Results from experimental and gene-association studies suggest that IGF-II may influence body weight regulation and that individuals with low IGF-II levels may be more susceptible to weight gain and obesity. We therefore assessed the association between circulating concentrations of IGF-II and subsequent weight gain and progression to obesity. Participants in this study were 463 nonobese men and women aged between 45 and 60 years with normal glucose tolerance and with metabolic and anthropometric assessments at baseline and follow-up clinic visits. We examined the association between baseline concentrations of fasting serum IGF-II and risk of gaining ≥2.5 kg body wt or developing obesity using unconditional logistic regression. A total of 217 participants gained ≥2.5 kg body wt, and 29 developed obesity after >4 years of follow-up. In multivariate analysis, baseline IGF-II levels were significantly lower in participants who subsequently gained weight compared with individuals who remained stable or lost weight (P = 0.010). Similarly, individuals who developed obesity had lower baseline IGF-II levels (P = 0.006). Relatively higher IGF-II levels were also associated with a reduced risk of gaining weight (P for trend across quintiles of IGF-II = 0.006). Our data suggest that circulating IGF-II levels may play a role in body weight regulation and development of obesity in men and women with normal glucose tolerance.

IIGF-I and IGF-II are peptide hormones that play an important role in the regulation of metabolism and growth (1). Although IGF-II is known to play a key role in fetal growth and development (2), the regulation and function of IGF-II in postnatal life is poorly understood (3,4). However, recent studies suggest that this hormone may be associated with lipid metabolism and body weight regulation (4).

Observational and experimental investigations in humans have shown that a number of allelic variants within the IGF-II gene influence body weight and BMI (57). In an overfeeding study, the apaI polymorphism in the IGF-II gene was also associated with increased adiposity and related metabolic changes (8). Together, these data indicate that IGF-II may influence body weight regulation and that individuals with low IGF-II levels may be more susceptible to weight gain and obesity. We therefore assessed the association between circulating concentrations of IGF-II and subsequent weight gain and progression to obesity in a random sample of middle-aged men and women who had normal glucose tolerance.

Participants and protocol.

The volunteers in this study all were participants in the Ely Study, a continuing population-based cohort study in Ely, Cambridgeshire, U.K. The detailed design of the study has been described previously (9). The original sample, comprising 1,122 people without known diabetes, was recruited between 1990 and 1992 at random from a population-based sampling frame consisting of all people in Ely aged between 40 and 65 years in 1990. The initial response rate was 74%. These individuals attended a morning clinic and underwent a standard 75-g oral glucose load, having fasted since 2200 h the previous evening.

Between 1994 and 1996, a 4.5-year follow-up study was undertaken of the 1,071 (95%) of the 1,122 individuals who did not have diabetes by 1985 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria at baseline (10). Twenty (2%) participants had died in the interim, and 937 (89%) of the remaining volunteers agreed to participate in the follow-up study. These 937 individuals aged 50–70 years attended a second morning clinic and underwent an additional glucose tolerance assessment in accordance with the previously described criteria.

Inclusion criteria.

Of the 937 individuals who attended both clinic visits, 604 (64%) were normoglycemic at baseline assessment by current WHO and American Diabetes Association criteria, with a fasting plasma glucose of <6.1 mmol/l and a 2-h plasma glucose value of <7.8 mmol/l (11,12). Because of the possible effects of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes on IGF-II and body weight (13,14), only these 604 participants were included in the analysis.

To assess the development of obesity in this population and because of possible compensatory metabolic changes in obese individuals (14), we excluded individuals who were obese at baseline according to current WHO guidelines (15). Thus, 52 participants who had BMI ≥30 were omitted from the analysis. Of the 552 eligible participants, 463 (84%) had blood available for assessment of baseline IGF-II concentrations. Mean overall weight change did not differ between individuals in this analysis and the 89 participants who did not have blood available for IGF-II assays (P = 0.301). Therefore, the study population for this investigation comprised 173 men and 290 women.

Anthropometric and metabolic assessment.

At both visits, height and weight were measured with the participant in light clothing. BMI was estimated as weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in meters) squared. Waist and hip circumferences were measured in duplicate using a metal tape. Blood samples were taken at fasting and 120 min after a 75-g oral glucose load. All samples were permanently stored at −70°C within 4 h. Plasma glucose was measured in the routine National Health Service Laboratory at Addenbrooke’s Hospital using the hexokinase method (16). Plasma insulin was measured by two-site immunometric assays with either 125I or alkaline phosphatase labels (17,18). Cross-reactivity with intact proinsulin was <0.2%, and interassay coefficients of variation (CVs) were <7%.

