Introduction: The extent and importance of higher HbA1c levels not due to mean blood glucose (MBG) in non-Hispanic Black (B) versus non-Hispanic White (W) individuals is controversial. We sought to clarify the relationship of HbA1c with metrics of glycemia derived from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a young biracial population.

Methods: Glycemic data of 33 B and 85 W, otherwise healthy youth with type 1 diabetes (age 14.7±4.8 years, M/F=51/67, duration of diabetes 5.4±4.7 years) was derived from a factory calibrated CGM and compared with assayed HbA1c. Hemoglobin glycation index (HGI) a metric of MBG difference in HbA1c not due to MBG =assayed HbA1c - Glucose Management Index (GMI).

Results: B patients had higher unadjusted levels of HbA1c, MBG, MBGSD, GMI and HGI than W patients. Percent glucose time in range (TIR) and percent sensor use (PSU) were lower for B patients. HbA1c remained higher in B patients (8.6%) versus (7.7%) for W (p<0.0001) after statistical adjustment for MBG, MBGSD, age, gender, insulin delivery method and PSU. MBG and race accounted for 80% of the variation in HbA1c in the model. Results were similar when TIR was substituted for MBG (R2=0.64, p<0.0001). The 95% for HGI=0.47% in W patients, 52% of B patients had HGI ≥0.5%. Percent time below range was similar for both groups.

Conclusions: Young B patients have clinically relevant higher HbA1c (~0.9%) at any given level of MBG or TIR than W patients, which may pose an additional risk for diabetes complications. HGI ≥0.5% may be an easy way to identify high risk patients.

Disclosure

N.J.Christakis: None. D.Felipe: None. R.Gomez: None. S.Chalew: Advisory Panel; Medtronic.

Funding

National Institutes of Health (1R21DK118643-01A1, U54GM104940)

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.