Thiazolidenediones such as pioglitazone improve insulin sensitivity in diabetic patients by several mechanisms, including increased uptake and metabolism of free fatty acids in adipose tissue. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of pioglitazone on mitochondrial biogenesis and expression of genes involved in fatty acid oxidation in subcutaneous fat. Patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly divided into two groups and treated with placebo or pioglitazone (45 mg/day) for 12 weeks. Mitochodrial DNA copy number and expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis were quantified by real-time PCR. Pioglitazone treatment significantly increased mitochondrial copy number and expression of factors involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, including peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR)-γ coactivator-1α and mitochondrial transcription factor A. Treatment with pioglitazone stimulated the expression of genes in the fatty acid oxidation pathway, including carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1, malonyl-CoA decarboxylase, and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase. The expression of PPAR-α, a transcriptional regulator of genes encoding mitochondrial enzymes involved in fatty acid oxidation, was higher after pioglitazone treatment. Finally, the increased mitochondrial copy number and the higher expression of genes involved in fatty acid oxidation in human adipocytes may contribute to the hypolipidemic effects of pioglitazone.
Recent studies (1–4) report that mitochondrial metabolism in muscle and adipocytes is disturbed in patients with insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and even in subjects with positive family history for diabetes. This includes a reduction in the expression of peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR) coactivator-1α (PGC-1α), a key regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis. Additionally, lower expression of PGC-1α–responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation was noted in morbid obesity and the pre-diabetic state in skeletal muscle (1,2,5). Little is known about the effect of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) on mitochondrial function. In Zucker diabetic rats, treatment with troglitazone restored impaired expression of PGC-1α and nuclear respiratory factor (NRF)-1 in muscle (6). Exposure of 3T3-L1 adipocytes to rosiglitazone for 48 h increased the number of mitochondria per cell, and the mitochondria became more similar to brown adipocytes (7). It has also been shown that a PPAR-γ ligand is required for the transcription of the brown adipocyte uncoupling protein (UCP)-1 in white adipocytes cultured in vitro (8,9).
A number of transcription factors are involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, including PGC-1α, mitochondrial transcription factor A (mtTFA), NRF-1 and -2, mitochondrial transcription factors B1 and B2, and estrogen-related receptor-α (5,10–12). PGC-1α, originally described as a brown fat–specific coactivator (13), has been recently described as a nuclear factor critical for activation of genes required for mitochondrial biogenesis in cell culture and rodent skeletal muscle (13–15). Several pieces of evidence demonstrate that PGC-1α is capable of interacting with and coactivating nuclear receptors, e.g., PPAR-γ (13), PPAR-α (16), and NRF-1 (14), indicating a broad spectrum of actions for PGC-1α (rev. in 17). PGC-1α may also modulate intracellular fatty acid transport and fatty acid β-oxidation (16). In muscle, mitochondrial number is increased in response to endurance exercise training and β-adrenergic receptor activation; both stimulate PGC-1α expression, mitochondrial biogenesis, and lipid oxidation (18,19). Interestingly, ectopic expression of PGC-1α in human white adipocytes induces the expression of brown adipocyte genes and promotes fatty acid oxidation in vitro (20).
The aim of the presented study was to define whether treatment of obese diabetic patients with pioglitazone, a potent selective PPAR-γ ligand, affects 1) mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number, 2) expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, and 3) expression of genes driving fatty acid oxidation in human subcutaneous adipocytes in vivo. We hypothesized that pioglitazone might increase mitochondrial content, increase expression of PGC-1α in diabetic patients, and alter the expression of genes involved in fatty acid β-oxidation. As a secondary aim, we measured the activity of the PPAR-α nuclear hormone receptor in these same samples by measuring the expression of PPAR-α and genes known to be transcribed in response to PPAR-α agonists.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Participants and sample collection.
