OBJECTIVE—In recent genome-wide association studies, two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near the HHEX locus were shown to be more frequent in type 2 diabetic patients than in control subjects. Based on HHEX's function during embryonic development of the ventral pancreas in mice, we investigated whether these SNPs affect β-cell function in humans.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 854 nondiabetic subjects, collected from five European clinical centers, were genotyped for the HHEX SNPs rs1111875 and rs7923837 and thoroughly characterized by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). To assess glucose-stimulated insulin release, a subgroup of 758 subjects underwent an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT).

RESULTS—SNPs rs1111875 and rs7923837 were not associated with anthropometric data (age, weight, height, BMI, body fat, and waist and hip circumference). After adjustment for center, family relationship, sex, age, and BMI, both SNPs were also not associated with glucose and insulin concentrations in the fasting state and during the OGTT or with measures of insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, HHEX SNP rs1111875 was not associated with insulin release during the IVGTT. By contrast, the minor A-allele of HHEX SNP rs7923837 was significantly associated with higher IVGTT-derived first-phase insulin release before and after appropriate adjustment (P = 0.013 and P = 0.014, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS—A common genetic variation in the 3′-flanking region of the HHEX locus, i.e., SNP rs7923837, is associated with altered glucose-stimulated insulin release. This SNP's major allele represents a risk allele for β-cell dysfunction and, thus, might confer increased susceptibility of β-cells toward adverse environmental factors.

Type 2 diabetes is the most prevalent metabolic disease of the Western industrialized world. It is generally agreed that type 2 diabetes is caused by environmental factors, such as high-caloric diet and reduced physical activity, and a polygenic background that confers increased susceptibility toward these environmental challenges (1). To identify the genes involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, genome-wide association studies in several cohorts based on large-scale single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of genomic variation were recently published (27). These studies revealed 10 potential type 2 diabetes candidate genes. Three formerly characterized genes with known effects on insulin sensitivity or insulin secretion, respectively, i.e., PPARG, KCNJ11, and TCF7L2, could be confirmed. However, the role of the other seven candidate genes in the development of pre-diabetes phenotypes, such as insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction, is not well established. Two of the type 2 diabetes candidate SNPs are located in the 3′-flanking region of the HHEX locus (2). HHEX encodes the transcription factor hematopoietically expressed homeobox protein (HHEX), which is expressed in the embryonic ventral-lateral foregut that gives rise to the ventral pancreas and the liver (8). Knockout of this gene was shown to impair proliferation of endodermal epithelial cells, positioning of ventral foregut endoderm cells relative to the mesoderm, and budding and morphogenesis of the ventral pancreas (8). This genetic manipulation finally provoked lethality during midgestation (8). Due to these developmental defects of the HHEX knockout, it was obvious to investigate whether the two reported type 2 diabetes candidate SNPs near the HHEX locus (2) affect β-cell function. This was therefore assessed in five nondiabetic European populations thoroughly characterized by an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT).

A total of 844 nondiabetic subjects were recruited from the five European clinical centers constituting the EUGENE2 consortium, i.e., the Lundberg Laboratory for Diabetes Research (Göteborg, Sweden), the Polyclinic Mater Domini of the University Magna Graecia (Catanzaro, Italy), the Steno Diabetes Center (Copenhagen, Denmark), the Kuopio University Hospital (Kuopio, Finland), and the Tübingen University Hospital (Tübingen, Germany). The baseline characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. All participants underwent standard medical history and physical examination, assessment of smoking status, alcohol consumption habits and activity, routine blood tests, and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). A subgroup of 758 subjects was further characterized by an IVGTT. In addition, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps were performed in four centers (n = 575). The participants gave informed written consent, and the protocols were approved by the local ethical committees.

Genotyping of the study population.

