Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is a disorder in which, despite the presence of islet antibodies at diagnosis of diabetes, the progression of autoimmune β-cell failure is slow. LADA patients are therefore not insulin requiring, at least during the first 6 months after diagnosis of diabetes. Among patients with phenotypic type 2 diabetes, LADA occurs in 10% of individuals older than 35 years and in 25% below that age. Prospective studies of β-cell function show that LADA patients with multiple islet antibodies develop β-cell failure within 5 years, whereas those with only GAD antibodies (GADAs) or only islet cell antibodies (ICAs) mostly develop β-cell failure after 5 years. Even though it may take up to 12 years until β-cell failure occurs in some patients, impairments in the β-cell response to intravenous glucose and glucagon can be detected at diagnosis of diabetes. Consequently, LADA is not a latent disease; therefore, autoimmune diabetes in adults with slowly progressive β-cell failure might be a more adequate concept. In agreement with proved impaired β-cell function at diagnosis of diabetes, insulin is the treatment of choice.

In 1986, Groop et al. (1) reported a subgroup of type 2 diabetic patients who, despite having islet autoantibodies, showed preserved β-cell function. The type of diabetes in these patients was referred to as latent type 1 diabetes, showing clearly different features from classic type 1 and classic type 2 diabetes. Later, Tuomi et al. (2) and Zimmet et al. (3) launched the eponym LADA (latent autoimmune diabetes in adults) for this slowly progressive form of autoimmune diabetes initially managed with diet and oral hypoglycemic agents before becoming insulin requiring. However, it is now clear that classic autoimmune type 1 diabetes (4) is frequent among patients older than 30 years at diagnosis of diabetes. Whether LADA is a separate entity from conventional autoimmune type 1 diabetes among adults may therefore be challenged. In this article, we review LADA with regard to definitions and our experience with β-cell function and discuss treatment. The question as to whether the eponym LADA still should be used will also be considered.

LADA is the most common term describing patients with a type 2 diabetic phenotype combined with islet antibodies and slowly progressive β-cell failure. However, other eponyms are shown in Table 1. If defined as a type 2 diabetic phenotype combined with islet antibodies, the prevalence of LADA is around 10% among incident case subjects of diabetes aged 40–75 years (16). A similar prevalence is found among non-insulin-requiring patients older than 35 years at diagnosis with phenotypic type 2 diabetes (17). Actually, a similar frequency of LADA (∼10%) was found among type 2 diabetic patients of all ages in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (18). Among type 2 diabetic patients younger than 35 years of age at diagnosis, the frequency of LADA is much higher (∼25%) (1820). Although LADA patients by definition are not insulin requiring at and during the first time after diagnosis of diabetes, within 6 years, β-cell function is severely impaired, leading to insulin dependency in most LADA patients (18,21). Nevertheless, β-cell failure, defined as unmeasurable fasting C-peptide, may take up to 12 years until it occurs in patients with islet antibodies (22). It is important to clarify that obesity does not exclude LADA. Obese type 2–like diabetic patients with islet antibodies show progressive β-cell failure (23). In agreement, Juneja et al. found that only islet antibodies (islet cell antibodies [ICAs] or GAD antibodies [GADAs]) defined “LADA” (≈ type 1 1/2 diabetes); not BMI, age, or clinical presentation (24). High concentrations of islet antibodies (12) predict future β-cell failure, whereas a low number of islet antibodies, particularly lack of ICAs, is associated with lack of progression to β-cell failure (25,26). Although LADA is considered to be confined to adulthood, Lohmann et al. (9) recently introduced the term “LADY-like” (latent autoimmune diabetes in the young) based on two children diagnosed with islet antibodies without insulin dependency, who later showed slowly progressive β-cell failure. A similar observation in a Turkish case (15) gave birth to another eponym: LADC (latent autoimmune diabetes in children). The rising prevalence of obesity among children indicates that assessment for islet antibodies will be increasingly important. Without determination of islet antibodies, it is not possible to separate type 1 diabetes from type 2 diabetes among obese children. Slowly progressive autoimmune diabetes is a growing problem in children.