Two groups of subjects were included in this study. The first group had type 2 diabetes and was part of a clinical trial on the effects of pioglitazone on body composition (21). Briefly, it included 22 men and 26 women aged 54.7 ± 9.5 years, with a BMI 32.1 ± 5.1 kg/m2. Diabetes was defined by a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥126 mg/dl at entry or FPG >115 mg/dl and a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test glucose ≥200 mg/dl or current use of either metformin or sulfonylureas. Baseline FPG at entry had to be ≤200 mg/dl. Insulin and triglyceride concentrations were 14.7 ± 9.4 mIU/ml and 213.9 ± 112.1 mg/dl, respectively. The second group consisted of nine men and three women without diabetes who had a mean age of 22.4 ± 3.2 years and mean BMI 28.9 ± 4.6 kg/m2. All patients signed a consent form approved by the Pennington Biomedical Research Center ethical review board after risks and procedures had been explained.
The diabetic subjects were randomly divided into two groups of 24 patients each and treated with placebo or pioglitazone. Pioglitazone and matching placebos were prepared by Takeda Pharmaceuticals and were given as a single daily dose of 30 mg/day or placebo each morning for 12 weeks. The dose of pioglitazone was increased to 45 mg/day at week 8 if the FPG was >100 mg/dl or the HbA1c was ≥7.0%.
Treatment with pioglitazone after 12 weeks improved glucose control as evidenced by a decrease in HbA1c (−0.96 ± 1.11%), a decrease in triglycerides (−54.18 ± 134.85 mg/dl), and an increase in body weight (+1.68 ± 2.4 kg) (21). Subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies were obtained from diabetic and nondiabetic subjects using a Bergstrom needle as previously described (22).
RNA and DNA extraction.
Total RNA from 50 to 100 mg adipose tissue was isolated with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and quantified spectrophotometrically. The integrity of the RNA was confirmed by PAGE with Sybr green detection. DNA was extracted from the same tissue, after separation of protein and RNA with Trizol, by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation according to the manufacturer’s procedure. The total amount of DNA recovered was determined by spectrophotometry.
Real-time RT-PCR for RNA.
Real-time RT-PCR for tested genes was performed using a Taqman 100R × n PCR Core Reagent Kit (Applied Biosystems, Roche, Branchburg, NJ) as described previously (24). Taqman probes and primers were designed using Primer Express Software version 2.0 (Applied Biosystems, Roche, Branchburg, NJ). The sequences of primers and probes and accession numbers for each gene are shown in Table 1. Real-time RT-PCR was carried out in an ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems, Branchburg, NJ) using the following parameters: one cycle of 48°C for 30 min, then 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. All expression data were normalized by dividing the amount of target by amount of cyclophilin B used as internal control.
Real-time PCR for mitochondrial DNA.
Relative amounts of nuclear DNA and mtDNA were determined by quantitative real-time PCR. The ratio of mtDNA to nuclear DNA reflects the tissue concentration of mitochondria per cell. For this purpose, a 120-nucleotide–long mtDNA fragment within the ND 1 gene was selected for quantification of mtDNA according to He et al. (23). The PCR product was cloned into the plasmid pCDNAII according to the manufacture’s protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsband, CA) and verified by DNA sequencing. The concentration of DNA in the plasmid was estimated from the absorbance (260 nm) and calculated to give a stock of 2.5 × 1010 copy/μl. Plasmid standards of known copy number were used to generate a standard curve from which the copy number of the unknowns was determined. The quantification assay was performed in a total volume of 50 μl containing 10 μl DNA template, 5 μl of 10 × buffer A, 11 μl of 25 mmol/l MgCL2, 1 μl of each dNTP, 0.5 μl AMPErase UNG (uracil-N-glycosylase), 0.25 μl AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase, and 15.25 μl water. Amplification and detection were performed in an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems, Roche, Branchburg, NJ). The PCR was initiated with 2 min at 50°C (for the activation of AmpErase UNG), followed by 10min at 95°C (for deactivation of AmpErase UNG and activation of AmpliTag Gold). This was followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C. To normalize results, a 120-bp region of nuclear DNA (lipoprotein lipase) was also amplified and cloned as described above. The total amount of nuclear DNA was not affected by TZD. The PCR conditions were the same as for mtDNA.
Citrate synthase activity.
Citrate synthase activity was measured according to the method described previously (24). Briefly, 50 mg tissue was placed in extraction buffer (10:1 vol/vol) containing 50 mmol/l Tris/HCl, 1 mmol/l MgCL2, 100 mmol/l KCl, 250 mmol/l sucrose, and 30 mmol/l 2-mercaptoethanol. The suspension was homogenized by polytron and centrifuged twice (9,000g, 15 min, 4°C). The pellet and lipid were carefully removed. For the measure, the activity the assay buffer containing 0.11 mmol/l 5-5′-dithio-bis (2-nitrobenzoic acid), 0.25 mmol/l acetyl-CoA, and 0.28 mmol/l oxaloacetate was used. The reaction was initiated by adding of 30 μl of enzyme extract. Changes in absorbance at 412 nm in 25οC were measured during 10 min using kinetic software (Microplate Manager; Bio-Rad Laboratories). The results are presented as changes in activity in the two treatment groups (μmol · min−1 · g tissue−1).
Statistical analysis.
All clinical data were entered into the Pennington Biomedical Research Center database, extracted and combined with a gene expression database, and analyzed using JMP version 5.0.1a (SAS, Cary, NC). Correlations were performed in a pairwise fashion using the Pearson product-moment statistic. Two-way ANOVA was performed using time and treatment as factors to assess changes in gene expression within subject during the study. The effect of metformin and sulfonylureas on gene expression was tested using variance-covariance analysis (SAS version 8). All values are presented in figures and tables as sample (raw) means ± SE. Significant differences were assumed for P < 0.05.
RESULTS
Characteristics of the study populations.
The patients treated with pioglitazone and those treated with placebo were well matched at baseline. The nondiabetic subjects were markedly younger and leaner than the diabetic subjects.
Expression of PGC-1α and mtDNA copy number in type 2 diabetes.
mtDNA copy number was significantly higher in healthy patients compared with diabetic nontreated subjects (P < 0.05; Fig. 1A). Mitochondrial number did not change in the placebo group but significantly increased after pioglitazone treatment (P < 0.01; Fig. 1A). There was no significant difference between nondiabetic control subjects and diabetic patients after treatment with pioglitazone.
PGC-1α mRNA was significantly higher in nondiabetic control subjects compared with diabetic nontreated subjects (P < 0.05; Fig. 1B). The placebo-treated subjects showed no significant changes for any of the genes that were measured. Treatment with pioglitazone increased the mRNA for PGC-1α in diabetic patients (P < 0.01; Fig. 1B).
Citrate synthase activity, a marker of mitochondrial aerobic capacity, increased in pioglitazone-treated patients (8.19 ± 0.9 vs. 6.07 ± 0.3 μmol · min−1 · g tissue−1; NS; change in activity: 2.12 ± 0.77 vs. −0.09 ± 0.48 μmol · min−1 · g−1 tissue; P < 0.05; Fig. 1C). Patients in the placebo group showed no differences in the citrate synthase activity (6.94 ± 0.49 vs. 7.03 ± 0.86 μmol · min−1 · g tissue−1; data not shown). A modest positive relationship was observed between mtDNA copy number and citrate synthase activity (R = 0.52; P < 0.05; data not shown).
Effect of pioglitazone on gene expression.
Pioglitazone increased the gene expression of several factors involved in mitochondrial biogenesis (Fig. 2A–C). mtTFA, a downstream target of PGC-1α, increased in pioglitazone-treated patients (P < 0.05; Fig. 2A). The mRNA for cytochrome C tended to increase in the pioglitazone-treated group (Fig. 2B). Unexpectedly, the mRNA for NRF-1 was not affected by pioglitazone and did not differ between the two groups (Fig. 2C). The expression of UCP-1, a marker of brown adipose tissue, increased in pioglitazone-treated subjects (P < 0.05; Fig. 2H). In contrast, there was no difference between the two groups in the mRNA level for adrenergic β-3 receptor (ADRB3; Fig. 2I). Pioglitazone increased the expression of genes required for fatty acid oxidation (Fig. 2D–G), including PPAR-α (P < 0.05; Fig. 2D), medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD; P < 0.0001; Fig. 2E), carnitine palmitoylotransferase I (CPT-1; P < 0.05; Fig. 2F), and malonyl-CoA decarboxylase (MLYCD; P < 0.001; Fig. 2G). The expression of PGC-1β, a homolog of PGC-1α implicated in the regulation of fatty acid oxidation (25), tended to be higher after pioglitazone treatment, although the difference was not statistically significant (0.82 ± 0.05 vs. 0.69 ± 0.05; NS; data not shown). The expression of two members of the p160 coregulator family, steroid receptor coactivator-1 and nuclear receptor coactivator-2, both involved in energy homeostasis in white and brown adipose tissue by formation of complexes with PGC-1α (26) did not change after pioglitazone treatment (data not shown).
