We tested whether carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) is associated with plasma cholesteryl ester transfer (CET) and/or the plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) concentration in type 2 diabetic and control subjects. In 87 male and female subjects with type 2 diabetes (nonsmokers, no insulin or lipid-lowering drug treatment) and 82 control subjects, IMT, plasma CET, CETP mass, and lipids were determined. HDL cholesterol was lower, whereas IMT, pulse pressure, plasma triglycerides, and plasma CET and CETP concentration were higher in diabetic patients versus control subjects. In diabetic patients, plasma CET was positively determined by triglycerides (P < 0.001), non-HDL cholesterol (P < 0.001), CETP (P = 0.002), and the interaction between CETP and triglycerides (P = 0.004). In control subjects, plasma CET was positively related to triglycerides (P < 0.001) and non-HDL cholesterol (P < 0.001). HDL cholesterol was inversely related to plasma CET in each group (P < 0.01 for both). IMT was positively associated with plasma CET in diabetic (P = 0.05) and control (P < 0.05) subjects after adjustment for age, sex, and pulse pressure. No independent relationship with plasma CETP mass was found. Plasma CET is a positive determinant of IMT. Plasma CETP mass, in turn, is a determinant of CET with an increasing effect at higher triglycerides. These data, therefore, provide a rationale to evaluate the effects of CETP inhibitor treatment on plasma CET and on cardiovascular risk in diabetes-associated hypertriglyceridemia.

The inverse relationship between HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease is well documented in nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic populations (1,2). Among other mechanisms, the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP)-mediated process of plasma CET plays a key role in HDL metabolism. CETP transfers cholesteryl esters from HDL toward lipoproteins of lower-density classes in exchange for triglycerides (3–5). Hence, the plasma CET process is likely to contribute to low HDL cholesterol, as frequently observed in type 2 diabetes (5).

Only few studies have addressed the effect of plasma CETP levels and the rate of plasma CET on cardiovascular risk in humans. A small study showed a positive correlation between the plasma CETP concentration and carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) (6). In addition, plasma CETP mass was shown to be a positive determinant of incident coronary artery disease but only in subjects with high triglycerides (7). The CET process itself could, however, also represent a beneficial pathway by enabling the transport of HDL-derived cholesteryl esters back to the liver via VLDL and LDL (3). The impact of the plasma CET process on atherosclerosis development remains, therefore, uncertain (8).

CETP inhibitors represent a new class of drugs that effectively raise HDL cholesterol (9,10). While pharmacological inhibition of circulating CETP has been shown to retard atherosclerosis in animal experiments (11), the effect of this treatment on cardiovascular disease in humans is not yet known nor is it clear which patient categories would benefit most from such treatment. Many studies (12–17) have shown that plasma CET is enhanced in type 2 diabetes. This abnormality is largely ascribed to alterations in the concentration and composition of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins that accept cholesteryl esters from HDL, although the extent to which variations in the CETP concentration per se affect the rate of plasma CET is still uncertain (5).

In view of a potentially deleterious effect of elevated plasma CETP levels on cardiovascular disease in hypertriglyceridemic subjects (7), we hypothesized that an increased CET is a determinant of subclinical atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes. In the present study, we determined the contribution of the plasma CETP concentration to CET and established whether IMT is associated with plasma CET or the CETP concentration in type 2 diabetes.

The study protocol was approved by the medical ethics committee of the University Medical Center Groningen, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Type 2 diabetic patients and age-matched nondiabetic control subjects, aged >18 years, were recruited by advertisement in local newspapers. Current or previous smoking or use of lipid-lowering drugs were exclusion criteria, since these factors would have introduced bias with respect to the evaluation of determinants affecting IMT. Subjects with micro- or macroalbuminuria defined as urinary albumin >20 mg/l were also excluded. Maximal alcohol intake was three beverages per day.

Fifty-three male and 34 female type 2 diabetic patients were included in this study. The nondiabetic control group comprised 45 male and 37 female subjects. Type 2 diabetes was previously diagnosed using blood glucose cutoff values as defined by the World Health Organization, and patients were treated with diet alone (26%) or in combination with oral glucose-lowering agents (74%). Insulin treatment was an exclusion criterion. Oral glucose-lowering drugs used were sulfonylurea (33%), biguanides (26%), or the combination of these two (41%). Next to these drugs, eight patients used a thiazolidinedione and two patients used acarbose. Forty-six percent of diabetic patients but none of the control subjects used one or more antihypertensive drugs (73% ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists, 42% β-blockers, 40% diuretics, and 15% calcium antagonists). Seventy-nine percent of the female type 2 diabetic patients and 65% of the female nondiabetic subjects were postmenopausal (P = 0.18). Fourteen percent of premenopausal female nondiabetic and 14% of premenopausal female diabetic subjects used oral contraceptives.

All participants were evaluated after an overnight fast. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. Waist circumference was measured as the smallest circumference between rib cage and iliac crest. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured, after at least 15 min of rest, at the left arm in a sitting position using a sphygmomanometer. Pulse pressure was calculated as the difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Carotid IMT measurement.

IMT of the carotid arteries was measured by ultrasonography in the supine position. High-resolution B-mode ultrasound images (ACUSON 128 XP; Ohmeda, Mountain View, CA) with a 7.0-MHz linear array transducer were used to measure intima-media wall thickness. The right and left common carotid arterial wall segments were imaged from a fixed lateral transducer angle at the far wall of the distal 1-cm segments of both common carotid arteries, proximal to the carotid bulb. The scans were recorded on S-VHS tape and analyzed offline by an independent image analyst unaware of subject characteristics. B-mode image analyses were digitized with a frame grabber (DT286 l; Data Translation, Marlboro, MA). The image analysis software was developed using an algorithm developed by Selzer et al. (18). The mean IMT over the six segments of both carotid arteries was calculated and designated mean IMT. At a mean IMT of 0.80 mm, intersonographer variability amounted to 0.05 mm, with an image analyst variability of <0.03 mm, corresponding to a total variation coefficient between 6.3 and 7.3%.

Laboratory measurements.

Venous blood samples for measurement of apolipoproteins (apos), CET, and CETP mass were collected into EDTA-containing tubes (1.5 mg/ml) that were immediately placed on ice. Plasma was obtained within 30 min by centrifugation at 4°C. Samples were kept frozen at −80°C until analysis.

Plasma total cholesterol and triglycerides were assayed by routine enzymatic methods (Roche/Hitachi catalog no. 11876023 and no. 11875540, respectively; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). HDL cholesterol was determined in the supernatant fraction after precipitation of apoB-containing lipoproteins with polyethylene glycol-6000. Non-HDL cholesterol was calculated by subtracting HDL cholesterol from plasma total cholesterol. ApoA-I and apoB were measured by immunoturbidimetry (Roche/Cobas Integra Tina-quant catalog no. 03032566 and no. 03032574, respectively; Roche Diagnostics).

Plasma CET was assayed essentially as previously described (19,20). In brief, [3H]cholesterol was equilibrated for 24 h with plasma cholesterol at 4°C followed by incubation at 37°C for 3 h. Subsequently, apoB-containing lipoproteins were precipitated by the addition of phosphotungstate/MgCl2. Lipids were extracted from the precipitate, and the labeled cholesteryl esters were separated from labeled unesterified cholesterol on silica columns.

Plasma CETP concentration was analyzed using a double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (21). A combination of monoclonal antibodies TP1 and TP2 was employed as coating antibodies and monoclonal antibody TP20, labeled with digoxigenine, as the secondary antibody. The CETP control samples were validated using a radioimmunoassay (carried out by Dr. R.M. McPherson, Montreal, Canada).

Glucose was analyzed with an APEC glucose analyzer (APEC, Danvers, MA). HbA1c was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (normal range 4.6–6.1%; Bio-Rad, Veenendaal, the Netherlands).

Statistical analysis.

Data are shown as means ± SD. In case of a skewed distribution, data are presented as median (interquartile range). Data were compared using unpaired t tests. When data were not normally distributed, Mann-Whitney U tests were used. χ2 analysis was used to evaluate differences in proportions of parameters. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to reveal independent relationships between variables. When variables had a skewed distribution, logarithmically transformed values were used in the models. For continuous variables, we subtracted the mean value from the measured value to obtain a distribution centered on the mean. In further models, we considered interactions between levels of the variables of interest by including product terms in the models. Two-sided P values ≤0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Table 1 summarizes clinical characteristics, carotid IMT measurement, and glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients and control subjects. Sex distribution (P = 0.43) and age were not different between the groups. Carotid IMT was higher in diabetic patients than in control subjects. In both groups, IMT was higher in male compared with female subjects. BMI and waist circumference were greater in diabetic patients than in control subjects, whereas diabetic female subjects were more obese than diabetic male subjects. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as pulse pressure were higher in diabetic patients. Fasting glycemia and HbA1c levels were also higher in diabetic patients.

As shown in Table 2, plasma total cholesterol was moderately lower in type 2 diabetic patients compared with control subjects, but non-HDL cholesterol and plasma apoB levels were not different between the groups. Plasma total cholesterol was slightly lower in diabetic male than in diabetic female subjects. In diabetic patients, plasma triglycerides were higher, whereas HDL cholesterol and plasma apoA-I levels were lower compared with control subjects. In both the diabetic and the control group, HDL cholesterol and plasma apoA-I levels were higher in female than in male subjects. Plasma CET as well as CETP concentration was higher in type 2 diabetic patients compared with control subjects. Among diabetic patients, plasma CETP was higher in female than in male subjects, but the difference in CET was not significant. There was no significant effect of menopausal status on plasma CETP in either group (data not shown; P > 0.10 for both).

Multiple linear regression analyses showed that in type 2 diabetic patients plasma CET was independently and positively determined by plasma triglycerides (log transformed, P < 0.001), non-HDL cholesterol (P < 0.001), plasma CETP (P = 0.002), and the interaction between plasma CETP and triglycerides (P = 0.004, multiple r = 0.84) (Fig. 1). There was no effect of antihypertensive medication on plasma CET (P = 0.75). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that in diabetic patients plasma CETP concentration was higher in female subjects (P = 0.004) but was unrelated to BMI (P = 0.24) and the use of antihypertensive drugs (P = 0.83). In control subjects, plasma triglycerides (P < 0.001) and non-HDL cholesterol (P < 0.001), but not plasma CETP mass (P = 0.20), were independent determinants of plasma CET (multiple r = 0.75). In each group, HDL cholesterol was negatively associated with plasma CET (P < 0.001 and P = 0.007 in diabetic and control subjects, respectively) and positively with female sex (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001; multiple r = 0.52 and 0.48 in diabetic and control subjects, respectively).

Multiple linear regression analyses were also carried out to determine whether IMT was associated with plasma CET and/or the CETP concentration. In these analyses, age, sex, and pulse pressure (as best fitting hemodynamic variable) were included since these variables are recognized to be strong determinants of IMT (22,23). In each group, plasma CET was a positive determinant of IMT after adjustment for age, sex, and pulse pressure (Table 3; multiple r = 0.60 and 0.48 in diabetic and control subjects, respectively). IMT was not independently associated with plasma CETP mass in diabetic patients (P = 0.84) and control subjects (P = 0.89).

We have demonstrated for the first time that plasma CET is a determinant of IMT in type 2 diabetic patients and nondiabetic control subjects. These findings support the hypothesis that a high transfer of cholesteryl esters from HDL to apoB-containing lipoproteins is involved in the development of atherosclerosis. Plasma CET in type 2 diabetic patients was elevated compared with control subjects as expected (12–17), and in each group HDL cholesterol was inversely related to plasma CET. Besides positive effects of the plasma triglyceride level and non-HDL cholesterol, the plasma CETP concentration per se contributed to plasma CET in diabetic patients. Furthermore, the effect of the plasma CETP level on plasma CET becomes more important with higher plasma triglycerides. Our data, therefore, agree with the concept that maneuvers aimed at inhibiting active CETP mass in plasma may attenuate the CET process in diabetes-associated hypertriglyceridemia, which in turn could favorably affect cardiovascular risk.

The isotopic procedure employed to determine plasma CET in the present study represents an accurate measure of net cholesteryl ester mass transfer from HDL to apoB-containing lipoproteins (13). Abnormalities in the concentration and composition of apoB-containing lipoproteins that accept cholesteryl esters from HDL are largely responsible for the increased plasma CET in type 2 diabetes (12,17). In the current study, we found that the plasma triglyceride and non-HDL cholesterol levels contribute to plasma CET in diabetic and nondiabetic control subjects. As expected, plasma triglycerides were higher in diabetic patients, but non-HDL cholesterol was not different between the groups. This could be due to selection of participants since criteria for lipid-lowering treatment are stricter for diabetic patients, and we intentionally only included subjects who never used lipid-lowering drugs. Consequently, diabetic patients with relatively normal plasma cholesterol levels may have been preferentially included. We have also demonstrated that the plasma CETP concentration itself affects CET independently from triglycerides and non-HDL cholesterol. This suggests that the CETP concentration is a determinant of plasma CET at any plasma level of triglycerides and non-HDL cholesterol concentration and agrees with our previous findings in a much smaller group of patients (16). A potentially important observation is the positive interaction between plasma CETP mass and triglycerides on plasma CET, which underscores that the contribution of the plasma CETP concentration as such to CET becomes more important with higher plasma triglycerides. In comparison, a previous in vitro study (24) has shown that variation in the plasma CETP level only affects net cholesteryl ester mass transfer from HDL to VLDL at high plasma triglyceride concentrations. Another study demonstrated a negative correlation of HDL cholesterol with the plasma level of active CETP in hypertriglyceridemic male subjects (25).

