Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most prevalent complications of diabetes and affects the quality of life of many individuals (1). In addition to markedly decreasing quality of life, diabetic neuropathy causes pain, burning, tingling, and leg and foot cramps (2,3). Relieving neuropathy pain through the use of pharmacological agents has been shown to improve quality of life (4). There are no global pharmacotherapies to prevent the development of diabetic neuropathy, and, the mainstays of treatment remain optimizing glycemic control and controlling symptoms (2).

Nerve growth factor (NGF), a neurotrophic factor, is an endogenous protein that encourages neuron survival of definite populations, encourages morphological differentiation, and adjusts neuronal gene expression in many ways. Additionally, NGF can compensate for the loss of activity of neurons resulting from disease progression and could stimulate nerve regeneration (5).

Many drugs are used for symptomatic treatment of diabetic neuropathy, including gabapentin, anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, and topical agents (6). Vitamin B complex is a widely used treatment of diabetic neuropathy. This use is supported by its affordability and its potential to promote nerve regeneration and reduce neurodegeneration (7). Moreover, it has been proven effective in reducing pain intensity and improving quality of life (6).

Carnosine is a naturally occurring endogenous chemical that has received much research in recent years owing to its potentially beneficial effects on human health (8). Carnosine (β-alanyl-l-histidine) is an endogenous peptide found in the brain, muscles, and other tissues (9). It plays roles as an antioxidant, antiglycation agent, metal chelator, and hydroxyl radical scavenger and has been found to have neuroprotective effects against neurodegenerative diseases (10). Carnosine has been shown to prevent various diseases, including diabetes, cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease. It is considered an anti-aging supplement that can preserve cognitive function in elderly people and activate glial cells in the brain, causing them to secrete neurotrophins, including NGF (11).

We conducted a story to assess the effect of carnosine as an adjuvant therapy with vitamin B complex on NGF levels, as well as its effect on nerve conduction and Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) scores.

This was a 12-month, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial that was carried out at the outpatient diabetes and endocrinology clinic of Ain Shams University Hospital from February 2021 to February 2022.

Study Participants

Sixty patients with type 2 diabetes complicated with diabetic neuropathy who matched the inclusion criteria were selected from among the clinic’s regular patients and enrolled in the study. The study protocol was accepted by the Ethical Committee of Beni Suef University (REC-H-PhBSU-21004), and the study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05422352). Informed consent was obtained from all participants at the start of the study. Reporting of the study follows the recommendations of the 2010 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (12).

Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes according to American Diabetes Association criteria (13), diabetic neuropathy, age 50–85 years, disease duration ≥5 years, and taking oral antidiabetic therapy. Active diabetic neuropathy with abnormal nerve conduction readings is sufficient to define diabetic neuropathy, according to the American Academy of Neurology, in addition to the simplified short protocol of the American Academy of Neuro-electrophysiological Medicine (14).

Exclusion criteria included nondiabetic neuropathy caused by exposure to organochlorine pesticides; medications such as sulfa drugs, corticosteroids, and cisplatin; and neurological illnesses such as Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, and malignancy. Additional exclusion criteria were chronic diseases such as hypothyroidism, renal disease, hepatic disease, or HIV; any chronic infection; or medications that could affect the study results, such as aldose reductase inhibitors, mexiletine, antidepressants, opiates, capsaicin, neuroleptics, antioxidants, and especially methyl cobalamin, anticonvulsants, pyridoxine, or other vitamin B complex preparations. Also, individuals who had a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 or were pregnant or breastfeeding were not eligible.

Patient Classification

Comprehensive medical histories were taken and physical examinations were performed on all subjects. The examination specifically assessed the age of diabetes onset, disease duration, and presence of chronic diabetes complications, with a particular focus on diabetic neuropathy. Any adverse effects associated with medication administration were also documented. Anthropometric data were collected, and BMIs were calculated. Blood pressure was measured using a mercury sphygmomanometer after a 5-minute resting period in the seated position.

A total of 100 individuals with diabetic neuropathy were assessed for eligibility; of them, 25 did not meet inclusion criteria, 5 declined to participate, and 10 were excluded. Sixty patients were therefore randomized equally into one of two groups based on the therapy they received and followed for 3 months.

Group 1 included 30 individuals who received carnosine capsules in combination with vitamin B complex capsules for 12 weeks. White oval-shaped hard carnosine capsules (15) contained 500 mg of β-alanyl-l-histidine taken orally twice daily. Inactive ingredients included cellulose (for the capsule), as well as magnesium stearate and stearic acid, both from vegetable sources. Vitamin B complex capsules contained vitamins B1 (150 mg), B6 (100 mg), and B12 (1 mg) (Neurovit, European Egyptian Pharmaceutical Industries, Alexandria, Egypt) and were taken twice daily.

Group 2 included 30 patients who received only the vitamin B complex capsules with the same formula described above twice daily for 12 weeks.

Assessment of Diabetic Neuropathy

All patients completed a questionnaire comprising the 15 yes/no questions of the MNSI before the study began and again at its end. Thirteen of these questions assessed diabetic neuropathy symptoms, one assessed peripheral vascular disease, and one assessed general asthenia. Physical examination assessed the appearance of the feet (deformities, dry skin, callus, infection, and fissure), ulceration of the feet, ankle reflexes, vibration perception at the great toe, and monofilament. The MNSI score directly correlates with the severity of neuropathy. This applies to both the questionnaire and physical examination components of the questionnaire (16). Positive (pain, tingling, and temperature feeling) and negative (numbness) sensory complaints, muscular weakness and cramping, foot ulcers or cracks, and amputation were all covered in the questionnaire (17). All questions were scored as 0 for a negative response or 1 for a positive response (negative replies on items 7 and 13 counted as one point). Diabetic neuropathy was confirmed with seven or more affirmative replies on the MNSI questionnaire (17). Arabic translation of the questionnaire was done by Trjim.com for translation in Cairo and revised by a consultant neurologist. The difference in MNSI score from baseline to 12 weeks was used to assess the effectiveness of the therapy.

Both groups of patients underwent nerve conduction studies (NCSs) in left and right lower limbs using the Nihon Kohden X1 MEB-2300 device. In the common peroneal and posterior tibial nerves, motor nerve conduction characteristics such as compound muscle action potential amplitudes, distal latency, and motor conduction velocity were assessed. Peak latency and amplitude of sensory nerve action potential were measured as part of sensory conduction research. To establish enough uniformity in the experimental protocol, all participants’ stimulation and recording conditions were kept consistent. According to the criteria shown in Table 1, changes in NCS results from baseline in week 12 were regarded as an improvement in diabetic neuropathy.

Table 1

Reference Values for Improvement in NCS Results

Nerve TypeNerve Conduction PropertiesReference Value
Motor nerves Amplitude ≥3 mV 
Latency ≥0.5 ms 
Conduction velocity ≥40 ms 
Sensory nerves Amplitude ≥10 mV 
Latency ≥0.5 ms 
Conduction velocity ≥40 ms 
Nerve TypeNerve Conduction PropertiesReference Value
Motor nerves Amplitude ≥3 mV 
Latency ≥0.5 ms 
Conduction velocity ≥40 ms 
Sensory nerves Amplitude ≥10 mV 
Latency ≥0.5 ms 
Conduction velocity ≥40 ms 

Neurological assessments were performed by a qualified and certified neurologist who was not aware of patients’ randomization throughout clinical examinations and conduction of the NCSs.

Collection of Samples and Laboratory Analysis

Peripheral blood samples were obtained in sterile vacutainer tubes containing potassium-ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (final concentration 1.5 mg/mL) for A1C determination. For biochemical examination, clotted blood samples of NGF were obtained, and the serum was separated by centrifugation at 1,000 RPM for 15 minutes. The serum was kept at 80°C until it was used. Blood was collected at the beginning of the study (day 0) and at 12 weeks. Patients were free of any potentially interfering or confounding factors such as fever or infections at the time of blood collection. FBG level, fasting lipid profile, and serum creatinine were estimated using Cobas Integra 800 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). To assess the regulation of growth, maintenance, and proliferation of neurons, a human NGF enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit was provided by the bioassay technology laboratory (Shanghai Crystal Day Biotech Co.), according to manufacturer instructions.

Follow-Up and End Points

It was reported in previous studies that the appropriate interval of carnosine treatment was 3 months (18), and this time period was used to reveal the maximum effect of carnosine as add-on therapy to vitamin B complex on NGF levels, MNSI score, and NCS results. All patients were thoroughly and clinically followed up monthly during the study duration for assessment of effects and compliance with both vitamin B complex and carnosine treatment and for monitoring of adverse effects. Assessment of compliance with treatment was based on the amount of dispensed and returned capsules. According to the literature, noncompliance was defined as taking <80% of the study medicine or of the vitamin B complex.

Statistical Analysis

Data were gathered, reviewed, and entered into IBM SPSS, v. 23, statistical software. Quantitative data were presented as mean ± SD and ranges when found to be parametric and median with interquartile range (IQR) when found to be nonparametric. Qualitative variables were presented as numbers and percentages.

Comparisons between groups on qualitative variables were done by using the χ2 test. Comparisons between groups on quantitative data with parametric distribution were done using an independent t test, whereas the comparison between groups on quantitative data with nonparametric distribution was done by using a Mann-Whitney U test. Comparisons between two paired groups on quantitative data with parametric distribution were done using a paired t test, and comparisons between two paired groups on quantitative data with nonparametric distribution were done using a Wilcoxon test. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between two quantitative parameters in the same group. The CI was set to 95%, and the margin of error accepted was set to 5%. P values <0.05 were considered significant, and those <0.01 were highly significant.

Demographic Parameters

There were no significant differences in baseline demographic and laboratory characteristics of the two groups, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Between-Group Comparisons of Baseline Demographics, Laboratory Parameters, MNSI Scores, and NCS Results

VariableGroup 1 (n = 30)Group 2 (n = 30)P
Age, years 70.33 ± 9.38 (51–84) 70.50 ± 9.43 (50–84) 0.946 
Sex   1.000 
 Female 23 (76.7) 23 (76.7)  
 Male 7 (23.3) 7 (23.3)  
Disease duration, years 16.97 ± 7.25 (5–30) 17.17 ± 7.09 (7–31) 0.914 
Weight, kg 81.43 ± 10.51 (69–102) 81.57 ± 10.78 (69–105) 0.961 
Height, cm 157.25 ± 40.11 (15–189) 162.93 ± 29.78 (15–190) 0.536 
BMI, kg/m2 29.48 ± 4.48 (21.6–40) 29.17 ± 4.29 (21.6–37.5) 0.783 
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 127.17 ± 10.80 (110–150) 125.93 ± 11.18 (110–150) 0.666 
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 79.17 ± 5.43 (70–90) 80.00 ± 6.43 (70–90) 0.590 
FBG, mg/dL 148.63 ± 48.99 (74–255) 153.53 ± 47.02 (100–255) 0.694 
A1C, % 7.24 ± 0.94 (5.8–9.4) 7.33 ± 0.98 (5.8–9.4) 0.718 
NGF, pg/mL 99.83 ± 32.89 (50–160) 99.87 ± 32.61 (50–160) 0.997 
MNSI score 7.87 ± 1.11 (7–11) 8.07 ± 1.20 (7–12) 0.505 
NCS results 
Motor nerves    
 Latency, ms 5.90 ± 3.33 (3.1–13.3) 4.57 ± 2.25 (2.1–12.1) 0.075 
 Amplitude, mV 3.17 ± 2.19 (0.9–6.8) 3.56 ± 1.93 (1.1–8.5) 0.208 
 Conduction velocity, ms 41.52 ± 7.22 (13.7–53.9) 39.00 ± 7.83 (21–52) 0.200 
Sensory nerves    
 Latency, ms 4.36 ± 1.19 (1.8–6.5) 4.35 ± 1.17 (1.9–6.6) 0.983 
 Amplitude, mV 5.04 ± 4.02 (1–13.6) 3.64 ± 2.39 (0.9–9.6) 0.366 
VariableGroup 1 (n = 30)Group 2 (n = 30)P
Age, years 70.33 ± 9.38 (51–84) 70.50 ± 9.43 (50–84) 0.946 
Sex   1.000 
 Female 23 (76.7) 23 (76.7)  
 Male 7 (23.3) 7 (23.3)  
Disease duration, years 16.97 ± 7.25 (5–30) 17.17 ± 7.09 (7–31) 0.914 
Weight, kg 81.43 ± 10.51 (69–102) 81.57 ± 10.78 (69–105) 0.961 
Height, cm 157.25 ± 40.11 (15–189) 162.93 ± 29.78 (15–190) 0.536 
BMI, kg/m2 29.48 ± 4.48 (21.6–40) 29.17 ± 4.29 (21.6–37.5) 0.783 
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 127.17 ± 10.80 (110–150) 125.93 ± 11.18 (110–150) 0.666 
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 79.17 ± 5.43 (70–90) 80.00 ± 6.43 (70–90) 0.590 
FBG, mg/dL 148.63 ± 48.99 (74–255) 153.53 ± 47.02 (100–255) 0.694 
A1C, % 7.24 ± 0.94 (5.8–9.4) 7.33 ± 0.98 (5.8–9.4) 0.718 
NGF, pg/mL 99.83 ± 32.89 (50–160) 99.87 ± 32.61 (50–160) 0.997 
MNSI score 7.87 ± 1.11 (7–11) 8.07 ± 1.20 (7–12) 0.505 
NCS results 
Motor nerves    
 Latency, ms 5.90 ± 3.33 (3.1–13.3) 4.57 ± 2.25 (2.1–12.1) 0.075 
 Amplitude, mV 3.17 ± 2.19 (0.9–6.8) 3.56 ± 1.93 (1.1–8.5) 0.208 
 Conduction velocity, ms 41.52 ± 7.22 (13.7–53.9) 39.00 ± 7.83 (21–52) 0.200 
Sensory nerves    
 Latency, ms 4.36 ± 1.19 (1.8–6.5) 4.35 ± 1.17 (1.9–6.6) 0.983 
 Amplitude, mV 5.04 ± 4.02 (1–13.6) 3.64 ± 2.39 (0.9–9.6) 0.366 

