Conophylline is a vinca alkaloid extracted from the tropical plant Ervatamia microphylla and has been shown to induce differentiation of pancreatic AR42J cells. In the present study, we investigated the effect of conophylline on the differentiation of pancreatic precursor cells. In the rat pancreatic rudiment in organ culture, conophylline inhibited the formation of cystic structure and increased the number of insulin-positive cells. Conophylline also markedly increased the expression of mRNA for insulin and the number of pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1–positive cells. These effects of conophylline were similar to those of activin A. We also examined the effect of conophylline on neonatal rats treated with streptozotocin, a model of type 2 diabetes. Treatment with conophylline significantly reduced the plasma glucose concentration and improved glucose tolerance in response to glucose loading. The insulin content and the β-cell mass at 2 months were significantly increased by conophylline. The number of islet-like cell clusters and pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1–positive ductal cells was greater in conophylline-treated rats. These results suggest that conophylline induces differentiation of pancreatic precursor cells and increases the formation of β-cells.

Insulin resistance and hyposecretion of insulin are two major features in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (1). Recent studies done in animal models of diabetes have suggested that the β-cell mass is a critical factor in the onset of overt diabetes. For example, insulin receptor substrate-1–deficient mice, made by homologous recombination, have remarkable insulin resistance. Nevertheless, they are not diabetic (2). The amount of β-cell hyperplasia is significant in these mice and perhaps hypersecretion of insulin compensates for the insulin resistance. Consequently, severe insulin resistance per se does not cause diabetes, and the β-cell mass that overcomes insulin resistance can prevent diabetes. In this regard, agents capable of stimulating pancreatic β-cell neogenesis may be potentially innovatory for the treatment of diabetes. This notion is fascinating in light of the fact that regeneration of the β-cell is impaired in animal models of type 2 diabetes. For example, in the Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rat, an animal model of type 2 diabetes, β-cell neogenesis was remarkably impaired (3). Furthermore, augmentation of differentiation potential would have reversed the onset of diabetes. Thus, an administration of glucagon-like peptide 1 or exendin 4 in neonatal GK rats can improve glucose tolerance in adults (4). It is expected that the promotion of β-cell neogenesis can prevent diabetes. Differentiation promoting factors such as glucagon-like peptide 1, exendin 4, islet neogenesis-associated protein (INGAP), betacellulin, hepatocyte growth factor, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-β, and activin have been described (49). Among them, activins play a key role in pancreatic development and regulate pancreatic differentiation (1012). Moreover, activins may regulate pancreatic regeneration (13). Activins, however, have pleiotropic actions in various organs and, in particular, induce apoptosis in some cells (14,15). This action may be considerably deteriorative for clinical use. Agents that reproduce the activin action, but without apoptosis-inducing activity, would be quite useful. In this regard, Umezawa et al. (16) have screened such compounds and recently identified the compound conophylline. Conophylline is extracted from Ervatamia microphylla, a tropical plant in Thailand (17). It has a unique structure typical of vinca alkaloid with a molecular weight of 794. As it is smaller than activins, better penetration to the tissues is expected. To elucidate the effect of conophylline on pancreatic progenitor cells, we investigated whether conophylline induces differentiation in fetal pancreas in organ culture. We also examined the effect of conophylline in vivo using neonatal streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats.

Conophylline was isolated from the leaves of Ervatamia microphylla and purified as previously described (18). Briefly, a chloroform extract of the leaves was chromatographed on a silica gel column with hexane:ethyl acetate (1:2) to produce the active fraction. After the active fraction was dissolved in MeOH and the insoluble fraction removed, it was then applied onto a Toyopearl HW-40 column and eluted with methanol to produce the active material. Finally, the crude material was purified by centrifugal partition chromatography and freeze dried from t-butyl alcohol to produce white powder. Recombinant human activin A was provided by Dr. Eto of Ajinomoto (Kawasaki, Japan).

Animals and dissection of pancreatic rudiments.

Pregnant Wistar rats were purchased from Japan SLC (Shizuoka, Japan). The morning of the discovery of the vaginal plug was designated as embryonic day 0.5 (E0.5). Pregnant rats at 14.5 days of gestation were killed by cervical dislocation. Embryos were removed from the uterus. Embryonic pancreata were dissected from the digestive tracts under a stereoscopic microscope.