The plasma CETP concentration was found to be higher in the diabetic group. With few exceptions (26,27), most previous studies (16,17,28,29) found unaltered plasma CETP activity levels per se in type 2 diabetes. Plasma CETP activity, determined using an assay that measures the amount of active CETP, is closely correlated with its mass in nondiabetic as well as in diabetic patients (30). However, there are differences in the relationship between plasma CETP mass and its activity in diabetic compared with healthy subjects, as evidenced by a lower ratio of CETP activity divided by its mass in diabetes (30). This may, at least, in part explain the discrepancy with previous plasma CETP activity data. The effect of the diabetic state on plasma CETP concentration appeared to be attributable to an increased level in diabetic female subjects. The effect of obesity on plasma CETP mass may be absent in diabetes (31), and plasma CETP was unrelated to BMI in the currently studied diabetic patients. Therefore, the higher BMI in female compared with male diabetic subjects does not explain their higher plasma CETP concentration. Since other reports also showed slightly higher plasma CETP levels in female subjects (32,33), a sex effect, as such, is possible. However in the diabetic group, this sex effect on plasma CETP did not result in a significant difference in plasma CET between male and female subjects. This is probably explained by the slightly lower plasma triglyceride levels in diabetic female subjects.

Carotid artery IMT, as measured by ultrasonography, predicts the development of cardiovascular disease (34). It is unequivocally established that IMT is determined by age, sex, and hemodynamic factors (22,23), which were again documented in the present study. Previous reports (35,36) have shown that IMT may also be associated with non-HDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and plasma triglycerides. It should be noted that we did not attempt to establish whether the relationship of IMT with plasma CET was independent from these lipoprotein and lipid levels because there were strong interrelationships between plasma apoB-containing lipoproteins, CET, and HDL cholesterol. It was recently documented (7) that the plasma CETP concentration determines cardiovascular risk in hypertriglyceridemic subjects. Our study did not demonstrate an independent relationship of plasma CETP with IMT, neither in diabetic nor in control subjects. In view of present results, the possibility is raised that an enhanced plasma CET due to elevated plasma triglycerides in conjunction with high CETP is associated with cardiovascular disease rather than an elevated CETP level alone.

Limitations of our study include its observational nature and the restricted number of diabetic patients who only used oral hypoglycemic drugs. Metabolic control was adequate in most diabetic patients. Since glycation of CETP and of HDL-related apos may influence the CET process, further data are needed to establish the association of plasma CET with (subclinical) atherosclerosis in poorly controlled diabetes (37).

It is obvious that the effect of CETP inhibitor treatment on cardiovascular disease can only be tested in clinical end point studies. Furthermore, it is important to realize that therapeutic measures aimed at lowering plasma CET are not restricted to drugs that inhibit CETP activity. Both fibrate and statin therapy reduce plasma CET by decreasing cholesteryl acceptor lipoproteins, i.e., VLDL and LDL (5,21). Moreover, statins additionally lower the plasma CETP level (5,21,38). Keeping this in mind, the present data provide a metabolic background in support of the hypothesis that lowering of plasma CETP may ameliorate cardiovascular risk in diabetes-associated hypertriglyceridemia.

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1. Graphical presentation of the interaction between the plasma CETP concentration and plasma triglycerides on plasma CET in type 2 diabetic patients.
View largeDownload slide

Graphical presentation of the interaction between the plasma CETP concentration and plasma triglycerides on plasma CET in type 2 diabetic patients.

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1. Graphical presentation of the interaction between the plasma CETP concentration and plasma triglycerides on plasma CET in type 2 diabetic patients.
View largeDownload slide

Graphical presentation of the interaction between the plasma CETP concentration and plasma triglycerides on plasma CET in type 2 diabetic patients.

