We read with interest the article by Wanic et al. (1) in which they present the first prospective data on polymorphisms in carnosinase genes and progression of diabetic nephropathy in diabetic patients. Prior studies, in which a polymorphism in carnosinase gene CNDP1 was identified and confirmed as a risk factor, were cross-sectional and mostly in patients with type 2 diabetes (24). At variance with these cross-sectional studies, Wanic et al. did not find a significantly increased risk for development of nephropathy in the cross-sectional part of their study (1).

Wanic et al. mention that power of the prospective part of their study was high and sufficient to detect a relative risk of 1.5. The prospective part of the study by Wanic et al. is indeed relatively large, with many cases of the end point end-stage renal disease (ESRD). As the authors mention—and adequately perform—it is important to adjust for diabetes duration in studies on diabetes complications (5). In studies on ESRD, however, it is equally important to adjust for baseline renal function and proteinuria (6,7). In our opinion, to actually exclude polymorphisms in carnosinase genes as risk factors for progression in diabetic nephropathy, Wanic et al. should have included data on these parameters in their Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Optimally, they should also have included data on mortality in their cohort because patients with diabetic nephropathy are at high risk for nonrenal mortality. A survival advantage or disadvantage for the CNDP1 polymorphism could not only underlie associations with diabetic nephropathy in prior cross-sectional studies (24) but also obscure a relationship with development of ESRD in a prospective study. Thus, we disagree with the conclusion that CNDP1 polymorphisms can be excluded as a risk factor for nephropathy in type 1 diabetes.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

1.
Wanic K, Placha G, Dunn J, Smiles A, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Exclusion of polymorphisms in carnosinase genes (CNDP1 and CNDP2) as a cause of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes: results of large case-control and follow-up studies.
Diabetes
57
:
2547
–2551,
2008
2.
Vardarli I, Baier LJ, Hanson RL, Akkoyun I, Fischer C, Rohmeiss P, Basci A, Bartram CR, van der Woude FJ, Janssen B: Gene for susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes maps to 18q22.3–23.
Kidney Int
62
:
2176
–2183,
2002
3.
Janssen B, Hohenadel D, Brinkkoetter P, Peters V, Rind N, Fischer C, Rychlik I, Cerna M, Romzova M, de Heer E, Baelde H, Bakker SJ, Zirie M, Rondeau E, Mathieson P, Saleem MA, Meyer J, Koppel H, Sauerhoefer S, Bartram CR, Nawroth P, Hammes HP, Yard BA, Zschocke J, van der Woude FJ: Carnosine as a protective factor in diabetic nephropathy: association with a leucine repeat of the carnosinase gene CNDP1.
Diabetes
54
:
2320
–2327,
2005
4.
Freedman BI, Hicks PJ, Sale MM, Pierson ED, Langefeld CD, Rich SS, Xu J, McDonough C, Janssen B, Yard BA, van der Woude FJ, Bowden DW: A leucine repeat in the carnosinase gene CNDP1 is associated with diabetic end-stage renal disease in European Americans.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
22
:
1131
–1135,
2007
5.
Rogus JJ, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Genetic studies of late diabetic complications: the overlooked importance of diabetes duration before complication onset.
Diabetes
51
:
1655
–1662,
2002
6.
Kamper AL: The importance of a correct evaluation of progression in studies on chronic kidney disease.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
22
:
3
–5,
2007
7.
Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD, The Collaborative Study Group: The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy.
N Engl J Med
329
:
1456
–1462,
1993