Data are mean ± SD (range), compared using Student t tests, or n (%), compared using a χ2 test.

Effect of Carnosine Supplementation as Add-On to Vitamin B Complex on Diabetic Neuropathy

The MNSI questionnaire was used as a subjective assessment of progress. There was a significant difference in MNSI score after 12 weeks of supplementation with carnosine in the treatment group (P < 0.01), as shown in Figure 1A and Table 3. In contrast, no difference in scores was found in the control group from baseline (8.07 ± 1.20) to 12 weeks (8.37 ± 1.22) (P = 0.071).

Figure 1

Comparison between group 1 baseline and 12-week results for MNSI score (A) and NGF (B).

Figure 1

Comparison between group 1 baseline and 12-week results for MNSI score (A) and NGF (B).

Close modal
Table 3

Between-Groups Comparison of NGF, MNSI Score, and NCS Results at 12 Weeks

VariableGroup 1 (n = 30)Group 2 (n = 30)P
NGF, pg/mL 557.33 ± 316.84 (160–1,400) 103.20 ± 39.33 (46–210) 0.000 
MNSI score 4.53 ± 1.50 (2–7) 8.37 ± 1.22 (6–11) 0.000 
Changes in NCS results 
Motor nerves: peroneal nerve    
 Latency   0.000 
  No change 8 (26.7) 26 (86.7)  
  Improved 22 (73.3) 1 (3.3)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 3 (10.0)  
 Amplitude   0.039 
  No change 22 (73.3) 25 (83.3)  
  Improved 7 (23.3) 1 (3.3)  
  Worsened 1 (3.3) 4 (13.3)  
 Conduction velocity   0.002 
  No change 21 (70.0) 27 (90.0)  
  Improved 9 (30.0) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 3 (10.0)  
Motor nerves: tibial nerve    
 Latency   0.000 
  No change 6 (20.0) 27 (90.0)  
  Improved 24 (80.0) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 3 (10.0)  
 Amplitude   0.014 
  No change 22 (73.3) 27 (90.0)  
  Improved 7 (23.3) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 1 (3.3) 3 (10.0)  
 Conduction velocity   0.002 
  No change 21 (70.0) 28 (93.3)  
  Improved 9 (30.0) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 2 (6.7)  
Sensory nerves: sural nerve    
 Latency   0.000 
  No change 15 (50.0) 26 (86.7)  
  Improved 15 (50.0) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 4 (13.3)  
 Amplitude   0.001 
  No change 20 (66.7) 26 (86.7)  
  Improved 10 (33.3) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 4 (13.3)  
VariableGroup 1 (n = 30)Group 2 (n = 30)P
NGF, pg/mL 557.33 ± 316.84 (160–1,400) 103.20 ± 39.33 (46–210) 0.000 
MNSI score 4.53 ± 1.50 (2–7) 8.37 ± 1.22 (6–11) 0.000 
Changes in NCS results 
Motor nerves: peroneal nerve    
 Latency   0.000 
  No change 8 (26.7) 26 (86.7)  
  Improved 22 (73.3) 1 (3.3)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 3 (10.0)  
 Amplitude   0.039 
  No change 22 (73.3) 25 (83.3)  
  Improved 7 (23.3) 1 (3.3)  
  Worsened 1 (3.3) 4 (13.3)  
 Conduction velocity   0.002 
  No change 21 (70.0) 27 (90.0)  
  Improved 9 (30.0) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 3 (10.0)  
Motor nerves: tibial nerve    
 Latency   0.000 
  No change 6 (20.0) 27 (90.0)  
  Improved 24 (80.0) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 3 (10.0)  
 Amplitude   0.014 
  No change 22 (73.3) 27 (90.0)  
  Improved 7 (23.3) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 1 (3.3) 3 (10.0)  
 Conduction velocity   0.002 
  No change 21 (70.0) 28 (93.3)  
