The 2 Drop Clinitest, 5 Drop Clinitest, Tes-Tape, and Ketodiastix semiquantitative urinary glucose methods were evaluated using 300 urine samples from diabetic patients and comparing the results with those obtained by an AutoAnalyzer-glucose oxidase method. At high levels of glycosuria (above 1,500 mg.'100 ml.) the 2 Drop Clinitest method gave better quantitation than the other methods. In this range the Keto-diastix method often gave falsely low results. At intermediate levels of glycosuria (376 to 1,500 mg.'100 ml.) there appeared to be little or no difference among the methods. The 2 Drop Clinitest method was often insensitive to levels of urinary glucose below 376 mg.'100 ml. In this range the other three methods gave comparable results, with the exception that Tes-Tape was sometimes positive with normal levels (1 to 15 mg.'100 ml.) of glycosuria. Proteinuria and pregnancy had no effect on any of the methods. Acetest was a more sensitive and accurate indicator of urinary ketone levels than Keto-diastix.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Medical Intelligence|
May 01 1974
Evaluation of Some Commonly Used Semiquantitative Methods for Urinary Glucose and Ketone Determinations
Ronald C James, M.D.;
Ronald C James, M.D.
Veterans Administration Hospital and the Departments of Internal Medicine (Metabolic and Endocrine Division) and Statistics, The University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri 65201
Search for other works by this author on:
Gerald R Chase, Ph.D.
Gerald R Chase, Ph.D.
Veterans Administration Hospital and the Departments of Internal Medicine (Metabolic and Endocrine Division) and Statistics, The University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri 65201
Search for other works by this author on:
Citation
Ronald C James, Gerald R Chase; Evaluation of Some Commonly Used Semiquantitative Methods for Urinary Glucose and Ketone Determinations. Diabetes 1 May 1974; 23 (5): 474–479. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.23.5.474
Download citation file: