Infusion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Ameliorates Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetic Rats: Identification of a Novel Role in Improving Insulin Sensitivity Open Access

The fat-fed, STZ-induced rat T2D model was established as previously described (19).

Bone marrow–derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) were isolated, purified, and identified as described previously (20,21).

MSCs between passage three and six were used for infusion. To investigate the relationship between infusion phase and the effectiveness of MSCs, we performed MSC infusion (2 × 10⁶ MSCs suspended in 0.2 mL physiological saline) in T2D rats through the tail vein at 7 (early phase) or 21 days (late phase) after STZ injection. The MSC-treated rats at 7 days were then infused with the same dose of MSCs at 42 days post-STZ administration. The untreated control T2D rats were infused with 0.2 mL physiological saline.

MSCs were labeled 2 h prior to infusion with 2 μmol/L chloromethyl-benzamidodialkylcarbocyanine (CM-DiL; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. On days 1, 3, and 7 post-MSC infusion, which was performed either during the early phase (day 7) or late phase (day 21) after STZ administration, animals were executed and their liver and pancreas were removed for preparation of cryosections. Labeled MSCs were calculated in 10 random fields of each of five tissue sections under fluorescence microscopy with 570-nm filters. Paraffin sections of liver and pancreas were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and used for histopathologic analysis.

One week after STZ injection, oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs), intraperitoneal insulin tolerance tests (IPITTs), and insulin release tests (IRTs) were performed to confirm the T2D rat model. Two weeks after MSC infusion, OGTTs, IPITTs, serum insulin, and C-peptide were assessed again. Plasma glucose levels were monitored throughout the experiments with a glucometer-ACCU-CHEK Advantage Meter (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Serum insulin and C-peptide measurements were performed by ELISA (Rat Insulin/C-peptide Elisa Kit; Millipore, St. Charles, MO).

Fasting blood glucose (FBG) and serum insulin (FINS) concentrations were measured in blood collected through tail prick at 2 weeks after MSC infusion. The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) described previously was used to assess changes in insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and pancreatic β-cell function (HOMA-β) in treated groups during the experimental period (22). The following equations were used to calculate the HOMA-IR index and HOMA-β index (HBCI): HOMA-IR index = (FBG [in mmol/L] × FINS [in units/L])/22.5 and HOMA-β = (20 × FINS [in units/L])/(FBG [in mmol/L] − 3.5).

To define the role of MSCs in modulating insulin sensitivity, we performed hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp studies, as described previously (23), at 2 weeks after MSC infusion. Blood glucose concentrations were monitored at 10-min intervals throughout the clamp studies. Basal and clamp hepatic glucose production (HGP), glucose disposal rate (GDR), and glucose infusion rate (GIR) were calculated as described previously (23,24). After the clamp studies, the rats were killed, and liver, epididymal adipose pads, muscle, and pancreas were removed for histological analysis.

Pancreatic sections were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-rat insulin, rabbit anti-rat glucagons (Sigma-Aldrich), or rabbit anti-rat Ki67 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) (1:1,000) for 2 h. The sections were then washed with PBS with Tween 20 and incubated with Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated anti-mouse IgG and Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) for 1 h. Subsequently, pancreatic cryosections were stained with DAPI (Vector, Burlingame, CA) at 0.1 μg/mL. Sections were observed by fluorescence microscopy with 420- and 590-nm filters.

Total protein was extracted from samples of skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and liver by PRO-PREP Protein Extraction Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Kyungki-Do, Korea). Aliquots containing 50 μg of protein were separated by 8% SDS-PAGE. Western blot analyses were performed using the monoclonal antibodies against GLUT2, GLUT4, total or phosphorylated IRS-1 (Tyr⁶¹²), and Akt (Ser⁴⁷³) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), respectively. Anti-rat β-actin was used as a control (Sigma-Aldrich).

