Postheparin plasma hepatic lipase (HL) activity has been shown to correlate with features of the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes in humans. We examined HL postheparin plasma enzyme activity, hepatocyte mRNA, and protein mass in the insulin-resistant, fructose-fed Syrian golden hamster, and the response of the insulin-sensitizing peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ agonist rosiglitazone. Male Syrian golden hamsters were treated for 5 weeks with 1) normal diet (DIET group), 2) 60% fructose diet (FRUC group), or 3) 60% fructose and rosiglitazone (20 mmol · kg−1 · day−1) (FRUC+RSG group). Hepatocyte HL mRNA, protein mass, and postheparin plasma HL activity were increased in FRUC compared with DIET hamsters. FRUC+RSG hamsters had partial normalization of HL mRNA, mass, and activity. There was a shift in the size of LDL particles from large to small in FRUC animals and a shift back to large LDL size in FRUC+RSG. This is the first demonstration that HL hepatocyte mRNA, mass, and plasma enzymatic activity increase concomitantly with induction of an insulin-resistant state and can be partially normalized by treatment with an insulin sensitizer. The increase in HL in insulin-resistant states may play an important role in the typical dyslipidemia of these conditions, and reduction of HL could explain some of the beneficial effects of insulin sensitizers on the plasma lipid profile.

The insulin resistance (or metabolic) syndrome is estimated to affect approximately one-quarter of the North American population (1) and is associated with a high risk for the development of both type 2 diabetes as well as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (2,3). The typical dyslipidemia of insulin-resistant states and type 2 diabetes consists of hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL cholesterol, and small, dense LDL particles and is thought to contribute to the accelerated cardiovascular disease in affected individuals (4,5).

Hepatic lipase (HL), a lipolytic enzyme that is a secreted glycoprotein, is synthesized by hepatocytes and bound to heparan sulfate proteoglycans at the surface of liver sinusoidal capillaries (6). HL shares a number of structural and functional homologies with lipoprotein lipase (LPL) but, unlike LPL, it has significant phospholipase as well as triglyceride lipase activity and is more active than LPL in hydrolyzing the triglycerides and phospholipids of LDL and HDL. The activities of HL and LPL are also differentially regulated (7). HL expression is regulated predominantly by cell cholesterol content (through a sterol response element in its promoter region), steroid and thyroid hormones, and possibly glucose and/or insulin, although in adult humans, HL responsiveness to insulin remains controversial (6,8). Some (9,10), but not all (11), in vitro studies have shown a stimulatory effect of insulin on HL secretion from hepatocytes, and regulation of the HL gene by insulin or insulin resistance has not been conclusively demonstrated (6). Clinical studies in humans, in contrast, have consistently shown correlations between postheparin plasma HL activity and parameters of the insulin resistance (metabolic) syndrome, such as direct measures of insulin resistance, obesity (particularly abdominal type/visceral fat obesity), type 2 diabetes, hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL cholesterol (8,1218), whereas loss of intra-abdominal fat and reduction of insulin resistance have been found to be significantly correlated with a reduction in postheparin HL (19).

HL plays a key role in the metabolism of lipoproteins, affecting their plasma concentrations as well as their physicochemical properties, although there is no consensus as to whether the overall effect of HL is that of pro- or antiatherogenicity (20,21). HL has a major effect on the remodeling of LDL, converting large, buoyant LDL particles to more atherogenic, smaller, more dense lipoprotein particles (20,2225). Because the insulin resistance syndrome is also characterized by the presence of small, dense LDL particles (26,27), the elevation of HL activity in insulin resistance may be implicated in promoting the formation of small, dense LDL particles in insulin-resistant states. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have prospectively examined the molecular regulation of HL in vivo with induction of insulin resistance and subsequent insulin sensitization.

We have previously shown that a 60% fructose diet in the Syrian golden hamster results in insulin resistance and dyslipidemia (28) and that rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR)γ agonist insulin sensitizer, ameliorates insulin resistance and dyslipidemia (29). In the present study, we found that HL activity is increased in the fructose-fed hamster and reduced with rosiglitazone treatment. The changes in HL activity were associated with similar changes in HL mRNA and protein mass, suggesting that HL gene transcription is regulated in some manner by one of the components of the insulin-resistant state.

Male Syrian golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) were purchased from Charles River (Quebec, Canada). All animals were housed in pairs and were given free access to food and water. Hamsters were fed a normal diet for 7 days to allow acclimatization to the new environment and recovery from the stress of shipping. They were then placed on one of three feeding protocols as previously described (29): 1) normal diet for 5 weeks (DIET), 2) high-fructose diet (hamster diet with 60% fructose; Dyets, Bethlehem, PA) for 5 weeks (FRUC), and 3) high-fructose diet for 5 weeks with rosiglitazone (20 μmol · kg−1 · day−1) (GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA) diluted in water and given once daily by gavage for the last 3 weeks of the fructose feeding period (FRUC+RSG). The hamsters’ weights were monitored every week. At the end of the 5 weeks, 14 h after removal of food, the animals received an intraperitoneal injection of heparin for determination of postheparin plasma HL activity as described below. Additional animals did not receive heparin but were killed for fast-protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) determination of plasma lipoproteins and HL mRNA and protein mass on snap-frozen liver biopsy samples. Plasma HL enzymatic activity was also determined in the absence of heparin administration in four normal diet–fed hamsters to determine whether HL can be detected in preheparin plasma, as has been suggested by others (30). In the present study, comparative data between groups are reported for postheparin samples because the administration of heparin allowed us to measure both LPL and HL activities. In addition, the administration of heparin ensured that we were measuring the total HL activity (i.e., bound plus unbound), not just the unbound HL.

We have found that retro-orbital plexus blood sampling from Syrian golden hamsters induces considerable stress and results in an elevation of plasma glucose and free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations. Because hamsters do not have a tail, it is also not possible to obtain blood by tail vein sampling as it is in other rodents. Consequently, measurements of fasting plasma insulin, triglyceride, glucose, and FFAs that are reported in Table 1 represent cumulative data from our laboratory from DIET, FRUC, and FRUC+RSG hamsters that had placement of femoral and arterial catheters for in vivo studies, as previously described by us (29). All animal protocols were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University Health Network.

Protocol for measurement of plasma LPL and HL activity.

Following the 5-week treatment period, 50 units heparin was injected intraperitoneally into the hamster, and after 30 min, blood was collected under anesthesia from the abdominal aorta into chilled EDTA tubes on ice to prevent ongoing lipolysis of the samples in the test tubes (DIET, n = 20; FRUC, n = 19; and FRUC+RSG, n = 21). Samples were spun at 3,000 rpm for 15 min, and plasma was stored at −70°C for later analysis of LPL and HL activity.

For measurement of LPL and HL activity, the total plasma triglyceride lipase activity was determined as previously described (31) in pre- and postheparin plasma. In brief, plasma was diluted 1:10 with Krebs-Ringer phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, incubated with a triolein/phosphatidylcholine/albumin emulsion, and trace labeled with glycerol tri[1-14C]oleate (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) in 0.178 mol/l Tris-HCl, 0.11 mol/l NaCl, buffer, pH 8.5, containing 55 mg/ml albumin and 0.01 mg/ml heparin, resulting in final incubation pH of 8.2. The incubation was carried out for 60 min at 37°C, and the resultant FFAs were extracted and [14C] content determined. The inclusion of a monoclonal antibody specific for LPL allowed for the determination of LPL activity and HL activity (32). The LPL-specific mAb 5D2 antibody used to block LPL activity in this study recognizes multiple species of LPL. Although this mAb was originally produced against bovine LPL, it cross-reacts strongly with human LPL and with LPL from numerous animals tested (33,34). The antibody is effective against hamster LPL because there was substantial inhibition of total postheparin lipase activity, in some cases inhibiting 70% of the activity. A bovine skim milk LPL standard was included in each assay and used to correct for interassay variation. Human postheparin control plasma was assayed to monitor interassay variation. The intra-assay coefficient of variation was 7% for human LPL and 6% for human HL. The interassay coefficient of variation was 8% for LPL and 10% for HL.