To distinguish LADA from classic type 1 diabetes, HLA studies may be of value. Although it has been suggested that LADA deviates from classic type 1 diabetes (17), others have found classic type 1 diabetes risk HLA genotypes in LADA (13,27). Indeed, low frequencies of type 1 diabetes protective HLA genotypes, particularly HLA DQA1-DQB1*0102(3)-*0602(3)/X, are associated with LADA (27). It has been claimed that there might be a co-segregation between type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the context of LADA (28). An assumption that LADA may be a feature of a general autoimmune tendency has support from an increased frequency of serological markers of thyroid and adrenal disease in type 2 diabetic patients with GADAs (29). Antibodies associated with celiac disease are also found more often in LADA patients than in type 2 diabetic patients (30). However, these antibodies are also more frequent than expected in classic type 1 diabetic patient and thereby cannot be used to separate LADA from classic type 1 diabetes.

Most recently, the eponym ADA (autoimmune diabetes in adults) has been suggested to replace the term LADA for diabetic patients with islet antibodies without a need for insulin treatment for at least the first 6 months after diagnosis (31). ADA is meant to distinguish slowly progressive autoimmune diabetes from the classic rapid onset autoimmune type 1 diabetes.

To follow the development of β-cell dysfunction in patients with the type 2 diabetic phenotype combined with islet antibodies, we prospectively followed 233 adult-onset diabetic patients after their diagnosis of diabetes since 1985–1987 (32). Among these patients, 22 ICA+ and 17 ICA were regularly followed with a combined intravenous glucose and glucagon test (33) during the first 5 years after diagnosis. We followed the remaining patients by fasting plasma (p)-C-peptide measurements. Here, we summarize the most pertinent data collected (22,34).

At baseline soon after diagnosis, the plasma C-peptide response to the glucose infusion was clearly lower (P < 0.001) in type 2 diabetic patients with ICAs compared with type 2 diabetic patients without ICAs (Fig. 1A). However, the plasma C-peptide response to glucose was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in ICA+ type 2 diabetic patients versus patients with classic type 1 diabetes. One year after diagnosis, the plasma C-peptide response to glucose infusion had deteriorated in ICA+ type 2 diabetic patients, now no different from the response found among our classic type 1 diabetic patients. The plasma C-peptide response to glucagon injection at diagnosis was as impaired in type 2 diabetic patients with ICAs as in classic type 1 diabetes (Fig. 1B), in both groups clearly (P < 0.01) lower than in ICA type 2 diabetic patients. Similarly, at diagnosis, fasting plasma C-peptide concentrations were as low among type 2 diabetic patients with ICAs as among classic type 1 diabetic patients (Fig. 2). Hence, there was an impairment of β-cell function initially in ICA+ type 2 diabetic patients, although less severe than in classic type 1 diabetes (34). Three years after diagnosis, fasting plasma C-peptide had clearly decreased both in ICA+ type 2 diabetic patients and in patients with classic type 1 diabetes.

Figure 3 illustrates the development of the plasma C-peptide responses to the combined glucose and glucagon provocation test from diagnosis up to 5–7 years thereafter among patients with islet antibodies (GADAs and IA-2 antibodies [IA-2As] now also considered) and control subjects. Adult-onset diabetic patients with islet antibodies showed a low response of plasma C-peptide to the glucose injection at diagnosis. Indeed, this was also shown among diabetic patients without islet antibodies. Moreover, the plasma C-peptide response to the glucagon injection was clearly diminished among patients with islet antibodies compared with those without at the time of diagnosis and had further deteriorated among the former 5–7 years after diagnosis. Hence, though not as severe as in classic type 1 diabetic patients, LADA patients have an early impairment in β-cell function. LADA is not a latent form of autoimmune diabetes. Hence, we favor the use of ADA (31) rather than LADA for this type of patient in the future.