Because many of the subjects were treated with sulfonylureas and/or metformin, we tested the effect of these treatments on gene expression at baseline by ANOVA. There were no significant differences in gene expression at baseline in patients treated with metformin or sulfonylurea as compared with patients not taking these drugs at study entry.
The mRNA for PGC-1α was highly correlated with mRNA for several genes in the mitochondrial biogenesis pathway, including mtTFA (Fig. 3A) and NRF-1 (Fig. 3B). Statistically significant but much smaller correlations were observed between mRNA for PGC-1α and mitocondrial copy number and UCP-1 (Fig. 3C and D). No relationship was found between PGC-1α and ADRB3 or cytochrome C (data not shown). Interestingly, PGC-1α expression was highly correlated with the mRNA for two members of p160 family coregulators: nuclear receptor coactivator-2 (R = 0.84; P < 0.0001; data not shown) and steriod receptor coactivator-1 (R = 0.77; P < 0.0001; data not shown).
The baseline expression of mRNA for PPAR-α was significantly correlated with several PPAR-α targets: MCAD (Fig. 4A), MLYCD (Fig. 4B), and CPT-1 (Fig. 4C). Additionally, a strong correlation was found between PPAR-α mRNA and PGC-1α (Fig. 4D), PGC-1β (R = 0.50; P < 0.001; data not shown), steriod receptor coactivator-1 (R = 0.75; P < 0.0001; data not shown), and nuclear receptor coactivator-2 (R = 0.75; P < 0.0001; data not shown) but not with ADRB3 (data not shown), UCP-1 (data not shown), or mitochondrial copy number (data not shown).
DISCUSSION
The antidiabetic effects of TZDs are well established, although the full spectrum of actions is not fully understood, especially when the effects on mitochondrial function are considered. There are several important findings from our study testing the in vivo effect of pioglitazone on mitochondria and genes involved in fatty acid metabolism in subcutaneous adipose tissue from diabetic patients. First, using quantitative real-time PCR, we observed a significantly higher mitochondrial copy number per cell in adipose tissue obtained from healthy young control subjects compared with diabetic patients. Furthermore, treatment of diabetic individuals with pioglitazone restored the reduced level of mitochondrial number to that observed in nondiabetic control subjects. It has been previously reported that the real-time PCR method used in our experiment is highly sensitive to determine the mitochondrial copy number in several tissue including adipocytes (23,27). We found that the increase in mitochondrial DNA was mirrored by an increase in the citrate synthase activity, a mitochondrial protein encoded by a nuclear gene that is widely recognized as a marker of mitochondrial activity and correlated to mitochondrial number in human muscle (28). Previous studies (29) in rodent adipose tissue showed a similar increase in citrate synthase activity with pioglitazone. The relationship between mtDNA copy number and citrate synthase activity is quite variable across tissues, as the mtDNA content and the activity of mitochondrial machinery represent structural and functional aspects of the organelle (30). Although the activity of mitochondrial enzymes and mitochondrial number are generally linked, activity of the enzymes is determined by more than just the mass of the enzymes, adding complexity to the regulation of ATP synthesis and fat oxidation.