  Improved 9 (30.0) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 2 (6.7)  
Sensory nerves: sural nerve    
 Latency   0.000 
  No change 15 (50.0) 26 (86.7)  
  Improved 15 (50.0) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 4 (13.3)  
 Amplitude   0.001 
  No change 20 (66.7) 26 (86.7)  
  Improved 10 (33.3) 0 (0.0)  
  Worsened 0 (0.0) 4 (13.3)  

Data are mean ± SD (range), compared using Student t tests, or n (%), compared using χ2 tests.

Effect of Supplementation on Nerve Growth and the Promotion of Neuronal Reestablishment

After 12 weeks of carnosine and vitamin B complex treatment, supplementation showed a significant increase in NGF levels in the carnosine group and alternatively no significant difference in levels of NGF in the control group between baseline and 12 weeks (Figure 1B and Table 3).

Effect of Supplementation on Nerve Conduction

The assessment of electrophysiological nerve conduction showed a significant change in the latency and conduction velocity and amplitude of sensory nerves and motor nerves after 12 weeks of supplementation of carnosine plus vitamin B complex compared with group 2, who received vitamin B complex only (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Between-group comparison at 12 weeks of nerve conduction (A) and sensory nerves (B).

Figure 2

Between-group comparison at 12 weeks of nerve conduction (A) and sensory nerves (B).

Close modal

Correlation Between NGF and MNSI Score

NGF and MNSI scores were tested for association with other studied variables in patients with diabetic neuropathy. A negative correlation was found between NGF and MNSI (r = −0.472, P = 0.009).

Diabetic neuropathy is highly prevalent around the world and has devastating consequences, with major impacts on quality of life and morbidity. About one-third of all people with diabetes suffer from diabetic neuropathy. There are no approved pharmacotherapies for the prevention of diabetic neuropathy (2).

In diabetic neuropathy, both large myelinated fibers and small, thinly myelinated fibers are involved. Diabetes neuronal abnormalities can be caused by experimental reduction of particular neurotrophic factors, their receptors, or their binding protein. In experimental diabetes models, there is a decrease in the obtainability of these growth factors, which may result in metabolic abnormalities or may be independent of glycemic control. These neurotrophic factors are crucial for neuronal maintenance, apoptosis resistance, and regeneration potential (19).

Increasing evidence suggests that the accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) plays a major role in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy (20). It has been postulated that AGE-modified peripheral nerve myelin is susceptible to macrophage phagocytosis, which induces macrophages to release protease, which in turn may help demyelination in diabetic neuropathy (21).

There is also increasing evidence of NGF deficiency in diabetes. NGF plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy, and increasing its levels may help to prevent the progression of diabetic neuropathy (5). Low NGF levels in diabetes might be the result of decreased NGF synthesis, transport, or both, most likely as a consequence of glucose-induced oxidative stress.

In the current study, the supplementation effect of carnosine together with vitamin B complex compared with vitamin B complex alone was evaluated and showed a significant improvement in NGF levels after 12 weeks of follow-up. Previous studies have shown that carnosine may stimulate neuronal cells by increasing neurotrophin synthesis in glial cells (22). Other studies have shown the effect of carnosine in the prevention of diabetes complications, mainly diabetic nephropathy, and in decreasing the oxidative stress that usually accompanies diabetes (23).

Carnosine is considered an ideal antioxidant with unique properties such as being nontoxic, water soluble, and heat inactive; additionally, it is a nutrient with neuroprotective properties (10). Carnosine has been found to prevent the formation of AGEs by reducing blood glucose levels, thereby preventing early glycation and even reversing previously formed AGEs (24). Moreover, carnosine can inhibit the oligomerization of proteins that play an important role in the degeneration of neurons in many neurodegenerative illnesses (e.g., Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases) (25). Additionally, the results of the current study showed a significant reduction in MNSI score, which is considered a noninvasive method of measuring improvement in diabetic neuropathy. Patients experienced relief in burning sensations and touch sensitivity, fewer leg cramps, and a reduced worsening of symptoms at night. These findings were in line with a previous study, in which carnosine was found to improve diabetic neuropathy, particularly abnormal sensory perception (25).

The current study used NCSs as a parameter to assess the function of both motor and sensory peripheral nerves. We found a significant improvement in latency and conduction velocity for both sensory and motor nerves and a significant improvement in the amplitude of sensory nerves. Previous studies have shown improvement in autonomic and somatic symptoms with a decrease in the signs of diabetic neuropathy after supplementation of methylcobalamin (26). To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to confirm the ability of carnosine in combination with vitamin B complex to alleviate symptoms of diabetic neuropathy as assessed with NCSs.

One limitation of this study is its small sample size. Thus, larger, multicenter randomized trials will be needed to confirm our findings of the effects of carnosine supplementation in diabetic neuropathy and NCS results for extended periods of time.

NGF plays a role in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy, and supplementation of carnosine in combination with vitamin B complex was found to enhance NGF levels and to improve diabetic neuropathy symptoms as assessed by the MNSI and NCSs.

Duality of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions

M.H.H. conceived of and implemented the study and contributed to its design; conducted the practical work of the research, including recruiting patients, collecting samples, and administering questionnaires; and wrote the manuscript. H.F.S. supervised the development of the manuscript. H.E.D.M.A. supervised the practical work and contributed to the study design. N.A.I. participated in the practical work of the study and revised the manuscript. H.R. contributed to the study design and revised the manuscript. M.H.H. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

