Genetic outcross and backcross analysis of nonobese diabetic (NOD/Lt) mice with a related but diabetes-resistant strain, nonobese normal (NON/Lt), has demonstrated that susceptibility to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is controlled in a recessive fashion by multiple genetic loci, including one (Idd-1s) associated with H-2 on chromosome 17 and another (Idd-2s) associated with Thy-1b/Apoa-1b (formerly Alp-1) on chromosome 9. To analyze the separate pathogenic contributions of Idd-1s and Idd-2s, two distinct congenie stocks of NOD/Lt mice homozygous on chromosomes 17 and 9 for NON/Lt linkage markers for the respective resistance alleles (Idd-1s and Idd-2r) were developed. The recessive nature of Idd-1s was confirmed at the fifth backcross generation in that 83% of females and 29% of males homozygous for NOD H-2 haplotype developed diabetes, whereas no diabetes occurred in any of the mice homozygous or heterozygous for the NON haplotype. However, codominant and recessive MHC-associated susceptibility genes in this congenie stock were indicated by the finding that at least one copy of the NOD/Lt MHC was required for insulitis development. Virtually no insulitis was detected in the pancreases of mice homozygous for NON haplotype at 42 wk of age, whereas heavy generalized insulitis was present in 3 of 19 H-2 heterozygotes and in 7 of 7 diabetic and 3 of 5 nondiabetic mice homozygous for NOD haplotype. Further indication of the presence of MHC-associated codominant and recessive MHC-associated susceptibility genes was the observation that the NOD MHC haplotype correlated in a codominant fashion with a relative increase in the percentage of splenic T-lymphocytes bearing the Ly-2 surface marker. Severe insulitis and concomitant high diabetes incidences occurred in all gentoypic classes of congenie mice carrying Thy-1/Apoa-1 linkage markers for either NOD or NON alleles at Idd-2. Molecular analysis indicated that the NON-derived Idd-2r resistance allele had been replaced by recombination with Idd-2s from NOD. Restriction-fragment–length polymorphism analysis of two polymorphic markers proximal to Thy-1, low-density lipoprotein receptor Ldlr and Ets-1, a protooncogene, confirmed a recombinant chromosome 9, because homozygosity for NOD genomie fragments was found centromeric to an NON congenie segment of at least 20 centiMorgans spanning the Thy-1 and Mod-1 loci. Of the polymorphic markers analyzed on chromosome 9 with a panel of first-backcross diabetic segregante, the strongest linkage association was with Thy-1b. The ease with which the Idd-2s susceptibility locus can apparently be uncoupled from the Thy-1 linkage marker underscores the difficulties of assessing gene action when a marker gene and the gene of interest recombine at a relatively high frequency. In summary, diabetogenesis in NOD/Lt mice requires a complex interaction between both recessive and dominant genes on multiple chromosomes, with both recessive and dominant expression indicated depending on the trait being assessed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Articles|
November 01 1989
Genetic Control of Diabetogenesis in NOD/Lt Mice: Development and Analysis of Congenic Stocks
Michal Prochazka;
Michal Prochazka
Jackson Laboratory
Bar Harbor, Maine
Search for other works by this author on:
David V Serreze;
David V Serreze
Jackson Laboratory
Bar Harbor, Maine
Search for other works by this author on:
Sherri M Worthen;
Sherri M Worthen
Jackson Laboratory
Bar Harbor, Maine
Search for other works by this author on:
Edward H Leiter
Edward H Leiter
Jackson Laboratory
Bar Harbor, Maine
Search for other works by this author on:
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. E.H. Leiter, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609.
Diabetes 1989;38(11):1446–1455
Article history
Received:
May 11 1989
Revision Received:
July 12 1989
Accepted:
July 12 1989
PubMed:
2576007
Citation
Michal Prochazka, David V Serreze, Sherri M Worthen, Edward H Leiter; Genetic Control of Diabetogenesis in NOD/Lt Mice: Development and Analysis of Congenic Stocks. Diabetes 1 November 1989; 38 (11): 1446–1455. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.38.11.1446
Download citation file:
69
Views