Our data are consistent with results from in vivo experiments performed on rat and dogs treated with TZD (31). Morphological studies confirmed a higher number of mitochondria per perirenal adipocyte in both species after TZD treatment (31). In another in vitro experiment, 3T3-L1 adipocytes exposed 48 h to PPAR-γ agonists increased mitochondrial density and altered mitochondrial morphology toward brown adipocytes with concomitant increased expression of several mitochondrial proteins (7,32). Interestingly, in our in vivo study as well as in white adipose tissue tested in vitro (8,9), the expression of UCP-1, a gene whose expression is typically restricted to brown adipocytes, increased after TZD.
The molecular mechanisms involved in mitochondrial biogenesis in fat tissue have only been partially elucidated. Physiological studies (14,17) imply that PGC-1α has a principal role in this process in muscle. In humans, cultured in vitro, the overexpression of PGC-1α or the addition of TZD increased mitochondrial number (7,20). Alternately, preexisting “quiescen” brown adipocytes may have increased their mitochondria number (33).
These observations are important from several perspectives. First, Semple et al. (4) observed a threefold reduction in PGC-1α mRNA in adipose tissue of morbidly obese patients, suggesting that mitochondrial number might also be reduced in severe obesity. Our study, performed in less severely obese type 2 diabetic subjects underscores the possibility that reduced PGC-1α and mitochondrial biogenesis are primary defects in obesity and insulin resistance. One shortcoming of these studies is that our nondiabetic control group was slightly leaner and significantly younger than the diabetic subjects. In parallel to these findings in skeletal muscle, nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation are downregulated in the muscle of individuals with diabetes or a family history of diabetes (1,2,34). The present data demonstrate that pioglitazone increases PGC-1α expression and mitochondrial copy number. Second, an increase in mitochondrial number per cell might increase aerobic metabolism. Large adipocytes are known to use glycolytic pathways, as evidenced by an increased production of lactate in both in vitro and in vivo experiments (35,36). It has been reported that lactate production is increased in obesity (37). In one study (38), plasma lactate tended to decrease after TZD treatment, but in our study we did not observe any changes in fasting lactate (data not shown). Lastly, changes observed in expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis were mirrored by an increase in the expression of genes required for fat oxidation (PPAR-α, CPT-1, MLYCD, and MCAD).
That PPAR-α would be correlated to the expression of genes involved in fat oxidation is not unexpected (39,40). PPAR-α agonists increase the transcription of a variety of genes that are associated with decreased lipid synthesis and increased fat oxidation (39,40). One controversial in vitro study (41) demonstrated that pioglitazone can directly activate PPAR-α. TZDs increased the expression in vivo of genes in the fatty acid oxidation pathway in rodents (42,43). Another possibility to explain the observed increase in PPAR-α target genes is that the upregulation of PGC-1α expression, observed in our study after TZD treatment, could induce expression or coactivate PPAR-α. Vega et al. (16) suggest that PGC-1α acts as a coactivator of PPAR-α in the transcriptional control of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation.
PPAR-γ ligands increase fatty acid uptake by human muscle in vitro (44) and increase fat oxidation in cultured human and rodent myotubes (45,46). The opposite effect was observed in vivo (42) and in vitro (47). There is no evidence that TZDs influence whole-body fatty acid oxidation in humans. PPAR-γ agonists increase flux of fatty acids into adipocytes and away from muscle (21). Sequestration of lipid in adipose tissue could explain why we (48) and others (49) find that whole-body resting or postprandial fat oxidation does not change, even though genes required for fatty acid oxidation increase. Alternately, TZDs could change a metabolic flexibility and the dynamic changes in substrate oxidation throughout the day.
To summarize, we observed an increase in PGC-1α and PPAR-α expression after pioglitazone treatment. Based on the literature and these results, we speculate that pioglitazone, by increasing transcription of PGC-1α, upregulates the mitochondrial machinery in adipose tissue. Given the data at hand, we cannot determine which of these factors plays the primary function in mitochondrial biogenesis. We can only speculate that pioglitazone, by activation of PGC-1α transcription, may coordinately activate mitochondrial biogenesis and PPAR-α/fatty acid oxidation pathways. Alternatively, pioglitazone as a weak agonist of PPAR-α might induce expression of downstream genes involved in fatty acid oxidation. Finally, all of these may happen independently and need to be explored in further experiments in vivo.