The complete patient group was followed up 12 years after diagnosis of diabetes (22). Figure 4 summarizes the major results. Adult-onset diabetic patients with two or three antibodies (ICAs, GADAs, IA-2As) deteriorated in β-cell function within 5 years, whereas among those with only ICAs or only GADAs, severe β-cell dysfunction seemed to occur later, as noted at the follow-up after 12 years. In contrast, β-cell function was unaffected and preserved 12 years after diagnosis among individuals without islet antibodies and individuals with only IA-2As. Interestingly, five diabetic patients initially without islet antibodies developed ICAs after diagnosis of diabetes, and actually, after becoming ICA+, their fasting C-peptide concentrations decreased. Hence, our 12-year prospective study of patients with adult-onset diabetes showed that the presence of two or three islet antibodies (ICAs, GADAs, and IA-2As) at diagnosis predicts severe deterioration in β-cell function within 5 years. The presence of only ICAs or only GADAs is associated with severe deterioration within 12 years, whereas a development of ICAs after diagnosis predicts a later development of β-cell dysfunction.

Whether the responses of β-cells to oral glucose or mixed meals are as impaired as the responses to intravenous glucose or glucagon are unknown. No comparison between oral versus intravenous responses of insulin secretion in LADA patients has been published (31).

General.

Diet treatment in LADA is similar to that in classic type 1 diabetes. Obese LADA patients benefit from restriction in calories consumed and increased levels of physical activity. A warning message has been issued for glibenclamide, which might promote the autoimmune process (35). Thiazolidinediones seem to prevent diabetes in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse (36). However, human data are lacking. Metformin is probably useful in obese LADA patients. Nevertheless, insulin therapy is the treatment of choice. As indicated from our studies, β-cell function is impaired at diagnosis of autoimmune diabetes in adult patients, irrespective of the clinical phenotype. Hence, there is no reason to postpone the commencement of insulin therapy. Indeed, type 2 diabetic patients without islet antibodies primarily treated with insulin demonstrate better β-cell function 2 years after diagnosis than those primarily treated with glibenclamide (37). Primarily insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients also show better glycemic control (lower HbA1c [A1C] values) 2 (37) and 4 years (38) after diagnosis than their glibenclamide-treated counterparts. This emphasizes that patients with autoimmune diabetes should be insulin-treated as early as possible.

Experimental treatment to prevent progression of β-cell destruction.

Kobayashi et al. (39) identified three independent risk factors for progression of β-cell failure in LADA: sulfonylurea treatment, ICA+ periods, and initial body weight. In their pilot study, a small dose of insulin instead of sulfonylurea in the early stage of treatment of LADA patients gave a sustained plasma C-peptide response, whereas most sulfonylurea-treated patients progressed to an insulin-dependent state. However, the rather similar findings in type 2 diabetic patients without islet antibodies referred to above (37) do not support a specific immunomodulating effect of insulin. Moreover, the lack of a preventive effect on autoimmune diabetes in the subcutaneous Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (40) and in oral insulin trials (41,42) does not support the idea of insulin as a specific remedy for autoimmune diabetes. Insulin improves β-cell function because of its unspecific effect on glucose toxicity.

Based on the concept that decrements in β-cell activity decrease exposure of β-cell antigens (43), diazoxide and octreotide have been used in classic type 1 diabetes but only with a slight and temporary effect (44,45). However, this approach has not yet been tested in LADA.