Cholesterol and triglycerides were measured using the RA 1000 (Bayer Diagnostics, Basingstoke, U.K.), with a standard enzymatic method. Nonesterified fatty acid concentrations were determined enzymatically on the basis of the activity of acyl-CoA synthetase (Boehringer Mannheim, Lewes, Sussex, U.K.). Plasma leptin levels were measured using a two-site immunometric assay with a detection limit of 0.1 ng/ml (Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, U.K.). Inter- and intra-assay CVs were <7.5%. Baseline plasma concentrations of fasting IGF-I and IGF-II were measured by previously reported antibody-based assays (19). All interassay CVs were <10%. The Cambridge Local Research Ethics Committee, U.K., granted ethical permission for the study, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Definition of outcomes.

Weight change is a complex phenomenon that reflects a composite of negative, stable, and positive energy balance. These components may have distinct underlying biological processes (20). Weight loss is also associated with severe illness or preexisting disease (21,22). We therefore categorized participants a priori into exclusive categories of weight loss (lost ≥2.5 kg), weight stable (lost <2.5 kg or gained <2.5 kg), and weight gain (gained ≥2.5 kg). Using the WHO criterion of BMI ≥30 (15), we also examined progression to obesity as a secondary outcome variable.

Statistical analysis.

To obtain near-normal distributions, we applied logarithmic transformations to all nonnormally distributed variables. For baseline risk factors and follow-up characteristics, means or proportions were calculated for categories of weight change status. Stratified linear regression and the χ2 test were used to assess the statistical significance of associations between categories of weight change for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Linear regression and the Pearson partial correlation coefficients were used to assess the association between baseline risk factors and concentrations of circulating IGF-II.

We used unconditional logistic regression analysis to estimate the relative risk of weight gain and obesity according to circulating levels of IGF-II. As well as using IGF-II as a continuous variable, we categorized participants according to quintiles (20th percentile cutoffs) determined by the distribution of IGF-II levels in the study population. Because there was only a small number of participants who developed obesity (n = 29), we assessed the association between IGF-II and progression to obesity using IGF-II as a continuous variable. In a secondary post hoc analysis, we also used a dichotomous IGF-II variable comparing the relative risk of obesity and weight gain above and below the 20th percentile. Adjusted estimates of relative risk and 95% CIs were obtained with multivariate models that controlled for baseline age, sex, BMI, length of blood storage, follow-up time, weight, cholesterol, insulin, and IGF-I concentrations.

To further exclude the potential for bias and confounding, sex-specific relative risks were also assessed and the analysis was repeated excluding participants in the weight loss group or the 28 (6%) individuals who developed glucose intolerance at follow-up. In sex-specific analysis, associations between levels of IGF-II and weight gain were similar, and there was no detectable interaction between sex and IGF-II with subsequent weight gain (P = 0.295). All data were therefore presented for men and women combined. An analysis excluding participants who lost weight or developed glucose intolerance showed similar results to those for all eligible participants. We therefore presented data for the whole study population.

Linear trends comparing continuous variables with their corresponding categorical or polynomial terms and possible interactions between covariates and IGF-II were assessed with log likelihood ratio tests. For continuous variables, values are given as arithmetic or geometric means and 95% CIs. All analyses were done with Stata 7.0 statistical package (Stata, College Station, TX).

Baseline and follow-up characteristics.

A total of 41 (9%) study participants lost ≥2.5 kg body wt, 217 (47%) gained ≥2.5 kg body wt, and 205 (44%) maintained a stable weight (gained or lost <2.5 kg) after >4 years of follow-up (mean ± SD, 4.4 ± 0.3). In a cross-sectional investigation, baseline IGF-II levels were significantly correlated with cholesterol (r = 0.14, P = 0.002) and IGF-I (r = 0.11, P = 0.022), which remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis. However, IGF-II did not show any substantial associations with BMI (r = 0.01, P = 0.803), waist-to-hip ratio (r = −0.04, P = 0.333), waist circumference (r = −0.05, P = 0.384), or body weight (r = 0.01, P = 0.898). By contrast, in a prospective analysis, circulating IGF-II was inversely correlated with overall weight change (r = −0.10, P = 0.025) and change in BMI (r = −0.09, P = 0.046).

Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of the 463 study participants according to follow-up weight gain or weight stable/loss status. Weight gainers were slightly younger than those who maintained a stable weight or lost weight (P = 0.049) and had slightly longer mean follow-up time (4.4 ± 0.3 years vs. 4.5 ± 0.3 years; P = 0.011). In addition, IGF-II levels at baseline were significantly lower among people who gained weight than among those who remained stable or lost weight (P = 0.004). Figure 1 shows that in multivariate analysis, the difference in baseline IGF-II concentrations between groups remained statistically significant (P = 0.010). Similarly, Fig. 2 shows that levels of IGF-II were much lower in the 29 participants who later developed obesity compared with nonobese participants (mean [95% CI]; 466 [386 to 546] ng/ml vs. 580 [560 to 599] ng/ml; P = 0.006).

Levels of IGF-II and risk of weight gain and obesity.

As a continuous variable, the relative risk of weight gain was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.97; P = 0.010) for each 100 ng/ml increase in the level of IGF-II. Adding a quadratic term for IGF-II did not improve the fit of the model (P = 0.097), and the linear term remained statistically significant (P = 0.027), suggesting that the relation was linear. In a similar analysis, the relative risk of developing obesity was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.60–0.92; P = 0.007), which was not materially altered in multivariate analysis (relative risk = 0.76 [0.59–0.98]; P = 0.037).

To examine whether there was a threshold level of IGF-II associated with weight gain, we examined the risk of weight gain across categories of IGF-II concentrations (Table 2). An inverse association was still evident across categories of IGF-II concentrations in both univariate analysis (P for trend = 0.001) and multivariate analysis (P for trend = 0.006). However, relative risk estimates above the 20th percentile were broadly similar, suggesting that there might be a threshold level of circulating IGF-II concentrations and risk of weight gain or that the relation was hyperbolic. Compared with participants with levels below the 20th percentile (IGF-II <400 ng/ml), the risk of gaining weight in multivariate analysis was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.25–0.68; P = 0.001) among participants with IGF-II levels above the 20th percentile. Likewise, the corresponding relative risk of developing obesity for individuals above the 20th percentile was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.14–1.11; P = 0.078), compared with individuals with IGF-II levels below the 20th percentile. However, because of the small number of cases, this finding did not reach conventional statistical significance.

In this prospective study of men and women with normal glucose tolerance, relatively low concentrations of circulating IGF-II were associated with an increased risk of gaining weight and developing obesity. There was also some evidence to suggest that the association between IGF-II levels and weight gain may be nonlinear or that there may be a threshold level of IGF-II that confers the greatest risk of gaining weight.

The limitations of these observational data merit consideration. It is possible that unidentified correlates of IGF-II and risk factors for obesity could explain or modify our observations. For example, circulating concentrations of IGF-binding proteins may modify the association between IGF-II and weight gain. Measurement error as a result of variability in levels of IGF-II and other biological variables might have led to underestimation of the effect of IGF-II on weight gain and residual confounding. However, the pronounced inverse association between IGF-II and weight gain or obesity was not materially changed after controlling for correlates of IGF-II, possible confounders and putative risk factors for obesity.

Circulating concentrations of IGF-II may be elevated in individuals with underlying disease, such as cancer (23)— a condition that may also be associated with weight loss (22). We therefore conducted a secondary analysis excluding participants who subsequently lost weight and found similar inverse associations, indicating that these findings are unlikely to be biased by a subset of individuals with underlying disease. Furthermore, excluding from the analysis 28 participants who subsequently developed glucose intolerance did not materially alter the reported associations.

The results from this study concur with findings from gene-association studies examining the relation between allelic variants in the IGF-II gene and body weight (5,6). The imprinted IGF-II gene lies in close proximity to the insulin gene on chromosome 11p in humans. Accumulating data suggest that this genomic region may be important in the regulation of childhood and adult body weight and fat mass (7,2428). More recently, a 12-kb deletion of a possible intergenic control region of the IGF-II gene was associated with decreased IGF-II expression and increased adiposity in mice (29).

At least four polymorphisms within the IGF-II gene have shown strong associations with body weight and BMI in men (6). One of these variants has also been associated with circulating concentrations of the hormone. Consistent with the results from the present study, in heavier wild-type (GG) homozygotes, circulating IGF-II levels were found to be statistically significantly lower than lighter rare (AA) homozygotes (5). These results may explain why individuals with IGF-II levels below the 20th percentile had the greatest risk of weight gain in the current investigation. More notable, the apaI IGF-II gene variant has also been related to overfeeding-induced anthropometric and metabolic changes. Specifically, wild-type (GG) carriers of the apaI polymorphism gained significantly more subcutaneous fat mass than rare (AA) allele carriers (8), suggesting that in an environment of caloric excess, individuals with low circulating IGF-II levels may be more likely to gain weight and develop obesity.