HL mass and mRNA.

Blood was drawn from five hamsters in each of the four treatment groups for FPLC determination of plasma lipoproteins. The animals were then killed, and the liver tissue was frozen in liquid nitrogen at −70°C for later analysis of HL mass and mRNA. HL mass was determined from 150 μg of liver tissue lysate from each animal using chemiluminescent Western blots, as previously described (35), with an affinity-purified anti-rat HL antibody provided by Dr. A. Bensadoon (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY). Purified human HL was used as the positive control.

For measurement of HL mRNA, total RNA was extracted from frozen samples using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Five micrograms of total RNA was converted to single-stranded cDNA using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Ten percent of this first-strand reaction was used as the template for subsequent PCR. Twenty-four cycles of PCR (95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 90 s) were performed using primers specific for HL or β-actin. The primer pairs were as follows: HL: 5′-atg cca att ttg tgg atg cca t-3′, and 5′-ctg ttt tcc cac ttg aac ttg a-3′; and actin: 5′-cct ttt cca gcc ttc ctt c-3′, and 5′-tac tcc tgc ttg ctg atc c-3′.

Lipoprotein composition analysis.

Fasting plasma was separated by FPLC. Briefly, 100 μl of fasting plasma was applied to a Superose 6HR column, and the samples were eluted in PBS at a rate of 0.4 ml/min in 60 fractions of 500 μl. Fractions corresponding to VLDL, LDL, and HDL were pooled and lipid composition quantified by enzymatic assays using commercially available kits for triglycerides and total cholesterol (Roche Diagnostics, Laval, Quebec, Canada). Apolipoprotein (apo)B was determined using an in-house electroimmunoassay.

Statistical analysis.

All the values are reported as means ± SE. For comparison of HL activity, HL mRNA and protein mass, and VLDL, LDL, and HDL lipid composition between DIET, FRUC, and FRUC+RSG hamsters, one-way ANOVA was used followed by post hoc analysis with Tukey’s test. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant. The 95% CIs were calculated and illustrated for difference plots of FPLC profiles.

Effect of rosiglitazone treatment on body weight, plasma insulin, FFAs, triglycerides, and glucose (Table 1).

There were no significant differences among the groups for any of the measured baseline parameters, although there was a trend for FRUC hamsters to have higher FFA, insulin, and triglyceride levels.

Lipid composition (from pooled FPLC fractions) in lipoprotein fractions from DIET, FRUC, and FRUC+RSG hamsters (Table 2 ).

VLDL-triglyceride in the FRUC group was significantly higher than in the other two groups (P < 0.05). LDL cholesterol was higher in FRUC (P < 0.01) and FRUC+RSG (P < 0.05) hamsters than in DIET. HDL triglyceride was higher in FRUC (P < 0.01) and FRUC+RSG animals compared with DIET (P < 0.05), and HDL cholesterol was also higher in the FRUC group than in the DIET group (P < 0.05).

Postheparin HL and LPL activity in fasting hamsters (Fig. 1A and B).

HL activity was increased ∼40% in fructose-fed hamsters compared with control hamsters (112 ± 7 nmol FFA · ml−1 · min−1 in FRUC vs. 66 ± 4 in DIET, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1A). Treatment of fructose-fed hamsters with rosiglitazone resulted in partial normalization of the elevated HL activity (84 ± 7 nmol FFA · ml−1 · min−1 in FRUC+RSG, P < 0.001, versus FRUC, P = 0.2, for FRUC+RSG vs. DIET). There were no significant differences in plasma postheparin LPL activity between the various treatment groups (Fig. 1B).

Preheparin plasma lipase activities (not shown).

Preheparin HL activity from the four normal diet–fed hamsters was 71.2 ± 9.1 nmol FFA · ml−1 · min−1 (range 60–80), similar to that detected in postheparin plasma from normal diet–fed hamsters. LPL, on the other hand, was lower in preheparin plasma (16 ± 6.3 nmol FFA · ml−1 · min−1) than in postheparin plasma.

HL protein mass.

Changes in HL protein mass in liver paralleled the changes in HL activity in plasma. HL mass was increased in fructose-fed hamsters (P < 0.001 for FRUC vs. DIET) and was partially normalized with rosiglitazone treatment (P < 0.05 for FRUC+RSG vs. FRUC). There were no significant differences between the FRUC+RSG and DIET groups (Fig. 2).

HL mRNA levels.

Changes in HL mRNA paralleled the changes in postheparin HL activity and HL mass. HL mRNA was increased in fructose-fed hamsters (P < 0.05 for FRUC vs. DIET) and tended to be lower with rosiglitazone treatment, although the latter was not significantly different from that of FRUC hamsters. There were no significant differences between the FRUC+RSG and DIET groups (Fig. 3).

Small and large LDL cholesterol in DIET, FRUC, and FRUC+RSG hamsters.

Fructose feeding resulted in a significant increase in large (FPLC fractions 22–24) and small (FPLC fractions 26–29) LDL (Fig. 4A shows the differences between mean LDL profiles for FRUC and DIET, and 95% CIs that do not cross zero indicate significant differences between FRUC and DIET animals, P < 0.05). The addition of rosiglitazone to a high-fructose diet decreased small LDL (Fig. 4B) (P < 0.005 for FRUC+RSG vs. FRUC) and shifted the peak to larger LDL size.

In the present study we have shown that fructose feeding was associated with increases in postheparin plasma HL enzymatic activity, hepatocyte HL protein mass, and HL mRNA. Rosiglitazone, a PPARγ agonist member of the thiazolidinedione class of insulin-sensitizing therapeutic agents, partially normalized the elevated HL mRNA, protein, and plasma enzyme activity in fructose-fed hamsters. Although we cannot prove from these studies that it is the insulin resistance per se that induces these changes in HL, these findings do suggest that the HL gene is up- and downregulated by some factor that is associated with whole-body insulin resistance and insulin sensitization, respectively. The precise molecular mechanism of HL gene regulation in insulin resistance remains to be determined.

We have previously shown (28,29) that high-fructose feeding for a 3- to 5-week period induced significant hypertriglyceridemia, with increased hepatic VLDL production and the development of whole-body insulin resistance in the Syrian golden hamster. We have also recently shown (29) that these abnormalities were ameliorated with rosiglitazone treatment. As in the present study, we could not determine whether the effects of rosiglitazone on HL activity were mediated by the potent insulin-sensitizing effect of rosiglitazone or by some other effect of PPARγ activation. As one may predict with induction of a hypertriglyceridemic insulin-resistant state, LDL particles shifted from large to small with fructose feeding and back again to large with rosiglitazone treatment. HL is known to play an important role in the metabolic conversion of large, buoyant LDL to potentially more atherogenic, small, dense LDL particles, although triglyceride enrichment of LDL particles per se is also thought to play an important role (24,25,26). We cannot be certain, therefore, whether the changes in LDL particle size occurred as a direct consequence of the changes in plasma HL activity or are attributable to some other factor. One could speculate though that the insulin resistance–induced increase in HL activity could play an important role in the formation of small, dense LDL particles that typically characterize the insulin-resistant state (8,26).

The plasma LDL cholesterol concentration increased significantly with fructose feeding (FRUC group) compared with a normal diet (DIET group) (Table 2). Rosiglitazone treatment of fructose-fed hamsters (FRUC+RSG) was associated with a plasma LDL cholesterol concentration that was significantly elevated above that of DIET hamsters. An elevation of LDL cholesterol with rosiglitazone treatment has been noted previously in diabetic humans (36). Despite the elevation of plasma LDL cholesterol, there was a net shift in LDL size from small to large with rosiglitazone in the present study, as discussed above, similar to the LDL size changes that occur in rosiglitazone-treated diabetic humans (36).