Plasma membrane protein preparations from skeletal muscle, adipose tissues, and liver were performed using Sigma-Aldrich Proteo-Prep Membrane Extraction Kit. Aliquots containing 25 μg of plasma membrane protein were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE, and Western blot analysis was performed as described above. Anti–Na⁺-K⁺-ATPase α1-subunit (membrane marker) antibody was used as a control (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.).

All data are presented as means ± SE from at least four independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 14.0.1 for Windows. Individual data in experimental groups were compared with Student t test. Multiple comparisons were performed by ANOVA. Group differences at the level of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Success of fat-fed, STZ-induced T2D rat model was confirmed by checking for blood glucose, OGTTs, IPITTs, and IRTs, respectively. One week after STZ injection, blood glucose levels in the STZ-treated group increased to more than double that of normal rat (Supplementary Fig. 1A). The results of OGTTs revealed significant deterioration in glucose metabolism, and IPITTs showed a significant decrease in insulin sensitivity (Supplementary Fig. 1B and C). In IRTs, insulin secretion curves in response to glucose load in STZ-treated rats were consistent with that of T2D (Supplementary Fig. 1D). Moreover, morphological destruction of pancreatic islets characterized by significant reduction of islet size and decrease of insulin-positive cells was observed in STZ-induced rats (Supplementary Fig. 1E). Consistent with previous reports, these fat-fed, STZ-induced diabetic rats could be considered to be equivalent to stage 2 of diabetes (19,25).

To identify MSC characteristics, phenotypes and multiple differentiating capacities of cultured BM-derived adherent cells at passage three were analyzed, respectively. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 2A, 95% of these cells were positive for CD29, CD44, and CD54, but negative for CD14, CD34, and CD45. They were also capable of differentiating toward osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic lineages under appropriate conditions as previously described (Supplementary Fig. 2B). These results indicate that the cultured cells possessed the characteristics of MSCs described in previous studies (20,21).

During the study period, untreated T2D rats showed persistent hyperglycemia, combined with gradual decrease in body weight and higher mortality after fasting. Nevertheless, MSC-treated T2D rats showed a transiently significant and subsequently moderate decrease of blood glucose level (Figs. 1A and 2A) and significant improvement of blood glucose metabolism (Figs. 1B and 2B) and insulin sensitivity (Figs. 1C and 2C). These results together demonstrated that MSC administration could contribute to amelioration of hyperglycemia in T2D rats, whether infused during the early (day 7) or late phase (day 21) after STZ injection. However, the reduction in blood glucose levels caused by a single MSC infusion was only maintained for ∼4 weeks. We then performed a second MSC infusion 42 days after the first infusion. As shown in Fig. 1A, blood glucose levels declined again, and reached similar lower values as observed after the first MSC administration. This response curve of blood glucose indicated that it is hard to maintain a long-term blood glucose decline in T2D rats with a single-dose MSC infusion. The limited role of single-dose MSC infusion on hyperglycemia is observed in most cases in diabetic animal models (5,14,26,27).

Accordingly, serum insulin concentration was examined at different time points throughout the study. Consistent with previous reports (19,25), at 7 days after STZ injection, T2D rats did not exhibit severe serum insulin deficiency compared with normal rats (Supplementary Fig. 1D). In contrast, at 14 days after STZ injection, the marked decrease of insulin concentration in T2D can be observed (Fig. 1D). It indicated that an HFD combined with STZ administration induced progressive β-cell dysfunction in T2D rats. It was notable that MSCs infused during the early phase after STZ injection could induce a significant increase in insulin concentration (Fig. 1D), but not during the late phase (Fig. 2D). The trend of serum C-peptide variation was similar to that of insulin concentration (Figs. 1E and 2E).

To assess the influence of MSC treatment on STZ-induced tissue damage, we performed histopathologic analysis. As previously reported (25,28), HFD alone induced fat deposition, steatosis in liver, and hypertrophic islets in pancreas. HFD plus STZ induced an inflammatory reaction, necrosis or fibrosis in the liver, and decreased mass of pancreatic islets (Supplementary Fig. 3A). However, these pathological damages were effectively relieved by MSC infusion during the early phase after STZ treatment, but not during the late phase (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. 3A). Results from immunofluorescence staining showed that MSC infusion during the early phase ameliorated the destruction of pancreatic islets and produced a similar morphology to normal islets, which were organized with insulin-producing cells located centrally and glucagon-producing cells located peripherally (Fig. 3B). Nevertheless, MSC infusion during the late phase did not exhibit this apparent amelioration (Fig. 3C). Consistent with these results, MSC infusion during the early phase led to significant restoration of the numbers of pancreatic islets and the ratio of β-cells per islet (Fig. 3D and F). In contrast, MSC infusion during the late phase did not exhibit this effect (Fig. 3E and G). We next performed insulin/Ki67 double immunofluorescence to examine whether MSC infusion during the early phase could promote β-cell proliferation. However, Ki67-positive β-cells could not be detected in both MSC-treated and control groups (data not shown), suggesting that the “increased” islet and β-cell numbers were not generated by cell proliferation. These results suggested that only infusion of MSCs during the early phase could obviously relieve STZ-induced tissue damage in T2D rats, but not during the late phase. We also proposed that the significant restoration of islet number and β-cell “increase” upon MSC infusion during the acute phase of the T2D rat model may be largely caused by the cytoprotective properties of infused MSCs.

Several reports demonstrated that the pro-repair function of MSCs can be strengthened by their preferential homing to the acute injury tissues (29,30). We measured the homing status of infused MSCs in liver and pancreas at different time points. The results showed that MSCs infused during the early phase could preferentially home to the damaged tissues, but not when MSCs were infused during the late phase (Supplementary Fig. 3C and D). The increased recruitment of MSCs infused during the early-injured phase in damaged tissues suggests their contribution, at least in part, to relieving STZ-induced tissue damage, and subsequently to improving the overall metabolic outcome.

Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp studies performed under euglycemic conditions (Supplementary Fig. 4A) showed the comparison of basal/clamp HGP, GDR, and GIR in each group (Fig. 4). As shown in Fig. 4A and B, GDR and GIR (GIR levels at the different time points were shown in Supplementary Fig. 4B) were significantly increased in MSC-treated diabetic rats. There was no significant difference in basal HGP between MSC-treated and untreated T2D rats, but clamp HGP was significantly lower in MSC-treated rats (Fig. 4C and D). Furthermore, the values of the IR index and HBCI in MSC-treated rats also reflected their reduced insulin resistance and improved β-cell function (Fig. 4E and F). Thus, these results together demonstrated that MSC infusion could improve insulin sensitivity, whether the infusion was performed during the early or late phase after STZ injection.

To determine the possible mechanism involved in the effect of MSC infusion on insulin resistance, we assessed the expression and redistribution of GLUT4 in skeletal muscle and adipose and liver tissues during the late phase after STZ injection. The total and the plasma membrane fraction of GLUT4 in skeletal muscle and adipose tissues were dramatically decreased by STZ; however, both of them were partially restored by MSC administration. Although the total GLUT4 expression in liver tissue was also markedly increased after MSC treatment, the obvious increase of GLUT4 in the plasma membrane fraction was not observed (Fig. 5A and B). Thus, these results suggest that MSCs might mediate GLUT4 expression and translocation through a tissue-specific pathway and accordingly improve the sensitivity of target tissues to insulin action.

To further determine the possible regulatory role of MSC treatment on other GLUT family proteins, we performed immunoblotting in the livers of MSC-treated rats to measure the expression of GLUT2, a glucose-sensitive transporter. Consistent with previous studies (31), HFD treatment alone did not influence the expression of GLUT2, whereas HFD plus STZ treatment led to a significant increase of GLUT2. However, this STZ-induced elevation was partially reversed by MSC administration (Supplementary Fig. 5). These results showed the obviously inversed roles of MSC infusion on the expression levels of GLUT4 and GLUT2. Given that the expression of GLUT2 is inversely related to blood glucose level (32), it is reasonable to postulate that the downregulation of GLUT2 expression in T2D rat liver may be caused by the amelioration of hyperglycemia by infusion of MSCs.