Culture of the pancreatic rudiments in three-dimensional collagen gels.

Pancreatic rudiments were grown in three-dimensional collagen gels in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 2 mmol/l glutamine, 50 units/ml penicillin, and 75 mg/ml streptomycin. In some experiments, 2 nmol/l activin A or 0.1 μg/ml conophylline was added to the culture medium. Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. Medium was replaced every 48 h. At the indicated times, the rudiments were photographed and fixed for immunohistochemistry as described below. The DNA content of the rudiment was measured by fluorometric assay (19).

In vivo experiments using neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats.

One-day-old male neonatal Wistar rats received a single intraperitoneal injection of 85 μg/g of streptozoficin (STZ) (Wako, Tokyo, Japan) freshly dissolved in 0.05 mmol/l citrate buffer (pH 4.5). The day of STZ injection was designated as day 0. The pups were left with their mothers until 4 weeks. All neonates were tested 1 day after the STZ injection (day 1) for blood glucose using Accu-Chek Active (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The animals were included in this study only if their blood glucose concentration was between 200 and 350 mg/dl on day 1. Neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats were injected subcutaneously with 5 μg/g conophylline or vehicle on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Fasting blood glucose concentration and body weight were measured daily for the first week and then once a week for up to 8 weeks. The plasma insulin concentration was measured on day 8 and week 8 with an insulin assay kit (Morinaga, Yokohama, Japan), using rat insulin as standard. Eight weeks after the STZ treatment, an intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (2 g/kg body wt) was performed after 14 h fasting. The experimental protocol was approved by the animal care committee of Gunma University.

Immunohistochemistry.

The pancreatic rudiments and pancreas were fixed at 4°C in 10% formaldehyde in PBS for 24 h and embedded in Paraplast (Labonord, Templemars, France). Each pancreatic block was serially sectioned (6 μm) throughout its length. Immunostaining was performed as previously described (6). The sections were examined and photographed with Axiophoto (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). The antibodies used in this study had the following dilutions: guinea pig anti-porcine insulin (provided by Dr. T. Matozaki, Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan) 1:1,000, rabbit anti-human pancreatic polypeptide (PP) (Peptide Institute, Mino, Japan) 1:1,000, monoclonal anti-amylase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) 1:200, and rabbit anti-human pancreatic duodenal homeobox (PDX)-1 (Dr. Y. Kajimoto, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) 1:5,000. The fluorescent secondary antibodies were as follows: fluorescein anti–guinea pig antibodies and anti-rabbit antibodies (Alexa Fluor; Molecular Probes) 1:250.

Quantitative analysis.

To determine the number of cell types per pancreatic rudiment, serial 6-μm sections were cut and collected on multiwell glass slides. One of two consecutive sections was analyzed by immunocytochemistry for a given antigen (20). A total of 50 sections were analyzed per rudiment. Only the immunoreactive cells for which a nucleus was clearly visible were counted. The results of each experimental point were obtained by measuring the absolute number of each cell type in at least four pancreatic rudiments. An islet-like cell cluster (ICC) is designated as a cluster of insulin-positive cells containing less than eight cells across. To measure the number of ICCs in neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats, ICCs in 20 fields per section were counted and at least 5 sections were counted per rat. To determine the β-cell mass, the area of insulin-producing cells, as a percentage of the pancreatic area, was measured by using National Institutes of Health Image software. To calculate the β-cell mass, this relative volume of β-cells was multiplied by the pancreatic weight (6). The insulin content was measured after extraction with 0.1 mol/l HCl as previously described (6). Data are presented as means ± SE, and statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test.

RNA extraction and quantification of mRNA expression by real-time RT-PCR.

Total RNA was extracted from cultured pancreatic rudiments at different time points using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Messenger RNA was extracted using the Quick Prep Kit (Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology, Piscataway, NJ). RNA or mRNA samples were pretreated with DNase to remove contamination of genomic DNA. First-strand cDNA was synthesized by using a preamplication system for the SUPERSCRIPT First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen Japan). Real-time PCR was performed as previously described (21). The expression of rat insulin, PP, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in each sample was quantitated in separate tubes with the following primers: rat insulin I (sense and antisense were 5′-GGCTTTTGTCAAACAGCACCTTTG3′ and 5′-AGTTGCAGTAGTTCTCCAGTTGG-3′, respectively), rat PP (sense and antisense were 5′-TGAACAGAGGGCTCAATACGAAAC-3′ and 5′-AGACGAAGGGAGGCTACAAATCC-3′, respectively), rat glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (sense and antisense were 5′-CATGACCACAGTCCATGCCATC-3′ and 5′-CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCATATTC-3′, respectively). No PCR products were detected in the real-time PCR procedure without reverse transcription, indicating that the contamination of genomic DNA was negligible. Gels of the PCR products after quantitation of the indicated genes by real-time PCR showed single bands (264, 236, and 451 bp, respectively), the sizes of which were the same as expected. To measure the changes in the mRNA expression, mRNA was obtained from control and activin- and conophylline-treated tissues every 24 h, and each datum was standardized by the ratio of E14.5 rat mRNA.

Conophylline promoted differentiation of insulin-producing cells in organ culture.

Figure 1A shows the macroscopic morphology of pancreatic rudiments cultured in collagen gel for 72 h. The size of the rudiments was almost the same in the control and activin- and conophylline-treated rudiments. The ratio of the DNA content of the control and activin- and conophylline-treated rudiments was 1:0.94:1.06 (n = 3). At E14.5, the pancreatic rudiments consisted of duct-like epithelia surrounded by a considerable amount of mesenchymal tissue (Fig. 1B, b). A few insulin-positive cells were scattered around the epithelia (Fig. 1B, a). After a 72-h culture, duct-like epithelia expanded and formed cysts (Figs. 1B–D). The number of insulin-positive cells increased slightly (Fig. 1B and C). In activin-treated tissues, expansion of duct-like epithelia was moderate, and insulin-positive cells formed small clusters (Fig. 1B–E, f). In conophylline-treated tissues, expansion of duct-like epithelia was scarce and many islet-like cell clusters were observed (Fig. 1B–G, h). In addition, formation of small ducts was observed.

Since activin A converts amylase-secreting AR42J into PP-secreting cells (22), we first measured the changes in the number of PP-positive cells. In specimens obtained at 72 h, the number of PP-, insulin-, or amylase-positive cells was measured. Regarding the number of PP-positive cells, no statistical significance was obtained among the three groups (Fig. 1C). The number of insulin-positive cells in activin-treated tissue was significantly higher than that of the control. Likewise, the number of insulin-positive cells in the conophylline-treated rudiment was significantly greater than that of the control (Fig. 1C). Activin A and conophylline significantly reduced the number of amylase-positive cells. Real-time RT-PCR analysis further confirmed these results. The PP expression of the control group increased fourfold at 72 h, whereas that of the activin- and conophylline-treated groups did not increase significantly (Fig. 2). The insulin expression in the control group increased only slightly. In contrast, the expression of insulin in activin- and conophylline-treated tissues increased ∼200-fold at 72 h.

Conophylline promoted early step of β-cell differentiation.

We then studied the effect of conophylline in rudiments cultured for a longer period. Conophylline is light sensitive and degraded by ultraviolet rays. We tested various conditions and found that an addition of conophylline every 48 h provided the maximal effect (data not shown). Accordingly, we added conophylline every 2 days and cultured pancreatic rudiments for 10 days. In the control, epithelia expanded and formed cysts and insulin- or PDX-1–positive cells were scattered around them (Fig. 3A). In conophylline-treated tissues, epithelial expansion was scarce and the numbers of insulin- and PDX-1–positive cells increased markedly around duct-like structures (Fig. 3B). Moreover, many ICCs were observed. Quantitative analysis using the National Institutes of Health Image software showed that the relative area for PDX-1–and insulin-positive cells in conophylline-treated tissues were significantly greater than those of the control, and the ratio of area of insulin to PDX-1 in conophylline-treated tissues was lower than that of the control (Fig. 3C).

Effect of conophylline in neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats.