Population studies assessing the cross-sectional association among circulating IGF-II concentrations and indexes of body weight or obesity are sparse. One investigation in three ethnic groups found no association with IGF-II levels and BMI (30) and only weak inverse associations with measures of central adiposity, such as waist-to-hip ratio. A more recent cross-sectional study found that obese men and women had statistically significantly lower mean IGF-II levels compared with leaner individuals (31). However, in comparison with lean controls, at least two clinical studies have reported higher IGF-II concentrations in people with obesity (14,32).

The inconsistent cross-sectional associations between IGF-II and indexes of adiposity and possibly elevated IGF-II levels in obese individuals may be due to compensatory changes as a result of weight change. For example, weight recuperation in female patients with anorexia nervosa is associated with significant increases in serum levels of IGF-II (33). However, it is difficult to draw any firm conclusions from these clinical observations because of the associated metabolic disturbances related to prolonged periods of fasting and caloric deficit. In addition, by altering levels of circulating IGF-binding proteins, the degree of hyperinsulinemia may also influence levels of IGF-II in obesity (14). Furthermore, propensity to obesity may depend not only on initial levels of circulating IGF-II but also on how IGF-II levels change in response to changes in body weight and adiposity. Hence, metabolic adaptation to caloric excess and subsequent weight change may also be important in body weight regulation (34).

Alternatively, IGF-II may be associated with other correlates of energy balance that have been shown to predict weight gain, such as muscle mass, energy expenditure, or the ratio of fat to carbohydrate oxidation (35,36). IGF-I and IGF-II play a critical role in muscle regeneration, and relatively higher IGF-II levels may prevent the age-related decline in muscle mass and metabolic function (3739). Evidence from transgenic experimental studies also suggest that IGF-II may be involved in fat metabolism. Circulating IGF-II concentrations in humans are nearly fourfold higher than levels of circulating IGF-I, peaking at puberty and showing only a modest decline with age, whereas systemic levels of IGF-II decline soon after birth in rodents (3). Nevertheless, transgenic mice overexpressing IGF-II are lighter, exhibiting reduced fat mass and lipid content of adipose tissue (4042). Oxidation of oral lipids is also increased in IGF-II transgenic animals, whereas rates of lipogenesis and lipolysis are similar to control animals, indicating that IGF-II may influence the metabolic utilization of ingested lipids (42).

The relation between IGF-II and body weight might also be due to a central-acting role of IGF-II on the regulation of feeding behavior and body weight. In both humans and rodents, IGF-I, IGF-II, and insulin and their receptors are expressed in hypothalamic regions implicated in adiposity signaling and regulation of food intake (43). Similar to insulin, experimental studies have shown that intracerebroventricular injections of IGF-II induce hypophagia and weight change in rodents, although data are inconclusive (4446). Furthermore, in a manner analogous to insulin, IGF-II attenuates the release of neuropeptide Y, a potent orexigenic peptide, from the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus in vitro (47). These central IGF-II actions may be mediated through the IGF-I receptor or via the insulin receptor isoform A. The latter is the only insulin receptor isoform expressed in central nervous tissue and has high affinity for IGF-II (48). Systemic and central administration of insulin has also been shown to increase IGF-II expression in the ventromedial and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus (49,50), suggesting that insulin-mediated changes in IGF-II may have a neuroendocrine function in regulating feeding behavior.

In summary, these prospective data demonstrate that low levels of circulating IGF-II are associated with an increased risk of weight gain and obesity in a population with normal glucose tolerance. Investigations of the regulation and physiological activity of IGF-II in postnatal life may help to clarify these observations.

FIG. 1.

Fasting IGF-II concentrations at baseline in participants who subsequently maintained a stable weight or lost weight compared with weight gainers. Data are means and 95% CIs adjusted for follow-up time, length of blood storage, baseline age, sex, weight, BMI, IGF-I, 0-h cholesterol, and 0-h insulin.

FIG. 1.

Fasting IGF-II concentrations at baseline in participants who subsequently maintained a stable weight or lost weight compared with weight gainers. Data are means and 95% CIs adjusted for follow-up time, length of blood storage, baseline age, sex, weight, BMI, IGF-I, 0-h cholesterol, and 0-h insulin.

Close modal
FIG. 2.

Fasting IGF-II concentrations at baseline in participants who subsequently developed obesity compared with nonobese participants at follow-up. Data are means and 95% CIs adjusted for follow-up time, length of blood storage, baseline age, sex, weight, BMI, IGF-I, 0-h cholesterol, and 0-h insulin.

FIG. 2.

