We tested 32 routine clinical parameters for their ability to discriminate between a high risk and a low risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) within 5–7 years after pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Latino women (n = 671) with GDM who did not have diabetes 4–16 weeks after delivery returned for at least one 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) within 7.5 years. Multivariate analysis was used to identify parameters ascertained during or immediately after the index pregnancy that were independently associated with the development of diabetes during follow-up. Life table analysis revealed a 47% cumulative incidence rate of NIDDM 5 years after delivery for this cohort of patients who did not have diabetes at the initial postpartum examination. Four variables were identified as independent predictors of NIDDM: the area under the OGTT glucose curve at 4–16 weeks postpartum, the gestational age at the time of diagnosis of GDM, the area under the OGTT glucose curve during pregnancy, and the highest fasting serum glucose concentration during pregnancy. Examination of relative risks (RRs) of NIDDM between the highest and lowest quartiles of the cohort for each variable, adjusted for the other three variables, revealed that the postpartum OGTT provided the best discrimination between high-risk and low-risk individuals (adjusted RR = 11.5 [95% confidence interval 4.5–29.1] compared with adjusted RRs of only 0.5–2.5 for the other three variables). Women who met World Health Organization criteria for impaired glucose tolerance at the early postpartum examination had a 5-year unadjusted 80% risk of diabetes, which was much higher than the risk of NIDDM that has been reported for Latino people with impaired glucose tolerance who were not selected for a history of GDM. Our findings indicate that postpartum glucose tolerance testing is superior to other routine clinical parameters in defining the risk of NIDDM within 5–7 years after pregnancies complicated by GDM. Furthermore, a history of GDM appears to impart a specific risk for NIDDM that cannot be explained by the degree of glucose tolerance observed when patients are not pregnant.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Articles|
May 01 1995
Predicting Future Diabetes in Latino Women With Gestational Diabetes: Utility of Early Postpartum Glucose Tolerance Testing
Siri L Kjos;
Siri L Kjos
Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Ruth K Peters;
Ruth K Peters
Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Anny Xiang;
Anny Xiang
Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Olivia A Henry;
Olivia A Henry
Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Martin Montoro;
Martin Montoro
Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas A Buchanan
Thomas A Buchanan
Departments of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California
Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas A. Buchanan, General Hospital—Room 6602, 1200 North State St., Los Angeles, CA 90033
Diabetes 1995;44(5):586–591
Article history
Received:
November 03 1994
Revision Received:
January 26 1995
Accepted:
January 26 1995
PubMed:
7729620
Citation
Siri L Kjos, Ruth K Peters, Anny Xiang, Olivia A Henry, Martin Montoro, Thomas A Buchanan; Predicting Future Diabetes in Latino Women With Gestational Diabetes: Utility of Early Postpartum Glucose Tolerance Testing. Diabetes 1 May 1995; 44 (5): 586–591. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.44.5.586
Download citation file:
337
Views