.0032 1.37 (0.96–1.95) 0.0810 
 Cancer 1.13 (0.93–1.36) 0.2131 1.00 (0.74–1.34) 0.9717 
 CKD 2.05 (1.70–2.46) <0.0001 2.71 (1.97–3.73) <0.0001 
 CVD 1.69 (1.35–2.11) <0.0001 2.76 (2.02–3.77) <0.0001 
 Emphysema 1.93 (1.36–2.75) 0.0004 1.28 (0.68–2.42) 0.4410 

Risks for CV Mortality

The weighted unadjusted CV mortality was also significantly higher in lean NAFLD subjects than in lean control subjects without NAFLD (15.1 vs. 3.7%, P <0.001) (Table 1). The unadjusted HR for CV morality in the lean NAFLD group was 4.83 (95% CI 3.44–6.79). After adjusting for demographic variables, metabolic components, and primary comorbidities, NAFLD was statistically associated with increased risk of CV mortality (adjusted HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.50–3.77) (Figure 3). Again, older age, male sex, being a smoker, CKD, and CVD were associated with increased CV mortality (Table 2).

FIGURE 3.

Adjusted survival curves on Cox proportion hazards model for cardiovascular mortality among lean individuals, NHANES III (1988–1994). aHR, adjusted HR.

FIGURE 3.

Adjusted survival curves on Cox proportion hazards model for cardiovascular mortality among lean individuals, NHANES III (1988–1994). aHR, adjusted HR.

Close modal

The reciprocal association between NAFLD and obesity has been consistently reported (2531). In this context, most NAFLD subjects are overweight/obese and have other components of metabolic syndrome (3235). Despite this strong association with obesity, there are increasing data that a proportion of subjects with NAFLD are lean (12,36). In the United States, the prevalence of lean NAFLD in the general population has been estimated to be ∼7% (36). In contrast, the prevalence of lean NAFLD is significantly higher in countries such as India and Korea (13,29,30,3745). Although the presence of NAFLD in lean individuals is well documented, the clinical implications of having lean NAFLD are less clear. In a few studies with liver biopsy, significant numbers of these lean NAFLD patients had underlying NASH and advanced fibrosis (4648). Nevertheless, data regarding the long-term mortality outcomes are quite scarce. In one study with 49 months of follow-up, mortality rates were not different between the obese and lean NAFLD patients, with CV events being the most important outcomes (48).

In the context of long-term outcomes, our study highlights a number of important issues. First, compared with lean controls, lean NAFLD patients had significantly higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, and IR. This indicates that presence of fatty liver is a surrogate for underlying metabolic abnormality, even in the absence of obesity. Furthermore, the prevalence of CV conditions, which are the major cause of mortality among patients with NAFLD, was significantly higher in the lean NAFLD group than in lean control subjects. In these contexts, our findings are in agreement with previously published data about lean NAFLD (2931). Although the prevalence of these metabolic conditions is higher in the lean NAFLD patients than in the lean control subjects, it has previously been shown that these rates are still lower than the rates for obese NAFLD patients (36). In this context, it is plausible that there is spectrum of metabolic abnormality, with obese NAFLD subjects having the most abnormal metabolic profile, whereas lean control subjects without NAFLD have the best metabolic profile, and lean individuals with NAFLD fall somewhere in between (29,31,32,36). This indicates that although the exact prevalence rates of lean NAFLD may vary according to the geographic areas of the world, most lean NAFLD subjects will have some degree of metabolic abnormality.

The most important aspect of our study was the long-term outcomes of patients with lean NAFLD. In this study, we show that even after controlling for all important confounders, having lean NAFLD is associated with both increased overall mortality and CV mortality. These data indicate that NAFLD in lean individuals is independently associated with mortality, especially from the CV causes. These data have important implications with documentation of fatty liver, which by itself independently increases the risk of CV mortality and overall mortality. These individuals should be counseled about the risk, and lean NAFLD should be considered like any other risk for adverse CV outcomes and managed accordingly.

This study does have some limitations. First, we used ION and its validation by ultrasound as the diagnostic strategy for NAFLD. It is possible that some patients with NAFLD were not picked up by ultrasound or ION, which underestimates the true impact of NAFLD in the lean population. Additionally, CVD history was obtained from self-reported medical history in the NHANES studies, which could cause a reliability issue in the absence of qualitative and quantitative data. Similarly, alcohol consumption was determined by self-report, which has moderate reliability in active drinkers and high reliability among nondrinkers.

In conclusion, this study revealed that lean individuals with NAFLD have metabolic abnormality as documented by higher rates of components of metabolic syndrome, which, in turn, puts them at increased risk for CV and all-cause mortality. In this context, the presence of fatty liver should prompt clinicians to address metabolic conditions that may potentially modify the long-term outcomes in these individuals, regardless of their body weight.