Close modal
TABLE 1

Clinical characteristics and mean carotid artery IMT in type 2 diabetic patients and control subjects

Type 2 diabetic patients (n = 87)
Control subjects (n = 82)
P value
MaleFemaleMaleFemale
n 53 34 45 37 0.43 
Age (years) 59 ± 9 56 ± 8 58 ± 10 53 ± 7* 0.15 
Carotid IMT (mm) 0.91 ± 0.19 0.81 ± 0.20* 0.86 ± 0.15 0.77 ± 0.12* 0.025 
BMI (kg/m2) 27.9 ± 4.4 30.7 ± 5.6* 26.1 ± 3.3 25.1 ± 3.9 <0.001 
Waist circumference (cm) 102 ± 13 99 ± 14 94 ± 10 81 ± 12† <0.001 
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 141 ± 18 146 ± 20 132 ± 16 132 ± 21 <0.001 
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 86 ± 9 88 ± 8 84 ± 9 81 ± 12 0.003 
Pulse pressure (mmHg) 55 ± 16 58 ± 18 48 ± 11 51 ± 17 0.005 
Glucose (mmol/l) 8.4 ± 1.8 9.4 ± 2.7 5.8 ± 0.7 5.5 ± 0.7* <0.001 
HbA1c (%) 6.7 ± 0.9 6.8 ± 1.1 5.4 ± 0.4 5.3 ± 0.4 <0.001 
Type 2 diabetic patients (n = 87)
Control subjects (n = 82)
P value
MaleFemaleMaleFemale
n 53 34 45 37 0.43 
Age (years) 59 ± 9 56 ± 8 58 ± 10 53 ± 7* 0.15 
Carotid IMT (mm) 0.91 ± 0.19 0.81 ± 0.20* 0.86 ± 0.15 0.77 ± 0.12* 0.025 
BMI (kg/m2) 27.9 ± 4.4 30.7 ± 5.6* 26.1 ± 3.3 25.1 ± 3.9 <0.001 
Waist circumference (cm) 102 ± 13 99 ± 14 94 ± 10 81 ± 12† <0.001 
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 141 ± 18 146 ± 20 132 ± 16 132 ± 21 <0.001 
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 86 ± 9 88 ± 8 84 ± 9 81 ± 12 0.003 
Pulse pressure (mmHg) 55 ± 16 58 ± 18 48 ± 11 51 ± 17 0.005 
Glucose (mmol/l) 8.4 ± 1.8 9.4 ± 2.7 5.8 ± 0.7 5.5 ± 0.7* <0.001 
HbA1c (%) 6.7 ± 0.9 6.8 ± 1.1 5.4 ± 0.4 5.3 ± 0.4 <0.001 

Data are means ± SD. P values for the difference between type 2 diabetic patients (male and female subjects combined) and control subjects (male and female subjects combined) are shown. Within-group difference between male and female subjects:

*

P < 0.05,

†

P < 0.001.

View Large
TABLE 2

Plasma lipid parameters, CET, and CETP concentration in type 2 diabetic patients and control subjects

Type 2 diabetic subjects (n = 87)
Control subjects (n = 82)
P value
MaleFemaleMaleFemale
n 53 34 45 37 0.43 
Plasma total cholesterol (mmol/l) 5.2 ± 0.9 5.6 ± 0.8* 5.6 ± 1.0 5.8 ± 0.8 0.008 
Non-HDL cholesterol (mmol) 3.87 ± 0.96 4.16 ± 0.90 4.16 ± 1.03 3.98 ± 0.79 0.51 
HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.28 ± 0.33 1.46 ± 0.37* 1.49 ± 0.36 1.82 ± 0.41† <0.001 
Plasma triglycerides (mmol/l) 1.82 (0.97–2.46) 1.64 (1.26–2.15) 1.34 (0.94–2.07) 1.21 (0.86–1.73) 0.008 
Plasma apoA-I (g/l) 1.26 ± 0.17 1.43 ± 0.28† 1.36 ± 0.21 1.53 ± 0.22† 0.001 
Plasma apoB (g/l) 0.90 ± 0.20 0.96 ± 0.22 0.99 ± 0.26 0.90 ± 0.19 0.49 
Plasma CET (nmol · ml−1 · h−1) 23.3 ± 8.1 25.0 ± 9.5 20.6 ± 7.3 19.7 ± 4.7 0.001 
Plasma CETP concentration (mg/l) 2.36 ± 0.83 2.90 ± 0.99* 2.16 ± 0.68 2.17 ± 0.65 0.001 
Type 2 diabetic subjects (n = 87)
Control subjects (n = 82)
P value
MaleFemaleMaleFemale
n 53 34 45 37 0.43 
Plasma total cholesterol (mmol/l) 5.2 ± 0.9 5.6 ± 0.8* 5.6 ± 1.0 5.8 ± 0.8 0.008 
Non-HDL cholesterol (mmol) 3.87 ± 0.96 4.16 ± 0.90 4.16 ± 1.03 3.98 ± 0.79 0.51 
HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.28 ± 0.33 1.46 ± 0.37* 1.49 ± 0.36 1.82 ± 0.41† <0.001 
Plasma triglycerides (mmol/l) 1.82 (0.97–2.46) 1.64 (1.26–2.15) 1.34 (0.94–2.07) 1.21 (0.86–1.73) 0.008 
Plasma apoA-I (g/l) 1.26 ± 0.17 1.43 ± 0.28† 1.36 ± 0.21 1.53 ± 0.22† 0.001 
Plasma apoB (g/l) 0.90 ± 0.20 0.96 ± 0.22 0.99 ± 0.26 0.90 ± 0.19 0.49 
Plasma CET (nmol · ml−1 · h−1) 23.3 ± 8.1 25.0 ± 9.5 20.6 ± 7.3 19.7 ± 4.7 0.001 
Plasma CETP concentration (mg/l) 2.36 ± 0.83 2.90 ± 0.99* 2.16 ± 0.68 2.17 ± 0.65 0.001 