Fasting IGF-II concentrations at baseline in participants who subsequently developed obesity compared with nonobese participants at follow-up. Data are means and 95% CIs adjusted for follow-up time, length of blood storage, baseline age, sex, weight, BMI, IGF-I, 0-h cholesterol, and 0-h insulin.

Close modal
TABLE 1

Baseline characteristics of study participants by subsequent weight change status, the Ely study, 1990–1996

Baseline variablesWeight stable/loss (n = 246)Weight gain (n = 217)P value
Women (%) 154 (63) 136 (63) 0.855 
Age (years) 53.1 (52.1–54.0) 51.7 (50.7–52.7) 0.049 
Former/current smokers (%)* 108 (45) 112 (53) 0.116 
Antihypertensive medication (%) 21 (9) 25 (12) 0.284 
Family history of diabetes (%) 40 (16) 38 (17) 0.720 
Height (cm) 167.4 (166.7–168.2) 167.5 (166.7–168.3) 0.877 
BMI (kg/m224.2 (23.9–24.5) 24.2 (23.9–24.5) 0.855 
Weight (kg) 68.1 (67.1–69.2) 68.2 (67.1–69.3) 0.939 
Waist-to-hip ratio 0.80 (0.79–0.80) 0.80 (0.80–0.81) 0.250 
Waist circumference (cm) 78.7 (77.7–79.6) 79.6 (78.6–80.6) 0.168 
2-h glucose (mmol/l) 5.4 (5.3–5.6) 5.5 (5.4–5.7) 0.372 
0-h insulin (pmol/l) 33.2 (31.3–35.2) 35.5 (33.3–37.8) 0.123 
0-h IGF-I (ng/ml) 149 (142–155) 146 (140–153) 0.652 
0-h cholesterol (mmol/l) 6.3 (6.1–6.4) 6.1 (6.0–6.3) 0.113 
0-h NEFA (mmol/l)§ 0.37 (0.34–0.40) 0.39 (0.35–0.42) 0.525 
0-h triglycerides (mmol/l) 1.07 (1.01–1.12) 1.03 (0.97–1.09) 0.370 
0-h leptin (ng/ml)* 6.5 (5.8–7.2) 6.9 (6.1–7.7) 0.453 
0-h IGF-II (ng/ml) 598 (572–624) 542 (514–569) 0.004 
Baseline variablesWeight stable/loss (n = 246)Weight gain (n = 217)P value
Women (%) 154 (63) 136 (63) 0.855 
Age (years) 53.1 (52.1–54.0) 51.7 (50.7–52.7) 0.049 
Former/current smokers (%)* 108 (45) 112 (53) 0.116 
Antihypertensive medication (%) 21 (9) 25 (12) 0.284 
Family history of diabetes (%) 40 (16) 38 (17) 0.720 
Height (cm) 167.4 (166.7–168.2) 167.5 (166.7–168.3) 0.877 
BMI (kg/m224.2 (23.9–24.5) 24.2 (23.9–24.5) 0.855 
Weight (kg) 68.1 (67.1–69.2) 68.2 (67.1–69.3) 0.939 
Waist-to-hip ratio 0.80 (0.79–0.80) 0.80 (0.80–0.81) 0.250 
Waist circumference (cm) 78.7 (77.7–79.6) 79.6 (78.6–80.6) 0.168 
2-h glucose (mmol/l) 5.4 (5.3–5.6) 5.5 (5.4–5.7) 0.372 
0-h insulin (pmol/l) 33.2 (31.3–35.2) 35.5 (33.3–37.8) 0.123 
0-h IGF-I (ng/ml) 149 (142–155) 146 (140–153) 0.652 
0-h cholesterol (mmol/l) 6.3 (6.1–6.4) 6.1 (6.0–6.3) 0.113 
0-h NEFA (mmol/l)§ 0.37 (0.34–0.40) 0.39 (0.35–0.42) 0.525 
0-h triglycerides (mmol/l) 1.07 (1.01–1.12) 1.03 (0.97–1.09) 0.370 
0-h leptin (ng/ml)* 6.5 (5.8–7.2) 6.9 (6.1–7.7) 0.453 
0-h IGF-II (ng/ml) 598 (572–624) 542 (514–569) 0.004 

Data shown are age- and sex-adjusted means and 95% CIs where applicable, unless otherwise indicated.

*

n = 452 because of missing values;

age- and sex-adjusted geometric means and 95% CIs;

obtained from χ2 tests and stratified linear regression analyses;

§

n = 457 because of missing values. NEFA, nonesterified fatty acid.

