Variants in hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-4α cause maturity-onset diabetes of the young, type 1 (MODY1) and may also be risk factors for type 2 diabetes. We sequenced the HNF4A gene of 95 MODY3-negative probands from the Norwegian MODY Registry. We found three novel coding variants in exon 8 of HNF4A: G326R, T339I, and W340X. In intron 7, we noted a single nucleotide polymorphism in the binding site of a previously published primer pair, which in some cases caused allelic drop out when amplifying exon 8. We also detected two novel sequence variants of the P2 promoter region, of which P2 −192C>G showed linkage with diabetes in two families (maximal logarithm of odds score of 3.1 and 0.8, respectively). This variant and a surrounding haplotype restricted by 3.7 Mb was also found in two Danish MODY pedigrees. The age of onset was higher in the P2 −192C>G carriers (median 45 years) compared with that reported for other MODY1 individuals. We could not support a biological role of the P2 promoter variant by in vitro transfection assays. In conclusion, we have identified three novel HNF4A mutations and a 3.7-Mb haplotype, including the HNF4A P2 promoter, which was linked with diabetes.

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) can result from disease-causing sequence variants in any of at least six different genes that encode the glycolytic enzyme glucokinase (GCK) and five transcription factors: hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-1α, -1β, and -4α, insulin promoter factor-1, and NEUROD1 (1). Recently, genetic variants in the β-cell–specific P2 promoter region of the HNF4A (MODY1) gene have gained substantial attention in MODY (2–5) and in type 2 diabetes (6–12).

We have investigated the prevalence of sequence variants of the HNF4A gene in probands recruited from the Norwegian MODY Registry (13) after first excluding the presence of mutations in HNF1A (MODY3). In clinically relevant cases, we had also excluded mutations in GCK (MODY2). Here, we present a summary of sequence variants detected during the screening and discuss their role in the development of monogenic diabetes.

Since 1997, physicians have referred subjects to the Norwegian MODY Registry based on at least two of the following criteria: 1) first-degree relative with diabetes, 2) onset of diabetes before age 25 years in at least one family member, 3) low dose of insulin requirement (<0.5 units · kg−1 · day−1), 4) early-onset diabetes defined as diabetes diagnosed between age 25 and 40 years, and 5) subjects with an unusual type 1 diabetes (low-dose insulin requirement, no antibodies, or atypical history). Obviously, the conventional criteria of MODY (1) are not met in all cases. Nevertheless, inclusion of subjects based only on the conventional criteria will exclude some true MODY patients, e.g., those with de novo mutations, age at diagnosis after age 25 years, or limited clinical data on the family history of diabetes.

We sequenced HNF4A in 95 probands recruited from the Norwegian MODY Registry. Twenty-three probands fulfilled conventional MODY criteria (1), whereas the remaining 72 subjects were categorized as having suspected MODY. All probands were negative for mutations in HNF1A (13). Moreover, GCK mutations were excluded in 42 probands who had a MODY2-like phenotype. Standard oral glucose tolerance tests were performed (75 g glucose), and World Health Organization criteria for diabetes were applied. The study was approved by the regional committee for research ethics. We obtained written informed consent from the patients or their parents.

Molecular genetics.

HNF4A was sequenced using previously reported (14) or newly designed (online appendix Table 1 [available at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org]) primers. In particular, a new primer pair for exon 8 had to be used in order to avoid allelic drop out observed when using the published strategy (14). For the determination of allele frequencies of the novel variants and the IVS7 nt-88C>T single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) causing allelic drop out, we sequenced the relevant exon and flanking introns directly in 100 blood donors. The P2 −192C>G SNP was genotyped in 1,006 healthy Norwegian subjects using Sequenom’s MassARRAY system. The allele frequencies of the polymorphisms were estimated in 95 MODY probands.

Linkage analysis.

Power calculation using 1,000 replicates and SLINK/MSIM software yielded maximal average logarithm of odds (LOD) scores of 4.4 and 0.3 in families N88 and N510, respectively. To assess the significance of the P2 variant cosegregating with MODY, we used a previously described parametric LOD score analysis with age-related penetrances (15) and the MLINK/VITESSE (version 1.0) program. To investigate a possibly shared haplotype, we genotyped family members with the microsatellite markers D20S855, D20S96, D20S43, D20S89, D20S119, and D20S1151. Estimation of individual haplotypes in families N88 and N510 were done using the SIMWALK (version 2.89) software, and haplotype frequencies among unrelated controls were calculated with PHASE (version 2.1.1).

Plasmid constructs.

A luciferase reporter gene construct for the P2 promoter studies was kindly provided by Dr. Gerhard Ryffel, Essen, Germany (5). We used specifically designed mutagenesis primers to create P2 promoter constructs containing the −192C>G and −50G>C sequence variants (QuickChange XL kit; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Sequences of the constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Cell culture and transfection studies.

Rat insulinoma INS-1 cells were transfected and assessed as previously described for HeLa cells (13). Each experiment was performed in triplicate on each of 5 consecutive experimental days. Transcriptional activation was measured as luciferase activity generated from reporter constructs transfected into INS-1 cells. We performed transfection of the cells using 4 μl FuGene6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) and a total amount of 2 μg DNA, including 0.025 μg pRLSV40 (Promega, Madison, WI) for normalization of transfection efficiencies and various amounts of wild-type or mutant constructs. The total quantity of plasmids was maintained constant by adding suitable amounts of empty pGL3-Basic (Promega) reporter vector. The cells were harvested 24 h posttransfection, and total cell extracts were prepared. The transcriptional activity was measured using the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega).

Statistical analysis.

We used linear regression to estimate any difference in the luciferase activity for the wild-type and mutant constructs. We chose a significance level of 5% and used Stata (version 7.0; Stata, College Station, TX).

We found four previously undescribed mutations in HNF4A (Figs. 1 and Table 1), three in exon 8 (G326R, T339I, W340X), and one in the P2 promoter (P2 −192C>G). It was not possible to extend the pedigrees N511 and N528 for an evaluation of cosegregation for the G326R and W340X variants, respectively. T339I was a spontaneous mutation, as the healthy parents did not harbor the mutation and the family relationships were confirmed by microsatellite analysis. In addition, we observed the previously reported exon 7 variant V255M (16) in two families in which there was no cosegregation with diabetes (N91 and N557, data not shown). None of the putative pathogenic variants were identified in 200 control chromosomes. We also observed several polymorphisms and intron variants (online appendix Table 2).

During sequencing of exon 8, we observed an allelic drop out caused by an SNP (IVS7 nt-88C>T) in the binding site of the originally published forward primer (14). The frequency of the C allele of the IVS7 nt-88C>T SNP was 59% in 95 MODY probands and 57% in unrelated blood donors.

We observed two novel variants of the P2 promoter, P2 −192C>G (families N88 and N510; Fig. 1) and P2 −50G>C (families N515; data not shown), of which only the former showed a pattern of cosegregation with disease. The P2 −192C>G variant was not found among 1,006 control individuals. We genotyped additional family members from families N88 and N510 for the P2 −192C>G variant. By linkage analysis, we found a maximum two-point LOD score of 3.1 and 0.80, respectively, in the two families (online appendix Table 3). Haplotype determination using microsatellite markers surrounding the HNF4A locus showed that the N88 and N510 families shared a minimal haplotype of <3.7 Mb flanked by the markers D20S855 and D20S89 (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, this haplotype was also shared with two Danish families harboring the same P2 −192C>G variant (families DK-657 and DK-515; Fig. 2A) (17). The same microsatellite marker haplotype was not present among 20 Norwegian blood donors. In contrast, on constructing a haplotype of closely spaced SNPs spanning HNF4A and the P2 promoter region, we found that the P2 −192C>G variant resides on the most common HNF4A SNP haplotype in Norway (Fig. 2B).

An elevated age at onset of diabetes was the most distinguishing clinical feature of subjects with the P2 −192C>G variant (median onset of 45 years) compared with subjects with coding variants. In addition, the subjects were generally lean (Table 2). Since sulfonylurea has been reported to be effective in MODY1 patients (18), we noted that among the subjects with the P2 promoter variant P2 −192C>G, five subjects were treated with sulfonylurea and used on average a dose of 43% of the maximum licensed dose (with a mean level of HbA1c [A1C] 7.7%). Among the subjects with coding variants, one subject was using sulfonylurea, requiring 8% of the maximum licensed dose (A1C 9.2%). We found no significant difference in transcriptional activity between the wild-type and either of the two P2 promoter variants when they were coupled to a reporter gene and tested in INS-1 cells (online appendix figure). We found that disease-associated variants in the coding and promoter regions of HNF4A account for 9% (2 of 23) of MODY3-negative probands meeting conventional criteria and 4% (3 of 72) among the probands with suspected MODY, based on the putative causal effects of P2 −192C>G, G326R, T339I, and W340X (Table 1).

Mutation screening of HNF4A in 95 probands recruited from the Norwegian MODY Registry revealed three coding mutations in exon 8 (G326R, T339I, and W340X) not previously reported, as well as a previously undescribed disease-associated variant of the P2 promoter. Cosegregation was not possible to evaluate for G326R and W340X. The T339I was a de novo mutation and hence the second spontaneous mutation to be reported in MODY1 (18). G326R, T339I, and W340X were all located in a genomic region encoding the transactivating domain of the protein, and they affected residues strictly conserved in the human, mouse, rat, and Drosophila HNF-4α homologues. Moreover, they were not found in 200 control chromosomes. Thus, these variants are likely to cause monogenic diabetes. In our material, variants in the coding and promoter regions of HNF4A causing monogenic diabetes account for 9% of MODY3-negative probands meeting conventional criteria. We therefore consider, in Norway, MODY1 to be much less common than MODY3 and consider MODY2 to be the third most prevalent type (13; unpublished data).

Due to a highly frequent SNP in a primer binding site, we observed an allelic drop out (19) when sequencing exon 8 with the originally suggested primer pairs (14). Resequencing should therefore be considered in patients tested with the previously published primers. Notably, all the three novel coding variants that we observed occurred in exon 8.

We found two single nucleotide substitutions in the P2 promoter region. The P2 −192C>G variant cosegregated with diabetes in two Norwegian families (maximal LOD score 3.1 and 0.80, respectively). The P2 −192C>G variant is located 10 bases upstream of the HNF-1 binding site and is conserved in the corresponding position in mouse. Interestingly, the same variant was also found in five Danish pedigrees (17) but not in 1,006 control subjects. We tested two of the Danish pedigrees and found a shared haplotype block of 3.7 Mb. Other haplotype-specific variants in HNF4A were not found. We believe that the observed maximum two-point LOD score (3.1) for the −192C>G variant at a recombination fraction of 0.10 (and not 0.00) in family N88 results from a slight misspecification of the model that underestimates the true phenocopy rate (subjects IV-1 and IV-19 are phenocopies). Based on the genetic data, we have established that the P2 variant or another variant within the shared 3.7-Mb haplotype is linked to diabetes in the two Norwegian and in two of the Danish pedigrees. We could not support a functional role of the P2 promoter variant by an in vitro transfection assay. This result does not, however, exclude that the P2 promoter variant is biologically relevant. Interestingly, Ek et al. (17) provide in vitro data showing that P2 −192C>G disrupts the binding of an unidentified sequence-specific DNA-binding complex present in human islet extracts.

Most of the subjects with the P2 −192C>G variant were lean and had a later onset of diabetes (median onset age of 45 years) compared with other recently described HNF4A mutation carriers (mean onset age of 23 years) (18), suggesting that it defines a particular subgroup of diabetic subjects. Late-onset monogenic diabetes has also been noted for the coding HNF4A variant V393I (20).

Several studies in various ethnic populations have suggested that haplotypes spanning the regulatory regions of HNF4A associate with type 2 diabetes (7–10,12), while other studies have failed to show this relationship (11), a problem generally noted in association studies (21). One reason for the discrepancy between the studies might be allelic heterogenetity (22). Rare risk variants, like the described P2 −192C>G variant, with modest attributable risk in the population but with major impact in a family, will most likely not be detected by conventional multipopulation association studies (23,24). In such cases, exhaustive sequencing in extended families showing linkage to the region might be an alternative approach.

In conclusion, variants in the coding and promoter regions of HNF4A leading to monogenic diabetes account for ∼9% of MODY3-negative probands meeting conventional criteria, making MODY1 the third most prevalent MODY form in Norway. An HNF4A P2 promoter haplotype was linked with late-onset diabetes, further supporting the role of the HNF4A region in type 2 diabetes.