Duality of Interest

Z.M.Y. is a consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, AbbVie, Intercept, and GlaxoSmithKline. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions

P.G., N.F., C.T.L., and L.d.A. participated in the study design and helped with the interpretation of the data and drafting of the manuscript. J.P. performed the statistical analysis and helped with the interpretation of the data. Z.M.Y. conceived of the study, participated substantially in its design and coordination, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Z.M.Y. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

1.
Younossi
Z
,
Anstee
QM
,
Marietti
M
, et al
Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention
.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
2018
;
15
:
11
20
2.
Chalasani
N
,
Younossi
Z
,
Lavine
JE
, et al
The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
.
Hepatology
2018
;
67
:
328
357
3.
Estes
C
,
Razavi
H
,
Loomba
R
,
Younossi
Z
,
Sanyal
AJ
.
Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease
.
Hepatology
2018
;
67
:
123
133
4.
Younossi
ZM
,
Blissett
D
,
Blissett
R
, et al
The economic and clinical burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the United States and Europe
.
Hepatology
2016
;
64
:
1577
1586
5.
Wong
RJ
,
Aguilar
M
,
Cheung
R
, et al
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the United States
.
Gastroenterology
2015
;
148
:
547
555
6.
Golabi
P
,
Otgonsuren
M
,
Cable
R
, et al
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with impairment of health related quality of life (HRQOL)
.
Health Qual Life Outcomes
2016
;
14
:
18
7.
Perumpail
RB
,
Liu
A
,
Wong
RJ
,
Ahmed
A
,
Harrison
SA
.
Pathogenesis of hepatocarcinogenesis in non-cirrhotic nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: potential mechanistic pathways
.
World J Hepatol
2015
;
7
:
2384
2388
8.
Younossi
ZM
,
Koenig
AB
,
Abdelatif
D
,
Fazel
Y
,
Henry
L
,
Wymer
M
.
Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes
.
Hepatology
2016
;
64
:
73
84
9.
Mishra
A
,
Younossi
ZM
.
Epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
.
J Clin Exp Hepatol
2012
;
2
:
135
144
10.
Vernon
G
,
Baranova
A
,
Younossi
ZM
.
Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults
.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
2011
;
34
:
274
285
11.
Younossi
ZM
,
Stepanova
M
,
Negro
F
, et al
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in lean individuals in the United States
.
Medicine
2012
;
91
:
319
327
12.
Younossi
ZM
.
Long-term outcomes of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis to nonalcoholic steatofibrosis
.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
2017
;
15
:
1144
1147
13.
Margariti
E
,
Deutsch
M
,
Manolakopoulos
S
,
Papatheodoridis
GV
.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease may develop in individuals with normal body mass index
.
Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol
2012
;
25
:
45
51
14.
Stepanova
M
,
Rafiq
N
,
Makhlouf
H
, et al
Predictors of all-cause mortality and liver-related mortality in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
.
Dig Dis Sci
2013
;
58
:
3017
3023
15.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
.
Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94 [Internet], Vital Health Stat 1(32), 1994. Available from www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_01/sr01_032.pdf. Accessed 16 October 2017
16.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data, Analytic and reporting guidelines [Internet], 2016
.
17.
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology
.
AACE/ACE Guidelines: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan [Internet], 2015
.
Available from https://www.aace.com/files/dm-guidelines-ccp.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2018
18.
American Heart Association
.
Conditions–high blood pressure [Internet]
.
19.
Inker
LA
,
Schmid
CH
,
Tighiouart
H
, et al
Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C
.
N Engl J Med
2012
;
367
:
20
29
20.
Otgonsuren
M
,
Estep
MJ
,
Hossain
N
, et al
Single non-invasive model to diagnose non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)
.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
2014
;
29
:
2006
2013
21.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
,
Office of Analysis and Epidemiology. NCHS 2011 Linked Mortality Files Matching Methodology [Internet], September 2013
.
22.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
.
NCHS 2011 Linked Morality Files, Public-Use Data Dictionary [Internet], 2015
.
23.
Wolter
KM
.
Taylor series methods. In Introduction to Variance Estimation
. 2nd ed.
New York
,
Springer
,
2007
, p.
226
271
24.
Allison
PD
.
Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide
.
Cary, NC