TABLE 2

Relative risk of weight gain according to levels of circulating IGF-II concentrations at baseline, the Ely Study, 1990–1996

IGF-II (ng/ml)PercentileWeight change category
Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)Adjusted odds ratio* (95% CI)
Weight stable/loss (n = 246)Weight gain (n = 217)
<400 <20th 33 (13) 60 (28) 1.00 1.00 
400–492 20th–40th 50 (20) 43 (20) 0.47 (0.26–0.85) 0.49 (0.26–0.90) 
493–610 41st–60th 54 (22) 38 (17) 0.39 (0.21–0.70) 0.36 (0.19–0.66) 
611–736 61st–80th 54 (22) 39 (18) 0.40 (0.22–0.72) 0.44 (0.23–0.82) 
>736 >80th 55 (23) 37 (17) 0.37 (0.20–0.67) 0.40 (0.21–0.74) 
P for trend    0.001 0.006 
IGF-II (ng/ml)PercentileWeight change category
Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)Adjusted odds ratio* (95% CI)
Weight stable/loss (n = 246)Weight gain (n = 217)
<400 <20th 33 (13) 60 (28) 1.00 1.00 
400–492 20th–40th 50 (20) 43 (20) 0.47 (0.26–0.85) 0.49 (0.26–0.90) 
493–610 41st–60th 54 (22) 38 (17) 0.39 (0.21–0.70) 0.36 (0.19–0.66) 
611–736 61st–80th 54 (22) 39 (18) 0.40 (0.22–0.72) 0.44 (0.23–0.82) 
>736 >80th 55 (23) 37 (17) 0.37 (0.20–0.67) 0.40 (0.21–0.74) 
P for trend    0.001 0.006 

Data are n (% of total) unless otherwise indicated.

*

Adjusted for follow-up time, length of blood storage, baseline age, sex, weight, BMI, IGF-I, 0-h cholesterol, and 0-h insulin.

This work is supported in part by the U.K. Medical Research Council (M.S.S., N.J.W., and the Ely Study), the British Diabetic Association, and the Anglia and Oxford Regional Health Authority also funded the Ely Study.

We are grateful to the staff of the St. Mary’s Street Surgery, Ely, U.K., and to H. Shannasy, S. Curran, S. Hennings, and J. Mitchell for help with the fieldwork for this study. We also thank Ramudan Abushufa, Endocrine Sciences Research Group, University of Manchester, U.K., for assistance with IGF assays; Professor Anne White, Endocrine Sciences Research Group, University of Manchester, U.K., for provision of IGF-II assay materials; and Professor Kay-Tee Khaw, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, U.K., for helpful discussions.