Heat-shock protein peptide (DiaPep277) was found to preserve endogenous insulin production in a phase II clinical trial, perhaps through induction of a shift from T-helper 1 (interferon-γ production reduced) to a T-helper 2 (interleukin-9 and -13 increased) predominance (46). Further studies are needed to clarify the putative effect of DiaPep277 on autoimmune β-cell destruction. In agreement, an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody reduced the deterioration in endogenous insulin production and improved metabolic control during the first year of type 1 diabetes in patients with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes (47). Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies may have direct effects on pathogenic T-cells. The ratio between CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells increased in subjects who responded with improved insulin production. Further studies are warranted to clarify the value of anti-CD3 monoclonal treatment of autoimmune diabetes. A first report of immunomodulation with subcutaneous GAD65 in LADA patients indicates that this treatment was safe, giving increased fasting p-C-peptide concentrations after 24 weeks in subjects treated with a moderate dose (20 μg) but not in subjects treated with higher doses (100 or 500 μg) or lower doses (4 μg) (48).

Autoimmune diabetes of slow onset is prevalent and found in 10% of phenotypic type 2 diabetic patients, actually in 25% of individuals below 35 years of age at diagnosis of diabetes. Prospective follow-up of these patients shows that complete β-cell failure occurs in almost all of these patients, but it may take up to 12 years until it develops. Although not insulin requiring at diagnosis, type 2 diabetic patients with islet antibodies have impaired β-cell function at diagnosis. Hence, insulin treatment is indicated at diagnosis. The effect of insulin in these patients is most likely against glucose toxicity and not immunomodulatory. Because of the slow progression of β-cell failure, patients with autoimmune diabetes of this type are candidates for immunomodulation. Different immunomodulatory agents have also been tried in these patients, with some effects favoring future attempts. As patients with autoimmune diabetes of slow onset develop future β-cell failure and also display disturbed β-cell function at diagnosis, we suggest that the term “latent autoimmune diabetes in adults” should be replaced. LADA is not a latent disease. We suggest autoimmune diabetes in adults with slowly progressive β-cell failure (ADASP).

This article is based on a presentation at a symposium. The symposium and the publication of this article were made possible by an unrestricted educational grant from Servier.

The Diabetes Foundation–Wallenberg Diabetes Research Program (K 98-99 JD-128 13), the Swedish Diabetes Association, the Swedish Medical Research Council (72X-14531), the Albert Påhlsson Foundation, and the Research Fund at Malmö University Hospital are acknowledged for support of our studies.