With respect to plasma HDL cholesterol concentrations, there was a significant increase in HDL cholesterol with fructose feeding. Rosiglitazone treatment of fructose-fed hamsters tended to reduce HDL cholesterol back toward the levels seen in the DIET group, but the reduction was not significant. The increase in HDL cholesterol that occurs with fructose feeding of hamsters is not typical of the lowering of plasma HDL cholesterol that is commonly seen in humans with insulin resistance syndromes. We can only speculate on the mechanisms whereby fructose feeding raises HDL in Syrian golden hamsters, since this was not the focus of the present study. First, we point out that others have shown similar elevations of HDL cholesterol with fructose feeding of rats (37) and Syrian golden hamsters (38,39). In the latter study, the elevation of VLDL, intermediate density lipoprotein/LDL, and HDL cholesterol accounted for the increased total cholesterol concentrations, whereas the increase in plasma triglycerides occurred entirely in the VLDL density range. To the best of our knowledge, the mechanism of the fructose-induced elevation of HDL cholesterol has not previously been studied. Although hamsters do have cholesteryl ester transfer protein (38), one major difference between rodents and humans is that rodents carry a greater proportion of their total plasma cholesterol in the HDL rather than in the LDL fraction (40). Human studies (41,42) have shown that nutritional interventions such as high-fat feeding induce insulin resistance with an elevation of HDL cholesterol and apoA-1 production, whereas a reduction of apoA-1 production occurs when the diet is switched from high to low fat. The anticipated lowering of HDL cholesterol in insulin-resistant states may not occur when insulin resistance is induced by short-term high-fructose or high-fat feeding. The exact mechanism of the elevation of HDL cholesterol in the fructose-fed hamster is currently not known and will require further investigation.

Our results are in accordance with numerous studies (8,1219), which have shown that an elevation in postheparin plasma HL activity is often associated with insulin-resistant states such as central obesity and type 2 diabetes. These findings have led to the hypothesis that the relation between HL and adiposity reflects the modulating effect of secondary factors associated with increased adiposity and insulin resistance, although the precise factors that regulate HL activity are not known. HL activity is not upregulated in a clear-cut fashion by insulin. Although studies (1214,16,19) in patients with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, conditions that are commonly associated with chronic hyperinsulinemia, have shown higher HL activity than in appropriate control subjects, euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp studies in humans have shown (43) that acute hyperinsulinemia actually reduces plasma HL activity. It is likely that instead of hyperinsulinemia per se it is some other aspect of insulin resistance that induces the increase in HL activity.

Although the polymorphism C-514T in the promoter region of the HL gene, which explains up to 38% of the variability in HL activity (44), has recently been (45) associated with fasting hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, the functional significance of this site is not known. HL is a secreted glycoprotein, and although we detected a concomitant increase in HL mRNA with induction of insulin resistance, it is also possible that the increase in plasma HL enzymatic activity could have occurred due in part to posttranslational modification of HL. HL is synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum, first as a high mannose form (52–55 kDa in the rat) and subsequently acquires sialic acid–containing complex oligosaccharides during transit through the Golgi cisternae (46). The mature HL (57–59 kDa, in the rat) is then rapidly secreted and has a residence half-time of ∼60 min in the hepatocyte. Trimming of the glucose residues off the high-mannose form appears to be a determining step for rat HL secretion (47,48). In humans, besides remodeling of the N-linked oligosaccharides, association of HL with calnexin, a chaperone protein, may increase the efficiency of HL export from the endoplasmic reticulum (49). Further studies are required to determine the precise molecular regulation of HL that occurs in the setting of insulin resistance.

We demonstrated that HL but not LPL enzymatic activity is easily measurable in preheparin plasma in the Syrian golden hamster, as has been previously reported (30), indicating that a significant proportion of the secreted enzyme is not bound to the endothelium by heparan sulfate proteoglycans but circulated freely in the circulation. Activity levels reported in this work, however, are postheparin values because the administration of heparin allowed us to simultaneously measure changes in LPL in response to the various experimental interventions, in addition to the combination of unbound and hepatic-bound HL activity.

In conclusion, we have shown that plasma HL enzymatic activity and hepatocyte HL mass and mRNA are increased in the fructose-fed, nondiabetic, insulin-resistant Syrian golden hamsters and that the increase is partially normalized by the PPARγ agonist insulin sensitizer rosiglitazone. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the molecular regulation of HL in vivo with induction of insulin resistance and subsequent insulin sensitization. Elevated HL in insulin resistance may play an important pathophysiological role in the atherogenic dyslipidemia of insulin-resistant states, particularly in the formation of potentially atherogenic, small, dense LDL particles. Further studies are required to confirm these findings in insulin-resistant humans and to determine the molecular regulation of HL in insulin-resistant states.

This work was supported by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (to G.F.L., MOP43839, and to K.A., MOP53093) and National Institutes of Health Grant (to J.D.B., HL64322). This work was supported in part by a research grant from GlaxoSmithKline Canada (to G.F.L. and K.A.).

G.F.L. holds a Canada Research Chair in Diabetes and is a Career Investigator of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

1.
Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH: Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
JAMA
287
:
356
–359,
2002
2.
Abbasi F, Brown BW Jr, Lamendola C, McLaughlin T, Reaven GM: Relationship between obesity, insulin resistance, and coronary heart disease risk.
J Am Coll Cardiol
40
:
937
–943,
2002
3.
Alexander CM, Landsman PB, Teutsch SM, Haffner SM: NCEP-defined metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and prevalence of coronary heart disease among NHANES III participants age 50 years and older.
Diabetes
52
:
1210
–1214,
2003
4.
Lewis GF, Steiner G: Hypertriglyceridemia and its metabolic consequences as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Metab Rev
12
:
37
–56,
1996
5.
Carr MC, Brunzell JD: Abdominal obesity and dyslipidemia in the metabolic syndrome: importance of type 2 diabetes and familial combined hyperlipidemia in coronary artery disease risk.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
89
:
2601
–2607,
2004
6.
Perret B, Mabile L, Martinez L, Terce F, Barbaras R, Collet X: Hepatic lipase: structure/function relationship, synthesis, and regulation.
J Lipid Res
43
:
1163
–1169,
2002
7.
Peinado-Onsurbe J, Soler C, Soley M, Llobera M, Ramirez I: Lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase activities are differentially regulated in isolated hepatocytes from neonatal rats.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1125
:
82
–89,
1992
8.
Deeb SS, Zambon A, Carr MC, Ayyobi AF, Brunzell JD: Hepatic lipase and dyslipidemia: interactions among genetic variants, obesity, gender, and diet.
J Lipid Res
44
:
1279
–1286,
2003
9.
Emmison N, Zammit VA, Agius L: Triacylglycerol accumulation and secretion in hepatocyte cultures: effects of insulin, albumin and Triton WR 1339.
Biochem J
285
:
655
–660,
1992
10.
Yoon TH, Yamada N, Ishibashi S, Shimano H, Gotoda T, Harada K, Akanuma Y, Murase T, Takaku F: The release of hepatic triglyceride lipase from rat monolayered hepatocytes in primary culture.
Endocrinol Jpn
37
:
437
–442,
1990
11.
Morita T, Sakata K, Kanagawa A, Ueki H: Stimulatory release of hepatic lipase activity from cultured rat hepatocytes by sodium orthovanadate: rapid increase in cyclic adenosine monophosphate content.
Biol Pharm Bull
17
:
577
–580,
1994
12.
Laakso M, Sarlund H, Ehnholm C, Voutilainen E, Aro A, Pyorala K: Relationship between postheparin plasma lipases and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in different types of diabetes.
Diabetologia
30
:
703
–706,
1987
13.
Despres JP, Ferland M, Moorjani S, Nadeau A, Tremblay A, Lupien PJ, Theriault G, Bouchard C: Role of hepatic-triglyceride lipase activity in the association between intra-abdominal fat and plasma HDL cholesterol in obese women.
Arterioscler
9
:
485
–492,
1989
14.
Syvanne M, Ahola M, Lahdenpera S, Kahri J, Kuusi T, Virtanen KS, Taskinen MR: High density lipoprotein subfractions in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease.
J Lipid Res
36
:
573
–582,
1995
15.
Kong C, Nimmo L, Elatrozy T, Anyaoku V, Hughes C, Robinson S, Richmond W, Elkeles RS: Smoking is associated with increased hepatic lipase activity, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia and early atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes.
Atherosclerosis
156
:
373
–378,
2001
16.