For genotyping, DNA was isolated from whole blood using commercial DNA isolation kits. SNPs were genotyped using TaqMan allelic discrimination assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Primer sequences are available upon request from the authors. TaqMan genotyping reaction was amplified on a GeneAmp PCR system 2700 and fluorescence detected using an ABI Prism 7000 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems). The overall genotyping success rate was 99.7%, and rescreening of 3.3% of subjects gave 100% identical results.

Body composition and body fat distribution.

Body composition was measured by bioelectrical impedance as the percentage of body fat. BMI was calculated as weight divided by the square of height in meters. Moreover, waist and hip circumferences were measured.

OGTT, IVGTT, and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp.

After an overnight fast, all subjects underwent a 75-g OGTT, and venous blood samples were obtained at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min for the determination of plasma glucose and insulin. On a separate occasion, an IVGTT was performed in overnight-fasted subjects, as described by the Botnia protocol (9). After baseline samples had been collected, a 0.3-g/kg body weight glucose dose of a 20% glucose solution was given at time 0. Blood samples for the measurement of plasma glucose and insulin were obtained at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min. Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp was performed starting at 60 min after the IVGTT glucose bolus. To this end, subjects received a primed infusion of short-acting human insulin (40 mU/m2 per min) for 120 min. Variable infusion of 20% glucose was started to clamp the plasma glucose concentration at 5 mmol/l. Blood samples for the measurement of plasma glucose were obtained at 5-min intervals. Plasma insulin levels were measured at baseline and at the steady state of the clamp. Plasma glucose and insulin were determined by standard laboratory methods.

Calculations.

The trapezoidal method was used to calculate the areas under the curve of plasma glucose (in mmol · l−1 · min−1) and insulin (in pmol · l−1 · min−1). Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR, in mmol/l · μU/ml) was calculated as Glc0 × Ins0/22.5, where Glc0 is glucose at 0 min and Ins0 is insulin at 0 min. Clamp-derived insulin sensitivity (M value) was calculated as the glucose infusion rate necessary to maintain euglycemia during the last 60 min (steady state) of the clamp (in μmol · kg−1 · min−1).

Statistical analyses.

Unless otherwise stated, data are given as means ± SD. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and differences in genotype distribution between the five centers were tested using χ2 test. Insulin levels and HOMA-IR were log transformed in order to obtain a normal distribution. Linear mixed model was applied to adjust for confounding factors. For mixed model analysis, we included the center and pedigree (coded as a family number) as random factors, the genotype and sex as fixed factors, and age, BMI, and HOMA-IR as covariates. The SNP genotype was expressed as a nominal value (0, homozygous for the major allele; 1, heterozygous; or 2, homozygous for the minor allele), handled as a covariate, and tested for association with traits in the additive inheritance model. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. These statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 14.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). In the additive model using global F test (ANOVA), our study was sufficiently powered (1-β > 0.8) to detect effect sizes with Cohen's f ≥ 0.19 for SNP rs7923837 and f ≥ 0.17 for SNP rs1111875 assuming average group sizes of n = 91 and n = 123, respectively, according to these SNPs’ smallest genotype groups. Power calculations were performed using G*power software (available at http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/aap/projects/gpower/).

We genotyped the 844 subjects (baseline characteristics given in Table 1) for the two SNPs rs1111875 C/T and rs7923837 G/A in the 3′-flanking region of the HHEX gene (chromosome 10). Both SNPs were found to be in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P = 0.55 and 0.49, respectively) and displayed minor allele frequencies (MAFs) very similar to those recently reported (2) (MAF 0.39 and 0.34, respectively, Table 2). Analysis of our genotype data revealed that both SNPs were in strong, but not in complete, linkage disequilibrium (D′ = 0.984, r2 = 0.779). Furthermore, the HHEX SNPs rs1111875 and rs7923837 did not show significant differences in genotype distribution between the five centers (P = 0.09 and P = 0.17, respectively) (supplementary Table 1 [available in the online appendix at http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db07-1254]). Both SNPs were not associated with anthropometric data such as age, weight, height, BMI, waist and hip circumference, or body fat content (data not shown). Neither SNP rs1111875 nor SNP rs7923837 was associated with fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, glucose levels at 120 min of OGTT, insulin levels at 30 min of OGTT, the areas under the curve of the glucose and insulin responses during the OGTT, or insulin sensitivity before and after adjustment for center, family relationship, sex, age, and BMI (Table 2; data by center presented in supplementary Tables 2–6). Furthermore, HHEX SNP rs1111875 was not associated with first-phase (0–10 min) or second-phase (10–60 min) insulin release during the IVGTT (Table 2 and supplementary Tables 2–6). By contrast, HHEX SNP rs7923837 was significantly associated with IVGTT-derived first-phase insulin release before as well as after adjustment (Table 2 and supplementary Tables 2–6). Notably, it is the minor A-allele that confers higher insulin responses to an intravenous glucose load. Furthermore, additional adjustment for HOMA-IR and glucose levels at 30 min of OGTT revealed a trend toward an association of HHEX SNP rs7923837 with insulin levels at 30 min of the OGTT (P = 0.066), supporting the role of this SNP in insulin release. Finally, to assess whether the association of HHEX SNP rs7923837 with IVGTT-derived first-phase insulin release is already detectable in healthy, normal glucose-tolerant subjects, we excluded 23 subjects with impaired fasting glucose, 110 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, and 20 subjects with both impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance (Table 1) from statistical analyses. In the remaining normal glucose-tolerant cohort, we no longer detected significant differences between the HHEX SNP rs7923837 genotypes after appropriate adjustment (P = 0.12 and P = 0.09 for first-phase insulin release and for first-phase insulin release over basal, respectively, IVGTT), and this is likely due to the reduced sample size.

We examined possible associations of two very recently reported type 2 diabetes candidate SNPs near the HHEX locus (2) with differences in insulin secretion (and insulin sensitivity) in 844 nondiabetic subjects from five different European clinical centers, 758 of them having undergone an IVGTT. Both SNPs that were found to be in strong, but not complete, linkage disequilibrium did not reveal an association with insulin resistance. We could not replicate the results of very recent studies showing an association of rs1111875 with acute insulin response (10) and β-cell glucose sensitivity (11), and this is probably due to the limited power of our study to detect smaller effects of this SNP (Cohen's f < 0.17) in insulin secretion parameters, which could still be clinically meaningful. However, we observed a clear association of SNP rs7923837 with first-phase insulin release, as derived from IVGTT data. Moreover, the major G-allele, which was formerly identified as a type 2 diabetes risk allele (2,46), turned out to represent a risk allele for impaired glucose-stimulated insulin response. This finding not only strengthens the role of the HHEX gene in the pathogenesis of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes, as suggested by genome-wide association studies (2,46), but moreover reveals the underlying mechanisms by which this SNP increases the risk of type 2 diabetes. Thus, knowledge of the HHEX genotype could advance the development of appropriate strategies in therapy and prevention of type 2 diabetes, as recently discussed (12). Based on the observations reported from the HHEX knockout mouse (8), the association of rs7923837 with differences in glucose-stimulated insulin release could arise from mild alterations in the embryonic organogenesis of the ventral pancreas. This part of the pancreas is also the major site of pancreatic polypeptide production. Therefore, it is possible that the SNP affects this hormone's production during embryogenesis and/or adulthood, provoking the effects on insulin release. These suggestions, however, await further physiological and molecular clarification.

Finally, it is noteworthy that we discovered distribution abnormalities in our insulin data, with heterozygous carriers of both HHEX SNPs displaying higher mean insulin levels and higher SD values than the homozygous groups. Further examination revealed that, in four centers, the heterozygous subjects had higher mean insulin levels than the homozygous groups, whereas the heterozygous subjects from the fifth center (Gothenburg) displayed somewhat lower mean insulin levels than the homozygous groups. Even though we have currently no explanation for these abnormalities, the center-specific differences are likely to explain the high SD values for insulin levels in the heterozygous individuals.

In conclusion, a common genetic variation in the 3′-flanking region of the HHEX locus, i.e., SNP rs7923837, is associated with altered glucose-stimulated insulin release. This SNP's major allele represents a crucial allele for β-cell dysfunction and, thus, might confer increased susceptibility of β-cells toward adverse environmental factors.

TABLE 1

Baseline characteristics of the nondiabetic study population

n 844 
Age (years) 40.1 ± 10.4 
Male/female sex (%) 43/57 
BMI (kg/m226.6 ± 4.9 
Waist-to-hip ratio 0.87 ± 0.09 
NGT (n691 
IFG (n23 
IGT (n110 
IFG and IGT (n20 
n 844 
Age (years) 40.1 ± 10.4 
Male/female sex (%) 43/57 
BMI (kg/m226.6 ± 4.9 
Waist-to-hip ratio 0.87 ± 0.09 
NGT (n691 
IFG (n23 
IGT (n110 
IFG and IGT (n20 

IFG, impaired fasting glucose; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; NGT, normal glucose tolerance; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.

TABLE 2

Associations of HHEX SNPs rs1111875 and rs7923837 with metabolic parameters

GenotypeHHEX rs1111875 (MAF 0.39)
P1P2P3HHEX rs7923837 (MAF 0.34)
P1P2P3
CCCTTTGGGAAA
n 303 418 123 — — — 356 395 91 — — — 
Fasting glucose (mmol/l) 5.10 ± 0.55 5.09 ± 0.54 5.01 ± 0.44 0.3 0.11 — 5.11 ± 0.56 5.08 ± 0.52 5.01 ± 0.43 0.4 0.3 — 
Glucose 120 min OGTT (mmol/l) 6.28 ± 1.58 6.25 ± 1.53 6.20 ± 1.42 1.0 0.8 — 6.27 ± 1.56 6.27 ± 1.54 6.15 ± 1.40 0.9 0.8 — 
AUC glucose OGTT (mmol · l−1 · min−1872 ± 175 862 ± 181 863 ± 151 0.7 0.9 — 870 ± 177 863 ± 178 862 ± 152 0.9 0.9 — 
Fasting insulin (pmol/l) 48.3 ± 32.5 54.2 ± 73.8 44.4 ± 29.9 0.22 0.06 — 48.1 ± 31.7 54.4 ± 75.9 44.8 ± 27.5 0.5 0.20 — 
Insulin 30 min OGTT (pmol/l) 360 ± 225 403 ± 282 385 ± 234 0.11 0.15 — 362 ± 220 407 ± 288 382 ± 240 0.13 0.4 — 
AUC insulin OGTT (pmol · l−1 · min−1247,575 ± 154,834 263,378 ± 188,720 246,755 ± 135,307 0.4 0.7 — 244,007 ± 147,702 268,633 ± 194,318 242,962 ± 133,361 0.4 0.7 — 
AUC insulin 0–10 min IVGTT (pmol · l−1 · min−1)* 3,580 ± 2,842 4,013 ± 3,232 3,616 ± 2,359 0.17 0.19 0.23 3,433 ± 2,434 4,173 ± 3,514 3,647 ± 2,209 0.013 0.046 0.014 
AUC insulin 0–10 min IVGTT over basal insulin (pmol · l−1 · min−1)* 3,062 ± 2,502 3,471 ± 2,749 3,198 ± 2,206 0.15 0.20 0.21 2,956 ± 2,282 3,602 ± 2,919 3,220 ± 2,061 0.016 0.049 0.025 
AUC insulin 10–60 min IVGTT (pmol · l−1 · min−1)* 11,164 ± 11,340 11,450 ± 10,699 9,576 ± 7,098 0.3 0.4 1.0 10,559 ± 9,987 11,877 ± 11,649 9,652 ± 6,086 0.19 0.7 0.4 
