The dose-response characteristics of three skeletal muscles, three adipose tissue beds, and heart muscle to single i.v. injection of insulin were compared in vivo. Comparisons were made at 8 dose levels spanning the entire range for response by all tissues and for the integrated whole body response as reflected in the rate of disappearance of 3H-2-deoxyglucose from plasma. The insulin-sensitive tissues varied widely with respect to the magnitude of the maximal response and the sensitivity to insulin as judged by the effective dose 50% (ED 50). Among the muscles, a slow-twitch oxidative muscle, soleus, was more sensitive than the fast-twitch glycolytic muscle, extensor digitorum longus (EDL), while a mixed muscle, quadriceps femoris, displayed even lower sensitivity. Heart muscle sensitivity was comparable to EDL. Among the adipose sites, the rank order of sensitivity was subcutaneous > epididymal ≫ omental. The threshold for a detectable response to insulin was 0.013 U/kg rat.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Contributions|
February 01 1984
Insulin Dose-Response Characteristics Among Individual Muscle and Adipose Tissues Measured in the Rat In Vivo with 3(H)2-Deoxyglucose
Frederick G Hom;
Frederick G Hom
Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington
Search for other works by this author on:
Charles J Goodner
Charles J Goodner
Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington
Search for other works by this author on:
Address reprint requests to Dr C J. Goodner, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104.
Diabetes 1984;33(2):153–159
Article history
Received:
May 05 1983
Revision Received:
July 15 1983
Accepted:
July 15 1983
PubMed:
6363169
Citation
Frederick G Hom, Charles J Goodner; Insulin Dose-Response Characteristics Among Individual Muscle and Adipose Tissues Measured in the Rat In Vivo with 3(H)2-Deoxyglucose. Diabetes 1 February 1984; 33 (2): 153–159. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.33.2.153
Download citation file:
50
Views