Prolonged elevations of glucose concentration have deleterious effects on β-cell function. One of the hallmarks of such glucotoxicity is a reduction in insulin gene expression, resulting from decreased insulin promoter activity. Small heterodimer partner (SHP; NR0B2) is an atypical orphan nuclear receptor that inhibits nuclear receptor signaling in diverse metabolic pathways. In this study, we found that sustained culture of INS-1 cells at high glucose concentrations leads to an increase in SHP mRNA expression, followed by a decrease in insulin gene expression. Inhibition of endogenous SHP gene expression by small interfering RNA partially restored high-glucose–induced suppression of the insulin gene. Adenovirus-mediated overexpression of SHP in INS-1 cells impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion as well as insulin gene expression. SHP downregulates insulin gene expression via two mechanisms: by downregulating PDX-1 and MafA gene expression and by inhibiting p300-mediated pancreatic duodenal homeobox factor 1–and BETA2-dependent transcriptional activity from the insulin promoter. Finally, the pancreatic islets of diabetic OLETF rats express SHP mRNA at higher levels than the islets from LETO rats. These results collectively suggest that SHP plays an important role in the development of β-cell dysfunction induced by glucotoxicity.
Insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction are two main features of type 2 diabetes (1). During insulin resistance, insulin secretion is increased to maintain glucose homeostasis. However, a prolonged increase in the demand for insulin secretion often leads to defects in insulin secretion, resulting in sustained hyperglycemia (2). Chronic hyperglycemia exerts deleterious effects on β-cell function, as shown in primary cultured rat and human islet cells as well as β-cell lines (3–6). One of the hallmarks of such glucotoxicity is reduced insulin gene expression caused by decreased insulin promoter activity (4,5,7–10). The transcriptional activity of the insulin gene is mainly regulated by transcription factors that are prominently expressed in β-cells. These include pancreatic duodenal homeobox factor 1 (PDX-1), BETA/NeuroD, and RIPE3b1/MafA (4,9–14), and it has been demonstrated that impaired insulin gene expression resulting from prolonged exposure to elevated glucose levels is associated with diminished PDX-1 (7,15) and MafA (9,16,17) activity.
Small heterodimer partner (SHP; NR0B2) is an atypical orphan nuclear receptor that lacks a conventional DNA-binding domain. It consists only of a putative ligand-binding domain (18). SHP represses the transcriptional activity of a number of nuclear receptors (18–29). Two recent studies have suggested that SHP plays an important role in glucose homeostasis by regulating hepatic gluconeogensis (30,31). In one of these studies, Yamagata et al. (30) showed that the expression of gluconeogenic genes, including glucose-6-phosphatase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, and fructose 1,6-bis phosphatase, is inhibited by bile acids in an SHP-dependent fashion. The hypothesis that SHP plays a pivotal role in hepatic gluconeogenesis was supported by our previous observations (31). Notably, SHP is also abundantly expressed in the pancreas (21,25,31,32), and we recently demonstrated that SHP directly interacts with BETA2 and suppresses the transcriptional activity of BETA2 (33). These results suggested that SHP could modulate insulin gene expression. However, little is known about the role that SHP plays in insulin gene expression and/or secretion in pancreatic β-cells.
In the current study, we report that high glucose concentrations induce SHP gene expression in the INS-1 rat insulinoma cell line and that SHP decreases the expression and transcriptional activity of β-cell–enriched transcription factors as well as insulin gene expression and secretion. These observations suggest that high-glucose–induced β-cell dysfunction is mediated, at least in part, by SHP.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
The INS-1 rat insulinoma cell line was cultured at 5% CO2/95% air at 37°C in RPMI-1640 (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY) containing 11.2 mmol/l glucose and 2 mmol/l l-glutamine. The medium was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1 mmol/l pyruvate, 10 mmol/l HEPES, 50 μmol/l 2-mercaptoethanol, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (INS-1 medium). All experiments were performed using INS-1 cells between the 20th and 30th passage.
Male 40-week-old Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty (OLETF) rats and their lean nondiabetic counterparts, Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) rats, were supplied by Otsuka Pharmaceutical (Tokushima, Japan). Male 6- to 7-week-old Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats weighting 250 g were purchased from Hyochang (Daegu, Korea). All procedures were performed according to institutional guidelines for animal research.
Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test.
For the intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test, rats were fasted for 14 h, glucose was injected intraperitoneally (2 g/kg body wt), and blood was drawn from the tail vein every 30 min. Blood glucose levels were measured using glucose reagent strips and a glucose meter (Abbott, Bedford, MA).
Islets were isolated from the pancreata of OLETF, LETO, and SD rats by a collagenase digestion technique. Briefly, the animals were anesthetized using Nembutal and then humanely killed by exsanguination. Collagenase type V (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was dissolved to a concentration of 1 mg/ml in Hank’s balanced salts solution and transfused into the pancreatic ducts via the common bile duct. The dissected pancreas was then incubated for 10–15 min at 37°C in a water bath with shaking every 3 min. The islets were picked up under a stereoscope (15× magnification) and placed in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (KRBB) containing 1% BSA, penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (0.1 mg/ml). Between 400 and 500 islets per rat were retrieved. The isolated islets were cultured overnight in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS and 5 mmol/l glucose to ensure optimal recovery, and 300 islets were used for each condition.
Preparation of recombinant adenovirus.
The cDNA encoding full-length human SHP was inserted in the EcoRI/XhoI sites of the pAdTrack-CMV shuttle vector. Human SHP has 77% identity with rat SHP at the amino acid level. The resulting vector was then electroporated into BJ5138 cells containing the Adeasy adenoviral vector to produce the recombinant adenoviral plasmid. The recombinants were amplified in HEK-293 cells and isolated and purified using CsCl (Sigma) gradient centrifugation. The preparations were collected and desalted, and the titers were determined using Adeno-X Rapid titer (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The efficiency of adenoviral infection was measured using an adenovirus containing cDNA encoding full-length human SHP tagged with green fluorescence protein (supplementary Fig. 1, which can be found in the online appendix [available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db06-0753]).
Construction of small interfering RNA for SHP.
The small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) for SHP were chemically synthesized (Samchully Pharm, Seoul, Korea), deprotected, annealed, and transfected according to the manufacturer’s instructions. INS-1 cells were plated at a density of 3 × 106 per 60-mm dish and subcultured for 2 days in INS-1 medium. Cells were transfected with 100 nmol/l of SiRNA-SHP oligos in Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent. At 48 h after transfection, total RNA was isolated for Northern blot analysis. The siRNA and nonspecific control siRNA sequences are as follows: rat SiRNA-SHP, AAA GAU CUU GCU AGA GGA ACC tt (sense); nonspecific control siRNA, GGA GUA CGC AUA CCU GAA AGG tt (sense). The efficiency of SHP-specific siRNA (siRNA-SHP) on endogenous SHP mRNA expression was measured by RT-PCR (supplementary Fig. 2).
Northern blot analysis.
INS-1 cells were plated at a density of 3 × 106 per 60-mm dish and subcultured for 2 days in INS-1 medium. Cells were then cultured for various times in media containing the indicated glucose concentrations with or without adenovirus. The media were changed every 24 h. An MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay for cell viability was performed before RNA isolation. Total RNA was isolated from the cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We used 20 μg of total RNA from each sample. The probes for SHP, insulin, PDX-1, MafA, and BETA2 were labeled with [α-32P]dCTP using a random-primer DNA-labeling system (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, U.K.).
Western blot analysis.