1.
Jones JI, Clemmons DR: Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions.
Endocr Rev
16
:
3
–34,
1995
2.
Constancia M, Hemberger M, Hughes J, Dean W, Ferguson-Smith A, Fundele R, Stewart F, Kelsey G, Fowden A, Sibley C, Reik W: Placental-specific IGF-II is a major modulator of placental and fetal growth.
Nature
417
:
945
–948,
2002
3.
Holly JM: The IGF-II enigma.
Growth Horm IGF Res
8
:
183
–184,
1998
4.
Wolf E, Hoeflich A, Lahm H: What is the function of IGF-II in postnatal life? Answers from transgenic mouse models.
Growth Horm IGF Res
8
:
185
–193,
1998
5.
O’Dell SD, Miller GJ, Cooper JA, Hindmarsh PC, Pringle PJ, Ford H, Humphries SE, Day IN: Apal polymorphism in insulin-like growth factor II (IGF2) gene and weight in middle-aged males.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
21
:
822
–825,
1997
6.
Gaunt TR, Cooper JA, Miller GJ, Day IN, O’Dell SD: Positive associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms in the IGF2 gene region and body mass index in adult males.
Hum Mol Genet
10
:
1491
–1501,
2001
7.
Gu D, O’Dell SD, Chen XH, Miller GJ, Day IN: Evidence of multiple causal sites affecting weight in the IGF2-INS-TH region of human chromosome 11.
Hum Genet
110
:
173
–181,
2002
8.
Ukkola O, Sun G, Bouchard C: Insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) and IGF-binding protein 1 (IGFBP1) gene variants are associated with overfeeding-induced metabolic changes.
Diabetologia
44
:
2231
–2236,
2001
9.
Wareham NJ, Byrne CD, Williams R, Day NE, Hales CN: Fasting proinsulin concentrations predict the development of type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care
22
:
262
–270,
1999
10.
World Health Organization:
Diabetes Mellitus: Report of a WHO Study Group.
Geneva, World Health Organization,
1985
11.
World Health Organization.
Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Mellitus and its Complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
Geneva, World Health Organization,
1999
12.
Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus: Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.
Diabetes Care
20
:
1183
–1197,
1997
13.
Swinburn BA, Nyomba BL, Saad MF, Zurlo F, Raz I, Knowler WC, Lillioja S, Bogardus C, Ravussin E: Insulin resistance associated with lower rates of weight gain in Pima Indians.
J Clin Invest
88
:
168
–173,
1991
14.
Frystyk J, Skjaerbaek C, Vestbo E, Fisker S, Orskov H: Circulating levels of free insulin-like growth factors in obese subjects: the impact of type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev
15
:
314
–322,
1999
15.
World Health Organization.
Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic
Geneva, World Health Organization,
1997
16.
Kunst A, Draeger B, Ziegenhorn J: UV-methods with hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. In
Methods of Enzymatic Analysis
. Bergmeyer H, Ed. Deerfield, Weinheim Verlag Chemie,
1983
, p.
163
–172
17.
Sobey WJ, Beer SF, Carrington CA, Clark PM, Frank BH, Gray IP, Luzio SD, Owens DR, Schneider AE, Siddle K: Sensitive and specific two-site immunoradiometric assays for human insulin, proinsulin, 65–66 split and 32–33 split proinsulins.
Biochem J
260
:
535
–541,
1989
18.
Alpha B, Cox L, Crowther N, Clark PM, Hales CN: Sensitive amplified immunoenzymometric assays (IEMA) for human insulin and intact proinsulin.
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem
30
:
27
–32,
1992
19.
Heald AH, Cruickshank JK, Riste LK, Cade JE, Anderson S, Greenhalgh A, Sampayo J, Taylor W, Fraser W, White A, Gibson JM: Close relation of fasting insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) with glucose tolerance and cardiovascular risk in two populations.
Diabetologia
44
:
333
–339,
2001
20.
Wedick NM, Mayer-Davis EJ, Wingard DL, Addy CL, Barrett-Connor E: Insulin resistance precedes weight loss in adults without diabetes: the Rancho Bernardo Study.
Am J Epidemiol
153
:
1199
–1205,
2001
21.
Harris TB, Launer LJ, Madans J, Feldman JJ: Cohort study of effect of being overweight and change in weight on risk of coronary heart disease in old age.
BMJ
314
:
1791
–1794,
1997
22.
Inui A: Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: current issues in research and management.
CA Cancer J Clin
52
:
72
–91,
2002
23.
Reeve AE, Becroft DM, Morison IM, Fukuzawa R: Insulin-like growth factor-II imprinting in cancer.
Lancet
359
:
2050
–2051,
2002
24.
Le Stunff C, Fallin D, Bougneres P: Paternal transmission of the very common class I INS VNTR alleles predisposes to childhood obesity.
Nat Genet
29
:
96
–99,
2001
25.
Dunger DB, Ong KK, Huxtable SJ, Sherriff A, Woods KA, Ahmed ML, Golding J, Pembrey ME, Ring S, Bennett ST, Todd JA: Association of the INS VNTR with size at birth. ALSPAC Study Team. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood.
Nat Genet
19
:
98
–100,
1998
26.
Lindsay RS, Kobes S, Knowler WC, Hanson RL: Genome-wide linkage analysis assessing parent-of-origin effects in the inheritance of birth weight.
Hum Genet
110
:
503
–509,
2002
27.
Roth SM, Schrager MA, Metter EJ, Riechman SE, Fleg JL, Hurley BF, Ferrell RE: IGF2 genotype and obesity in men and women across the adult age span.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
26
:
585
–587,
2002
28.
