Using α-cell–specific knockout of the mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2), Allister et al. (1) recently provided evidence for involvement of this protein in glucose regulation of glucagon release. This is an interesting and potentially important contribution with regard to the possible involvement of UCP2. However, the authors do not seem to notice that their data contradict the promoted model. The study focuses on intrinsic regulation of secretion, implying that the α-cell senses the glucose concentration and releases glucagon accordingly. The mechanism for α-cell glucose sensing is controversial, but the authors only mention the most cited model, in which glucose-derived ATP closes ATP-sensitive K+ channels to depolarize the α-cell (2). The depolarization leads to inactivation of Na+ channels involved in action potential firing and thereby to inhibition of glucagon release. Other α-cell models instead predict that glucose inhibits glucagon secretion by hyperpolarizing the α-cell after activating the electrogenic Na+/K+ pump (3) or shutting off a depolarizing store-operated current by stimulating Ca2+ sequestration in the endoplasmic reticulum (4,5).

Surprisingly, it is not settled how glucose affects the membrane potential of α-cells. Whereas electrophysiological recordings have indicated both depolarizing (2) and hyperpolarizing (6) effects, noninvasive measurements with a potential-sensitive dye indicate that glucose elevation hyperpolarizes α-cells (4,7). Using the electrophysiological approach, Allister et al. provide additional evidence for a hyperpolarizing effect of glucose both in control and UCP2-knockout α-cells. However, this finding is never mentioned. Focus is instead on UCP2-knockout α-cells being more depolarized, which is assumed to reflect higher ATP production. It seems somewhat biased to highlight indirect indications of metabolism-mediated depolarization of the α-cell and suppress direct evidence for a hyperpolarizing effect of glucose that contradicts the favored model for glucagon secretion.

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

1.
Allister
EM
,
Robson-Doucette
CA
,
Prentice
KJ
, et al
.
UCP2 regulates the glucagon response to fasting and starvation
.
Diabetes
2013
;
62
:
1623
1633
2.
Gromada
J
,
Ma
X
,
Høy
M
, et al
.
ATP-sensitive K+ channel-dependent regulation of glucagon release and electrical activity by glucose in wild-type and SUR1-/- mouse α-cells
.
Diabetes
2004
;
53
(
Suppl. 3
):
S181
S189
3.
Bode
HP
,
Weber
S
,
Fehmann
HC
,
Göke
B
.
A nutrient-regulated cytosolic calcium oscillator in endocrine pancreatic glucagon-secreting cells
.
Pflugers Arch
1999
;
437
:
324
334
4.
Liu
YJ
,
Vieira
E
,
Gylfe
E
.
A store-operated mechanism determines the activity of the electrically excitable glucagon-secreting pancreatic α-cell
.
Cell Calcium
2004
;
35
:
357
365
5.
Vieira
E
,
Salehi
A
,
Gylfe
E
.
Glucose inhibits glucagon secretion by a direct effect on mouse pancreatic α cells
.
Diabetologia
2007
;
50
:
370
379
6.
Barg
S
,
Galvanovskis
J
,
Göpel
SO
,
Rorsman
P
,
Eliasson
L
.
Tight coupling between electrical activity and exocytosis in mouse glucagon-secreting α-cells
.
Diabetes
2000
;
49
:
1500
1510
7.
Hjortoe
GM
,
Hagel
GM
,
Terry
BR
,
Thastrup
O
,
Arkhammar
PO
.
Functional identification and monitoring of individual α and β cells in cultured mouse islets of Langerhans
.
Acta Diabetol
2004
;
41
:
185
193
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.