Cells were plated and subcultured as described above for Northern blot analysis. Cell lysates were prepared using IPH lysis buffer (50 mmol/l Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mmol/l NaCl, 5 mmol/l EDTA, 0.1 mmol/l phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.5% NP-40) containing proteinase inhibitors and dithiothreitol. The proteins were then electrotransferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The membranes were blocked by incubation in blocking buffer; incubated with anti–PDX-1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-MafA antibody (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX), or anti-BETA2 antibody (Santa Cruz); washed; and incubated with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody. Signals were visualized by chemiluminescent detection according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Amersham). The membrane was reblotted with anti-actin antibody to verify equal loading of protein in each lane. Densitometric measurements of the bands were made by using the digitalized scientific software program UN-SCAN-IT (Silk Scientific, Orem, UT).
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR.
Total RNA was obtained from the islets (n = 300) of OLETF and LETO rats by using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas, Hanover, MD) and 2 μg of total RNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The following primers were used: rat SHP 5′-CCC AAG GAG TAC GCA TAC CTG A-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCC AGG ACT TCA CAC AAT GCC-3′ (reverse), rat insulin 5′-TCT TCT ACA CAC CCA AGT CCC G-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGT GCC AAG GTC TGA AGA TCC C-3′ (reverse), and rat β-actin 5′-CCC GCG AGT ACA ACC TTC T-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGT CAT CCA TGG CGA ACT-3′ (reverse). PCRs were carried out in a volume of 20 μl containing 4 μl of cDNA template (0.1 μg/μl), 10 pmol/l of each primer, and SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The products were detected with a real-time PCR System 7000 (Applied Biosystems), and the cycle threshold (Ct) values were used to determine the cycle number at which a statistically significant increase in fluorescence intensity was first detected. This value was normalized to the value for the control gene β-actin to yield the relative abundance. The ratio of the gene to β-actin were then normalized to that of controls.
Total RNA was obtained from the islets (n = 300) of SD rats using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen). The synthesis of cDNA was performed as mentioned above. PCRs were carried out under the following conditions using Taq polymerase (Takara, Tokyo): 94°C for 5 min for 33 cycles; 94°C for 50 s; 60°C for 50 s; and 72°C for 1 min. The following primers were used for standard PCR: rat SHP 5′-ATG AGC TCC AGC CAA TCA TCA GGG GTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCA CTT CAA CAA AAG CAT GTC TTC-3′ (reverse), actin 5′-GGC ATC GTC ACC AAC TGG GAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGA TTT CCC GCT CCG TGG-3′ (reverse).
In vitro transient transfection and reporter assays.
INS-1 cells were plated at a density of 3 × 105 cell per well in a 12-well plate and subcultured for 2 days in INS-1 medium. COS-1 cells were plated at a density of 1× 105 in a 12-well plate and subcultured for 1 day in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco BRL) containing 10% FBS. The promoter constructs (300 ng/well) and other DNAs were transiently transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen). β-Galactosidase plasmids were cotransfected as an internal control. Cells were transfected for 4 h, washed to remove plasmids, and then cultured in media containing the indicated glucose concentration (INS-1) or in culture medium alone (COS-1). Cells were harvested ∼24 h after transfection for luciferase and β-galactosidase assays. We analyzed 20 μl of cell lysate containing 15 μg of protein using a luciferase assay system according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI). Luciferase activity was detected using a SIRUS luminometer (Berthold, Pforzheim, Germany). Luciferase activity was normalized using β-galactosidase activity.
Measurement of insulin secretion and content.
INS-1 cells were plated and subcultured as described above for the reporter assay. To examine the effects of high glucose on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in INS-1, INS-1 cells were incubated with 30 mmol/l glucose for 96 h. The cells was then starved in medium containing 5 mmol/l glucose and 2% FBS for 5 h and subsequently incubated for 1 h at 37°C in modified KRBB solution (114 mmol/l NaCl, 4.4 mmol/l KCl, 1.28 mmol/l CaCl2, 1 mmol/l MgSO4, 29.5 mmol/l NaHCO3, 10 mmol/l HEPES, 5 mmol/l glucose, and 0.1% BSA, pH 7.4 [adjusted with NaOH]) with or without 25 mmol/l glucose. The supernatant (200 μl) was carefully collected and subjected to rat insulin radioimmunoassay (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO). To examine the effect of adenoviruses carrying SHP cDNA (Ad-SHP) on GSIS in INS-1 cells, INS-1 cells were infected with 6 × 106 pfu (plaque-forming units) of SHP or null adenoviruses for 2 h. The culture medium was then changed to RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS, and the cells were cultured for 24 h. GSIS was measured as described above. To measure the GSIS in pancreatic islets of OLETF and LETO rats, 10 islets were cultured overnight in RPMI containing 10% FBS in a 24-well plate. Islets were then starved by cultivating them in medium containing 5 mmol/l glucose and 2% FBS for 5 h, before incubating them for 1 h at 37°C in modified KRBB solution with or without 15 mmol/l glucose. Insulin secretion was measured as described above. To determine insulin content, the cells and islets were washed with RPMI-1640 and lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mmol/l HEPES, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 μmol/l phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 μmol/l E-64, 10 μmol/l pepstatin A, 10 μmol/l TLCK [tosyl-l-lysine chloromethyl ketone], and 100 μmol/l leupeptin, pH 8.0). After sonication and centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and subjected to rat insulin radioimmunoassay.
Data are the means ± SE. ANOVA was used to determine significant differences in multiple comparisons and was performed using the Duncan test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All experiments were performed at least three times.
Chronic exposure to high glucose concentrations induces β-cell dysfunction.
Induction of glucotoxicity was confirmed by measuring insulin mRNA levels, insulin content, and GSIS. Under the basal glucose concentration (5 mmol/l glucose), the INS-1 cells expressed insulin mRNA abundantly. Insulin mRNA expression under basal glucose and 11.2 mmol/l glucose (the concentration at which INS-1 cells are normally cultured) conditions was sustained for 96 h (Fig. 1A, lane 2; and supplementary Fig. 3; respectively). However, in the presence of 30 mmol/l glucose, insulin mRNA expression decreased gradually in a time-dependent manner and was faint at 96 h (Fig. 1A, lanes 5 and 7; and Fig. 1C). The initial decrease in insulin mRNA expression observed after 48 h could be partially restored by further incubating the cells with 5 mmol/l glucose (Fig. 1A, lanes 5 and 6); however, the expression level of insulin mRNA was still significantly decreased compared with the insulin levels of cells cultured in 5 or 11.2 mmol/l glucose for 96 h (Fig. 1A, lanes 2 and 4). Moreover, after 96 h, the decrease in insulin mRNA expression could not be recovered by further incubating the cells in 5 mmol/l glucose (Fig. 1A, lane 8). In addition, incubation with 30 mmol/l glucose for 96 h impaired GSIS and significantly decreased insulin content (Fig. 1B). The expression of the transcription factors PDX-1 and MafA also decreased over time in the presence of 30 mmol/l glucose, whereas the expression of BETA2 was not affected (Fig. 1C).
High glucose concentrations stimulate SHP gene expression.
Unlike insulin mRNA expression, SHP is expressed at low levels at basal glucose concentrations. However, exposure to 30 mmol/l glucose induced SHP expression, and this was followed by a decrease in insulin gene expression. SHP mRNA expression peaked at 24 h and was sustained for 96 h (Fig. 2A) in medium containing 30 mmol/l glucose. Transient transfection showed that the upregulation of SHP mRNA expression induced by the high glucose concentration was caused by increased SHP gene transcription (Fig. 2B). In primary cultured rat islets, high glucose also stimulated SHP gene expression in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2C).
siRNA-mediated inhibition of endogenous SHP expression blocks the suppression of insulin gene expression induced by high glucose concentrations.