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1. Pedigrees of Norwegian MODY families with HNF4A gene variants. Circles denote female family members, squares denote male family members, open symbols denote unaffected family members, and symbols with a slash denote deceased family members. Solid symbols indicate diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance. Individual mutation status is given where tested: N, normal allele; M, mutated allele. Numbers below the subject symbols denote age at study/age at diagnosis of diabetes. Arrowheads indicate the probands. In the text, the subjects are referred to with Roman numerals for the generation number and Latin numerals counting consecutively from the left. The proband in family N88, IV-14, was 47 years old at onset of diabetes but was referred to the MODY Registry based on her gestational diabetes at the ages of 34 and 37 years and the aggregation of diabetes in the family. In family N88, the following subjects were coded as unknown in the linkage analysis because before the genotyping we considered them to have diabetes from a different cause than the rest of the family: subjects V-5 (elevated GAD65 auto antibodies and high-risk haplotypes HLA-DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8) and V-6 (by history and not available for blood sampling) were considered to have type 1 diabetes. The spouses III-6 and III-11 were considered to have common type 2 diabetes. Subjects IV-1 and IV-19 are phenocopies but were coded as affected in the linkage analysis.
View largeDownload slide

Pedigrees of Norwegian MODY families with HNF4A gene variants. Circles denote female family members, squares denote male family members, open symbols denote unaffected family members, and symbols with a slash denote deceased family members. Solid symbols indicate diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance. Individual mutation status is given where tested: N, normal allele; M, mutated allele. Numbers below the subject symbols denote age at study/age at diagnosis of diabetes. Arrowheads indicate the probands. In the text, the subjects are referred to with Roman numerals for the generation number and Latin numerals counting consecutively from the left. The proband in family N88, IV-14, was 47 years old at onset of diabetes but was referred to the MODY Registry based on her gestational diabetes at the ages of 34 and 37 years and the aggregation of diabetes in the family. In family N88, the following subjects were coded as unknown in the linkage analysis because before the genotyping we considered them to have diabetes from a different cause than the rest of the family: subjects V-5 (elevated GAD65 auto antibodies and high-risk haplotypes HLA-DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8) and V-6 (by history and not available for blood sampling) were considered to have type 1 diabetes. The spouses III-6 and III-11 were considered to have common type 2 diabetes. Subjects IV-1 and IV-19 are phenocopies but were coded as affected in the linkage analysis.

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1. Pedigrees of Norwegian MODY families with HNF4A gene variants. Circles denote female family members, squares denote male family members, open symbols denote unaffected family members, and symbols with a slash denote deceased family members. Solid symbols indicate diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance. Individual mutation status is given where tested: N, normal allele; M, mutated allele. Numbers below the subject symbols denote age at study/age at diagnosis of diabetes. Arrowheads indicate the probands. In the text, the subjects are referred to with Roman numerals for the generation number and Latin numerals counting consecutively from the left. The proband in family N88, IV-14, was 47 years old at onset of diabetes but was referred to the MODY Registry based on her gestational diabetes at the ages of 34 and 37 years and the aggregation of diabetes in the family. In family N88, the following subjects were coded as unknown in the linkage analysis because before the genotyping we considered them to have diabetes from a different cause than the rest of the family: subjects V-5 (elevated GAD65 auto antibodies and high-risk haplotypes HLA-DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8) and V-6 (by history and not available for blood sampling) were considered to have type 1 diabetes. The spouses III-6 and III-11 were considered to have common type 2 diabetes. Subjects IV-1 and IV-19 are phenocopies but were coded as affected in the linkage analysis.
View largeDownload slide

Pedigrees of Norwegian MODY families with HNF4A gene variants. Circles denote female family members, squares denote male family members, open symbols denote unaffected family members, and symbols with a slash denote deceased family members. Solid symbols indicate diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance. Individual mutation status is given where tested: N, normal allele; M, mutated allele. Numbers below the subject symbols denote age at study/age at diagnosis of diabetes. Arrowheads indicate the probands. In the text, the subjects are referred to with Roman numerals for the generation number and Latin numerals counting consecutively from the left. The proband in family N88, IV-14, was 47 years old at onset of diabetes but was referred to the MODY Registry based on her gestational diabetes at the ages of 34 and 37 years and the aggregation of diabetes in the family. In family N88, the following subjects were coded as unknown in the linkage analysis because before the genotyping we considered them to have diabetes from a different cause than the rest of the family: subjects V-5 (elevated GAD65 auto antibodies and high-risk haplotypes HLA-DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8) and V-6 (by history and not available for blood sampling) were considered to have type 1 diabetes. The spouses III-6 and III-11 were considered to have common type 2 diabetes. Subjects IV-1 and IV-19 are phenocopies but were coded as affected in the linkage analysis.

