The glucose dependence of the insulinotropic action of KATP channel–blocking imidazoline compounds was investigated. Administration of 100 μmol/l phentolamine, but not 100 μmol/l efaroxan, markedly increased insulin secretion of freshly isolated mouse islets when the perifusion medium contained 5 mmol/l glucose. When the glucose concentration was raised to 10 mmol/l in the continued presence of either imidazoline, a clear potentiation of secretion occurred as compared with 10 mmol/l glucose alone. In the presence of efaroxan, a brisk first-phase–like increase was followed by a sustained phase, whereas a more gradual increase resulted in the presence of phentolamine. Administration of 100 μmol/l phentolamine was somewhat more effective than 100 μmol/l efaroxan to inhibit KATP channel activity in intact cultured β-cells (reduction by 96 vs. 83%). Both compounds were similarly effective to depolarize the β-cells. When measured by the perforated patch-technique, the depolarization by efaroxan was often oscillatory, whereas that by phentolamine was sustained. In perifused cultured islets, both compounds increased the cytosolic calcium concentration ([Ca2+]c) in the presence of 5 and 10 mmol/l glucose. Efaroxan induced large amplitude oscillations of [Ca2+]c, whereas phentolamine induced a sustained increase. It appears that a KATP channel block by imidazolines is not incompatible with a glucose-selective enhancement of insulin secretion. The glucose selectivity of efaroxan may involve an inhibitory effect distal to [Ca2+]c increase and/or the generation of [Ca2+]c oscillations.
Imidazolines are a group of investigational antidiabetic drugs. Originally, an antagonism at α-adrenoceptors was believed to be the mechanism of action of the prototypical imidazoline, phentolamine (1,2). When it became clear that the insulinotropic effect of this compound was not due to an α-antagonism but was related to its imidazoline moiety (3,4), it was hypothesized that this effect was mediated by a β-cell imidazoline receptor, as had been described previously for other pharmacological actions of imidazoline compounds (5).
The demonstration that phentolamine and other imidazolines block KATP channels in pancreatic β-cells (6,7) offered an explanation for their insulinotropic property. However, it remained unclear how the effect on the KATP channel was related to the hypothetical β-cell imidazoline receptor (8). The demonstration that the imidazoline RX 871024 increased insulin secretion not only by blocking KATP channels, but also by acting at a site distal to calcium influx, led to the alternative hypothesis that imidazolines have effects at multiple independent sites of the pancreatic β-cell (9). The concept of a β-cell imidazoline receptor mediating a multitude of effects was rendered less likely by the observation that the KATP channel block by imidazolines was exerted directly at Kir6.2, the pore-forming subunit of the channel (10,11).
Thus, it could be expected that by structural modification it should be possible to separate the blocking effect of the imidazolines on KATP channels from their more direct effect on exocytosis. An imidazoline devoid of a KATP channel–blocking activity was expected to stimulate secretion only in the presence of high but not basal glucose concentrations. In fact, several newly synthesized imidazoline compounds were shown to stimulate insulin secretion at concentrations at which they did not affect KATP channel activity (12,13). Consequently, these compounds were designated as a new generation of imidazoline compounds (14).
However, the mechanism of action of imidazolines appeared worth investigating because, from the beginning, the insulinotropic and glucose-lowering effect differs from that of sulfonylureas in that it is more antihyperglycemic than hypoglycemic (15). In this context, it should be kept in mind that the term “imidazolines” covers a rather heterogeneous group. We have shown earlier that phentolamine does in fact stimulate secretion also at basal glucose (16), whereas efaroxan has been described to exhibit a practically ideal glucose sensitivity in that it fails to increase insulin secretion at subthreshold glucose concentrations (17). The glucose dependence of the insulinotropic effect of RX 871024 decreased in a concentration-dependent manner between 10 and 100 μmol/l (9,14). Because all these compounds are blockers of KATP channels, the question arose whether an imidazoline-induced block of KATP channels was necessarily associated with a stimulatory effect on insulin secretion at a basal glucose concentration.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Efaroxan was kindly donated by RBI (Natick, MA) and phentolamine by Ciba-Geigy (Lörrach, Germany). Tolbutamide was obtained from Serva (Heidelberg, Germany), collagenase P from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany), and Fura-2/AM from Molecular Probes (Leiden, the Netherlands). Cell culture medium RPMI-1640 was purchased from Gibco BRL (Gaithersburg, MD), and fetal calf serum was obtained from Biochrom (Berlin, Germany). All other reagents of analytical grade were from E. Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Tolbutamide stock solutions were prepared in 0.1N NaOH.