The inability of feeding to induce the elevation of phosphorylated IRS-1 and Akt is currently believed to be a hallmark of insulin insensitivity or resistance in T2D animal models (33). To investigate the possible influence of MSC treatment on the IRS-1 and Akt phosphorylation level, we performed immunoblotting assays. As shown in Fig. 6, feeding induced significant increases of both phosphorylated IRS-1 and Akt levels in skeletal muscle and liver and adipose tissues of the control group. Compared with controls, marked impairment of the feeding-induced increase of phosphorylated IRS-1 and Akt in T2D rats was observed; however, this impairment can be partially suppressed by MSC infusion during the late phase after STZ treatment. These data suggest that MSC infusion can effectively potentiate the transduction of insulin signaling in insulin target tissues.

A number of previous studies and clinical trials have revealed that MSCs are capable of reducing glucose levels in animals or subjects with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (5,12,13). Based on current knowledge, it was considered that the underlying mechanism of the therapeutic effect of MSCs on hyperglycemia might involve islet regeneration, including direct differentiation into functionally competent β-cells (16,34–37). However, some controversial studies have suggested that the limited number of MSC-derived functional β-cells in vivo and the small amount of insulin produced by these cells seemed to be inadequate to maintain euglycemia (7,38,39). To explore these outstanding concerns, we induced T2D in a rat model by the method described previously (19) and performed MSC infusions during different phases after STZ injection. Consistent with other reports (5,25,34), our results proved that MSC infusion could partially reconstruct islet function and effectively ameliorate hyperglycemia in T2D rats.

Nevertheless, the beneficial effect of a single infusion of MSCs in ameliorating hyperglycemia in diabetic rats was maintained only for a period not exceeding 4 weeks. This rapid and relatively temporary effect of MSC infusion in ameliorating hyperglycemia could not be adequately explained by the partial restoration of islet function. Therefore, there might be other possible mechanisms underlying the effect of MSCs in lowering blood glucose levels in T2D.

Consistent with the notion that infused MSCs possess tissue repair and/or cytoprotective properties possibly due to their preferential homing property to acute-injured tissues (39), we observed the increased recruitment of MSCs within STZ-damaged tissues (liver and pancreas) and the corresponding tissue repair, including significant islet reconstruction, when MSCs were infused during the early injury phase (day 7), but not during the late phase (day 21). Thus, the remarkable tissue repair and the possible cytoprotective properties of MSC infusion should contribute to ameliorating hyperglycemia in the early phase of the acute-induced T2D rat model, but not in the late phase. However, given that the physiopathologic changes during the late phase of the T2D rat model that we used are more similar to T2D in humans compared with those during the early phase, we proposed that the observed effects of MSC infusion in the late phase would provide more helpful insight into the clinical situation.

Given the important role of insulin resistance in the development of T2D, it is doubtful whether MSCs could modulate insulin sensitivity of peripheral target tissues. To date, there have been no reports on this issue. To evaluate the possible effect of MSCs on insulin resistance in T2D rats, we established a T2D rat model with markedly decreased insulin sensitivity, as previously reported (40), and performed euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp studies, which have become the standard reference method for the study of glucose metabolism. As demonstrated in Fig. 4, MSC treatment significantly improved insulin sensitivity, whether it was performed during the early phase or late phase after STZ injection. These findings demonstrate that MSCs can ameliorate hyperglycemia by modulating the insulin sensitivity of peripheral target tissues.