We then examined the effect of conophylline in vivo using neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats. As shown in Fig. 4A, the plasma glucose concentration peaked on day 2 in neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats, with a peak value of ∼400 mg/dl. The plasma glucose concentration then decreased gradually but remained significantly higher than that in the normal rats at 2 months of age (Table 1). We administered conophylline on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. As shown in Fig. 4A, the plasma glucose concentration was significantly lower on day 2 (P < 0.01) and thereafter. At 2 months of age, the plasma glucose concentration was significantly lower in conophylline-treated rats compared with STZ-induced diabetic rats (Table 1). An intraperitoneal glucose-loading test was done at 2 months. As shown in Fig. 4B, the plasma glucose response to glucose loading was greatly improved in conophylline-treated rats. The insulin secretion in response to glucose loading was also improved in conophylline-treated rats, but the response was still delayed compared with normal rats. As shown in Table 1, the insulin content and the β-cell mass were significantly increased in conophylline-treated rats. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the percent of PDX-1–positive ductal cells was markedly increased (Figs. 5A and B), and the number of ICCs was also significantly greater in conophylline-treated rats compared with vehicle-treated rats. Note that conophylline did not affect the number of BrdU-positive ductal cells or BrdU-positive β-cells in the islets (data not shown).

Here, we demonstrate that conophylline induced differentiation of fetal rat pancreas in organ culture. Previous studies using pancreatic anlage showed that mesenchymal factors promoted differentiation of pancreatic progenitors to exocrine lineage (22), and removal of mesenchymal tissue promoted differentiation to the endocrine lineage (20). Miralles et al. (20) showed that conversion of progenitor cells to endocrine or exocrine cells was modulated by mesenchyme-derived follistatin, an inhibitor of activin A. Collectively, these results imply that differentiation of progenitor cells is regulated by the activin-follistatin system, which acts as an autocrine/paracrine mechanism. In agreement with this notion, activin A induces differentiation of AR42J cells, a model of pancreatic progenitor cells, into endocrine cells (22). Conophylline is also capable of inducing differentiation of AR42J cells into insulin-producing cells. It had been postulated that conophylline reproduces the action of activin A (16). In an organ culture system, conophylline markedly augmented the expression of the insulin gene and significantly increased the number of insulin-positive cells (Figs. 1 and 2). This was also the case in the activin-treated group, which suggests that activin A and conophylline suppressed the effect of mesenchymal cells and promoted differentiation to the endocrine lineage. Because conophylline activates p38 mitogen–activated protein kinase and induces the expression of neurogenin 3, as does activin A (16), conophylline may induce differentiation of pancreatic progenitor cells using the same pathway as activin (16). Hence, conophylline also reproduces the action of activin A in organ culture. Although conophylline increased the number of insulin-positive cells, unlike activin A, it did not significantly induce cystic expansion of the duct-like structure. Instead, there were many small ducts. This indicates that conophylline increased branching morphogenesis of the ducts. It is known that activin A inhibits branching morphogenesis of the pancreatic ducts (14). Conophylline may be less potent in inhibiting branching morphogenesis than activin A. Previous studies by Gittes et al. (23) and Miralles et al. (20) showed that mesenchymal tissue promoted differentiation of pancreatic anlage to the exocrine lineage. On the other hand, typical acinar structure was not formed and the duct-like structures expanded as cystoids in our experiments. This may have resulted from the cultivation conditions of the pancreatic anlage. Because insulin gene expression at 72 h measured by real-time PCR increased remarkably, we stimulated pancreatic anlage with conophylline every 2 days to induce them into insulin-positive cells. As a result, insulin-positive cells increased in the duct-like structures and ICCs invaginated from them. These ICCs were PDX-1 positive, and many of their cells expressed both insulin and PDX-1. These findings suggest that conophylline acts on pancreatic progenitor cells in the duct-like structures and promotes differentiation into insulin-producing cells. Although conophylline increased the number of insulin- and PDX-1–positive cells, the ratio of insulin to PDX-1 was reduced. Conophylline may act on the early step of β-cell differentiation. In this study, we detected the expression of PP in pancreatic rudiments. This result appears to be contradictory to the generally accepted view that PP is first expressed in the pancreas at birth. However, Herrera and colleagues (24,25) have shown that PP promotor is activated in earlier time points, and PP-positive cells are detected in some studies (26,27). Our result is in line with these reports.

An in vivo study using neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats further indicates that conophylline promotes differentiation of β-cells and improves glucose metabolism. This model has been widely used to study regeneration of pancreatic β-cells (2833). Glucagon-like peptide 1 and exendin 4 have been shown to ameliorate diabetes in this model (32). The present results demonstrate that conophylline increased β-cell mass and insulin content and is effective in the promotion of β-cell regeneration. Since conophylline increased the numbers of PDX-1–positive ductal cells and ICCs, it is quite likely that conophylline promotes neogenesis of β-cells by acting on the early stage of β-cell differentiation.