To determine whether the β-cell dysfunction induced by high glucose concentrations is mediated by SHP, we downregulated endogenous SHP expression by transfecting INS-1 cells with siRNA-SHP and then incubating them in medium containing 11.2 or 30 mmol/l glucose. siRNA-SHP significantly inhibited the upregulation of endogenous SHP expression at the high glucose concentration. Moreover, it partially blocked high-glucose–induced suppression of insulin gene expression. These observations suggest that high-glucose–induced β-cell dysfunction is mediated, at least in part, by endogenous SHP expression (Fig. 3).
SHP overexpression induces β-cell dysfunction.
To elucidate the mechanism by which SHP mediates β-cell dysfunction, INS-1 cells were infected with Ad-SHP at doses of 0.6, 1.2, 3, and 6 × 106 pfu and then cultured in medium containing 5 mmol/l glucose. Ad-SHP downregulated insulin mRNA expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Fig. 4A and B). Moreover, Ad-SHP downregulated PDX-1 and MafA mRNA expression in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4A), and the decreases in PDX-1 and MafA mRNA expression preceded the decreases in insulin mRNA expression (Fig. 4B). On the other hand, Ad-SHP had no effect on BETA2 expression (Fig. 4A). The disparate effects of SHP overexpression on PDX-1, MafA, and BETA2 expression were confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 4C). Collectively, these results suggest that SHP decreases the expression of the insulin gene by inhibiting expression from the PDX-1 and MafA genes, but not from the BETA2 gene.
SHP represses p300-enhanced insulin transcription activity of PDX-1 and BETA2.
PDX-1 and BETA2 interact in a p300 coactivator–mediated fashion, and this interaction is critical for the activation of the insulin promoter (34). SHP also acts as a corepressor of BETA2 by competing with p300 for binding to BETA2 (33). Thus, we examined the effect of SHP on the coactivator activity of p300 in PDX-1 and BETA2 transactivation, using a human insulin promoter luciferase reporter assay. In the absence of SHP expression, the p300 expression vector dose-dependently increased the insulin transcriptional activity of PDX-1 and BETA2 (Fig. 5). When the SHP expression vector was contransfected with 500 ng of the p300 expression vector, SHP repressed the insulin transcription activity of PDX-1, and BETA2 increased by p300 expression alone (Fig. 5). These data suggest that the inhibitory effect of SHP on insulin transcription may be partially attributable to its ability to inhibit the coactivation activity of p300.
SHP gene expression is upregulated in the pancreatic islets of OLETF rats.
Next, we examined whether SHP gene expression is upregulated in an animal model of diabetes. The expression of SHP in the pancreatic islets of the two rat types was examined by real-time RT-PCR after confirming by intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test that the OLETF rats had developed hyperglycemia (supplementary Fig. 4). The pancreatic islets of OLETF rats showed significantly increased SHP expression compared with the islets from LETO rats. Conversely, the islets of OLETF rats showed decreased insulin gene expression compared with the islets from LETO rats (Fig. 6). The GSIS and insulin content of the islets from OLETF rats were decreased compared with those of LETO rats (supplementary Fig. 5).
SHP inhibits GSIS.
Finally, we tested whether SHP impairs GSIS in INS-1 cells. Static stimulation with 25 mmol/l glucose significantly increased the insulin secretion of INS-1 cells. This glucose-mediated stimulation of insulin secretion was significantly inhibited by Ad-SHP but not by empty vector (Ad-Null) (Fig. 7).
In this study, we found that a high glucose concentration increased SHP expression and that this was followed by decreased insulin enhancer–driven promoter activation as well as by decreases in insulin gene expression and secretion. SHP appears to downregulate insulin gene expression by two mechanisms. First, it downregulates the gene expression of the insulin transcription enhancers PDX-1 and MafA, and, second, it inhibits the p300-upregulated transcriptional activity of PDX-1 and BETA2 on the insulin promoter. These observations collectively suggest that SHP plays an important role in the development of β-cell dysfunction induced by glucotoxicity.