Data are means ± SD or median (interquartile range). P values for the difference between type 2 diabetic patients (male and female subjects combined) and control subjects (male and female subjects combined) are shown. Within-group difference between male and female subjects:

*

P < 0.05,

†

P < 0.001.

View Large
TABLE 3

Determinants of carotid artery IMT in 87 type 2 diabetic patients and 82 control subjects by multiple linear regression analysis

Regression coefficientP
Type 2 diabetic patients   
    Constant 4.55 × 10−2 0.74 
    Age (years) 8.43 × 10−3 <0.001 
    Sex (M/F) 9.10 × 10−2 <0.05 
    Pulse pressure (mmHg) 3.34 × 10−3 <0.01 
    Plasma CET (nmol · ml−1 · h−1) 4.13 × 10−3 0.05 
Control subjects   
    Constant 21.4 × 10−2 0.02 
    Age (years) 5.89 × 10−3 <0.001 
    Sex (M/F) 6.13 × 10−2 <0.05 
    Pulse pressure (mmHg) 3.18 × 10−3 0.001 
    Plasma CET (nmol · ml−1 · h−1) 4.02 × 10−3 <0.05 
Regression coefficientP
Type 2 diabetic patients   
    Constant 4.55 × 10−2 0.74 
    Age (years) 8.43 × 10−3 <0.001 
    Sex (M/F) 9.10 × 10−2 <0.05 
    Pulse pressure (mmHg) 3.34 × 10−3 <0.01 
    Plasma CET (nmol · ml−1 · h−1) 4.13 × 10−3 0.05 
Control subjects   
    Constant 21.4 × 10−2 0.02 
    Age (years) 5.89 × 10−3 <0.001 
    Sex (M/F) 6.13 × 10−2 <0.05 
    Pulse pressure (mmHg) 3.18 × 10−3 0.001 
    Plasma CET (nmol · ml−1 · h−1) 4.02 × 10−3 <0.05 
View Large

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The present study is supported by a grant from the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation (grant 2001.00.012).

Dr. L.D. Dikkeschei (Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands) is acknowledged for measurement of plasma lipids and apos. L. van der Zee is acknowledged for CETP measurement. The statistical help of Dr. W.J. Sluiter and Dr. H.L. Hillege is greatly appreciated.

1.
Gordon DJ, Probstfield RJ, Garrison RJ, Neaton JD, Castelli WP, Knoke JD, Jacobs Dr Jr, Bangdiwala S, Tyroler HA: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cariovascular disease: four prospective American studies.
Circulation
 
79
:
8
–15,
1989
2.
Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Haffner SM, Pyörälä K, Kallia V, Laakso M: Dyslipidemia and hyperglycemia predict coronary heart disease events in middle-age patients with NIDDM.
Diabetes
 
46
:
1354
–1359,
1997
3.
Tall AR: Plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein.
J Lipid Res
 
34
:
1255
–1274,
1993
4.
Rye KA, Clay MA, Barter PJ: Remodelling of high density lipoproteins by plasma factors.
Atherosclerosis
 
145
:
227
–238,
1999
5.
Borggreve SE, De Vries R, Dullaart RPF: Alterations in high-density lipoprotein metabolism and reverse cholesterol transport in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus: role of lipolytic enzymes, lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase and lipid transfer proteins.
Eur J Clin Invest
 
33
:
1051
–1069,
2003
6.
Foger B, Luef G, Ritsch A, Schmidauer C, Doblinger A, Lechleitner M, Aichner F, Patsch JR: Relationship of high-density lipoprotein subfractions and cholesteryl ester trasfer protein in plasma to carotid artery wall thickness.
J Mol Med
 
