Subjects with NIDDM have increased plasma proinsulin concentrations, compared with nondiabetic subjects, both in absolute terms and as a proportion of circulating insulin-like molecules. It remains uncertain whether this reflects a primary β-cell defect in proinsulin processing or is secondary to hyperglycemia. We addressed this question by assessing the effects of reducing hyperglycemia on relative hyperproinsulinemia in subjects with NIDDM. Eight subjects with NIDDM underwent three 8-week periods in a randomized crossover design of therapy with diet alone, sulfonylurea (gliclazide), or insulin (ultralente). The effects on β-cell peptide concentrations were assessed 1) fasting, 2) in response to hyperglycemie clamping, and 3) in response to an injection of the nonglucose secreto-gogue arginine and compared with measurements in seven nondiabetic control subjects. Both sulfonylurea and insulin therapy substantially reduced fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentrations, compared with diet therapy alone. The diabetic subjects on diet therapy had relative hyperproinsulinemia, assessed relative to C-peptide concentrations, fasting and in response to hyperglycemie clamping and arginine, compared with control subjects. Neither sulfonylurea nor insulin therapy altered the relative hyperproinsulinemia. Insulin therapy reduced fasting proinsulin concentrations from geometric mean 29.4 (1 SD range, 14.6-59.0) pmol/l on diet therapy to 18.7 (7.3-48.1) pmol/l (P < 0.05). A similar trend was evident with fasting C-peptide concentrations with a reduction from 0.9 (0.6-1.4) nmol/l on diet therapy to 0.6 (0.4-0.9) nmol/l (P = 0.06), so that the relative hyperproinsulinemia, assessed as the ratio of fasting proinsulin to C-peptide, was unchanged by insulin. Similarly, insulin therapy failed to reduce the ratio of proinsulin to C-peptide concentrations in response to a hyperglycemie clamp and in the acute incremental response to arginine. Failure to improve the relative hyperproinsulinemia of NIDDM, despite significant reduction of hyperglycemia with exogenous insulin therapy, supports the hypothesis that relative hyperproinsulinemia in NIDDM is a reflection of a primary β-cell defect rather than being secondary to hyperglycemia.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Articles|
October 01 1997
Relative Hyperproinsulinemia of NIDDM Persists Despite the Reduction of Hyperglycemia With Insulin or Sulfonylurea Therapy
Jonathan Rachman;
Jonathan Rachman
Diabetes Research Laboratories, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford
Oxford, U.K.
Search for other works by this author on:
Jonathan C Levy;
Jonathan C Levy
Diabetes Research Laboratories, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford
Oxford, U.K.
Search for other works by this author on:
Beryl A Barrow;
Beryl A Barrow
Diabetes Research Laboratories, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford
Oxford, U.K.
Search for other works by this author on:
Susan E Manley;
Susan E Manley
Diabetes Research Laboratories, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford
Oxford, U.K.
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert C Turner
Robert C Turner
Diabetes Research Laboratories, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford
Oxford, U.K.
Search for other works by this author on:
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. J. Rachman, Diabetes Research Laboratories, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, U.K.
Diabetes 1997;46(10):1557–1562
Article history
Received:
June 18 1996
Revision Received:
June 10 1997
Accepted:
June 10 1997
PubMed:
9313749
Citation
Jonathan Rachman, Jonathan C Levy, Beryl A Barrow, Susan E Manley, Robert C Turner; Relative Hyperproinsulinemia of NIDDM Persists Despite the Reduction of Hyperglycemia With Insulin or Sulfonylurea Therapy. Diabetes 1 October 1997; 46 (10): 1557–1562. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.46.10.1557
Download citation file:
38
Views