The regulation of insulin gene expression in response to physiological stimuli enables β-cells to maintain adequate stores of intracellular insulin when there is a sustained increase in the demand for insulin secretion. Glucose is the major physiological regulator of insulin gene expression. However, prolonged elevation of glucose concentrations contributes to β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes, partly because it inhibits insulin gene expression (4,5,7–9). Indeed, in this study, we observed that chronic exposure of INS-1 cells to a high glucose concentration decreased insulin gene expression in a time-dependent manner. We then found that adenovirus-mediated overexpression of SHP in INS-1 cells impaired both GSIS and insulin gene expression. Moreover, when endogenous SHP gene expression in INS-1 cells was inhibited by SHP-specific siRNA, the insulin gene expression suppressed by high glucose concentrations was partially restored. In addition, SHP mRNA expression was higher in the pancreatic islets of diabetic OLETF rats than in the islets of the nondiabetic counterpart rats; the OLETF rat islets also expressed less insulin mRNA. Collectively, these data suggest that SHP could play a role in mediating the β-cell dysfunction that arises from the metabolic stress conferred by chronic hyperglycemia.
In our previous study, we found that SHP acts as corepressor for BETA2 because it competes with the p300 coactivator for binding to BETA2 (33). However, our previous study did not fully explain how SHP downregulates insulin gene expression, since BETA2 activity on its own does not significantly stimulate insulin promoter activity (34). Transcriptional regulation of the insulin gene is a very complex process that requires the cooperation of a number of transcription factors, including PDX-1, BETA2, and MafA (34,35). The impairment of insulin gene expression after prolonged exposure to high glucose concentrations is associated with diminished PDX-1 and MafA gene expression (7,9,15,16). Indeed, we found that INS-1 cells exposed chronically to a high glucose concentration showed decreased PDX-1 and MafA expression but no change in BETA2 expression. Like the effect of chronic high glucose levels, Ad-SHP downregulated the expression of PDX-1 and MafA but not BETA2. These data strongly suggest that SHP mediates the high-glucose–induced suppression of insulin gene expression by downregulating PDX-1 and MafA gene expression.
We showed that SHP can act as a BETA2 corepressor by competing with the p300 coactivator. Next, we examined whether this activity contributes to the mechanism through which SHP downregulates insulin gene expression. A recent study by Qiu et al. (34) demonstrated that the interaction between PDX-1 and BETA2 proteins, which is mediated by p300, plays a critical role in activating insulin promoter activity. More recently, Zhao et al. (35) demonstrated that MafA, PDX-1, and BETA2 cooperate in activating insulin gene transcription. Indeed, in this study, we found that p300, PDX-1, and BETA2 cooperate together to activate the insulin promoter in COS-1 cells. Moreover, we observed that SHP inhibited this cooperation. However, this inhibition did not result from a block in the activation of the insulin promoter mediated by PDX-1 and MafA (data not shown). Taken together, these observations as well as those of previous studies strongly suggest that SHP inhibits insulin promoter activity by preventing p300-mediated PDX-1 and BETA2 complex formation. Thus, on being upregulated by a high glucose concentration, SHP impairs insulin gene expression by two mechanisms that affect transactivators of insulin gene expression.
In conclusion, this study suggests that β-cell dysfunction induced by chronic high-glucose exposure is mediated by the abnormal regulation of SHP, although it remains to be determined whether SHP plays the same role in vivo. Our findings suggest that SHP downregulates insulin gene expression by inhibiting the direct physical interactions between insulin enhancers as well as by repressing their gene expression. To more clearly elucidate the role SHP plays in the development of β-cell dysfunction, it would be useful to generate animals in which SHP expression in the pancreatic β-cells is conditionally knocked out.
K.-G.P. and K.-M.L. contributed equally to this work.
Additional information for this article can be found in an online appendix at http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db06-0753.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
This study was supported by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation through the NRL program (grant M106 00000271-06J000-27110). K.-M.L. and H.-Y.S. were supported by the Brain Korea 21 project in 2006.
We thank Prof. David D. Moore (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX) for helpful comments and a critical review of the manuscript.