Islets were isolated from the pancreas of NMRI mice by a conventional collagenase digestion technique and hand-picked under a stereomicroscope. Single cells were obtained by incubation of the islets for 10 min in a Ca2+-free medium and subsequent vortex mixing for 1 min. Islets and single islet cells were cultured for up to 4 days in RPMI-1640 culture medium with 10% fetal calf serum (5 mmol/l glucose) in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C.
KATP channel activity was measured by a standard patch-clamp technique using the cell-attached configuration (18). Pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass (2 mm od, 1.4 mm id; Hilgenberg, Malsfeld, Germany) by a two-stage vertical puller (List Electronic, Darmstadt, Germany) and had resistances between 3 and 6 MOhm when filled with solution. Currents were recorded by an EPC7 patch-clamp amplifier (List Electronic) and were low pass filtered by a 4-pole Bessel filter at 2 kHz and stored on videotape. The pipette holding potential was 0 mV in cell-attached recordings. The membrane potential of β-cells was determined using the whole-cell and perforated patch modes under current clamp condition (19). Test compounds were applied and washed out by changing the bath medium with a slow bath perfusion system. The compositions of the bath and pipette media were as given by Zünkler et al. (20). All experiments were performed at room temperature (20–23°C). Data were analyzed off line using pClamp 6.03 software (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA).
Microfluorimetric measurements of the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration.
Islets and islet cells were cultured on glass coverslips in Petri dishes and were used from day 2 to 4 after isolation. Fura-2/AM was loaded at a concentration of 2 μmol/l for 45 min at 37°C. The coverslip with the attached cells or islets was inserted in a purpose-made perifusion chamber on the stage of an epifluorescence microscope fitted with a Zeiss Fluar (40×) objective. The fluorescence (excitation at 340 or 380 nm, emission >470 nm) was recorded by a slow-scan charged-coupled device (CCD) camera (TILL Photonics). All perifusions were performed at 37°C using a HEPES-buffered Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate medium. Image pairs were taken at intervals as indicated in the figures. Illumination time for each image was 800 ms.
Measurement of insulin secretion.
Batches of 50 freshly isolated NMRI mouse islets were perifused at 37°C with a HEPES-buffered Krebs-Ringer medium containing various glucose concentrations and the indicated drug. The insulin content in the fractionated effluent was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden).
Data handling and statistics.
Statistical calculations were performed by Prism and Instat software (GraphPad, San Diego CA). If not specified otherwise, differences were considered significant if P < 0.05.
Whether KATP channel–blocking imidazolines necessarily stimulate insulin secretion at a basal glucose concentration was evaluated by comparing the effects of efaroxan and phentolamine on freshly isolated perifused islets. Both compounds were used at a concentration that was expected to strongly depolarize β-cells by inhibition of KATP channel activity. The effect of each imidazoline was first measured in the presence of 5 mmol/l glucose, a nonstimulatory concentration, before glucose was increased to 10 mmol/l in the continued presence of the imidazoline. Efaroxan did not increase insulin secretion in the presence of 5 mmol/l glucose, but rather caused a small, significant decrease (Fig. 1A). When the glucose concentration was raised to 10 mmol/l in the presence of efaroxan, there was a rapid and strong increase of secretion, which was followed by a sustained phase of stimulated secretion. On the whole, this pattern resembled the biphasic increase elicited by 20 mmol/l glucose (Fig. 1B), whereas 10 mmol/l glucose alone, in control perifusions, only produced a 50% increase in insulin secretion over baseline (Fig. 1A). Phentolamine, after a lag time of about 10 min, markedly increased secretion in the presence of 5 mmol/l glucose. A further increase in secretion occurred when the glucose concentration was raised to 10 mmol/l, but it was slower than that in the presence of efaroxan (Fig. 1A).
The effect of both imidazolines on KATP channel activity was compared using intact cultured β-cells. Administration of 100 μmol/l efaroxan decreased channel activity from a control value of 100% to 18.6 ± 4.2% (n = 10). Administration of 100 μmol/l phentolamine was significantly more effective, reducing channel activity to 3.6 ± 1.6% (n = 5), which is close to the effect of 500 μmol/l tolbutamide (0.6 ± 0.4%, n = 4). The difference between the effects of efaroxan and phentolamine (P < 0.01, Welch’s t test) raised the possibility that the lack of insulinotropic effect of efaroxan in the presence of 5 mmol/l glucose was due to a less complete channel block by efaroxan.
However, the more complete channel block by phentolamine did not translate into a significantly stronger depolarization. In the standard whole-cell configuration, 100 μmol/l efaroxan depolarized the β-cell plasma membrane potential from a resting value of −73.3 ± 1.7 mV to −28.6 ± 3.4 mV (n = 6), and 100 μmol/l phentolamine depolarized from −67.9 ± 4.7 mV to −28.2 ± 5.8 mV (n = 4). The effect of efaroxan was reversible within 3 min, whereas the depolarization by phentolamine was of slow onset and only partially reversible during the washout phase. To ascertain that these observations were also valid for metabolically intact β-cells in the presence of 5 mmol/l glucose, the depolarizing effect was measured using the perforated patch configuration. Within 3 min, efaroxan depolarized the membrane potential from a resting value of −63.7 ± 2.6 mV to a plateau value of −47.8 ± 2.7 mV (n = 6), whereas phentolamine required at least 8 min to depolarize from −65.4 ± 1.6 mV to a plateau value of −48.4 ± 2.2 mV (n = 4). When these plateau values were reached, action potentials occurred regularly. Long-term recordings (Fig. 2) showed oscillations of the plasma membrane potential in 5 of 10 experiments in the presence of efaroxan, whereas phentolamine led to a continuous depolarization (6 of 6 experiments).
The ability of both imidazolines to inhibit KATP channel activity and to depolarize β-cells suggested that they should also increase the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]c) by opening of l-type Ca2+ channels. As expected, both compounds at 100 μmol/l increased [Ca2+]c in single β-cells in the presence of 5 mmol/l glucose. The extent of the increase corresponded roughly to the steady-state increase achieved by a depolarization with 40 mmol/l K+ under the same conditions (data not shown). [Ca2+]c was also measured in cultured islets perifused following the same experimental protocol (Fig. 3A–D) as that for insulin secretion measurements. An interesting difference between efaroxan and phentolamine became apparent: efaroxan induced an oscillatory pattern of [Ca2+]c increase, whereas phentolamine led to a sustained increase in [Ca2+]c with superimposed low-amplitude oscillations. The large-amplitude oscillations induced by efaroxan (amplitude corresponding to that of a depolarization with 40 mmol/l K+, frequency between 0.3 and 0.5 × min−1) are obscured by presenting the mean values (Fig. 3B) but are obvious in individual experiments (Fig. 3D). Raising the glucose concentration in the presence of efaroxan altered the synchronized oscillatory pattern, which resumed after periods of 10–20 min. Raising glucose from 5 to 10 mmol/l affected the phentolamine-induced increase in [Ca2+]c: a marked transient decrease first occurred, followed by a return to the sustained high [Ca2+]c (Fig. 3A). The ability of efaroxan to increase [Ca2+]c in the presence of 5 mmol/l glucose was verified with freshly isolated islets (data not shown).
The present experiments show that efaroxan, a KATP channel–blocking imidazoline, does not increase insulin secretion in the presence of a nonstimulatory glucose concentration but exerts a marked enhancing effect when the glucose concentration is raised. The interest in imidazolines as potential antidiabetic drugs was always moti-vated by a higher glucose dependence of their insulinotropic effect as compared with that of sulfonylureas (5,17), but published data on the effects of efaroxan have regularly documented a stimulatory effect at basal glucose concentrations (7,21). The reason for this discrepancy is unclear; it could reflect species differences (rat versus mouse islets). However, the secretory effects of phentolamine are clearly less dependent on stimulatory glucose concentrations than those of efaroxan, confirming our earlier observations of heterogeneity within the group of imidazolines (16).
The requirement of a high glucose concentration for efaroxan to be an effective secretagogue is surprising because of mechanistic considerations. It is generally accepted that compounds with a direct blocking effect on KATP channels act as both initiators and enhancers of insulin secretion. For this reason sulfonylureas are regarded as stimulators of secretion in their own right, even though there is some debate as to whether a minimum of exogenous fuel is needed for the insulinotropic effect (22,23). One could thus logically expect that only imidazolines devoid of effects on KATP channels and acting exclusively at distal steps of stimulus-secretion coupling require the presence of stimulatory glucose concentrations to influence insulin secretion (14).
In the present study, 100 μmol/l efaroxan blocked KATP channels slightly less effectively than did 100 μmol/l phentolamine. However, both compounds showed similar depolarizing efficacy and efaroxan was even slightly more effective to increase [Ca2+]c in single β-cells. Our conclusion, therefore, is that the greater glucose dependence of efaroxan effects on insulin secretion is not simply a function of a less complete KATP channel closure. This view is supported by previous observations that phentolamine also exerts an enhancing effect on secretion in the presence of 5 mmol/l glucose, when used at the lower concentration of 32 μmol/l (16).
In view of the depolarizing effect of both imidazolines, the increase in [Ca2+]c of single β-cells in the presence of 5 mmol/l glucose is most likely due to an influx of Ca2+ via l-type Ca2+ channels. This process normally results in stimulation of insulin secretion, but the latter can be antagonized by inhibition of metabolism (24). An inhibitory effect of efaroxan on energy metabolism does not seem compatible with the large enhancement of secretion in the pres-ence of 10 mmol/l glucose. The lack of increase of secretion by efaroxan in 5 mmol/l glucose in spite of an increase in [Ca2+]c might be due to an inhibition by the drug (and not by phentolamine) of a step distal to Ca2+ influx. The stimulatory effect of both compounds on secretion in the presence of 10 mmol/l glucose can be viewed as an enhancement of the KATP channel–independent actions of glucose (25).
The results of the [Ca2+]c measurements in intact islets added a further degree of complexity to this picture. The oscillations of [Ca2+]c induced by efaroxan in the presence of 5 mmol/l glucose resemble the slow large-amplitude oscillations produced by a stimulatory glucose concentration. In contrast, phentolamine caused a sustained increase of [Ca2+]c. These features parallel those of the changes in membrane potential: efaroxan often caused oscillatory depolarizations, whereas the depolarization evoked by phentolamine was sustained. The less frequent occurrence of oscillations in the electrophysiological than in the microfluorimetric experiments may be due to the lower temperature at which the latter was performed.
The transient decrease in [Ca2+]c caused by the rise in glucose concentration in the presence of the imidazolines is most likely due to the activation of an ATP-dependent uptake of Ca2+ into internal stores (26). A similar transient decrease occurs when the glucose concentration is increased to a stimulatory value in the presence of sulfonylureas (27). Because the [Ca2+]c oscillations elicited by efaroxan continued when increasing glucose from 5 to 10 mmol/l, it is unlikely that [Ca2+]c represents the decisive signal for the first phase-like increase of secretion under this condition. A possible explanation is that a glucose-dependent metabolic signal overcomes the hypothetical inhibitory action of efaroxan distal to [Ca2+]c influx. Complete elucidation of the mechanisms of action of imidazolines will require investigation of their interplay with the metabolic regulation of insulin secretion.
This article is based on a presentation at a symposium. The symposium and the publication of this article were made possible by an unrestricted educational grant from Servier.
[Ca2+]c, cytosolic free calcium concentration; KATP channel, ATP-sensitive K+ channel.
This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ru 368/4-1) and the Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft. Skilful technical assistance by Petra Weber, Verena Lier-Glaubitz, and Sabine Warmbold is gratefully acknowledged.