Rice T, Chagnon YC, Perusse L, Borecki IB, Ukkola O, Rankinen T, Gagnon J, Leon AS, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Bouchard C, Rao DC: A genomewide linkage scan for abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat in black and white families: the HERITAGE Family Study.
Diabetes
51
:
848
–855,
2002
29.
Jones BK, Levorse J, Tilghman SM: Deletion of a nuclease-sensitive region between the Igf2 and H19 genes leads to Igf2 misregulation and increased adiposity.
Hum Mol Genet
10
:
807
–814,
2001
30.
Cruickshank JK, Heald AH, Anderson S, Cade JE, Sampayo J, Riste LK, Greenhalgh A, Taylor W, Fraser W, White A, Gibson JM: Epidemiology of the insulin-like growth factor system in three ethnic groups.
Am J Epidemiol
154
:
504
–513,
2001
31.
Chang S, Wu X, Yu H, Spitz MR: Plasma concentrations of insulin-like growth factors among healthy adult men and postmenopausal women: associations with body composition, lifestyle, and reproductive factors.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
11
:
758
–766,
2002
32.
Frystyk J, Vestbo E, Skjaerbaek C, Mogensen CE, Orskov H: Free insulin-like growth factors in human obesity.
Metabolism
44
:
37
–44,
1995
33.
Argente J, Caballo N, Barrios V, Munoz MT, Pozo J, Chowen JA, Morande G, Hernandez M: Multiple endocrine abnormalities of the growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor axis in patients with anorexia nervosa: effect of short- and long-term weight recuperation.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
82
:
2084
–2092,
1997
34.
Weyer C, Pratley RE, Salbe AD, Bogardus C, Ravussin E, Tataranni PA: Energy expenditure, fat oxidation, and body weight regulation: a study of metabolic adaptation to long-term weight change.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
85
:
1087
–1094,
2000
35.
Ravussin E, Gautier JF: Metabolic predictors of weight gain.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
23 (Suppl. 1)
:
37
–41,
1999
36.
Sun G, Ukkola O, Rankinen T, Joanisse DR, Bouchard C: Skeletal muscle characteristics predict body fat gain in response to overfeeding in never-obese young men.
Metabolism
51
:
451
–456,
2002
37.
Musaro A, McCullagh K, Paul A, Houghton L, Dobrowolny G, Molinaro M, Barton ER, Sweeney HL, Rosenthal N: Localized Igf-1 transgene expression sustains hypertrophy and regeneration in senescent skeletal muscle.
Nat Genet
27
:
195
–200,
2001
38.
Barton ER, Morris L, Musaro A, Rosenthal N, Sweeney HL: Muscle-specific expression of insulin-like growth factor I counters muscle decline in mdx mice.
J Cell Biol
157
:
137
–148,
2002
39.
O’Dell SD, Day IN: Insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II).
Int J Biochem Cell Biol
30
:
767
–771,
1998
40.
Rogler CE, Yang D, Rossetti L, Donohoe J, Alt E, Chang CJ, Rosenfeld R, Neely K, Hintz R: Altered body composition and increased frequency of diverse malignancies in insulin-like growth factor-II transgenic mice.
J Biol Chem
269
:
13779
–13784,
1994
41.
Rossetti L, Barzilai N, Chen W, Harris T, Yang D, Rogler CE: Hepatic overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-II in adulthood increases basal and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in conscious mice.
J Biol Chem
271
:
203
–208,
1996
42.
Da Costa TH, Williamson DH, Ward A, Bates P, Fisher R, Richardson L, Hill DJ, Robinson IC, Graham CF: High plasma insulin-like growth factor-II and low lipid content in transgenic mice: measurements of lipid metabolism.
J Endocrinol
143
:
433
–439,
1994
43.
Baskin DG, Wilcox BJ, Figlewicz DP, Dorsa DM: Insulin and insulin-like growth factors in the CNS.
Trends Neurosci
11
:
107
–111,
1988
44.
Harel Z, Tannenbaum GS: Centrally administered insulin-like growth factor II fails to alter pulsatile growth hormone secretion or food intake.
Neuroendocrinology
56
:
161
–168,
1992
45.
Lauterio TJ, Marson L, Daughaday WH, Baile CA: Evidence for the role of insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) in the control of food intake.
Physiol Behav
40
:
755
–758,
1987
46.
Tannenbaum GS, Guyda HJ, Posner BI: Insulin-like growth factors: a role in growth hormone negative feedback and body weight regulation via brain.
Science
220
:
77
–79,
1983
47.
Sahu A, Dube MG, Phelps CP, Sninsky CA, Kalra PS, Kalra SP: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor II suppress neuropeptide Y release from the nerve terminals in the paraventricular nucleus: a putative hypothalamic site for energy homeostasis.
Endocrinology
136
:
5718
–5724,
1995
48.
Moller DE, Yokota A, Caro JF, Flier JS: Tissue-specific expression of two alternatively spliced insulin receptor mRNAs in man.
Mol Endocrinol
3
:
1263
–1269,
1989
49.
Lauterio TJ, Aravich PF, Rotwein P: Divergent effects of insulin on insulin-like growth factor-II gene expression in the rat hypothalamus.
Endocrinology
126
:
392
–398,
1990
50.
Ahmed I, Lauterio TJ: Intracerebroventricular injection of insulin or glucose alters insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) concentrations in specific hypothalamic nuclei.
Brain Res.
595
:
242
–248,
1992

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Manjinder S. Sandhu, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort’s Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, U.K. E-mail: [email protected].

Received for publication 27 November 2002 and accepted in revised form 19 February 2003.

WHO, World Health Organization.