Cominacini L, Garbin U, Davoli A, Campagnola M, De Santis A, Pasini C, Pastorino AM, Bosello O: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations and postheparin hepatic and lipoprotein lipases in obesity: relationships with plasma insulin levels.
Ann Nutr Metab
37
:
175
–184,
1993
17.
Riemens SC, van Tol A, Scheek LM, Dullaart RP: Plasma cholesteryl ester transfer and hepatic lipase activity are related to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in association with insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic subjects.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest
61
:
1
–9,
2001
18.
Sibley SD, Palmer JP, Hirsch IB, Brunzell JD: Visceral obesity, hepatic lipase activity, and dyslipidemia in type 1 diabetes.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
88
:
3379
–3384,
2003
19.
Purnell JQ, Kahn SE, Albers JJ, Nevin DN, Brunzell JD, Schwartz RS: Effect of weight loss with reduction of intra-abdominal fat on lipid metabolism in older men.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
85
:
977
–982,
2000
20.
Zambon A, Deeb SS, Pauletto P, Crepaldi G, Brunzell JD: Hepatic lipase: a marker for cardiovascular disease risk and response to therapy.
Curr Opin Lipidol
14
:
179
–189,
2003
21.
Jansen H, Verhoeven AJ, Sijbrands EJ: Hepatic lipase: a pro- or anti-atherogenic protein?
J Lipid Res
43
:
1352
–1362,
2002
22.
Zambon A, Austin MA, Brown BG, Hokanson JE, Brunzell JD: Effect of hepatic lipase on LDL in normal men and those with coronary artery disease.
Arterioscler Thromb
13
:
147
–153,
1993
23.
Havel RJ: Genetic underpinnings of LDL size and density: a role for hepatic lipase?
Am J Clin Nutr
71
:
1390
–1391,
2000
24.
Kwiterovich PO Jr: Clinical relevance of the biochemical, metabolic, and genetic factors that influence low-density lipoprotein heterogeneity.
Am J Cardiol
90
:
30I
–47I,
2002
25.
Santamarina-Fojo S, Haudenschild C: Role of hepatic and lipoprotein lipase in lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis: studies in transgenic and knockout animal models and somatic gene transfer.
Int J Tissue React
22
:
39
–47,
2000
26.
Berneis KK, Krauss RM: Metabolic origins and clinical significance of LDL heterogeneity.
J Lipid Res
43
:
1363
–1379,
2002
27.
Fujimoto WY, Abbate SL, Kahn SE, Hokanson JE, Brunzell JD: The visceral adiposity syndrome in Japanese-American men.
Obesity Research
2
:
364
–372,
1994
28.
Taghibiglou C, Carpentier A, Van Iderstine SC, Chen B, Rudy D, Aiton A, Lewis GF, Adeli K: Mechanisms of hepatic very low density lipoprotein overproduction in insulin resistance: evidence for enhanced lipoprotein assembly, reduced intracellular apob degradation, and increased microsomal triglyceride transfer protein in a fructose-fed hamster model.
J Biol Chem
275
:
8416
–8425,
2000
29.
Carpentier A, Taghibiglou C, Leung N, Szeto L, Van Iderstine SC, Uffelman KD, Buckingham R, Adeli K, Lewis GF: Ameliorated hepatic insulin resistance is associated with normalization of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein expression and reduction in very low density lipoprotein assembly and secretion in the fructose-fed hamster.
J Biol Chem
277
:
28795
–28802,
2002
30.
Jansen H, Lammers R, Baggen MG, Wouters NM, Birkenhager JC: Circulating and liver-bound salt-resistant hepatic lipases in the golden hamster.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1001
:
44
–49,
1989
31.
Iverius PH, Brunzell JD: Human adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase: changes with feeding and relation to postheparin plasma enzyme.
Am J Physiol
249
:
E107
–E114,
1985
32.
Peterson J, Fujimoto WY, Brunzell JD: Human lipoprotein lipase: relationship of activity, heparin affinity, and conformation as studied with monoclonal antibodies.
J Lipid Res
33
:
1165
–1170,
1992
33.