73
:
369
–372,
1995
7.
Boekholdt SM, Kuivenhoven JA, Wareham NJ, Peters RJ, Jukema JW, Luben R, Bingham SA, Day NE, Kastelein JJ, Khaw KT: Plasma levels of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and the risk of future coronary artery disease in apparently healthy men and women: the prospective EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk population study.
Circulation
 
110
:
1418
–1423,
2004
8.
Fielding CJ, Havel RJ: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein: friend or foe? (Editorial).
J Clin Invest
 
97
:
2687
–2688,
1996
9.
De Grooth GJ, Kuivenhoven JA, Stalenhoef AFH, De Graaf J, Zwinderman AH, Posma JL, Van Tol A, Kastelein JJP: Efficacy and safety of a novel cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor, JTT-705, in humans: a randomized phase II dose-response study.
Circulation
 
105
:
2159
–2165,
2002
10.
Clark RW, Sutfin TA, Ruggeri RB, Willauer AT, Sugarman ED, Magnus-Aryitey G, Cosgrove PG, Sand TM, Wester RT, Williams JA, Perlman ME, Bamberger MJ: Raising high-density lipoprotein in humans through inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein: an initial multidose study of torcetrapib.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
 
24
:
490
–497,
2004
11.
Okamoto H, Yonemori F, Wakitani K, Minowa T, Maeda K, Shinkai H: A cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor attenuates atherosclerosis in rabbits.
Nature
 
406
:
203
–207,
2000
12.
Bagdade JD, Lane JT, Subbaiah PV, Otto ME, Ritter MC: Accelerated cholesteryl ester transfer in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Atherosclerosis
 
104
:
69
–77,
1993
13.
Sutherland WH, Walker RJ, Lewis-Barned NJ, Pratt H, Tillman HC: Plasma cholesteryl ester transfer in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.
Clin Chim Acta
 
231
:
29
–38,
1994
14.
Bhatnagar D, Durrington PN, Kumar S, Mackness MI, Boulton AJM: Plasma lipoprotein composition and cholesteryl ester transfer from high density to very low density lipoproteins in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.
Diabet Med
 
13
:
139
–144,
1996
15.
Elcheby M, Porokhov B, Pulcini T, Berthezène F, Ponsin G: Alterations in composition and concentration of lipoproteins and elevated cholesteryl ester transfer in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM).
Atherosclerosis
 
123
:
93
–101,
1996
16.
Riemens SC, Van Tol A, Sluiter WJ, Dullaart RPF: Elevated plasma cholesteryl ester transfer in NIDDM: relationships with apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins and phospholipid transfer protein.
Atherosclerosis
 
140
:
71
–79,
1998
17.
Guérin M, Le Goff W, Lassel TS, Van Tol A, Steiner G, Chapman MJ: Proatherogenic role of elevated CE transfer from HDL to VLDL1 and dense LDL in type 2 diabetes: impact of the degree of triglyceridemia.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
 
21
:
282
–288,
2001
18.
Selzer RH, Hodis HN, Kwong-Fu H, Mack WJ, Lee PL, Liu CR, Liu CH: Evaluation of computerized edge tracking for quantifying intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery from B-mode ultrasound images.
Atherosclerosis
 
111
:
1
–11,
1994
19.
Channon KM, Clegg RJ, Bhatnagar D, Ishola M, Arrol S, Durrington PN: Investigation of lipid transfer in human serum leading to the development of an isotopic method for the determination of endogenous cholesterol esterification and transfer.
Atherosclerosis
 
80
:
217
–226,
1990
20.
Dullaart RPF, Riemens SC, Scheek LM, Van Tol A: Insulin decreases plasma cholesteryl ester transport but not cholesterol esterification in healthy subjects as well as in normotriglyceridemic patients with type 2 diabetes.
Eur J Clin Invest
 
29
:
663
–671,
1999
21.
Van Venrooij FV, Stolk RP, Banga JD, Sijmonsma TP, Van Tol A, Erkelens DW, Dallinga GM: Common cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene polymorphisms and the effect of atorvastatin therapy in type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care
 
26
:
1216
–1223,
2003
22.
Howard G, Sharrett AR, Heiss G, Evans GW, Chambless LE, Riley WA, Burke GL: Carotid artery intimal-medial thickness distribution in general populations as evaluated by B-mode ultrasound: ARIC Investigators.
Stroke
 