Close modal
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2. A: Haplotypes of recombinant chromosomes for individuals in the Norwegian (N88 and N510) and Danish (DK-515 and DK-657) families based on microsatellite markers. Critical recombinant chromosomes in affected family members are presented. B: Deduced SNP-based mutation-carrying haplotypes in families N88 and N510 based on SNPs in the HNF4A region with positions given relative to P2 −192C>G. All mutation carriers in both families carried the identical mutation-carrying haplotype. Haplotypes in 50 blood donors were estimated with PHASE (version 2.1.1) based on the SNP genotypes, and the haplotypes with an estimated frequency >5% are shown.
View largeDownload slide

A: Haplotypes of recombinant chromosomes for individuals in the Norwegian (N88 and N510) and Danish (DK-515 and DK-657) families based on microsatellite markers. Critical recombinant chromosomes in affected family members are presented. B: Deduced SNP-based mutation-carrying haplotypes in families N88 and N510 based on SNPs in the HNF4A region with positions given relative to P2 −192C>G. All mutation carriers in both families carried the identical mutation-carrying haplotype. Haplotypes in 50 blood donors were estimated with PHASE (version 2.1.1) based on the SNP genotypes, and the haplotypes with an estimated frequency >5% are shown.

FIG. 2.
FIG. 2. A: Haplotypes of recombinant chromosomes for individuals in the Norwegian (N88 and N510) and Danish (DK-515 and DK-657) families based on microsatellite markers. Critical recombinant chromosomes in affected family members are presented. B: Deduced SNP-based mutation-carrying haplotypes in families N88 and N510 based on SNPs in the HNF4A region with positions given relative to P2 −192C>G. All mutation carriers in both families carried the identical mutation-carrying haplotype. Haplotypes in 50 blood donors were estimated with PHASE (version 2.1.1) based on the SNP genotypes, and the haplotypes with an estimated frequency >5% are shown.
View largeDownload slide

A: Haplotypes of recombinant chromosomes for individuals in the Norwegian (N88 and N510) and Danish (DK-515 and DK-657) families based on microsatellite markers. Critical recombinant chromosomes in affected family members are presented. B: Deduced SNP-based mutation-carrying haplotypes in families N88 and N510 based on SNPs in the HNF4A region with positions given relative to P2 −192C>G. All mutation carriers in both families carried the identical mutation-carrying haplotype. Haplotypes in 50 blood donors were estimated with PHASE (version 2.1.1) based on the SNP genotypes, and the haplotypes with an estimated frequency >5% are shown.

Close modal
TABLE 1

HNF4A gene mutations observed in Norwegian MODY families

FamilyMODY categorizationHNF4A gene locationDesignation at DNA level*Designation at protein level
N88 Suspected MODY Promoter P2 P2 −192C>G — 
N510 Conventional MODY Promoter P2 P2 −192C>G — 
N511 Suspected MODY Exon 8 c.976G>A G326R 
N37 Suspected MODY Exon 8 c.1016C>T T339I 
N528 Conventional MODY Exon 8 c.1020G>A W340X 
FamilyMODY categorizationHNF4A gene locationDesignation at DNA level*Designation at protein level
N88 Suspected MODY Promoter P2 P2 −192C>G — 
N510 Conventional MODY Promoter P2 P2 −192C>G — 
N511 Suspected MODY Exon 8 c.976G>A G326R 
N37 Suspected MODY Exon 8 c.1016C>T T339I 
N528 Conventional MODY Exon 8 c.1020G>A W340X 
*

c.1 is the first nucleotide of the ATG initiation codon in the cDNA.