Liu MS, Ma Y, Hayden MR, Brunzell JD: Mapping of the epitope on lipoprotein lipase recognized by a monoclonal antibody (5D2) which inhibits lipase activity.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1128
:
113
–115,
1992
34.
Chang SF, Reich B, Brunzell JD, Will H: Detailed characterization of the binding site of the lipoprotein lipase-specific monoclonal antibody 5D2.
J Lipid Res
39
:
2350
–2359,
1998
35.
Taghibiglou C, Rudy D, Van Iderstine SC, Aiton A, Cavallo D, Cheung R, Adeli K: Intracellular mechanisms regulating apoB-containing lipoprotein assembly and secretion in primary hamster hepatocytes.
J Lipid Res
41
:
499
–513,
2000
36.
Freed MI, Ratner R, Marcovina SM, Kreider MM, Biswas N, Cohen BR, Brunzell JD: Effects of rosiglitazone alone and in combination with atorvastatin on the metabolic abnormalities in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Am J Cardiol
90
:
947
–952,
2002
37.
Kamata K, Yamashita K: Insulin resistance and impaired endothelium-dependent renal vasodilatation in fructose-fed hypertensive rats.
Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol
103
:
195
–210,
1999
38.
Remillard P, Shen G, Milne R, Maheux P: Induction of cholesteryl ester transfer protein in adipose tissue and plasma of the fructose-fed hamster.
Life Sci
69
:
677
–687,
2001
39.
Bilz S, Samuel VT, Morino K, Shulman G: Effect of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) activation on lipid metabolism in a hamster model of combined hyperlipidemia (Abstract).
Diabetes
53 (Suppl. 2)
:
A53
,
2004
40.
Sicart R, Sable-Amplis R, Guiro A: Comparative studies of the circulating lipoproteins in hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) with a normal or spontaneous high level of cholesterol in the plasma.
Comp Biochem Physiol A
78
:
511
–514,
1984
41.
Velez-Carrasco W, Lichtenstein AH, Welty FK, Li Z, Lamon-Fava S, Dolnikowski GG, Schaefer EJ: Dietary restriction of saturated fat and cholesterol decreases HDL ApoA-I secretion.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
19
:
918
–924,
1999
42.
Brinton EA, Eisenberg S, Breslow JL: A low-fat diet decreases high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by decreasing HDL apolipoprotein transport rates.
J Clin Invest
85
:
144
–151,
1990
43.
Baynes C, Henderson AD, Richmond W, Johnston DG, Elkeles RS: The response of hepatic lipase and serum lipoproteins to acute hyperinsulinaemia in type 2 diabetes.
Eur J Clin Invest
22
:
341
–346,
1992
44.
Zambon A, Deeb SS, Brown BG, Hokanson JE, Brunzell JD: Common hepatic lipase gene promoter variant determines clinical response to intensive lipid-lowering treatment.
Circulation
103
:
792
–798,
2001
45.
Pihlajamaki J, Karjalainen L, Karhapaa P, Vauhkonen I, Taskinen MR, Deeb SS, Laakso M: G-250A substitution in promoter of hepatic lipase gene is associated with dyslipidemia and insulin resistance in healthy control subjects and in members of families with familial combined hyperlipidemia.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
20
:
1789
–1795,
2000
46.
Cisar LA, Bensadoun A: Characterization of the intracellular processing and secretion of hepatic lipase in FU5AH rat hepatoma cells.
Biochim Biophys Acta
927
:
305
–314,
1987
47.
Verhoeven AJ, Neve BP, Jansen H: Secretion and apparent activation of human hepatic lipase requires proper oligosaccharide processing in the endoplasmic reticulum.
Biochem J
337
:
133
–140,
1999
48.
Verhoeven AJ, Jansen H: Secretion of rat hepatic lipase is blocked by inhibition of oligosaccharide processing at the stage of glucosidase I.
J Lipid Res
31
:
1883
–1893,
1990
49.
Boedeker JC, Doolittle M, Santamarina-Fojo S, White AL: Role of N-linked carbohydrate processing and calnexin in human hepatic lipase secretion.
J Lipid Res
40
:
1627
–1635,
1999