AUC insulin 10–60 min IVGTT over basal insulin (pmol · l−1 · min−1)* 8,601 ± 9,316 8,737 ± 8,177 7,449 ± 6,222 0.3 0.5 0.8 8,205 ± 8,810 9,006 ± 8,526 7,491 ± 5,196 0.14 0.5 0.22 
HOMA-IR (mmol−1 · l−1 · μU−1 · ml−111.1 ± 8.2 12.8 ± 20.6 10.0 ± 7.0 0.17 0.042 — 11.1 ± 7.9 12.9 ± 21.1 10.1 ± 6.5 0.4 0.17 — 
M (μmol · kg−1 · min−1) 42.7 ± 16.5 41.1 ± 16.6 41.0 ± 16.4 0.5 0.6 — 42.8 ± 17.2 41.2 ± 16.5 40.0 ± 14.2 0.4 0.5 — 
GenotypeHHEX rs1111875 (MAF 0.39)
P1P2P3HHEX rs7923837 (MAF 0.34)
P1P2P3
CCCTTTGGGAAA
n 303 418 123 — — — 356 395 91 — — — 
Fasting glucose (mmol/l) 5.10 ± 0.55 5.09 ± 0.54 5.01 ± 0.44 0.3 0.11 — 5.11 ± 0.56 5.08 ± 0.52 5.01 ± 0.43 0.4 0.3 — 
Glucose 120 min OGTT (mmol/l) 6.28 ± 1.58 6.25 ± 1.53 6.20 ± 1.42 1.0 0.8 — 6.27 ± 1.56 6.27 ± 1.54 6.15 ± 1.40 0.9 0.8 — 
AUC glucose OGTT (mmol · l−1 · min−1872 ± 175 862 ± 181 863 ± 151 0.7 0.9 — 870 ± 177 863 ± 178 862 ± 152 0.9 0.9 — 
Fasting insulin (pmol/l) 48.3 ± 32.5 54.2 ± 73.8 44.4 ± 29.9 0.22 0.06 — 48.1 ± 31.7 54.4 ± 75.9 44.8 ± 27.5 0.5 0.20 — 
Insulin 30 min OGTT (pmol/l) 360 ± 225 403 ± 282 385 ± 234 0.11 0.15 — 362 ± 220 407 ± 288 382 ± 240 0.13 0.4 — 
AUC insulin OGTT (pmol · l−1 · min−1247,575 ± 154,834 263,378 ± 188,720 246,755 ± 135,307 0.4 0.7 — 244,007 ± 147,702 268,633 ± 194,318 242,962 ± 133,361 0.4 0.7 — 
AUC insulin 0–10 min IVGTT (pmol · l−1 · min−1)* 3,580 ± 2,842 4,013 ± 3,232 3,616 ± 2,359 0.17 0.19 0.23 3,433 ± 2,434 4,173 ± 3,514 3,647 ± 2,209 0.013 0.046 0.014 
AUC insulin 0–10 min IVGTT over basal insulin (pmol · l−1 · min−1)* 3,062 ± 2,502 3,471 ± 2,749 3,198 ± 2,206 0.15 0.20 0.21 2,956 ± 2,282 3,602 ± 2,919 3,220 ± 2,061 0.016 0.049 0.025 
AUC insulin 10–60 min IVGTT (pmol · l−1 · min−1)* 11,164 ± 11,340 11,450 ± 10,699 9,576 ± 7,098 0.3 0.4 1.0 10,559 ± 9,987 11,877 ± 11,649 9,652 ± 6,086 0.19 0.7 0.4 
AUC insulin 10–60 min IVGTT over basal insulin (pmol · l−1 · min−1)* 8,601 ± 9,316 8,737 ± 8,177 7,449 ± 6,222 0.3 0.5 0.8 8,205 ± 8,810 9,006 ± 8,526 7,491 ± 5,196 0.14 0.5 0.22 
HOMA-IR (mmol−1 · l−1 · μU−1 · ml−111.1 ± 8.2 12.8 ± 20.6 10.0 ± 7.0 0.17 0.042 — 11.1 ± 7.9 12.9 ± 21.1 10.1 ± 6.5 0.4 0.17 — 
M (μmol · kg−1 · min−1) 42.7 ± 16.5 41.1 ± 16.6 41.0 ± 16.4 0.5 0.6 — 42.8 ± 17.2 41.2 ± 16.5 40.0 ± 14.2 0.4 0.5 — 

n = 844. P values given for unadjusted data (P1). Additional P values are presented for all data after adjustment for center, family relationship, sex, age, and BMI (P2) and for IVGTT data after additional adjustment for HOMA-IR (P3). AUC, area under the curve; MAF, minor allele frequency. M = clamp-derived insulin sensitivity.

*

subgroup, n = 758;

subgroup, n = 575.

Published ahead of print at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org on 25 November 2007. DOI: 10.2337/db07-1254.

Additional information for this article can be found in an online appendix at http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db07-1254.

H.S. and A.S. contributed equally to this article.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank all study participants for their cooperation. The study was supported by the European community's framework program FP6 EUGENE2 (LSHM-CT-2004-512013).

1.
Freeman H, Cox RD: Type-2 diabetes: a cocktail of genetic discovery.
Hum Mol Genet
15
:
R202
–R209,
2006
2.
Sladek R, Rocheleau G, Rung J, Dina C, Shen L, Serre D, Boutin P, Vincent D, Belisle A, Hadjadj S, Balkau B, Heude B, Charpentier G, Hudson TJ, Montpetit A, Pshezhetsky AV, Prentki M, Posner BI, Balding DJ, Meyre D, Polychronakos C, Froguel P: A genome-wide association study identifies novel risk loci for type 2 diabetes.
Nature
445
:
881
–885,
2007
3.
Frayling TM, Timpson NJ, Weedon MN, Zeggini E, Freathy RM, Lindgren CM, Perry JR, Elliott KS, Lango H, Rayner NW, Shields B, Harries LW, Barrett JC, Ellard S, Groves CJ, Knight B, Patch AM, Ness AR, Ebrahim S, Lawlor DA, Ring SM, Ben-Shlomo Y, Jarvelin MR, Sovio U, Bennett AJ, Melzer D, Ferrucci L, Loos RJ, Barroso I, Wareham NJ, Karpe F, Owen KR, Cardon LR, Walker M, Hitman GA, Palmer CN, Doney AS, Morris AD, Smith GD, Hattersley AT, McCarthy MI: A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity.
Science
316
:
889
–894,
2007
4.
Scott LJ, Mohlke KL, Bonnycastle LL, Willer CJ, Li Y, Duren WL, Erdos MR, Stringham HM, Chines PS, Jackson AU, Prokunina-Olsson L, Ding CJ, Swift AJ, Narisu N, Hu T, Pruim R, Xiao R, Li XY, Conneely KN, Riebow NL, Sprau AG, Tong M, White PP, Hetrick KN, Barnhart MW, Bark CW, Goldstein JL, Watkins L, Xiang F, Saramies J, Buchanan TA, Watanabe RM, Valle TT, Kinnunen L, Abecasis GR, Pugh EW, Doheny KF, Bergman RN, Tuomilehto J, Collins FS, Boehnke M: A genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes in Finns detects multiple susceptibility variants.
Science
316
:
1341
–1345,
2007
5.
Zeggini E, Weedon MN, Lindgren CM, Frayling TM, Elliott KS, Lango H, Timpson NJ, Perry JR, Rayner NW, Freathy RM, Barrett JC, Shields B, Morris AP, Ellard S, Groves CJ, Harries LW, Marchini JL, Owen KR, Knight B, Cardon LR, Walker M, Hitman GA, Morris AD, Doney AS, Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC), McCarthy MI, Hattersley AT: Replication of genome-wide association signals in UK samples reveals risk loci for type 2 diabetes.
Science
316
:
1336
–1341,
2007
6.
