Human proinsulin and 32–33 split proinsulin have been measured in the peripheral circulation by immunoradiometric assays (IRMAs) and have been shown to be elevated in impaired glucose tolerance and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The IRMA for 32–33 split proinsulin did not discriminate between this molecule and des-32 or des-31,32 split proinsulin. We describe the comparison of IRMA for human plasma proinsulin and 32–33 split proinsulins with assays combined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), which can discriminate between 32–33 split, des-32 split, and des-31,32 split proinsulin. Subjects were those with normal glucose tolerance (n = 8) and those with NIDDM (n = 17), who were studied while fasting and 30 min after a glucose load. After collection, blood was centrifuged promptly, and the serum/plasma was stored frozen until assay. Both IRMA and HPLC methods were calibrated against synthetic peptides. Interassay coefficients of variation for the IRMA for proinsulin and 32-33 split proinsulin were < 13% over the ranges 3.8–65 pmol/l and 6.4–65 pmol/l, respectively. The following regression lines were obtained: proinsulin IRMA ½ −0.143 + 1.066 HPLC, r = 0.860; 32–33 split proinsulin IRMA ½ 0.048 + 1.051 HPLC; and des-31,32 split proinsulin, r = 0.814. For both analytes, there was no significant difference in the relationship of IRMA to HPLC results between the various subject groups and various time points. Thus, the IRMA for proinsulin has been validated by an independent method. The 32–33 split proinsulin IRMA predominately measures des-31,32 split proinsulin, which is the major partially processed proinsulin present in human plasma of both normal and NIDDM subjects.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Articles|
April 01 1995
Measurement of Proinsulin and Intermediates: Validation of Immunoassay Methods by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
Diane Ostrega;
Diane Ostrega
Section of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
Search for other works by this author on:
Kenneth Polonsky;
Kenneth Polonsky
Section of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
Search for other works by this author on:
Dinesh Nagi;
Dinesh Nagi
Academic Unit of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Whittington Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
John Yudkin;
John Yudkin
Academic Unit of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Whittington Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Lorna J Cox;
Lorna J Cox
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Penelope M S Clark;
Penelope M S Clark
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
C Nicholas Hales
C Nicholas Hales
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. C.N. Hales, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Box 232, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QR, U.K.
Diabetes 1995;44(4):437–440
Article history
Received:
June 14 1993
Revision Received:
December 08 1994
Accepted:
December 08 1994
PubMed:
7698513
Citation
Diane Ostrega, Kenneth Polonsky, Dinesh Nagi, John Yudkin, Lorna J Cox, Penelope M S Clark, C Nicholas Hales; Measurement of Proinsulin and Intermediates: Validation of Immunoassay Methods by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Diabetes 1 April 1995; 44 (4): 437–440. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.44.4.437
Download citation file:
98
Views