1.
Groop LC, Bottazzo GF, Doniac D: Islet cell antibodies identify latent type 1 diabetes in patients aged 35–75 years at diagnosis.
Diabetes
35
:
237
–241,
1986
2.
Tuomi T, Groop LC, Zimmet PZ, Rowley MJ, Knowles W, Mackay IR: Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase reveal latent autoimmune diabetes mellitus in adults with a non-insulin-dependent onset of disease.
Diabetes
42
:
359
–362,
1993
3.
Zimmet PZ, Tuomi T, Mackay IR, Rowley MJ, Knowles W, Cohen M, Lang DA: Latent autoimmune diabetes mellitus in adults (LADA): the role of antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in diagnosis and prediction of insulin dependency.
Diabet Med
11
:
299
–303,
1994
4.
Mølbak AG, Christau B, Marner B, Borch-Johnsen K, Nerup J: Incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in age groups over 30 years in Denmark.
Diabet Med
11
:
650
–655,
1994
5.
Kobayashi T, Tamemoto K, Nakanishi K, Kato N, Okubo M, Kajio H, Sugimoto T, Murase T, Kosaka K: Immunogenetic and clinical characterization of slowly progressive IDDM.
Diabetes Care
16
:
780
–788,
1993
6.
Lohmann T, Seissler J, Verlohren H-J, Schröder S, Rötger J, Dähn K, Morgenthaler N, Scherbaum WA: Distinct genetic and immunological features in patients with onset of IDDM before and after age 40.
Diabetes Care
20
:
524
–529,
1997
7.
Seissler J, de Sonnaville JJ, Morgenthaler NG, Steinbrenner H, Glawe D, Khoo-Morgenthaler UY, Lan MS, Notkins AL, Heine RJ, Scherbaum WA: Immunological heterogeneity in type I diabetes: presence of distinct autoantibody patterns in patients with acute onset and slowly progressive disease.
Diabetologia
41
:
891
–897,
1998
8.
Juneja R, Palmer JP: Type 1 1/2 diabetes: myth or reality?
Autoimmunity
29
:
65
–83,
1999
9.
Lohmann T, Nietzschmann U, Kiess W: “Lady-like”: is there a latent autoimmune diabetes in the young?
Diabetes Care
23
:
1707
–1708,
2000
10.
Pozzilli P, Di Mario U: Autoimmune diabetes not requiring insulin at diagnosis (latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult): definition, characterization, and potential prevention.
Diabetes Care
24
:
1460
–1467,
2001
11.
Lohmann T, Kellner K, Verlohren HJ, Krug J, Steindorf J, Scherbaum WA, Seissler J: Titre and combination of ICA and autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase discriminate two clinically distinct types of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA).
Diabetologia
44
:
1005
–1010,
2001
12.
Borg H, Gottsäter A, Landin-Olsson M, Fernlund P, Sundkvist G: High levels of antigen-specific islet antibodies predict future beta-cell failure in patients with onset of diabetes in adult age.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
86
:
3032
–3038,
2001
13.
Hosszufalusi N, Vatay A, Rajczy K, Prohaszka Z, Pozsonyi E, Horvath L, Grosz A, Gero L, Madacsy L, Romics L, Karadi I, Fust G, Panczel P: Similar genetic features and different islet cell autoantibody pattern of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) compared with adult-onset type 1 diabetes with rapid progression.
Diabetes Care
26
:
452
–457,
2003
14.
Palmer JP, Hirsch IB: What’s in a name: latent autoimmune diabetes of adults, type 1.5, adult-onset, and type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care
26
:
536
–538,
2003
15.
Aycan Z, Berberoglu M, Adiyaman P, Ergur AT, Ensari A, Evliyaoglu O, Siklar Z, Ocal G: Latent autoimmune diabetes mellitus in children (LADC) with autoimmune thyroiditis and Celiac disease.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab
17
:
1565
–1569,
2004
16.
Wroblewski M, Gottsäter A, Lindgärde F, Fernlund P, Sundkvist G: Gender, autoantibodies, and obesity in newly diagnosed diabetic patients aged 40–75 years.
Diabetes Care
21
:
250
–255,
1998
17.
Tuomi T, Carlsson A, Li H, Isomaa B, Miettinen A, Nilsson A, Nissen M, Ehrnstrom BO, Forsen B, Snickars B, Lahti K, Forsblom C, Saloranta C, Taskinen MR, Groop LC: Clinical and genetic characteristics of type 2 diabetes with and without GAD antibodies.
Diabetes
48
:
150
–157,
1999
18.