24
:
1297
–1304,
1993
23.
Zanchetti A, Crepaldi G, Bond MG, Gallus GV, Veglia F, Ventura A, Mancia G, Baggio G, Sampieri L, Rubba P, Collatina S, Serrotti E: Systolic and pulse blood pressures (but not diastolic blood pressure and serum cholesterol) are associated with alterations in carotid intima-media thickness in the moderately hypercholesterolaemic hypertensive patients of the Plaque Hypertension Lipid Lowering Italian Study: PHYLLIS study group.
J Hypertens
 
19
:
79
–88,
2001
24.
Mann CJ, Yen FT, Grant AM, Bihain BE: Mechanism of plasma cholesteryl ester transfer in hypertriglyceridemia.
J Clin Invest
 
88
:
2059
–2066,
1991
25.
Tato F, Vega GL, Grundy SM: Determinants of plasma HDL-cholesterol in hypertriglyceridemic patients.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
 
17
:
56
–63,
1997
26.
Kahri J, Syvänne M, Taskinen MR: Plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with and without coronary artery disease.
Metabolism
 
43
:
1498
–1502,
1994
27.
Riemens SC, Van Tol A, Sluiter WJ, Dullaart RPF: Plasma phospholipid transfer protein activity is lowered by 24 hour insulin and Acipimox administration: blunted response to insulin in type 2 diabetic patients.
Diabetes
 
48
:
1631
–1637,
1999
28.
Lottenberg SA, Lottenberg AMP, Nunes VS, McPherson R, Quintao ECR: Plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein concentration, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol esterification and transfer rates to lighter density lipoproteins in the fasting state and after a test meal are similar in type II diabetics and normal controls.
Atherosclerosis
 
127
:
81
–90,
1996
29.
Riemens SC, Van Tol A, Sluiter WJ, Dullaart RPF: Plasma phospholipid transfer protein activity is related to insulin resistance: impaired acute lowering by insulin in obese NIDDM patients.
Diabetologia
 
41
:
929
–934,
1998
30.
Dullaart RPF, De Vries R, Scheek LM, Borggreve SE, Van Gent T, Dallinga-Thie GM, Ito M, Nagano M, Sluiter WJ, Hattori H, Van Tol A: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with differential effects on plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein and phospholipid transfer protein activities and concentrations.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest
 
64
:
205
–216,
2004
31.
MacLean PS, Vadlamudi S, MacDonald KG, Pories WJ, Barakat HA: Suppression of hepatic cholesteryl ester transfer protein expression in obese humans with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
 
90
:
2250
–2258,
2005
32.
Marcel YL, McPherson R, Hogue M, Czarnecka H, Zawadzki Z, Weech PK, Whitlock ME, Tall AR, Milne RW: Distribution and concentration of cholesteryl ester transfer protein in plasma of normolipemic subjects.
J Clin Invest
 
85
:
10
–17,
1990
33.
Kinoshita M, Teramoto T, Shimazu N, Kaneko K, Ohta M, Koike T, Hosogaya S, Ozaki Y, Kume S, Yamanaka M: CETP is a determinant of serum LDL-cholesterol but not HDL-cholesterol in healthy Japanese.
Atherosclerosis
 
120
:
75
–82,
1996
34.
Salonen JT, Salonen R: Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart disease.
Arterioscler Thromb
 
11
:
1245
–1249,
1991
35.
Salonen R, Salonen JT: Determinants of carotid intima-media thickness: a population-based ultrasonographic study in eastern Finnish men.
J Intern Med
 
229
:
225
–231,
1991
36.
O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Kittner SJ, Bond MG, Wolfson SK, Bommer W, Price TR, Gardin JM, Savage PJ, the CHS Collaborative Research Group: Distribution and correlates of sonographically detected carotid artery disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study.
Stroke
 
23
:
1752
–1760,
1992
37.
Passarelli M, Catanozi S, Nakandakare ER, Rocha JC, Morton RE, Shimabukuro AF, Quintao ECR: Plasma lipoproteins from patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and “in vitro” glycation of lipoproteins enhance the transfer rate of cholesteryl ester from HDL to apo-B-containing lipoproteins.
Diabetologia
 
40
:
1085
–1093,
1997
38.
De Vries R, Kerstens MN, Sluiter WJ, Groen AK, Van Tol A, Dullaart RPF: Cellular cholesterol efflux to plasma from moderately hypercholesterolaemic type 1 diabetic patients is enhanced, and is unaffected by simvastatin treatment.
Diabetologia
 
48
:
1105
–1113,
2005
DIABETES
2005