View Large
TABLE 2

Clinical features of Norwegian MODY1 families

CharacteristicsCoding mutationsP2 −192C>G
Number of families 3 2 
Number of subjects (male) 3 (2) 14 (4) 
Current age (years) 26 (21–46) 56 (42–75) 
Age at diagnosis (years) 18 (16–38) 45 (20–63) 
Normal glucose tolerance/impaired glucose tolerance/diabetes 0/0/3 2/3/9 
Number of subjects diagnosed with diabetes before age 25 years 2 1 
Late diabetes complications (yes/no) 2/1 0/7 
Treatment in diabetic subjects (oral hypoglycemic agents/insulin) 1/1 5/2 
Insulin requirement (units/kg) 0.97 0.91 (0.40–1.41) 
BMI (kg/m2) 25.4 (22.1–30.4) 22.6 (18.5–30.1) 
A1C (%) 9.2 (8.0–9.3) 7.1 (5.4–8.3) 
Glucose (mmol/l) 7.4 (7.3–7.4) 7.9 (5.2–12.3) 
Insulin C-peptide (nmol/l) 0.9 (0.9–0.9) 0.5 (0.0–1.2) 
Triglycerides (mmol/l) 1.28 (1.22–1.33) 0.75 (0.31–2.30) 
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 4.9 (4.4–5.3) 5.7 (4.0–6.8) 
HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.2 (1.1–1.3) 1.6 (0.8–2.5) 
LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 2.9 (2.6–3.2) 3.4 (2.6–4.6) 
Apolipoprotein AI (mg/dl)* 120 185 (149–236) 
Apolipoprotein AII (mg/dl)* 28 31 (30–36) 
Apolipoprotein B (mg/dl)* 118 109 (87–113) 
Apolipoprotein CII (mg/dl)* 4.7 4 (3–7) 
CharacteristicsCoding mutationsP2 −192C>G
Number of families 3 2 
Number of subjects (male) 3 (2) 14 (4) 
Current age (years) 26 (21–46) 56 (42–75) 
Age at diagnosis (years) 18 (16–38) 45 (20–63) 
Normal glucose tolerance/impaired glucose tolerance/diabetes 0/0/3 2/3/9 
Number of subjects diagnosed with diabetes before age 25 years 2 1 
Late diabetes complications (yes/no) 2/1 0/7 
Treatment in diabetic subjects (oral hypoglycemic agents/insulin) 1/1 5/2 
Insulin requirement (units/kg) 0.97 0.91 (0.40–1.41) 
BMI (kg/m2) 25.4 (22.1–30.4) 22.6 (18.5–30.1) 
A1C (%) 9.2 (8.0–9.3) 7.1 (5.4–8.3) 
Glucose (mmol/l) 7.4 (7.3–7.4) 7.9 (5.2–12.3) 
Insulin C-peptide (nmol/l) 0.9 (0.9–0.9) 0.5 (0.0–1.2) 
Triglycerides (mmol/l) 1.28 (1.22–1.33) 0.75 (0.31–2.30) 
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 4.9 (4.4–5.3) 5.7 (4.0–6.8) 
HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.2 (1.1–1.3) 1.6 (0.8–2.5) 
LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) 2.9 (2.6–3.2) 3.4 (2.6–4.6) 
Apolipoprotein AI (mg/dl)* 120 185 (149–236) 
Apolipoprotein AII (mg/dl)* 28 31 (30–36) 
Apolipoprotein B (mg/dl)* 118 109 (87–113) 
Apolipoprotein CII (mg/dl)* 4.7 4 (3–7) 

Data are median (range), unless otherwise indicated. All biochemical blood values except A1C were measured in serum. Glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and lipids were sampled in fasting patients.

*

Calculations were based on one subject with a coding variant (the proband in family N511) or on six subjects with the P2 −192C>G variant.

View Large

L.B., S.J., and K.M. contributed equally to this article.

Additional information for this article can be found in an online appendix at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org.

DOI: 10.2337/db05-1677

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

This study was supported in part by funds from the Haukeland University Hospital, Innovest, and the University of Bergen (both to P.R.N.); the Aarskog Foundation and the Meltzer Foundation (both to H.R); the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and the Fulbright Foundation (both to P.R.N.).

We thank Dr. Torben Hansen and Dr. Oluf Pedersen for sharing unpublished data, Dr. Dag E. Undlien for HLA analysis, the Functional Genomics in Norway platform Centre for Integrated Genetics (Ås, Norway), Dr. Gerhard Ryffel for the HNF-P2 construct, and Dr. Anthony Wierzbicki for the apolipoprotein AII, AI, B, and C analyses.

1
Fajans SS, Bell GI, Polonsky KS: Molecular mechanisms and clinical pathophysiology of maturity-onset diabetes of the young.
N Engl J Med
 
345
:
971
–980,
2001
2
Thomas H, Jaschkowitz K, Bulman M, Frayling TM, Mitchell SM, Roosen S, Lingott-Frieg A, Tack CJ, Ellard S, Ryffel GU, Hattersley AT: A distant upstream promoter of the HNF-4alpha gene connects the transcription factors involved in maturity-onset diabetes of the young.
Hum Mol Genet
 
10
:
2089
–2097,
2001
3
Hansen SK, Párrizas M, Jensen ML, Pruhova S, Ek J, Boj SF, Johansen A, Maestro MA, Rivera F, Eiberg H, Andel M, Lebl J, Pedersen O, Ferrer J, Hansen T: Genetic evidence that HNF-1alpha-dependent transcriptional control of HNF-4alpha is essential for human pancreatic beta cell function.
J Clin Invest
 
110
:
827
–833,
2002
4
Gloyn AL, Ellard S, Shepherd M, Howell RT, Parry EM, Jefferson A, Levy ER, Hattersley AT: Maturity-onset diabetes of the young caused by a balanced translocation where the 20q12 break point results in disruption upstream of the coding region of hepatocyte nuclear factor-4α (HNF4A) gene.
Diabetes
 
51
:
2329
–2333,
2002
5
Mitchell SM, Vaxillaire M, Thomas H, Párrizas M, Benmezroua Y, Costa A, Hansen T, Owen KR, Tuomi T, Pirie F, Ryffel GU, Ferrer J, Froguel P, Hattersley AT, Frayling TM: Rare variants identified in the HNF-4alpha beta-cell-specific promoter and alternative exon 1 lack biological significance in maturity onset diabetes of the young and young onset type 2 diabetes.
Diabetologia
 
45
:
1344
–1348,
2002
6
Gupta RK, Kaestner KH: HNF-4alpha: from MODY to late-onset type 2 diabetes.
Trends Mol Med
 
10
:
521
–524,
2004
7
Silander K, Mohlke KL, Scott LJ, Peck EC, Hollstein P, Skol AD, Jackson AU, Deloukas P, Hunt S, Stavrides G, Chines PS, Erdos MR, Narisu N, Conneely KN, Li C, Fingerlin TE, Dhanjal SK, Valle TT, Bergman RN, Tuomilehto J, Watanabe RM, Boehnke M, Collins FS: Genetic variation near the hepatocyte nuclear factor-4α gene predicts susceptibility to type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes
 
53
:
1141
–1149,
2004
8
Love-Gregory LD, Wasson J, Ma J, Jin CH, Glaser B, Suarez BK, Permutt MA: A common polymorphism in the upstream promoter region of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-4α gene on chromosome 20q is associated with type 2 diabetes and appears to contribute to the evidence for linkage in an Ashkenazi Jewish population.
Diabetes
 
53
:
1134
–1140,
2004
9
Damcott CM, Hoppman N, Ott SH, Reinhart LJ, Wang J, Pollin TI, O’Connell JR, Mitchell BD, Shuldiner AR: Polymorphisms in both promoters of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-α are associated with type 2 diabetes in the Amish.
Diabetes
 
53
:
3337
–3341,
2004
10
Weedon MN, Owen KR, Shields B, Hitman G, Walker M, McCarthy MI, Love-Gregory LD, Permutt MA, Hattersley AT, Frayling TM: Common variants of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-4α P2 promoter are associated with type 2 diabetes in the U.K. population.
Diabetes
 
53
:
3002
–3006,
2004
11
Winckler W, Graham RR, de Bakker PI, Sun M, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Gaudet D, Hudson TJ, Ardlie KG, Daly MJ, Hirschhorn JN, Groop L, Altshuler D: Association testing of variants in the hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α gene with risk of type 2 diabetes in 7,883 people.
Diabetes
 
54
:
886
–892,
2005
12
Muller YL, Infante AM, Hanson RL, Love-Gregory L, Knowler W, Bogardus C, Baier LJ: Variants in hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α are modestly associated with type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians.
Diabetes
 
54
:
3035
–3039,
2005
13
Bjørkhaug L, Sagen JV, Thorsby P, Søvik O, Molven A, Njølstad PR: Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 alpha gene mutations and diabetes in Norway.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
 
88
:
920
–931,
2003
14
Yamagata K, Furuta H, Oda N, Kaisaki PJ, Menzel S, Cox NJ, Fajans SS, Signorini S, Stoffel M, Bell GI: Mutations in the hepatocyte nuclear factor-4alpha gene in maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY1).
Nature
 
384
:
458
–460,
1996
15
Vaxillaire M, Boccio V, Philippi A, Vigouroux C, Terwilliger J, Passa P, Beckmann JS, Velho G, Lathrop GM, Froguel P: A gene for maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) maps to chromosome 12q.
Nat Genet
 
9
:
418
–423,
1995
16
Møller AM, Urhammer SA, Dalgaard LT, Reneland R, Berglund L, Hansen T, Clausen JO, Lithell H, Pedersen O: Studies of the genetic variability of the coding region of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-4alpha in Caucasians with maturity onset NIDDM.
Diabetologia
 
40
:
980
–983,
1997
17
Ek J, Hansen SP, Lajer M, Nicot C, Boesgaard TW, Pruhova S, Johansen A, Albrechtsen A, Yderstræde K, Lauenborg J, Parrizas M, Boj SF, Jørgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Damm P, Ferrer J, Lebl J, Pedersen O, Hansen T: A novel −192c>g mutation in the proximal P2 promoter of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-4α gene (HNF4A) associates with late-onset diabetes.
Diabetes
 
55
:
1869
–1873,
2006
18
Pearson ER, Pruhova S, Tack CJ, Johansen A, Castleden HA, Lumb PJ, Wierzbicki AS, Clark PM, Lebl J, Pedersen O, Ellard S, Hansen T, Hattersley AT: Molecular genetics and phenotypic characteristics of MODY caused by hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha mutations in a large European collection.
Diabetologia
 
48
:
878
–885,
2005
19
Ellard S, Bulman MP, Frayling TM, Allen LI, Dronsfield MJ, Tack CJ, Hattersley AT: Allelic drop-out in exon 2 of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1α gene hinders the identification of mutations in three families with maturity-onset diabetes of the young.
Diabetes
 
48
:
921
–923,
1999
20
Hani EH, Suaud L, Boutin P, Chevre JC, Durand E, Philippi A, Demenais F, Vionnet N, Furuta H, Velho G, Bell GI, Laine B, Froguel P: A missense mutation in hepatocyte nuclear factor-4alpha, resulting in a reduced transactivation activity, in human late-onset non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
J Clin Invest
 
101
:
521
–526,
1998
21
Ioannidis JP, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG: Replication validity of genetic association studies.
Nat Genet
 
29
:
306
–309,
2001
22
Pritchard JK: Are rare variants responsible for susceptibility to complex diseases?
Am J Hum Genet
 
69
:
124
–137,
2001
23
Pritchard JK, Cox NJ: The allelic architecture of human disease genes: common disease-common variant or not?
Hum Mol Genet
 
11
:
2417
–2423,
2002
24
Zeggini E, Rayner W, Morris AP, Hattersley AT, Walker M, Hitman GA, Deloukas P, Cardon LR, McCarthy MI: An evaluation of HapMap sample size and tagging SNP performance in large-scale empirical and simulated data sets.
Nat Genet
 
37
:
1320
–1322,
2005
DIABETES
2006

Supplementary data

Supplement 1: Primers that were employed instead of the previously published primers.- pdf file
Supplement 2: HNF4A polymorphisms observed in Norwegian MODY patients.- pdf file
Supplement 3: Two point parametric analysis, MLOD scores for the P2 -192C>G variant.- pdf file
Supplement 4: Transcriptional activation by the P2 promoter sequence variants measured as luciferase activity.- pdf file