In conclusion, these data suggest that pioglitazone increases PGC-1α expression and mtDNA copy number and may enhance the oxidative capacity of white adipose tissue. It is noteworthy that the increase in mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation capacity is occurring in parallel with an increased lipid accumulation in the adipocytes (21). TZD-treated subjects gain weight, indicating storage of lipid in adipocytes, as previously published (48), and the balance of fat storage versus oxidation tips toward storage. Only if there is an increased demand for ATP or if an uncoupling process is initiated, can the increased amount of enzymes and mitochondrial machinery result in increased metabolism. Lastly, pioglitazone increases mitochondrial copy number to levels seen in healthy young control subjects and increases the expression of genes required for fatty acid oxidation.
Gene . | Accession number . | Forward primer . | Probe . | Reverse primer . |
---|---|---|---|---|
ND 1 | CCCTAAAACCCGCCACATCT | CCATCACCCTCTACATCACCGCCC | GAGCGATGGTGAGAGCTAAGGT | |
ND 4 | CCATTCTCCTCCTATCCCTCAAC | CCGACATCATTACCGGGTTTTCCTCTTG | CACAATCTGATGTTTTGGTTAAACTATATTT | |
LPL | NM_000237 | CGAGTCGTCTTTCTCCTGATGAT | ACATTCACCAGAGGGTC | TTCTGGATTCCAATGCTTCGA |
PGC-1α | NM_013261 | CACCAAACCCACAGAGAACA | CGCAGTCACAACACTTACAAGCCAAAC | GGGTCATTTGGTGACTCTGG |
PGC-1β | NM_133263 | CAGCCACTCGAAGGAACTTCA | CTGAACACGGCCCTCTGCTCTCACA | CGGATGCTTGGCGTTCTG |
mtTFA | NM_003201 | CCCAGATGCAAAAACTACAGAACTAA | TCCAACGCTGGGCAATTCTTCTA | TCCGCCCTATAAGCATCTTGA |
Cyt C | NM_001916 | TGGCCCCTCCCATCTACAC | AGAGTTTGACGATGGCACCCCAGCTA | ATCCTTGGCTATCTGGGACATG |
NRF-1 | NM_005011 | CGTTGCCCAAGTGAATTATTCTG | TTGTTCCACCTCTCCATCAGCCA | CCCTGTAACGTGGCCCAAT |
PPAR-α | NM_005036 | GCTTTGGCTTTACGGAATACCA | AGCCATCTGAGCCAGGACAGCTTCCTAA | TGAAAGCGTGTCCGTGATGA |
MCAD | AF251043 | TGCCCTGGAAAGGAAAACTTT | TGTAGAGCACCAAGCAATATCATTTATG | GTTCAACTTTCATTGCCATTTCAG |
CPT-1 | D87812 | CCAGAGCAGCACCCCAAT | CATCTGCTACAGGGCCAAAGCCACCT | CTGCAATCATGTAGGAAACTCCATAG |
MLYCD | NM_012213 | TGGCACTGACTGGTGACATCTC | AACATCCAGGCAATCGTGAAGGAACATC | TGTTCTTCTCTTCTGTTTCTGATGGA |
UCP-1 | NM_021833 | ACGACACGGTCCAGGAGTTC | TCACCGCAGGGAAAGAAACAGCACC | ACCAGCTAAAATCTTGCTTCCTAAAC |
TIF-2 | NM_006540 | AGTGACCTCCGTGCCTACGT | AGGATCATTAACCTGCTCGGGACCCAT | CAGGTTGCCTCCCCTCAGA |
SRC-1 | U40396 | GCAGATGCCAGGAATGAACA | TGCCCTGAGCAGATAAATGATCCC | TTGCAGTAGAGGCCTGTGTGTCT |
ADRB3 | NM_000025 | CGCAGCCCAGGCTTT | AGCCCCGTCGAGCCGTTG | CTTCTTGTCCTTCAGGCCTAAG |
Cyclophilin B | XM_042251 | GGAGATGGCACAGGAGGAAA | CATCTACGGTGAGCGCTTCCCCG | CGTAGTGCTTCAGTTTGAAGTTCTCA |
Gene . | Accession number . | Forward primer . | Probe . | Reverse primer . |