,
SAS Institute
,
1995
25.
Portillo-Sanchez
P
,
Bril
F
,
Maximos
M
, et al
High prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and normal plasma aminotransferase levels
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2015
;
100
:
2231
2238
26.
Del Ben
M
,
Polimeni
L
,
Baratta
F
,
Pastori
D
,
Loffredo
L
,
Angelico
F
.
Modern approach to the clinical management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
.
World J Gastroenterol
2014
;
20
:
8341
8350
27.
Katsiki
N
,
Mikhailidis
DP
,
Mantzoros
CS
.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and dyslipidemia: an update
.
Metabolism
2016
;
65
:
1109
1123
28.
Byrne
CD
,
Targher
G
.
NAFLD: a multisystem disease
.
J Hepatol
2015
;
62
:
S47
64
29.
Feng
R-N
,
Du
S-S
,
Wang
C
, et al
Lean-non-alcoholic fatty liver disease increases risk for metabolic disorders in a normal weight Chinese population
.
World J Gastroenterol
2014
;
20
:
17932
17940
30.
Kim
HJ
,
Kim
HJ
,
Lee
KE
, et al
Metabolic significance of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in nonobese, nondiabetic adults
.
Arch Intern Med
2004
;
164
:
2169
2175
31.
Kumar
R
,
Rastogi
A
,
Sharma
MK
, et al
Clinicopathological characteristics and metabolic profiles of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Indian patients with normal body mass index: do they differ from obese or overweight non-alcoholic fatty liver disease?
Indian J Endocrinol Metab
2013
;
17
:
665
671
32.
Yki-Järvinen
H
.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a cause and a consequence of metabolic syndrome
.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
2014
;
2
:
901
910
33.
Fazel
Y
,
Koenig
AB
,
Sayiner
M
,
Goodman
ZD
,
Younossi
ZM
.
Epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
.
Metabolism
2016
;
65
:
1017
1025
34.
Wainwright
P
,
Byrne
CD
.
Bidirectional relationships and disconnects between NAFLD and features of the metabolic syndrome
.
Int J Mol Sci
2016
;
17
:
367
35.
Sayiner
M
,
Koenig
A
,
Henry
L
,
Younossi
ZM
.
Epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States and the rest of the world
.
Clin Liver Dis
2016
;
20
:
205
214
36.
Younossi
ZM
,
Loomba
R
,
Anstee
QM
, et al
Diagnostic modalities for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and associated fibrosis
.
Hepatology
2018
;
68
:
349
360
37.
Younossi
ZM
,
Loomba
R
,
Rinella
ME
, et al
Current and future therapeutic regimens for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
.
Hepatology
2018
;
68
:
361
371
38.
Das
K
,
Das
K
,
Mukherjee
PS
, et al
Nonobese population in a developing country has a high prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver and significant liver disease
.
Hepatology
2010
;
51
:
1593
1602
39.
Bhat
G
,
Baba
CS
,
Pandey
A
,
Kumari
N
,
Choudhuri
G
.
Insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome in nonobese Indian patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
.
Trop Gastroenterol
2013
;
34
:
18
24
40.
Nishioji
K
,
Sumida
Y
,
Kamaguchi
M
, et al
Prevalence of and risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a non-obese Japanese population, 2011–2012
.
J Gastroenterol
2015
;
50
:
95
108
41.
Kim
NH
,
Kim
JH
,
Kim
YJ
, et al
Clinical and metabolic factors associated with development and regression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in nonobese subjects
.
Liver Int
2014
;
34
:
604
611
42.
Omagari
K
,
Kadokawa
Y
,
Masuda
J-I
, et al
Fatty liver in non-alcoholic non-overweight Japanese adults: incidence and clinical characteristics
.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
2002
;
17
:
1098
1105
43.
Kwon
Y-M
,
Oh
S-W
,
Hwang
S-S
,
Lee
C
,
Kwon
H
,
Chung
GE
.
Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with components of metabolic syndrome according to body mass index in Korean adults
.
Am J Gastroenterol
2012
;
107
:
1852
1858
44.
Vos
B
,
Moreno
C
,
Nagy
N
, et al
Lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (Lean-NAFLD): a major cause of cryptogenic liver disease
.
Acta Gastroenterol Belg
2011
;
74
:
389
394
45.
Cho
HC
.
Prevalence and factors associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a nonobese Korean population
.
Gut Liver
2016
;
10
:
117
125
46.
Conus
F
,
Rabasa-Lhoret
R
,
Péronnet
F
.
Characteristics of metabolically obese normal-weight (MONW) subjects
.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab
2007
;
32
:
4
12
47.
Fracanzani
AL
,
Valenti
L
,
Bugianesi
E
, et al
Risk of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and low visceral adiposity
.
J Hepatol
2011
;
54
:
1244
1249
48.
Leung
JC-F
,
Loong
TC-W
,
Wei
JL
, et al
Histological severity and clinical outcomes of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in nonobese patients
.
Hepatology
2017
;
65
:
54
64
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 for details.