In summary, conophylline reproduces the effect of activin A and acts on pancreatic progenitor cells located in the vicinity of duct epithelium. It promotes differentiation to endocrine cells. Conophylline may be useful for promotion of differentiation of pancreatic β-cells.

FIG. 1.

Effect of activin A and conophylline in fetal pancreas in organ culture. A: Morphology of the pancreatic rudiment. Pancreatic rudiments obtained at E14.5 were cultured in collagen gel for 72 h in the absence (a) and presence 4 nmol/l activin A (b) or 100 ng/ml conophylline (c). The bar represents 1 mm. B: Histology of the pancreatic rudiment. Pancreatic rudiments were cultured in collagen gel for 72 h in the absence (c and d) and presence (e and f) of 4 nmol/l activin A or 100 ng/ml conophylline (g and h). Tissues were obtained before (a and b) and after 72-h culture (ch). Sections were then stained with hematoxylin/eosin (b, d, f, and h) or anti-insulin antibody (red) (a, c, e, and g). C: Quantitative analysis. Pancreatic rudiments were cultured for 72 h as mentioned above. Sections were then stained with anti-PP, anti-amylase, or anti-insulin antibody, and the numbers of PP-, insulin-, and amylase-positive cell/rudiment were measured as described in research design and methods. Values are means ± SE obtained in five rudiments. *P < 0.05 vs. none.

FIG. 1.

Effect of activin A and conophylline in fetal pancreas in organ culture. A: Morphology of the pancreatic rudiment. Pancreatic rudiments obtained at E14.5 were cultured in collagen gel for 72 h in the absence (a) and presence 4 nmol/l activin A (b) or 100 ng/ml conophylline (c). The bar represents 1 mm. B: Histology of the pancreatic rudiment. Pancreatic rudiments were cultured in collagen gel for 72 h in the absence (c and d) and presence (e and f) of 4 nmol/l activin A or 100 ng/ml conophylline (g and h). Tissues were obtained before (a and b) and after 72-h culture (ch). Sections were then stained with hematoxylin/eosin (b, d, f, and h) or anti-insulin antibody (red) (a, c, e, and g). C: Quantitative analysis. Pancreatic rudiments were cultured for 72 h as mentioned above. Sections were then stained with anti-PP, anti-amylase, or anti-insulin antibody, and the numbers of PP-, insulin-, and amylase-positive cell/rudiment were measured as described in research design and methods. Values are means ± SE obtained in five rudiments. *P < 0.05 vs. none.

Close modal
FIG. 2.

Changes in the mRNA expression induced by activin A and conophylline. Pancreatic rudiments were cultured for the indicated time in the absence (○) and presence (•) of 4 nmol/l activin A or 100 ng/ml conophylline (▪). Expression of PP (A) and insulin (B) was measured by real-time RT-PCR. *P < 0.05 vs. none.

FIG. 2.

Changes in the mRNA expression induced by activin A and conophylline. Pancreatic rudiments were cultured for the indicated time in the absence (○) and presence (•) of 4 nmol/l activin A or 100 ng/ml conophylline (▪). Expression of PP (A) and insulin (B) was measured by real-time RT-PCR. *P < 0.05 vs. none.

Close modal
FIG. 3.

Effect of conophylline on the expression of PDX-1 and insulin. Pancreatic rudiments were cultured for 10 days in the absence (A) or presence (B) of 100 ng/ml conophylline. Sections were stained with anti–PDX-1 (green) and anti-insulin (red) antibodies. Nuclei were stained with 4,6-diamidio-2-phenylindol-HCl (DAPI) (blue). PDX-1/insulin double-positive cells are in yellow. A and B: magnified 200×. C: Quantitative analysis. The ratio of the insulin-positive cell area to the PDX-1–positive cell area was calculated. Values are means ± SE obtained in four rudiments. *P < 0.05 vs. control.

FIG. 3.

Effect of conophylline on the expression of PDX-1 and insulin. Pancreatic rudiments were cultured for 10 days in the absence (A) or presence (B) of 100 ng/ml conophylline. Sections were stained with anti–PDX-1 (green) and anti-insulin (red) antibodies. Nuclei were stained with 4,6-diamidio-2-phenylindol-HCl (DAPI) (blue). PDX-1/insulin double-positive cells are in yellow. A and B: magnified 200×. C: Quantitative analysis. The ratio of the insulin-positive cell area to the PDX-1–positive cell area was calculated. Values are means ± SE obtained in four rudiments. *P < 0.05 vs. control.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

Effect of conophylline on glucose metabolism in neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats. A: Neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats were injected with conophylline or vehicle on days 1, 3, 5, and 7, and the plasma glucose concentration was measured in conophylline (•) and vehicle-treated (○) rats. Response in normal rats is also shown (▵). Values are the means ± SE for values obtained in five rats, excluding the control group on day 7 (n = 4). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. vehicle. B: An intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test was done at 2 months of age. Changes in the plasma glucose concentration (a) and plasma insulin concentration (b) were measured. Values are means ± SE obtained in five rats. Dashed line indicates normal response, as reported previously (30). *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle.

FIG. 4.

Effect of conophylline on glucose metabolism in neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats. A: Neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats were injected with conophylline or vehicle on days 1, 3, 5, and 7, and the plasma glucose concentration was measured in conophylline (•) and vehicle-treated (○) rats. Response in normal rats is also shown (▵). Values are the means ± SE for values obtained in five rats, excluding the control group on day 7 (n = 4). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. vehicle. B: An intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test was done at 2 months of age. Changes in the plasma glucose concentration (a) and plasma insulin concentration (b) were measured. Values are means ± SE obtained in five rats. Dashed line indicates normal response, as reported previously (30). *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle.

Close modal
FIG. 5.

Effect of conophylline on the number of PDX-1–positive ductal cells and ICCs. Neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats were treated with conophylline or vehicle, and tissues were obtained on day 4. A: Pancreatic section was stained with anti–PDX-1 (red) and anti-cytokeratin (anti-CK) (green) antibodies. Nuclei were stained in blue. B: The number of ICCs and PDX-1–positive ductal cells was counted. For measurement of PDX-1–positive ductal cells, 300 ductal cells were examined. Values are the means ± SE obtained in five rats. *P < 0.01 vs. none.

FIG. 5.

Effect of conophylline on the number of PDX-1–positive ductal cells and ICCs. Neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats were treated with conophylline or vehicle, and tissues were obtained on day 4. A: Pancreatic section was stained with anti–PDX-1 (red) and anti-cytokeratin (anti-CK) (green) antibodies. Nuclei were stained in blue. B: The number of ICCs and PDX-1–positive ductal cells was counted. For measurement of PDX-1–positive ductal cells, 300 ductal cells were examined. Values are the means ± SE obtained in five rats. *P < 0.01 vs. none.

Close modal
TABLE 1

Effects of conophylline in neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats

NormalSTZSTZ/CnP
Body weight (g) 218.2 ± 10.2 210.0 ± 13.2 216.2 ± 9.4 
Pancreas weight (g) 0.82 ± 0.02 0.83 ± 0.04 0.89 ± 0.03 
Plasma glucose (mg/dl) 130.4 ± 4.0 158.2 ± 4.8 141.2 ± 3.4* 
Plasma insulin (ng/ml) 2.4 ± 0.2 0.90 ± 0.1 1.62 ± 0.3 
Insulin content (μg) 100.8 ± 6.8 42.1 ± 3.2 72.4 ± 4.5 
β-Cell mass (mg) 8.34 ± 0.90 2.76 ± 0.8 5.89 ± 0.7 
NormalSTZSTZ/CnP
Body weight (g) 218.2 ± 10.2 210.0 ± 13.2 216.2 ± 9.4 
Pancreas weight (g) 0.82 ± 0.02 0.83 ± 0.04 0.89 ± 0.03 
Plasma glucose (mg/dl) 130.4 ± 4.0 158.2 ± 4.8 141.2 ± 3.4* 
Plasma insulin (ng/ml) 2.4 ± 0.2 0.90 ± 0.1 1.62 ± 0.3 
Insulin content (μg) 100.8 ± 6.8 42.1 ± 3.2 72.4 ± 4.5 
β-Cell mass (mg) 8.34 ± 0.90 2.76 ± 0.8 5.89 ± 0.7 

Data are means ± SE for five rats. Conophylline (5 μg/g) (STZ/CnP) or vehicle (STZ) was injected into neonatal STZ-induced diabetic rats on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Various parameters were measured at 2 months.

