The recent discovery of uncoupling protein (UCP)-2 and UCP-3, and their high expression in skeletal muscle, has renewed interest in a possible role for these proteins in underlying the variability in energy expenditure and therefore metabolic efficiency. Using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, levels of expression of UCP-2 and long and short forms of UCP-3 were measured in skeletal muscle of 19 nondiabetic, male Pima Indians covering a wide range of body weight. Twenty-four-hour energy expenditure was measured in a respiratory chamber in 16 of these individuals. BMI was negatively correlated with the expression levels of the long (r = -0.53, P = 0.025) and short (r = -0.46, P = 0.047) forms of UCP-3. BMI was not correlated with UCP-2 expression. Metabolic rate during sleep, adjusted for fat-free mass and fat mass, was positively correlated with the long form of UCP-3 (r = 0.69, P = 0.006). These results indicate that UCP-3 may be a determinant of energy expenditure and metabolic efficiency in Pima Indians.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Abstract|
January 01 1999
Skeletal muscle uncoupling protein 3 expression is a determinant of energy expenditure in Pima Indians.
P Schrauwen;
P Schrauwen
Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Search for other works by this author on:
J Xia;
J Xia
Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Search for other works by this author on:
C Bogardus;
C Bogardus
Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Search for other works by this author on:
R E Pratley;
R E Pratley
Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Search for other works by this author on:
E Ravussin
E Ravussin
Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Search for other works by this author on:
Citation
P Schrauwen, J Xia, C Bogardus, R E Pratley, E Ravussin; Skeletal muscle uncoupling protein 3 expression is a determinant of energy expenditure in Pima Indians.. Diabetes 1 January 1999; 48 (1): 146–149. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.48.1.146
Download citation file: