179-OR: Cardiovascular Effectiveness of Empagliflozin vs. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists or Liraglutide in the EMPRISE Study

Within the EMPRISE® monitoring program, we evaluated the cardiovascular effectiveness of empagliflozin (EMPA) vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) or liraglutide using data from Medicare and 2 U.S. commercial claims databases [2014- (2018 for Medicare) ]. We identified patients ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes initiating (i) EMPA vs. GLP1-RA or (ii) EMPA vs. liraglutide. Primary outcomes were hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) , myocardial infarction (MI) , stroke, and all-cause mortality (Medicare only) . After 1:1 propensity score matching, we estimated pooled HR (95% CI) overall and in subgroups of patients with and without baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) . We identified 105,955 pairs of EMPA vs. GLP1RA initiators and 72,498 pairs of EMPA vs. liraglutide initiators (Table) . Relative to GLP1RA, EMPA had a lower risk of HHF [HR:0.62 (95% CI, 0.53, 0.71) ] and a similar risk of MI [0.95 (0.85, 1.07) ], stroke [1. (0.94, 1.27) ], and mortality [0.91 (0.77, 1.08) ]. Results were consistent for patients with and without CVD. When we compared EMPA vs. liraglutide, estimates were similar to those from GLP1 RA, both overall and across subgroups. Among real-world patients, EMPA was associated with a reduced risk of HHF, but with similar risk of MI, stroke, and mortality, across the broad spectrum of CVD, compared with GLP-1RA overall or liraglutide.

View largeDownload slide

View largeDownload slide

Close modal