Based on the results mentioned above, multiple roles and mechanisms might be involved in the effects of MSCs on ameliorating hyperglycemia in T2D, including the promotion of β-cell function and amelioration of insulin resistance. Infusion of MSCs during the early phase of T2D was able to not only promote β-cell function but also ameliorate insulin resistance, whereas MSC infusion during the late phase merely ameliorated insulin resistance.

To date, the molecular mechanism of insulin resistance in diabetes has been explored extensively. GLUT4 translocation from intracellular vesicles to the plasma membrane is considered the terminal step of insulin signal transduction. Reduced amounts of GLUT4 protein and reduced translocation of GLUT4 to the cell membrane due to insulin stimulation are implicated in insulin resistance and impaired glucose metabolism (41,42), whereas elevation of GLUT4 protein content and its translocation to the cell membrane of peripheral insulin target tissues are responsible for improvement in sensitivity to insulin action. Our study revealed that in skeletal muscle and adipose tissues, MSC infusion could restore the concentration of total GLUT4 and promote GLUT4 translocation to the cell membrane, thus facilitating glucose utilization to ameliorate insulin resistance. However, in liver tissue, MSCs increased total GLUT4 expression alone but did not influence the translocation of GLUT4.

Because MSC infusion into T2D rats during the early phase was able to increase the insulin secretion level, a question was raised as to whether MSCs improve insulin resistance through an insulin-dependent pathway or by directly affecting GLUT4. In a number of studies, insulin was found to dose-dependently increase the translocation of GLUT4 but could not influence the total protein expression level of GLUT4 in the state of induced insulin resistance (43). To investigate this question and avoid the possible influence of serum insulin concentration, we compared insulin level and GLUT4 expression in the insulin target tissues that were removed from each group during the late phase after STZ injection. Our results showed that although MSC infusion did not induce an increase in insulin concentration, the total amount of GLUT4 protein significantly increased compared with untreated T2D rats. Therefore, this demonstrates that MSCs were able to restore the expression of total GLUT4 protein through an insulin-independent pathway.

Functional membrane translocation from the cytoplasm of glucose transporters in insulin-responsive tissues is cardinally regulated by insulin signaling. Elevation of the cascaded phosphorylation of IRS-1 and Akt triggered by exogenous factors, including insulin, is essential for membrane translocation of GLUT4 (17,18,34). In this study, we observed that MSC treatment could not only increase the expression level of GLUT4 on the insulin target cell membrane of T2D rats but also partially restore the feeding-induced phosphorylation of IRS-1 and Akt. These findings suggest that the improvement of insulin sensitivity by MSC infusion may be virtually caused, at least partially, by the enhanced effect of MSCs on insulin signaling transduction. Certainly, it cannot be excluded that the MSC infusion–induced expression increase of GLUT4 may, to some extent, compensate the blunted insulin signaling in T2D models. The precise mechanisms by which MSC infusion regulates GLUT4 expression and IRS-1/Akt phosphorylation remain to be determined.

In summary, we verified that multiple roles and mechanisms were involved in the effect of MSCs in ameliorating hyperglycemia in T2D, and this is the first report of a novel role of MSC administration in improving insulin sensitivity. In addition, this is the first study to show that MSC infusion lead to increased GLUT4 expression and the member translocation in peripheral insulin target tissue through an insulin-independent manner. These novel findings established an important foundation for exploring MSC infusion to improve insulin sensitivity in T2D therapy.

This research was supported in part by the National Basic Science and Development Programme (2012CB518103 and 2012CB518105), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81001184), and the 863 Projects of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2011AA020113).

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Y.S. designed and conducted the experiments, performed data analyses, and wrote the manuscript. Y.Z., H.H., and Y.M. designed and conducted the experiments. J.L., J.S., and Y.C. conducted the experiments and analyzed data. Y.G. conducted glucose-clamp experiments and analyzed data. X.F. contributed to the review of the manuscript. W.H. contributed to the design and performance of the experiments and reviewed and revised the manuscript. W.H. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.