Diabetes Genetics Initiative of Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Lund University, and Novartis Institutes of BioMedical Research, Saxena R, Voight BF, Lyssenko V, Burtt NP, de Bakker PI, Chen H, Roix JJ, Kathiresan S, Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ, Hughes TE, Groop L, Altshuler D, Almgren P, Florez JC, Meyer J, Ardlie K, Bengtsson Boström K, Isomaa B, Lettre G, Lindblad U, Lyon HN, Melander O, Newton-Cheh C, Nilsson P, Orho-Melander M, Råstam L, Speliotes EK, Taskinen MR, Tuomi T, Guiducci C, Berglund A, Carlson J, Gianniny L, Hackett R, Hall L, Holmkvist J, Laurila E, Sjögren M, Sterner M, Surti A, Svensson M, Svensson M, Tewhey R, Blumenstiel B, Parkin M, Defelice M, Barry R, Brodeur W, Camarata J, Chia N, Fava M, Gibbons J, Handsaker B, Healy C, Nguyen K, Gates C, Sougnez C, Gage D, Nizzari M, Gabriel SB, Chirn GW, Ma Q, Parikh H, Richardson D, Ricke D, Purcell S: Genome-wide association analysis identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels.
Science
316
:
1331
–1336,
2007
7.
Steinthorsdottir V, Thorleifsson G, Reynisdottir I, Benediktsson R, Jonsdottir T, Walters GB, Styrkarsdottir U, Gretarsdottir S, Emilsson V, Ghosh S, Baker A, Snorradottir S, Bjarnason H, Ng MC, Hansen T, Bagger Y, Wilensky RL, Reilly MP, Adeyemo A, Chen Y, Zhou J, Gudnason V, Chen G, Huang H, Lashley K, Doumatey A, So WY, Ma RC, Andersen G, Borch-Johnsen K, Jorgensen T, van Vliet-Ostaptchouk JV, Hofker MH, Wijmenga C, Christiansen C, Rader DJ, Rotimi C, Gurney M, Chan JC, Pedersen O, Sigurdsson G, Gulcher JR, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kong A, Stefansson K: A variant in CDKAL1 influences insulin response and risk of type 2 diabetes.
Nat Genet
39
:
770
–775,
2007
8.
Bort R, Martinez-Barbera JP, Beddington RS, Zaret KS: Hex homeobox gene-dependent tissue positioning is required for organogenesis of the ventral pancreas.
Development
131
:
797
–806,
2004
9.
Tripathy D, Wessman Y, Gullstrom M, Tuomi T, Groop L: Importance of obtaining independent measures of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity during the same test: results with the Botnia clamp.
Diabetes Care
26
:
1395
–1401,
2003
10.
Grarup N, Rose CS, Andersson EA, Andersen G, Nielsen AL, Albrechtsen A, Clausen JO, Rasmussen SS, Jørgensen T, Sandbæk A, Lauritzen T, Schmitz O, Hansen T, Pedersen O: Studies of association of variants near the HHEX, CDKN2A/B and IGF2BP2 genes with type 2 diabetes and impaired insulin release in 10,705 Danish subjects validation and extension of genome-wide association studies.
Diabetes
56
:
3105
–3111,
2007
11.
Pascoe L, Tura A, Patel SK, Patel SK, Ibrahim IM, Ferrannini E, Zeggini E, Weedon MN, Mari A, Hattersley AT, McCarthy MI, Frayling TM, Walker M, the RISC Consortium, the U.K. Type 2 Diabetes Genetics Consortium: Common variants of the novel type 2 diabetes genes, CDKAL1 and HHEX/IDE, are associated with decreased pancreatic β-cell function.
Diabetes
56
:
3101
–3104,
2007
12.
Weyrich P, Stefan N, Haring HU, Laakso M, Fritsche A: Effect of genotype on success of lifestyle intervention in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes.
J Mol Med
85
:
107
–117,
2007

Supplementary data