Turner R, Stratton I, Horton V, Manley S, Zimmet P, Mackay IR, Shattock M, Bottazzo GF, Holman R, UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group: UKPDS 25: autoantibodies to islet-cell cytoplasm and glutamic acid decarboxylase for prediction of insulin requirement in type 2 diabetes.
Lancet
350
:
1288
–1293,
1997
19.
Landin-Olsson M, Karlsson FA, Lernmark Å, Sundkvist G, the Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden Group: Islet cell and thyrogastric antibodies in 633 consecutive 15–34 yr-old patients in the Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden.
Diabetes
41
:
1022
–1027,
1992
20.
Borg H, Arnqvist HJ, Björk E, Bolinder J, Eriksson JW, Nyström L, Jeppsson JO, Sundkvist G: Evaluation of the new ADA and WHO criteria for classification of diabetes mellitus in young adults people (15–34 yrs) in the Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden (DISS).
Diabetologia
46
:
173
–181,
2003
21.
Littorin B, Sundkvist G, Hagopian W, Landin-Olsson M, Lernmark Å, Östman J, Arnqvist HJ, Blohmé G, Bolinder J, Eriksson J, Lithner F, Scherstén B, Wibell L: Islet cell and glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies present at diagnosis of diabetes predict the need for insulin treatment: a cohort study in young adults whose disease was initially labeled as type 2 or unclassifiable diabetes.
Diabetes Care
22
:
409
–412,
1999
22.
Borg H, Gottsäter A, Fernlund P, Sundkvist G: A 12-year prospective of the relationship between islet antibodies and β-cell function at and after the diagnosis in patients with adult onset diabetes.
Diabetes
51
:
1754
–1762,
2002
23.
Gottsäter A, Landin-Olsson M, Lernmark Å, Fernlund P, Sundkvist G: Islet cell antibodies are associated with β-cell failure also in obese adult onset diabetic patients.
Acta Diabetol
31
:
226
–231,
1994
24.
Juneja R, Hirsch IB, Naik RG, Brooks-Worrell BM, Greenbaum CJ, Palmer JP: Islet cell antibodies and glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, but not the clinical phenotype, help to identify type 1(1/2) diabetes in patients presenting with type 2 diabetes.
Metabolism
50
:
1008
–1013,
2001
25.
Schölin A, Björklund L, Borg H, Arnqvist H, Björk E, Blohmé G, Bolinder J, Eriksson JW, Gudbjörnsdottir S, Nyström L, Östman J, Karlsson AF, Sundkvist G: Islet antibodies and remaining β-cell function eight years after diagnosis of autoimmune diabetes in young adults: a prospective follow-up of the nation-wide Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden (DISS).
J Intern Med
255
:
384
–391,
2004
26.
Schölin A, Törn C, Nyström L, Berne C, Arnqvist H, Blohmé G, Bolinder J, Eriksson JW, Kockum I, Landin-Olsson M, Östman J, Sundkvist G, Karlsson AF, Björk E: Normal weight promotes remission and low number of islet antibodies prolong the duration of remission in type 1 diabetes.
Diabet Med
21
:
447
–455,
2004
27.
Stenström G, Berger B, Borg H, Fernlund P, Dorman JS, Sundkvist G: HLA-DQ genotypes in classical type 1 diabetes and in latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult.
Am J Epidem
156
:
787
–796,
2002
28.
Li H, Lindholm E, Almgren P, Gustafsson A, Forsblom C, Groop L, Tuomi T: Possible human leukocyte antigen-mediated genetic interaction between type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
86
:
574
–582,
2001
29.
Gambelunghe G, Forini F, Laureti S, Murdolo G, Toraldo G, Santeusanio F, Brunetti P, Sanjeevi CB, Falorni A: Increased risk for endocrine autoimmunity in Italian type 2 diabetic patients with GAD65 autoantibodies.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf
) 
52
:
565
–573,
2000
30.
Kucera P, Novakova D, Behanova M, Novak J, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Andel M: Gliadin, endomysial and thyroid antibodies in patients with latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA).
Clin Exp Immunol
133
:
139
–143,
2003
31.
Fourlanos S, Dotta F, Greenbaum CJ, JP P, Harrison LC: Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults should be less latent.
Diabetologia.
In press
32.
Landin-Olsson M, Nilsson KO, Lernmark Å, Sundkvist G: Islet cell antibodies and fasting C-peptide predict insulin requirement at diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.
Diabetologia
33
:
561
–568,
1990
33.
Gottsäter A, Landin-Olsson M, Fernlund P, Gullberg B, Lernmark Å, Sundkvist G: Pancreatic beta-cell function evaluated by intravenous glucose and glucagon stimulation: a comparison between insulin and C-peptide to measure insulin secretion.
Scand J Lab Invest
52
:
631
–639,
1992
34.
Gottsäter A, Landin-Olsson M, Fernlund P, Lernmark Å, Sundkvist G: Beta-cell function in relation to islet cell antibodies (ICA) during the first three years after the clinical diagnosis of diabetes in type II diabetic patients.
Diabetes Care
16
:
902
–910,
1993
35.
Cabrera-Rode E: Prevalence of islet cell antibodies (ICA) in diabetes mellitus and other diseases in Cubans.
Autoimmunity
26
:
7
–9,
1997
36.
Beales PE, Pozzilli P: Thiazolidinediones for the prevention of diabetes in the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse: implications for human type 1 diabetes.
Diabete Metab Res Rev
18
:
114
–117,
2002
37.
Alvarsson M, Sundkvist G, Lager I, Henricsson M, Berntorp K, Fernqvist-Forbes E, Steen L, Westermark G, Westermark P, Orn T, Grill V: Beneficial effects of insulin versus sulphonylurea on insulin secretion and metabolic control in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients.
Diabetes Care
26
:
2231
–2237,
2003
38.
Alvarsson M, Sundkvist G, Lager I, Henricsson M, Berntorp K, Fernqvist-Forbes E, Steen L, Örn T, Grill V: Effects of insulin vs. glibenclamide in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients (Abstract).
Diabetologia
47 (Suppl. 1)
:
A56
,
2004
39.
Kobayashi T, Nakanishi K, Murase T, Kosaka K: Small dose of subcutaneous insulin as a strategy for preventing slowly progressive β-cell failure in islet cell antibody-positive patients with clinical features of NIDDM.
Diabetes
45
:
622
–626,
1996
40.
Effects of insulin in relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
N Engl J Med
346
:
1685
–1691,
2002
41.
Pozzilli P, Pitocco D, Visalli N, Cavallo MG, Buzzetti R, Crino A, Spera S, Suraci C, Multari G, Cervoni M, Manca Bitti ML, Matteoli MC, Marietti G, Ferrazzoli F, Cassone Faldetta MR, Giordano C, Sbriglia M, Sarugeri E, Ghirlanda G: No effect of oral insulin on residual beta-cell function in recent-onset type I diabetes (the IMDIAB VII): IMDIAB Group.
Diabetologia
43
:
1000
–1004,
2000
42.
Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Study Group: Effects of oral insulin in relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1.
Diabetes Care
28
:
1068
–1076,
2005
43.
Björk E, Kämpe O, Andersson A, Karlsson FA: Expression of the 64 kDa/glutamic acid decarboxylase rat islet cell autoantigen is influence by the rate of insulin secretion.
Diabetologia
32
:
490
–493,
1992
44.
Björk E, Berne C, Kämpe O, Wibell L, Oskarsson P, Karlsson FA: Diazoxide treatment at onset preserves residual insulin secretion in adults with autoimmune diabetes.
Diabetes
45
:
1427
–1430,
1996
45.
Ortqvist E, Bjork E, Wallensteen M, Ludvigsson J, Aman J, Johansson C, Forsander G, Lindgren F, Berglund L, Bengtsson M, Berne C, Persson B, Karlsson FA: Temporary preservation of beta-cell function by diazoxide treatment in childhood type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care
27
:
2191
–2197,
2004
46.
Raz I, Elias D, Avron A, Tamir M, Metzger M, Cohen IR: Beta-cell function in new-onset type 1 diabetes and immunomodulation with a heat-shock protein peptide (DiaPep277): a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial.
Lancet
358
:
1749
–1753,
2001
47.
Herold KC, Hagopian W, Auger JA, Poumian-Ruiz E, Taylor L, Donaldson D, Gitelman SE, Harlan DM, Xu D, Zivin RA, Bluestone JA: Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody in new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus.
N Engl J Med
346
:
1692
–1698,
2002
48.
Agardh C-D, Cilio CM, Lethagen A, Lynch K, Leslie RDG, Palmer M, Harris RA, Robertson JA, Lernmark Å: Clinical evidence for the safety of GAD65 immunomodulation in adult-onset autoimmune diabetes.
J Diabetes Complications
19
:
238
–246,
2005