*

P <0.05 vs. STZ.

P <0.01 vs. STZ.

The present study was supported by a grant from the Project for Realization of Regeneration Medicine and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.

The authors are grateful to Mayumi Odagiri for secretarial assistance.

1.
Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ: Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.
Diabet Med
15
:
539
–553,
1998
2.
Tamemoto H, Kadowaki T, Tobe K, Yagi T, Sakura H, Hayakawa T, Terauchi Y, Ueki K, Kaburagi Y, Satoh S, et al.: Insulin resistance and growth retardation in mice lacking insulin receptor substrate-1.
Nature
372
:
182
–186,
1994
3.
Plachot C, Movassat J, Portha B: Impaired beta-cell regeneration after partial pancreatectomy in the adult Goto-Kakizaki rat, a spontaneous model of type II diabetes.
Histochem Cell Biol
116
:
131
–139,
2001
4.
Tourrel C, Bailbe D, Lacorne M, Meile MJ, Kergoat M, Portha B: Persistent improvement of type 2 diabetes in the Goto-Kakizaki rat model by expansion of the β-cell mass during the prediabetic period with glucagon-like peptide-1 or exendin-4.
Diabetes
51
:
1443
–1452,
2002
5.
Rafaeloff R, Pittenger GL, Barlow SW, Qin XF, Yan B, Rosenberg L, Duguid WP, Vinik AI: Cloning and sequencing of the pancreatic islet neogenesis associated protein (INGAP) gene and its expression in islet neogenesis in hamsters.
J Clin Invest
99
:
2100
–2109,
1997
6.
Li L, Seno M, Yamada H, Kojima I: Promotion of beta-cell regeneration by betacellulin in ninety percent-pancreatectomized rats.
Endocrinology
142
:
5379
–5385,
2001
7.
Mashima H, Shibata H, Mine T, Kojima I: Formation of insulin-producing cells from pancreatic acinar AR42J cells by hepatocyte growth factor.
Endocrinology
137
:
3969
–3976,
1996
8.
Cras-Meneur C, Elghazi L, Czernichow P, Scharfmann R: Epidermal growth factor increases undifferentiated pancreatic embryonic cells in vitro: a balance between proliferation and differentiation.
Diabetes
50
:
1571
–1579,
2001
9.
Sanvito F, Herrera PL, Huarte J, Nichols A, Montesano R, Orci L, Vassalli JD: TGF-beta 1 influences the relative development of the exocrine and endocrine pancreas in vitro.
Development
120
:
3451
–3462,
1994
10.
Yamaoka T, Idehara C, Yano M, Matsushita T, Yamada T, Ii S, Moritani M, Hata J, Sugino H, Noji S, Itakura M: Hypoplasia of pancreatic islets in transgenic mice expressing activin receptor mutants.
J Clin Invest
102
:
294
–301,
1998
11.
Shiozaki S, Tajima T, Zhang YQ, Furukawa M, Nakazato Y, Kojima I: Impaired differentiation of endocrine and exocrine cells of the pancreas in transgenic mouse expressing the truncated type II activin receptor.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1450
:
1
–11,
1999
12.
Kim SK, Hebrok M, Li E, Oh SP, Schrewe H, Harmon EB, Lee JS, Melton DA: Activin receptor patterning of foregut organogenesis.
Genes Dev
14
:
1866
–1871,
2000
13.
Zhang YQ, Zhang H, Maeshima A, Kurihara H, Miyagawa J, Takeuchi T, Kojima I: Up-regulation of the expression of activins in the pancreatic duct by reduction of the beta-cell mass.
Endocrinology
143
:
3540
–3547,
2002
14.
Ball EM, Risbridger GP: Activins as regulators of branching morphogenesis.
Dev Biol
238
:
1
–12,
2001
15.
Hully JR, Chang L, Schwall RH, Widmer HR, Terrell TG, Gillett NA: Induction of apoptosis in the murine liver with recombinant human activin A.
Hepatology
20
:
854
–862,
1994
16.
Umezawa K, Hiroki A, Kawakami M, Naka H, Takei I, Ogata T, Kojima I, Koyano T, Kowithayakorn T, Pang H-S, Kam T-S. Induction of insulin production in rat pancreatic acinar carcinoma cells by conophylline.
Biomed Pharmacother
57
:
341
–350,
2003
17.
Umezawa K, Taniguchi T, Toi M, Ohse T, Tsutsumi N, Yamamoto T, Koyano T, Ishizuka M: Growth inhibition of K-ras-expressing tumours by a new vinca alkaloid, conophylline, in nude mice.
Drugs Exp Clin Res
22
:
35
–40,
1996
18.
Umezawa K, Ohse T, Yamamoto T, Koyano T, Takahashi Y: Isolation of a new vinka alkaloid from the leaves of Ervatamia microphylla as an inhibitor of ras functions.
Anticancer Res
14
:
2413
–2418,
1994
19.
Downs TR, Wifinger WW: Fluorometric quantification of DNA in cells and tissues.
Anal Biochem
131
:
538
–547,
1983
20.
Miralles F, Czernichow P, Scharfmann R: Follistatin regulates the relative proportions of endocrine versus exocrine tissue during pancreatic development.
Development
125
:
1017
–1024,
1998
21.
Maeshima A, Yamashita S, Maeshima K, Kojima I, Nojima Y: Activin A produced by ureteric bud is a differentiation factor for metanephric meaenchyme.
J Am Soc Nephrol
14
:
1523
–1534,
2003
22.
Mashima H, Ohnishi H, Wakabayashi K, Mine T, Miyagawa J, Hanafusa T, Seno M, Yamada H, Kojima I: Betacellulin and activin A coordinately convert amylase-secreting pancreatic AR42J cells into insulin-secreting cells.
J Clin Invest
97
:
1647
–1654,
1996
23.
Gittes GK, Galante PE, Hanahan D, Rutter WJ, Debase HT: Lineage-specific morphogenesis in the developing pancreas: role of mesenchymal factors.
Development
122
:
439
–447,
1996
24.
Herrera PL, Huarte J, Zufferey R, Nichols A, Mermillod B, Philippe J, Muniesa P, Sanvito F, Orci L, Vassalli JD: Ablation of islet endocrine cells by targeted expression of hormone-promotor-driven toxigenes.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
91
:
12999
–13003,
1994
25.
Herrera PL: Adult insulin- and glucagon-producing cells differentiate from two independent cell lineages.
Development
127
:
2317
–2322,
2000
26.
Bocian-Sabkowska J: Prenatal development of the human pancreatic islets.
Folia Histochem Cytobiol
35
:
151
–154,
1997
27.
Schwitzgebel VM, Scheel DW, Conners JR, Kalamaras J, Lee JE, Anderson DJ, Sussel L, Johnson JD, German MS: Expression of neurogenin 3 reveals an islet cell precursor population in the pancreas.
Development
127
:
3533
–3542,
2000
28.
Bonner-Weir S, Trent DF, Honey RN, Weir GC: Responses of neonaral rat islet to streptozotocin.
Diabetes
30
:
64
–69,
1981
29.
Cantenys D, Portha B, Dutrillaux MC, Hollande E, Roze C, Picon L: Histogenesis of the endocrine pancreas in newborn rats after destruction by streptozotocin: an immunocytochemical study.
Virch Arch
35
:
109
–122,
1981
30.
Dutrillaux MC, Portha B, Roze C, Hollande E: Ultrastructural study of pancreatic B cell regeneration in newborn rats after destruction by streptozotocin.
Virch Arch
39
:
173
–185,
1982
31.
Wang RN, Bouwens L, Kloppel G. Beta-cell proliferation in normal and streptozotocin-treated newborn rats: site, dynamics and capacity.
Diabetologia
37
:
1088
–1096,
1994
32.
Tourrel C, Bailbe D, Meile MJ, Kergoat M, Portha B: Glucagon-like peptide-1 and exendin-4 stimulate β-cell neogenesis in streptozotocin-treated newborn rats resulting in persistently improved glucose homeostasis at adult age.
Diabetes
50
:
1562
–1570,
2001
33.
Li L, Yi Z, Seno M, Kojima I: Activin A and Betacellulin: stimulation of β-cell regeneration in neonatal streptozotocin-treated rats.
Diabetes
53
:
608
–615,
2004