---|---|---|---|---|
ND 1 | CCCTAAAACCCGCCACATCT | CCATCACCCTCTACATCACCGCCC | GAGCGATGGTGAGAGCTAAGGT | |
ND 4 | CCATTCTCCTCCTATCCCTCAAC | CCGACATCATTACCGGGTTTTCCTCTTG | CACAATCTGATGTTTTGGTTAAACTATATTT | |
LPL | NM_000237 | CGAGTCGTCTTTCTCCTGATGAT | ACATTCACCAGAGGGTC | TTCTGGATTCCAATGCTTCGA |
PGC-1α | NM_013261 | CACCAAACCCACAGAGAACA | CGCAGTCACAACACTTACAAGCCAAAC | GGGTCATTTGGTGACTCTGG |
PGC-1β | NM_133263 | CAGCCACTCGAAGGAACTTCA | CTGAACACGGCCCTCTGCTCTCACA | CGGATGCTTGGCGTTCTG |
mtTFA | NM_003201 | CCCAGATGCAAAAACTACAGAACTAA | TCCAACGCTGGGCAATTCTTCTA | TCCGCCCTATAAGCATCTTGA |
Cyt C | NM_001916 | TGGCCCCTCCCATCTACAC | AGAGTTTGACGATGGCACCCCAGCTA | ATCCTTGGCTATCTGGGACATG |
NRF-1 | NM_005011 | CGTTGCCCAAGTGAATTATTCTG | TTGTTCCACCTCTCCATCAGCCA | CCCTGTAACGTGGCCCAAT |
PPAR-α | NM_005036 | GCTTTGGCTTTACGGAATACCA | AGCCATCTGAGCCAGGACAGCTTCCTAA | TGAAAGCGTGTCCGTGATGA |
MCAD | AF251043 | TGCCCTGGAAAGGAAAACTTT | TGTAGAGCACCAAGCAATATCATTTATG | GTTCAACTTTCATTGCCATTTCAG |
CPT-1 | D87812 | CCAGAGCAGCACCCCAAT | CATCTGCTACAGGGCCAAAGCCACCT | CTGCAATCATGTAGGAAACTCCATAG |
MLYCD | NM_012213 | TGGCACTGACTGGTGACATCTC | AACATCCAGGCAATCGTGAAGGAACATC | TGTTCTTCTCTTCTGTTTCTGATGGA |
UCP-1 | NM_021833 | ACGACACGGTCCAGGAGTTC | TCACCGCAGGGAAAGAAACAGCACC | ACCAGCTAAAATCTTGCTTCCTAAAC |
TIF-2 | NM_006540 | AGTGACCTCCGTGCCTACGT | AGGATCATTAACCTGCTCGGGACCCAT | CAGGTTGCCTCCCCTCAGA |
SRC-1 | U40396 | GCAGATGCCAGGAATGAACA | TGCCCTGAGCAGATAAATGATCCC | TTGCAGTAGAGGCCTGTGTGTCT |
ADRB3 | NM_000025 | CGCAGCCCAGGCTTT | AGCCCCGTCGAGCCGTTG | CTTCTTGTCCTTCAGGCCTAAG |
Cyclophilin B | XM_042251 | GGAGATGGCACAGGAGGAAA | CATCTACGGTGAGCGCTTCCCCG | CGTAGTGCTTCAGTTTGAAGTTCTCA |
ND, NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1; ND 4, NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4; LPL, liporotein lipase; Cyt C, cytochrome C; TIF-2, nuclear receptor coactivator-2; SRC-1, steroid receptor coactivator-1.
I.B. has received grant/research support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals. H.X. has received grant/research support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals. G.A.B. has served on an advisory board of, has received honoraria from, and has received grant/research support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals. S.R.S. has received honoraria/consulting fees and research support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals.
Article Information
This work was supported partially by an unrestricted grant from Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America.
We thank Michele McNeil for excellent technical assistance and Mattew Hulver, Kichoon Lee, and Marek Bogacki for helpful advice. We also thank the volunteers that participated in this study.