1.
Sadosky
A
,
Schaefer
C
,
Mann
R
, et al
.
Burden of illness associated with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy among adults seeking treatment in the US: results from a retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey
.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes
2013
;
6
:
79
92
2.
Alam
U
,
Sloan
G
,
Tesfaye
S.
Treating pain in diabetic neuropathy: current and developmental drugs
.
Drugs
2020
;
80
:
363
384
3.
Alam
U
,
Fawwad
A
,
Shaheen
F
,
Tahir
B
,
Basit
A
,
Malik
RA.
Improvement in neuropathy specific quality of life in patients with diabetes after vitamin D supplementation
.
J Diabetes Res
2017
;
2017
:
7928083
4.
Backonja
MM.
Gabapentin monotherapy for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with diabetes mellitus
.
Epilepsia
1999
;
40
(
Suppl. 6
):
S57
S59
5.
Apfel
SC.
Nerve growth factor for the treatment of diabetic neuropathy: what went wrong, what went right, and what does the future hold?
Int Rev Neurobiol
2002
;
50
:
393
413
6.
Girach
A
,
Julian
TH
,
Varrassi
G
,
Paladini
A
,
Vadalouka
A
,
Zis
P.
Quality of life in painful peripheral neuropathies: a systematic review
.
Pain Res Manag
2019
;
2019
:
2091960
7.
Altun
I
,
Kurutaş
EB.
Vitamin B complex and vitamin B12 levels after peripheral nerve injury
.
Neural Regen Res
2016
;
11
:
842
845
8.
Solana-Manrique
C
,
Sanz
FJ
,
Martínez-Carrión
G
,
Paricio
N.
Antioxidant and neuroprotective effects of carnosine: therapeutic implications in neurodegenerative diseases
.
Antioxidants (Basel)
2022
;
11
:
848
9.
Kim
MY
,
Kim
EJ
,
Kim
Y-N
,
Choi
C
,
Lee
B-H.
Effects of α-lipoic acid and L-carnosine supplementation on antioxidant activities and lipid profiles in rats
.
Nutr Res Pract
2011
;
5
:
421
428
10.
Kawahara
M
,
Tanaka
K-I
,
Kato-Negishi
M.
Zinc, carnosine, and neurodegenerative diseases
.
Nutrients
2018
;
10
:
147
11.
Yamashita
S
,
Sato
M
,
Matsumoto
T
, et al
.
Mechanisms of carnosine-induced activation of neuronal cells
.
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem
2018
;
82
:
683
688
12.
Schulz
KF
,
Altman
DG
,
Moher
D;
CONSORT Group
.
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
.
Ann Intern Med
2010
;
152
:
726
732
13.
American Diabetes Association
.
2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020
.
Diabetes Care
2021
;
43
(
Suppl. 1
):S14
S31
14.
England
JD
,
Gronseth
GS
,
Franklin
G
, et al.;
American Academy of
Neurology; American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine; American Academy of
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
.
Distal symmetric polyneuropathy: a definition for clinical research: report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
.
Neurology
2005
;
64
:
199
207
15.
Harris
RC
,
Tallon
MJ
,
Dunnett
M
, et al
.
The absorption of orally supplied beta-alanine and its effect on muscle carnosine synthesis in human vastus lateralis
.
Amino Acids
2006
;
30
:
279
289
16.
Feldman
EL
,
Stevens
MJ
,
Thomas
PK
,
Brown
MB
,
Canal
N
,
Greene
DA.
A practical two-step quantitative clinical and electrophysiological assessment for the diagnosis and staging of diabetic neuropathy
.
Diabetes Care
1994
;
17
:
1281
1289
17.
Herman
WH
,
Pop-Busui
R
,
Braffett
BH
, et al.;
DCCT/EDIC Research Group
.
Use of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument as a measure of distal symmetrical peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes: results from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications
.
Diabet Med
2012
;
29
:
937
944
18.
Regazzoni
L
,
de Courten
B
,
Garzon
D
, et al
.
A carnosine intervention study in overweight human volunteers: bioavailability and reactive carbonyl species sequestering effect
.
Sci Rep
2016
;
6
:
27224
19.
Pittenger
G
,
Vinik
A.
Nerve growth factor and diabetic neuropathy
.
Exp Diabesity Res
2003
;
4
:
271
285
20.
Sugimoto
K
,
Yasujima
M
,
Yagihashi
S.
Role of advanced glycation end products in diabetic neuropathy
.
Curr Pharm Des
2008
;
14
:
953
961
21.
Vlassara
H
,
Brownlee
M
,
Cerami
A.
Recognition and uptake of human diabetic peripheral nerve myelin by macrophages
.
Diabetes
1985
;
34
:
553
557
22.
Elbarbary
NS
,
Ismail
EAR
,
El-Naggar
AR
,
Hamouda
MH
,
El-Hamamsy
M.
The effect of 12 weeks carnosine supplementation on renal functional integrity and oxidative stress in pediatric patients with diabetic nephropathy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial
.
Pediatr Diabetes
2018
;
19
:
470
477
23.
Freund
MA
,
Chen
B
,
Decker
EA.
The inhibition of advanced glycation end products by carnosine and other natural dipeptides to reduce diabetic and age-related complications
.
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf
2018
;
17
:
1367
1378
24.
Villari
V
,
Attanasio
F
,
Micali
N.
Control of the structural stability of α-crystallin under thermal and chemical stress: the role of carnosine
.
J Phys Chem B
2014
;
118
:
13770
13776
25.
Boldyrev
AA
,
Aldini
G
,
Derave
W.
Physiology and pathophysiology of carnosine
.
Physiol Rev
2013
;
93
:
1803
1845
26.
Yaqub
BA
,
Siddique
A
,
Sulimani
R.
Effects of methylcobalamin on diabetic neuropathy
.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
1992
;
94
:
105
111
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/license.